RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In Kenya, there is a lack of data on the number of people with dementia. In this article, we aim to estimate the number of community-dwelling older adults (aged 60 years and above) that are potentially living with dementia in rural Kenya. METHODS: Recruitment of older adults occurred through adopting a convenience approach based on the catchment areas served by trained ten Community Health Workers (CHWs). Screening was conducted using the Brief Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D), in which prevalence ratios were reported. Regression analyses were run to understand the association between screening outcome and wellbeing, social isolation, and employment status (adjusted for age, sex, literacy, geography, and social status). RESULTS: Of the 3,546 older adults who were screened for dementia, 652 screened positive (PR = 0.18, 95%CIs 0.17 to 0.20). Back estimating screen positives based on established sensitivity and specificity of the tool against a gold standard (clinical diagnosis), yielded a prevalence of 9.4% (0.09, 95%CIs 0.08 to 0.11). Screening positive for dementia was associated with poorer quality of life (B =-0.17, p<0.001) and loneliness (B= 0.28, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is potentially 258,000 older adults living with dementia in Kenya, who likely have poorer outcomes. We need to encourage a timely diagnosis and develop better ways to support people living with dementia in Kenya and other resource-limited settings.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Kenya, many people are currently living with dementia without a formal diagnosis or support; often attributing symptoms to normal aging or as a consequence of past behaviors. Dementia screening is not commonplace within Kenya. Improving the supply (or opportunity) of dementia screening within the region may promote uptake, thus leading to more people to seek a formal diagnosis and subsequently receive support within the Kenyan healthcare system. Community Healthcare Workers (CHWs) have successfully demonstrated their value in delivering health interventions within Kenya and have strong links within local communities. OBJECTIVE: To integrate and evaluate a community-level dementia screening program among older adults in rural Kenya. METHODS: Through leveraging this resource, we will deliver dementia screening to older adults (≥60 years) within Makueni County, Kenya over a 6-month period. Here, we present a protocol for the process evaluation of a dementia screening program in Kenya - DEM-SKY. The process evaluation seeks to understand the adoption, implementation, continuation, and implementation determinants, using quantitative and qualitative measures. CONCLUSIONS: Gaining perspectives of different participants involved in the program (i.e., older adults, CHWs, hospital staff, and trainers), will ensure that we understand the reason for successful (or unsuccessful) delivery of DEM-SKY.
RESUMEN
STRiDE was an ambitious four-year project in seven countries aiming to build capacity around generating and using research to support the development of policies to improve quality of life of people with dementia and their carers. The project's innovative approach combined rigorous academic research and hands-on civil society advocacy. This paper explores the project's unique strategy for policy change and compiles case-studies from several of the STRiDE countries. Finally, we share lessons learned and next steps to keep momentum for policy change going in each of these countries - and beyond.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Kenya, there is lack of evidence on existing dementia care pathways, with minimal or no presentation for dementia-related symptoms in health care settings. Understanding the services available for people with dementia as well as how communities access the services could offer a practical pattern for policy makers to identify strategies that encourage early detection, care and support for people with dementia and their families. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate initial responses of individuals and their families to dementia and challenges encountered in help seeking through care pathways to inform dementia care-related policies and practice. METHODS: The Strengthening Responses to dementia in Developing Countries (STRiDE) Kenya team adapted case vignettes (brief hypothetical stories meant to elicit responses on how the characters would behave) developed by the entire STRiDE team. A total of 29 stakeholders were then asked to provide feedback on the completed vignettes and summarize a common pathway to dementia care in Kenya while using the proposed case vignettes. FINDINGS: We found four initial responses to dementia suspicion in Kenya where individuals:(i) Perceive symptoms as normal part of ageing, (ii) Consult a spiritual or traditional healer, (iii) Visit a private clinic or primary health care facilities, or (iv) No action taken. These were the first points within the care pathways which determined the care trajectory the person with dementia would follow. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of dementia care pathways could form a basis for improving the way communities perceive dementia etiology and establish standard pathways to care whilst ensuring that some pathways do not further pose an impediment to care and treatment for dementia.
