Myocardial Blood Flow by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Suspected Coronary Stenosis: Comparison to PET and Invasive Physiology.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent guideline recommendations, quantitative perfusion (QP) estimates of myocardial blood flow from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have only been sparsely validated. Furthermore, the additional diagnostic value of utilizing QP in addition to the traditional visual expert interpretation of stress-perfusion CMR remains unknown. The aim was to investigate the correlation between myocardial blood flow measurements estimated by CMR, positron emission tomography, and invasive coronary thermodilution. The second aim is to investigate the diagnostic performance of CMR-QP to identify obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Prospectively enrolled symptomatic patients with >50% diameter stenosis on computed tomography angiography underwent dual-bolus CMR and positron emission tomography with rest and adenosine-stress myocardial blood flow measurements. Subsequently, an invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve and thermodilution-based coronary flow reserve was performed. Obstructive CAD was defined as both anatomically severe (>70% diameter stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography) or hemodynamically obstructive (ICA with fractional flow reserve ≤0.80). RESULTS: About 359 patients completed all investigations. Myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements correlated weakly between estimates from CMR-QP, positron emission tomography, and ICA-coronary flow reserve (r<0.40 for all comparisons). In the diagnosis of anatomically severe CAD, the interpretation of CMR-QP by an expert reader improved the sensitivity in comparison to visual analysis alone (82% versus 88% [P=0.03]) without compromising specificity (77% versus 74% [P=0.28]). In the diagnosis of hemodynamically obstructive CAD, the accuracy was only moderate for a visual expert read and remained unchanged when additional CMR-QP measurements were interpreted. CONCLUSIONS: CMR-QP correlates weakly to myocardial blood flow measurements by other modalities but improves diagnosis of anatomically severe CAD. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03481712.

Echocardiography versus Cardiac MRI for Measurement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Individuals with Cancer and Suspected Cardiotoxicity.

Purpose To compare left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured with echocardiography and cardiac MRI in individuals with cancer and suspected cardiotoxicity and assess the potential effect on downstream clinical decision-making. Materials and Methods In this prospective, single-center observational cohort study, participants underwent same-day two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and cardiac MRI between 2011 and 2021. Participants with suboptimal image quality were excluded. A subset of 74 participants also underwent three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. The agreement of LVEF derived from each modality was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and at relevant thresholds for cardiotoxicity. Results A total of 745 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 5 [SD]; 460 [61.7%] female participants) underwent same-day echocardiography and cardiac MRI. According to Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias was -3.7% ± 7.6 (95% limits of agreement [LOA]: -18.5% to 11.1%) for 2D echocardiography versus cardiac MRI. In 74 participants who underwent cardiac MRI, 3D echocardiography, and 2D echocardiography, the mean LVEFs were 60.0% ± 10.4, 58.4% ± 9.4, and 57.2% ± 8.9, respectively (P < .001). At the 50% LVEF threshold for detection of cardiotoxicity, there was disagreement for 9.3% of participants with 2D echocardiography and cardiac MRI. Agreement was better with 3D echocardiography and cardiac MRI (mean bias, -1.6% ± 6.3 [95% LOA: -13.9% to 10.7%]) compared with 2D echocardiography and cardiac MRI (mean bias, -2.8% ± 6.3 [95% LOA: -15.2% to 9.6%]; P = .016). Conclusion Two-dimensional echocardiography had variations of ±15% for LVEF measurement compared with cardiac MRI in participants with cancer and led to misclassification of approximately 10% of participants for cardiotoxicity detection. Three-dimensional echocardiography had better agreement with cardiac MRI and should be used as first-line imaging. Keywords: Echocardiography, MR Functional Imaging, Cardiac Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Clinical Utility and Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients With Cancer.

There is growing interest in the role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in cardio-oncology. However, there is a paucity of real-world experience and outcome data for patients with cancer. This study sought to determine the clinical utility and prognostic value of coronary CTA in patients with cancer. In this prospective, single-center study, we recruited patients with cancer who underwent coronary CTA. Coronary artery disease (CAD) extent was classified as normal, nonobstructive (1% to 49% stenosis), and potentially obstructive (≥50% stenosis). Patients were followed up for a median of 9 months (interquartile range 3 to 30 months) for cancer-related deaths and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent unplanned revascularization, or cardiovascular death. The mean age of patients (n = 113) was 61 ± 12 years, and 68 were female (60%). The most common underlying cancers were breast (29%) and lymphoma (13%). A total of 25 patients had potentially obstructive CAD, most commonly of the left anterior descending artery. After coronary CTA, 88% statin-naive patients with potentially obstructive CAD were initiated on statin therapy. A total of 28/32 patients who were taking fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) continued therapy, of whom none had MACEs. Overall, there were no episodes of MACEs in this cohort and 11% had cancer-related deaths. Coronary CTA has an important role in the clinical decision-making in patients with cancer to detect CAD, initiate primary preventative therapy, and guide coronary revascularization. No MACEs occurred. Using this coronary CTA-guided approach, preventative therapy was initiated, and most patients continued prognostically important cancer therapy.

Neuroticism personality traits are linked to adverse cardiovascular phenotypes in the UK Biobank.

AIMS: To evaluate the relationship between neuroticism personality traits and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measures of cardiac morphology and function, considering potential differential associations in men and women. METHODS AND RESULTS: The analysis includes 36 309 UK Biobank participants (average age = 63.9 ± 7.7 years; 47.8% men) with CMR available and neuroticism score assessed by the 12-item Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised Short Form. CMR scans were performed on 1.5 Tesla scanners (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) according to pre-defined protocols and analysed using automated pipelines. We considered measures of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) structure and function, and indicators of arterial compliance. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate association of neuroticism score with individual CMR metrics, with adjustment for age, sex, obesity, deprivation, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, alcohol use, exercise, and education. Higher neuroticism scores were associated with smaller LV and RV end-diastolic volumes, lower LV mass, greater concentricity (higher LV mass to volume ratio), and higher native T1. Greater neuroticism was also linked to poorer LV and RV function (lower stroke volumes) and greater arterial stiffness. In sex-stratified analyses, the relationships between neuroticism and LV stroke volume, concentricity, and arterial stiffness were attenuated in women. In men, association (with exception of native T1) remained robust. CONCLUSION: Greater tendency towards neuroticism personality traits is linked to smaller, poorer functioning ventricles with lower LV mass, higher myocardial fibrosis, and higher arterial stiffness. These relationships are independent of traditional vascular risk factors and are more robust in men than women.

Diagnostic performance of clinical likelihood models of obstructive coronary artery disease to predict myocardial perfusion defects.

AIMS: Clinical likelihood (CL) models are designed based on a reference of coronary stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease. However, a reference standard for myocardial perfusion defects (MPDs) could be more appropriate. We aimed to investigate the ability of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology pre-test probability (ESC-PTP), the risk-factor-weighted (RF-CL) model, and coronary artery calcium score-weighted (CACS-CL) model to diagnose MPDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Symptomatic stable de novo chest pain patients (n = 3374) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography and subsequent myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, or cardiac magnetic resonance. For all modalities, MPD was defined as coronary computed tomography angiography with suspected stenosis and stress-perfusion abnormality in ≥2 segments. The ESC-PTP was calculated based on age, sex, and symptom typicality, and the RF-CL and CACS-CL additionally included a number of risk factors and CACS. In total, 219/3374 (6.5%) patients had an MPD. Both the RF-CL and the CACS-CL classified substantially more patients to low CL (<5%) of obstructive coronary artery disease compared with the ESC-PTP (32.5 and 54.1 vs. 12.0%, P < 0.001) with preserved low prevalences of MPD (<2% for all models). Compared with the ESC-PTP [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.74 (0.71-0.78)], the discrimination of having an MPD was higher for the CACS-CL model [AUC 0.88 (0.86-0.91), P < 0.001], while it was similar for the RF-CL model [AUC 0.73 (0.70-0.76), P = 0.32]. CONCLUSION: Compared with basic CL models, the RF-CL and CACS-CL models improve down classification of patients to a very low-risk group with a low prevalence of MPD.

Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend verification of myocardial ischemia by selective second-line myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) following a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Head-to-head data on the diagnostic performance of different MPI modalities in this setting are sparse. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare, head-to-head, the diagnostic performance of selective MPI by 3.0-T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 82rubidium positron emission tomography (RbPET) in patients with suspected obstructive stenosis at coronary CTA using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 1,732, mean age: 59.1 ± 9.5 years, 57.2% men) referred for coronary CTA with symptoms suggestive of obstructive CAD were included. Patients with suspected stenosis were referred for both CMR and RbPET and subsequently ICA. Obstructive CAD was defined as FFR ≤0.80 or >90% diameter stenosis by visual assessment. RESULTS: In total, 445 patients had suspected stenosis on coronary CTA. Of these, 372 patients completed both CMR, RbPET and subsequent ICA with FFR. Hemodynamically obstructive CAD was identified in 164 of 372 (44.1%) patients. Sensitivities for CMR and RbPET were 59% (95% CI: 51%-67%) and 64% (95% CI: 56%-71%); P = 0.21, respectively, and specificities 84% (95% CI: 78%-89%) and 89% (95% CI: 84%-93%]); P = 0.08, respectively. Overall accuracy was higher for RbPET compared with CMR (73% vs 78%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected obstructive stenosis at coronary CTA, CMR, and RbPET show similar and moderate sensitivities but high specificities compared with ICA with FFR. This patient group represents a diagnostic challenge with frequent mismatch between advanced MPI tests and invasive measurements. (Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 [Dan-NICAD 2]; NCT03481712).

Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline-Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Background Substantial differences exist between different guideline-recommended pretest probability (PTP) models for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was performed to study the performance of the 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guideline-recommended PTP (AHA/ACC-PTP) model in assessing the likelihood of obstructive CAD compared with previously proposed models. Methods and Results Symptomatic patients (N=50 561) referred for coronary computed tomography angiography were included. The reference standard was invasive coronary angiography with optional fractional flow reserve measurements. The AHA/ACC-PTP values based on sex and age were calculated and compared with the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP values based on sex, age, and symptoms as well as the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood values based on sex, age, symptoms, and risk factors. The AHA/ACC-PTP maximum values overestimated by a factor of 2.6 the actual prevalence of CAD. Compared with the AHA/ACC-PTP model (area under the receiver-operating curve, 71.5 [95% CI, 70.7-72.2]), inclusion of typicality of symptoms in the European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP improved discrimination of CAD (area under the receiver-operating curve, 75.5 [95% CI, 74.7-76.3]). Inclusion of both symptoms and risk factors in the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood model further improved discrimination (area under the receiver-operating curve, 77.7 [95% CI, 77.0-78.5]). The proportion of patients classified as very low PTP was lower using the AHA/ACC-PTP (5%) compared with the European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP (19%) and the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (49%) models. Conclusions The new AHA/ACC-PTP model overestimates the prevalence of obstructive CAD substantially if type of symptoms and risk factors are not taken into account. Inclusion of both symptoms and risk factors improves model performance and identifies more patients with very low likelihood of CAD in whom further testing can be deferred.

A Cost Analysis of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnostic Pathway of Patients Presenting With Unexplained Acute Myocardial Injury and Culprit-Free Coronary Angiography.

Aims: To determine financial implications of implementing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in the diagnostic pathway of a population with unexplained acute myocardial injury and normal coronary angiography. Methods and Results: We performed a focused cost-benefit analysis using a hypothetical population of 2,000 patients with unexplained acute myocardial injury and normal coronary angiography divided into two groups to receive either standard or CMR guided management over a 10-year period. As healthcare practice and costs considerably vary geographically and over time, an algorithm with 15 key variables was developed to permit user-defined calculations of cost-benefit and other analyses. Using current UK costs, routine use of CMR increases healthcare spending by 14% per patient in the first year. After 7 years, CMR guided practice is cost neutral, reducing cost by 3% per patient 10 years following presentation. In addition, CMR -guided therapy results in 7 fewer myocardial infarctions and 14 fewer major bleeding events per 1,000 patients over a 10-year period. The three most sensitive variables were, in decreasing order, the cost of CMR, the cost of ticagrelor and the percentage of the population with MI requiring DAPT. Conclusion: Routine use of CMR in patients with unexplained acute myocardial injury and normal coronary angiography is associated with cost reductions in the medium to long term. The initial higher cost of CMR is offset over time and delivers a more personalized and higher quality of care.

Correction to: CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology (ESC) survey of cardiac resynchronization therapy-an Irish subset analysis.

In the original version of this article, the author list contained a number of errors, namely a missing author name, and author names that had been merged incorrectly.

CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology (ESC) survey of cardiac resynchronization therapy-an Irish subset analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity in symptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function < 35%, a left bundle branch block (LBBB) and a widened QRS complex. This paper compares Irish national CRT practices with the European data that was gathered in the same multi-centre CRT Survey II. METHODS: Each recruiting centre completed an internet-based facilitating collection of information relating to health care resource utilization by each centre. A second form was completed for consecutive patients undergoing CRT implantation, to provide information on patient demographics, pre-implantation clinical evaluation and investigations, indication for implantation and the procedure as well as short-term complications and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients from 2 centres were representative of the current Irish practice and compared with data obtained. This was 26.6% of all CRT implantations in Ireland during this period (total number 319, 88 CRT-P, 231 CRT-D). Of those receiving CRT device, mean age was 73 years, 74.1% were male, with predominantly NYHA class III symptoms, and left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%. NT-pro-BNP level was substantially elevated in most patients. 56% were in sinus rhythm, 31% in atrial fibrillation with overall mean QRS duration of 166 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Within Ireland, the majority of CRT implantation are adherent with ESC guidelines. It has also highlighted problems that are noted in other ESC member countries such as the underutilization of device therapy in women, lack of referrals from peripheral centres and further need for optimization of medical therapy before device implantation.

Electrical manipulation of the failing heart.

Chronic heart failure with reduced (≤ 40%) ejection fraction (HFrEF) poses a significant residual mortality risk despite modern optimal medical therapy. In the last decades, we have witnessed the introduction of breakthrough cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) aimed at addressing sudden cardiac death and HF progression in patients with HFrEF, leading to improved survival and functional capacity. Following their introduction, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have undergone substantial technological improvements and have been investigated in different settings of HFrEF, some of which yielded controversial results. In this review, we provide a comprehensive, yet pragmatic, approach to the individual key points in the electrical manipulation of the failing heart with ICD and CRT including patient selection, technological advances in the implant technique, follow-up, and long-term management. The aim of the review is to provide real-life-oriented advices to maximize the desired outcomes of CIED-based therapy of HFrEF. Accordingly, a framework to inform the decision-making process in candidates to ICD and/or CRT has been developed reflective of a critical appraisal of the most recently available evidence reappraising some domains beyond the classic views.

Randomized placebo controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of single low-dose intracoronary insulin-like growth factor following percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (RESUS-AMI).

BACKGROUND: Residual and significant postinfarction left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, despite technically successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), remains an important clinical issue. In preclinical models, low-dose insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) has potent cytoprotective and positive cardiac remodeling effects. We studied the safety and efficacy of immediate post-PCI low-dose intracoronary IGF1 infusion in STEMI patients. METHODS: Using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multidose study design, we randomized 47 STEMI patients with significantly reduced (≤40%) LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after successful PCI to single intracoronary infusion of placebo (n = 15), 1.5 ng IGF1 (n = 16), or 15 ng IGF1 (n = 16). All received optimal medical therapy. Safety end points were freedom from hypoglycemia, hypotension, or significant arrhythmias within 1 hour of therapy. The primary efficacy end point was LVEF, and secondary end points were LV volumes, mass, stroke volume, and infarct size at 2-month follow-up, all assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment effects were estimated by analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline (24 hours) outcome. RESULTS: No significant differences in safety end points occurred between treatment groups out to 30 days (χ2 test, P value = .77). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline (24 hours post STEMI) clinical characteristics or LVEF among groups. LVEF at 2 months, compared to baseline, increased in all groups, with no statistically significant differences related to treatment assignment. However, compared with placebo or 1.5 ng IGF1, treatment with 15 ng IGF1 was associated with a significant improvement in indexed LV end-diastolic volume (P = .018), LV mass (P = .004), and stroke volume (P = .016). Late gadolinium enhancement (±SD) at 2 months was lower in 15 ng IGF1 (34.5 ± 29.6 g) compared to placebo (49.1 ± 19.3 g) or 1.5 ng IGF1 (47.4 ± 22.4 g) treated patients, although the result was not statistically significant (P = .095). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot trial, low-dose IGF1, given after optimal mechanical reperfusion in STEMI, is safe but does not improve LVEF. However, there is a signal for a dose-dependent benefit on post-MI remodeling that may warrant further study.