Evaluation of the age-dependent dosing recommendations for the administration of daily tinzaparin in children with thrombosis.

Essentials The once-daily dosing of tinzaparin provides an advantage over other low molecular weight heparins. The recommended age-dependent doses of tinzaparin in children have not previously been validated. Once-daily administration of tinzaparin is a safe and effective treatment of childhood thrombosis. Recommended doses are appropriate but monitoring may be required due to inter-individual variation. SUMMARY: Background The recommended starting doses of tinzaparin for the treatment of thrombosis in children have not previously been validated. There are few data to support the efficacy and safety of once-daily tinzaparin dosing in children with thrombosis. Objectives To investigate the use of tinzaparin for the treatment of childhood thrombosis, and to evaluate the age-dependent dosing recommendations and define outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of children aged 0 to < 16 years treated for thrombosis at a large teaching hospital in the UK between 2008 and 2015. Medical records were reviewed to evaluate tinzaparin dosing, anti-activated factor X (FXa) levels, and patient outcomes. Results Seventy-nine children were identified as having received tinzaparin. Dosing information was available for 57. Younger children required higher doses to reach a therapeutic level. The therapeutic dose requirement varied within age groups, supporting the use of anti-FXa monitoring. Over a median follow-up of 35 months, there were 13 (16%) bleeding episodes (two major; seven clinically relevant but non-major; and four minor). There were two (3%) recurrent episodes of thrombosis. Children were treated for a median duration of 3 months, and the majority (86%) remained on tinzaparin for the duration of their anticoagulant therapy. Conclusion Once-daily tinzaparin is a safe and effective treatment for childhood thrombosis, with rates of recurrence and bleeding similar to those for other anticoagulants used in children. The recommended starting doses are appropriate, but anti-FXa monitoring may be required, owing to interindividual variability in the therapeutic dose requirement.

A systematic review of anti-thrombotic therapy in epistaxis.

There is limited guidance available to clinicians regarding the management of antithrombotic therapy during epistaxis, whilst there has been an increase in the use of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. In addition, the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban, over the last decade has significantly increased the complexity of managing the anticoagulated epistaxis patient. We undertook a systemic literature review investigating potential management strategies for each class of anti-thrombotic therapy during epistaxis. A PubMED and Cochrane Library search was performed on 10/03/16 using, but not limited to, the search terms epistaxis, nosebleed, nose bleeding, nasal haemorrhage, nasal bleeding AND each of the following search terms: antithrombotic, anticoagulant, antiplatelet, aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and tranexamic acid. This yielded 3815 results, of which 29 were considered relevant. Other sources such as national and international guidelines related to the management of anti-thrombotics were also utilised. We present the findings related to the management of each class of anti-thrombotic therapy during epistaxis. Overall we found a lack of evidence regarding this topic and further high quality research is needed. This is an area growing in complexity and the support of colleagues in Haematology and Cardiology is increasingly important.