Is Better Standardization of Therapeutic Antibody Quality in Emerging Diseases Epidemics Possible?

During the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic many efforts have gone into the investigation of the SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies as possible therapeutics. Currently, conclusions cannot be drawn due to the lack of standardization in antibody assessments. Here we describe an approach of establishing antibody characterisation in emergent times which would, if followed, enable comparison of results from different studies. The key component is a reliable and reproducible assay of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation based on a banking system of its biological components - a challenge virus, cells and an anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody in-house standard, calibrated to the First WHO International Standard immediately upon its availability. Consequently, all collected serological data were retrospectively expressed in an internationally comparable way. The neutralising antibodies (NAbs) among convalescents ranged from 4 to 2869 IU mL-1 in a significant positive correlation to the disease severity. Their decline in convalescents was on average 1.4-fold in a one-month period. Heat-inactivation resulted in 2.3-fold decrease of NAb titres in comparison to the native sera, implying significant complement activating properties of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. The monitoring of NAb titres in the sera of immunocompromised COVID-19 patients that lacked their own antibodies evidenced the successful transfusion of antibodies by the COVID-19 convalescent plasma units with NAb titres of 35 IU mL-1 or higher.

Impact of complement and difference of cell-based assay and ELISA in determination of neutralization capacity against mumps and measles virus.

Neutralizing antibodies against mumps and measles virus are considered a correlate of protection against these diseases. Measurement of neutralizing antibodies is mostly performed using plaque reduction neutralization assay or 50% cell culture infective dose (CCID50) neutralization assay, but there are attempts for measuring neutralizing antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) which is simpler, but the literature data regarding its convenience are diverse. The role of complement and antibodies in neutralizing capacity of sera is not completely defined. Here, CCID50 neutralization assay and ELISA were used to determine the neutralization capacity against mumps and measles virus in human sera and therapeutic immunoglobulins (IVIGs). Results showed no correlation of neutralization titers obtained by CCID50 neutralization assay and IgG content obtained by ELISA for mumps or measles in human sera. Data showed some neutralization activity against measles virus and quite high against mumps virus of naïve guinea pig serum and that its addition increases neutralization capacity of IVIG and human sera against mumps and measles viruses. Heat inactivation of human sera reduced neutralization capacity against measles to small extent, and substantially against mumps virus. There is a significant impact of complement in measurement of neutralization capacity against mumps virus.