Very early risk modeling in patients with chest pain based on the pattern on admission ECG.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate the prognostic accuracy of admission ECG and its usefulness in determining the population at the highest risk of worse outcomes. BACKGROUND: Fast and accurate assessment of chest pain patients remains a challenge for clinicians. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is performed in each case of suspicion of the cardiac origin of chest pain. METHODS: Consecutive adult chest pain patients with suspicion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were enrolled in the study. The prognostic value of admission ECG changes alone and in combination with other clinical variables (cardiac troponin, diagnosis of AMI) were analyzed for the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in a one­year observation. RESULTS: The ischemic pattern on admission ECG was a single risk factor of MACE (HR 2.996 95% CI 1.31-6.86, p = 0.009), contrary to the single admission high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay (hs-cTnT) (HR 1.79 95% CI 0.695-4.61). The highest risk of MACE was identified in case of the presence of both ischemic-ECG and positive hs-cTnT (HR 3.19 95% CI 1.496-6.81, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of ischemic changes in ECG in chest pain population with AMI suspicion increases the risk of MACE. The group at highest risk of MACE can by identified by the additional stratification with the admission single hs-TnT measurement (Tab. 2, Fig. 4, Ref. 40). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: acute coronary syndromes, cardiac troponin, electrocardiogram, emergency department, chest pain.

Real-Life Outcomes of Coronary Bifurcation Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction (Zabrze-Opole Registry).

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions is a technical challenge associated with high risk of adverse events, especially in primary PCI. The aim of the study is to analyze long-term outcomes after PCI for coronary bifurcation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The outcome was defined as the rate of major adverse cardiac event related to target lesion failure (MACE-TLF) (death-TLF, nonfatal myocardial infarction-TLF and target lesion revascularization (TLR)) and the rate of stent thrombosis (ST). From 306 patients enrolled to the registry, 113 were diagnosed with AMI. In the long term, AMI was not a risk factor for MACE-TLF. The risk of MACE-TLF was dependent on the culprit lesion, especially in the right coronary artery (RCA) and side branch (SB) with a diameter >3 mm. When PCI was performed in the SB, the inflation pressure in SB remained the single risk factor of poor prognosis. The rate of cumulative ST driven by late ST in AMI was dependent on the inflation pressure in the main branch (MB). In conclusion, PCI of bifurcation culprit lesions should be performed carefully in case of RCA and large SB diameter and attention should be paid to high inflation pressure in the SB. On the contrary, the lower the inflation pressure in the MB, the higher the risk of ST.

External validation of the clinical chemistry score.

BACKGROUND: Combining high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) with estimated glomerular filtration rate and glucose within the Clinical Chemistry Score (CCS) could help in the assessment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: In patients presenting with suspected AMI to the emergency department, we aimed to externally validate the performance of the CCS in a prospective international multicenter study and to directly compare the diagnostic and prognostic performance of the CCS with hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI baseline levels alone using a single cut-off approach. The diagnostic endpoint was diagnostic accuracy for AMI as centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists including cardiac imaging and serial hs-cTnT/I measurements. The prognostic endpoint was 30-day AMI or death. RESULTS: AMI was the final diagnosis in 620/3827 patients (16.2%) adjudicated with hs-cTnT and 599 patients (15.7%) adjudicated with hs-cTnI. The CCS resulted in high diagnostic accuracy for AMI and prognostic accuracy for 30-days AMI/death as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), using hs-cTnT 0.90 (95%CI 0.89-0.91) and 0.89 (95%CI 0.88-0.90), using hs-cTnI 0.91 (95%Cl 0.90-0.92) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.89-0.91) respectively. E.g. a CCS of 0 points resulted in a sensitivity of 99.8% (95%CI 99.1-100%) for rule-out of index AMI and 99.5% (95%CI 98.5-100%) for AMI/death at 30 days for hs-cTnT and 99.8% (95%CI 98.9-100%) and 99.6% (95%CI 98.6-100%) using hs-cTnI. Overall, the single hs-cTnT/I measurement approach provided comparable diagnostic (sensitivity 99.5-99.7%) and prognostic (sensitivity 98.9-99.5%) performance versus the CCS. INTERPRETATION: The CCS provided high diagnostic and prognostic performance also in this independent large validation cohort. A single hs-cTnT/I measurement approach for rule-out MI yielded similar estimates.

