Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(5): 687-691, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30284234

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes the prevalence of malnutrition, depression, anxiety, and somatization and which factor has the biggest effect on quality of life (QoL) in individuals with resected cancer. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted among 747 participants. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ30, MST, and BSI-18 questionnaires. RESULTS: Prevalence for risk of malnutrition, depression, anxiety, and somatization were 36.4%, 35.5%, 35.2%, and 48.8%, respectively. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that malnutrition risk, somatization, depression, and anxiety accounted for 50.8% of the variance in functional scale, 45.3% in symptom scale, and 52.2% in global health. Malnutrition, somatization, depression, and anxiety displayed high explanatory power on all health-related QoL (HRQoL) scales. CONCLUSION: The risk of malnutrition and psychological symptoms is strongly associated with HRQoL in cancer patients; thus, medical oncologists should develop effective interventions that contribute to lowering the risk of malnutrition and psychological distress, thereby improving subjects' HRQoL before initiating adjuvant chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Neoplasias/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(11): 1392-1399, nov. 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-173729

RESUMEN

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze differences in physician and patient satisfaction in shared decision-making (SDM); patients’ emotional distress, and coping in subjects with resected, non-metastatic cancer. Methods: 602 patients from 14 hospitals in Spain were surveyed. Information was collected regarding physician and patient satisfaction with SDM, participants’ emotional distress and coping, as well as patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by means of specific, validated questionnaires. Results: Overall, 11% of physicians and 19% of patients were dissatisfied with SDM; 22% of patients presented hopelessness or anxious preoccupation as coping strategies, and 56% presented emotional distress. By gender, female patients showed a higher prevalence of dissatisfaction with SDM (23 vs 14%), anxious preoccupation (26 vs 17%), and emotional distress (63 vs 44%) than males. Hopelessness was more prevalent in individuals with stage III disease than those with stages I-II (28 vs 18%). Conclusion: Physicians must be mindful of the importance of emotional support and individual characteristics when communicating treatment options, benefits, and adverse effects of each alternative to oncological patients


No disponible


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(11): 1392-1399, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29611043

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze differences in physician and patient satisfaction in shared decision-making (SDM); patients' emotional distress, and coping in subjects with resected, non-metastatic cancer. METHODS: 602 patients from 14 hospitals in Spain were surveyed. Information was collected regarding physician and patient satisfaction with SDM, participants' emotional distress and coping, as well as patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by means of specific, validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, 11% of physicians and 19% of patients were dissatisfied with SDM; 22% of patients presented hopelessness or anxious preoccupation as coping strategies, and 56% presented emotional distress. By gender, female patients showed a higher prevalence of dissatisfaction with SDM (23 vs 14%), anxious preoccupation (26 vs 17%), and emotional distress (63 vs 44%) than males. Hopelessness was more prevalent in individuals with stage III disease than those with stages I-II (28 vs 18%). CONCLUSION: Physicians must be mindful of the importance of emotional support and individual characteristics when communicating treatment options, benefits, and adverse effects of each alternative to oncological patients.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Toma de Decisiones , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/psicología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica/métodos , Oncología Médica/normas , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...