RESUMEN
Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients commonly undergo metformin monotherapy. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combination therapy of dapagliflozin plus linagliptin versus dapagliflozin plus vildagliptin as add-on therapy in T2DM patients inadequately controlled on metformin. Methodology This was an 18-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase III clinical study. About 236 participants were randomly assigned to receive either a fixed-dose combination of dapagliflozin 10 mg plus linagliptin 5 mg tablets or a fixed-dose combination of dapagliflozin 10 mg plus vildagliptin SR 100 mg tablets added to metformin monotherapy. The primary outcome was the mean change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of week 16. The key secondary endpoints were mean change in postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), fasting blood glucose (FBG), body weight, and the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c less than 7.0%. Results The dapagliflozin/linagliptin combination therapy showed a more significant change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of 16 weeks (mean reduction: -1.59% vs. -1.25%) compared to dapagliflozin/vildagliptin (p < 0.0001). Additionally, compared to the dapagliflozin/vildagliptin group, the dapagliflozin/linagliptin group demonstrated a significant reduction in both PPBG (mean reduction: -59.99 mg/dL vs. -55.34 mg/dL) and FPG (mean reduction: -32.91 mg/dL vs. -26.78 mg/dL). A total of 18 adverse events were reported in 17 (7.20%) participants, all of which were mild and resolved completely. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions Compared to dapagliflozin and vildagliptin combination therapy, dapagliflozin and linagliptin fixed-dose combination provided clinically significant improvements in glycemic control. Because of its effectiveness, safety, and tolerability, the fixed-dose combination of dapagliflozin and linagliptin was a better option for treating T2DM patients who had previously only received metformin monotherapy.
RESUMEN
AIMS: To assess the effects on glycaemic control of lixisenatide vs placebo as add-on treatment to basal insulin (BI) ± metformin and effects on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction in patients with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Patients (n = 448) with inadequately controlled T2D were randomized (1:1) to lixisenatide or placebo as add-on to BI ± metformin for 24 weeks after an 8-week run-in phase, during which BI was titrated to a target self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG; 4.4-5.6 mmol/L). The primary endpoint was absolute change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included: percentage of responders; changes in 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG); 7-point SMPG (daily average); body weight (BW); total daily BI dose; fasting plasma glucose; and safety assessments. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar in the two treatment groups. After insulin optimization during run-in, lixisenatide was superior to placebo in mean change from baseline (7.9% [standard deviation {s.d.}, 0.66] and 7.9% [0.70], respectively) to week 24 in HbA1c (least squares mean [standard error {s.e.}] change -0.62% [0.09] vs -0.11% [0.09]; P < .0001, respectively) and higher proportions of patients achieved HbA1c targets. Two-hour PPG, daily mean SMPG and mean BW were reduced further and daily BI dose was lower with lixisenatide than placebo (-1.12 kg vs 0.04 kg [P < .0001]; -3.0 U vs -1.9 U [P = .0033], respectively). Treatment-emergent adverse events were greater with lixisenatide than placebo (63.8% vs 40.8%, respectively). The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia was similar (lixisenatide 15.6% vs placebo 13.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In Asian patients insufficiently controlled on BI ± metformin, lixisenatide was superior to placebo in glycaemic control, with a tolerability profile in line with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01632163 (clinicaltrials.gov).