Use of cardiac troponin in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

The diagnosis ofcoronary artery disease, which is one of the most common causes of death and disability worldwide, still remains a significant problem for clinicians. High­sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs­cTn) assays became the cornerstone in the diagnostic workup of acute myocardial infarction. Nowadays, they take an important position in diagnostic algorithms. However, there are still some unexplained issues in this field.This review summarizes and emphasizes the crucial role of hs­cTn in acute coronary syndromes. The 0/1­hour hs­cTn algorithm was mentioned for the first time in the 2015 official European Society of Cardiology guidelines on non-ST­segment­elevation acute coronary syndromes. It was derived, validated, and implemented for all clinically­available assays since then. In this review, troponin­based strategies for rapid rule­out or rule­in of non-ST­segment elevation myocardial infarction are gathered and compared with the update on the official European Society of Cardiology 0/1­hour pathway with the most recent values of hs­cTn. The document also focuses on the problem of possible analytic confounders (false­­positive and false­negative results) and compares the usefulness of cTn to other diagnostic techniques (eg, magnetic resonance imaging). The review is divided into short, easy­to­read sections emphasizing 6 key messages on how to use and interpret hs­cTn base algorithms in clinical practice at the emergency department.

Predicting Major Adverse Events in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Early and accurate detection of short-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an unmet clinical need. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that adding clinical judgment and electrocardiogram findings to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measurement at presentation and after 1 h (ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm) would further improve its performance to predict MACE. METHODS: Patients presenting to an emergency department with suspected AMI were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter diagnostic study. The primary endpoint was MACE, including all-cause death, cardiac arrest, AMI, cardiogenic shock, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and high-grade atrioventricular block within 30 days including index events. The secondary endpoint was MACE + unstable angina (UA) receiving early (≤24 h) revascularization. RESULTS: Among 3,123 patients, the ESC hs-cTnT 0/1 h algorithm triaged significantly more patients toward rule-out compared with the extended algorithm (60%; 95% CI: 59% to 62% vs. 45%; 95% CI: 43% to 46%; p < 0.001), while maintaining similar 30-day MACE rates (0.6%; 95% CI: 0.3% to 1.1% vs. 0.4%; 95% CI: 0.1% to 0.9%; p = 0.429), resulting in a similar negative predictive value (99.4%; 95% CI: 98.9% to 99.6% vs. 99.6%; 95% CI: 99.2% to 99.8%; p = 0.097). The ESC hs-cTnT 0/1 h algorithm ruled-in fewer patients (16%; 95% CI: 14.9% to 17.5% vs. 26%; 95% CI: 24.2% to 27.2%; p < 0.001) compared with the extended algorithm, albeit with a higher positive predictive value (76.6%; 95% CI: 72.8% to 80.1% vs. 59%; 95% CI: 55.5% to 62.3%; p < 0.001). For 30-day MACE + UA, the ESC hs-cTnT 0/1 h algorithm had a higher positive predictive value for rule-in, whereas the extended algorithm had a higher negative predictive value for the rule-out. Similar findings emerged when using hs-cTnI. CONCLUSIONS: The ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm better balanced efficacy and safety in the prediction of MACE, whereas the extended algorithm is the preferred option for the rule-out of 30-day MACE + UA. (Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation [APACE]; NCT00470587).

Combined Use of High-Sensitive Cardiac Troponin, Copeptin, and the Modified HEART Score for Rapid Evaluation of Chest Pain Patients.

BACKGROUND: Clinical short-term risk stratification is a recommended approach in patients with chest pain and possible acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to further improve high safety of biomarker-based rule-out algorithms. The study aim was to assess clinical performance of baseline concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT) and copeptin and the modified HEART score (mHS) in early presenters to the emergency department with chest pain. METHODS: This cohort study included patients with chest pain with onset maximum of 6 h before admission and no persistent ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram. hs-TnT, copeptin, and the mHS were assessed from admission data. The diagnostic and prognostic value for three baseline rule-out algorithms: (1) single hs-TnT < 14 ng/l, (2) hs-TnT < 14 ng/l/mHS ≤ 3, and (3) hs-TnT < 14 ng/l/mHS ≤ 3/copeptin < 17.4 pmol/l, was assessed with sensitivity and negative predictive value. Primary diagnostic endpoint was the diagnosis of AMI. Prognostic endpoint was death and/or AMI within 30 days. RESULTS: Among 154 enrolled patients, 44 (29%) were classified as low-risk according to the mHS; AMI was diagnosed in 105 patients (68%). For ruling out AMI, the highest sensitivity and NPV from all studied algorithms were observed for hs-TnT/mHS/copeptin (100%, 95% CI 96.6-100, and 100%, 95% CI 75.3-100). At 30 days, the highest event-free survival was achieved in patients stratified with hs-TnT/mHS/copeptin algorithm (100%) with 100% (95% CI 75.3-100) NPV and 100% (95% CI 96.6-100) sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of baseline hs-TnT, copeptin, and the mHS has an excellent sensitivity and NPV for short-term risk stratification. Such approach might improve the triage system in emergency departments and be a bridge for inclusion to serial blood sampling algorithms.

Prospective validation of prognostic and diagnostic syncope scores in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Various scores have been derived for the assessment of syncope patients in the emergency department (ED) but stay inconsistently validated. We aim to compare their performance to the one of a common, easy-to-use CHADS2 score. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients ≥ 40 years old presenting with syncope to the ED in a multicenter study. Early clinical judgment (ECJ) of the treating ED-physician regarding the probability of cardiac syncope was quantified. Two independent physicians adjudicated the final diagnosis after 1-year follow-up. Major cardiovascular events (MACE) and death were recorded during 2 years of follow-up. Nine scores were compared by their area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) for death, MACE or the diagnosis of cardiac syncope. RESULTS: 1490 patients were available for score validation. The CHADS2-score presented a higher or equally high accuracy for death in the long- and short-term follow-up than other syncope-specific risk scores. This score also performed well for the prediction of MACE in the long- and short-term evaluation and stratified patients with accuracy comparative to OESIL, one of the best performing syncope-specific risk score. All scores performed poorly for diagnosing cardiac syncope when compared to the ECJ. CONCLUSIONS: The CHADS2-score performed comparably to more complicated syncope-specific risk scores in the prediction of death and MACE in ED syncope patients. While better tools incorporating biochemical and electrocardiographic markers are needed, this study suggests that the CHADS2-score is currently a good option to stratify risk in syncope patients in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01548352.

Copeptin as a Prognostic Marker in Acute Chest Pain and Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In patients admitted with chest pain and suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), it is crucial to early identify those who are at higher risk of adverse events. The study aim was to assess the predictive value of copeptin in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain and nonconclusive ECG. METHODS: Consecutive patients suspected for an ACS were enrolled prospectively. Copeptin and high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT) were measured at admission. Patients were followed up at six and 12 months for the occurrence of death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Among 154 patients, 11 patients died and 26 experienced MACCE. Mortality was higher in copeptin-positive than copeptin-negative patients with no difference in the rate of MACCE. Copeptin reached the AUC 0.86 (0.75-0.97) for prognosis of mortality at six and 0.77 (0.65-0.88) at 12 months. It was higher than for hs-TnT and their combination at both time points. Copeptin was a strong predictor of mortality in the Cox analysis (HR14.1 at six and HR4.3 at 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: Copeptin appears to be an independent predictor of long-term mortality in a selected population of patients suspected for an ACS. The study registration number is ISRCTN14112941.

Effect of Definition on Incidence and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainties regarding the most appropriate definition and treatment of type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) due to supply-demand mismatch have contributed to inconsistent adoption in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: This study sought a better understanding of the effect of the definition of T2MI on its incidence, treatment, and event-related mortality, thereby addressing an important unmet clinical need. METHODS: The final diagnosis was adjudicated in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction by 2 independent cardiologists by 2 methods: 1 method required the presence of coronary artery disease, a common interpretation of the 2007 universal definition (T2MI2007); and 1 method did not require coronary artery disease, the 2012 universal definition (T2MI2012). RESULTS: Overall, 4,015 consecutive patients were adjudicated. The incidence of T2MI based on the T2MI2007 definition was 2.8% (n = 112). The application of the more liberal T2MI2012 definition resulted in an increase of T2MI incidence of 6% (n = 240), a relative increase of 114% (128 reclassified patients, defined as T2MI2012reclassified). Among T2MI2007, 6.3% of patients received coronary revascularization, 22% dual-antiplatelet therapy, and 71% high-dose statin therapy versus 0.8%, 1.6%, and 31% among T2MI2012reclassified patients, respectively (all p < 0.01). Cardiovascular mortality at 90 days was 0% among T2MI2012reclassified, which was similar to patients with noncardiac causes of chest discomfort (0.2%), and lower than T2MI2007 (3.6%) and type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI) (4.8%) (T2MI2012reclassified vs. T2MI2007 and T1MI: p = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: T2MI2012reclassified has a substantially lower event-related mortality rate compared with T2MI2007 and T1MI. (Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation [APACE] Study; NCT00470587).