Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiographics ; 34(2): 413-26, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24617688

RESUMEN

Midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNETs) are rare, and the primary tumor is usually small and difficult to visualize at imaging. Patients often present late with extensive liver and nodal metastases and may experience symptoms secondary to the release of active substances by the primary tumor, such as serotonin and its metabolites, which have local and systemic effects. Locally, this causes desmoplasia and vascular encasement and may lead to small bowel obstruction and ischemia, with significant morbidity and mortality. Systemically, the release of active substances into the circulation can cause flushing, diarrhea, and abdominal pain (carcinoid syndrome); these substances can be detected in urine and blood serum and used as markers for diagnosis and treatment follow-up. MNETs retain expression of specific peptide receptors such as somatostatin receptors, which will bind to synthetic somatostatin analogs such as octreotide. This feature is useful for functional imaging of patients with MNETs and for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using somatostatin analogs. Resection of the primary tumor is advocated, even in patients with extensive metastases, because it may prevent development of local complications, can help control systemic symptoms, and has been shown to confer some survival advantage. Computed tomography and functional imaging are used to identify the primary tumor and assess its resectability. The main factors governing resectability are patient comorbidities (eg, carcinoid heart disease), vascular involvement, and desmoplasia.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias del Íleon/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias del Íleon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
Med Mycol ; 50(5): 538-42, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22074309

RESUMEN

Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains a challenge as the clinical manifestations are not specific, and a histological diagnosis is often unfeasible. The 2002 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (MSG) criteria for classification of cases into possible, probable or proven were revised in 2008. Our objective was to analyze the impact of these revisions on the diagnosis of IA. A retrospective analysis of 589 high risk patient-episodes revealed that 125 of 155 'possible' (81%) and 12 of 16 'probable' (75%) cases of IA should be changed to 'non-classifiable' when the new criteria were applied. We concluded, as expected, that the 2008 EORTC/MSG revised definitions reduced the number of cases classified as 'possible' IA, but additionally, there has been a dramatic reduction in 'probable' cases. These changes have significant implications on the interpretation of clinical trial data based on EORTC/MSG classifications.


Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis/clasificación , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicaciones , Terminología como Asunto , Aspergilosis/epidemiología , Aspergilosis/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA