Kidney Transplantation in Old Recipients From Old Donors: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: The program Old for Old or European Senior Program (ESP), allocates donors aged ≥65 years to recipients of ≥65, within a narrow geographic area in order to minimize cold ischemia time, decrease the waiting time for elderly patients listed for kidney transplantation and expand the transplant resource in this group. The ESP is not officially applied in Greece. In our center, the Old for Old criteria have been used since 2003 for elderly patients who are candidates for kidney transplantation. METHODS: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the results of kidney transplantation from donors ≥65 years to recipients ≥65 years (Old for Old group), by examining a 5-year actual survival of the recipient and the graft. Ten Old for Old transplantations were performed at our center and the graft and patient survival was estimated during a 5-year follow-up. This group was compared to a control group of 10 recipients under the age of 65, who received grafts from deceased donors aged ≥65 years; it was found that graft and patient survival was significantly lower in the Old for Old group (50% and 58% respectively), compared to the control group, with graft and patient survival 72% and 80%, respectively (P < .05). The main cause of death was cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: More studies with higher number of patients are needed for the assessment of survival outcome between the elderly transplanted patient and those on dialysis listed for renal allografts to conclude whether Old for Old transplantation is beneficial. It is also important to consider a better pre-transplant medical evaluation with attention to cardiovascular status of the candidates and modification of the immunosuppression protocol in order to avoid serious infections and long hospital stays.

Fulminant Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome in a renal transplant patient and review of the literature.

We describe a rare fulminant case of Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS) in a 37-year-old female renal transplant patient, indistinguishable from severe sepsis clinically and in the laboratory. HPS involves rapidly escalating immune system activation, resulting in a cytokine cascade, which can, especially in immunocompromised patients, lead to multi-organ failure, and even death. Thirty-two Herpesviridae-associated HPS cases in renal transplant patients have been reported and are reviewed. Overall mortality is 47% (15/32 cases).

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: initial results from a center in Greece.

AIM: The outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) in type 1 diabetes has dramatically improved in recent years. We report the initial results of our SPK program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2010, we performed and prospectively obtained data on 4 SPKs in 4 type 1 diabetic patients with chronic renal failure. The recipients were 3 men and 1 woman, of overall mean age of 40.75 ± 4.78 years, mean time from diabetes diagnosis of 27 ± 15 years, and time on dialysis of 3.5 ± 0.57 years. All grafts were procured from multiorgan brain-dead donors of mean age 26 ± 8.16 years and mean body weight of 74 ± 4.34 kg. The pancreatic grafts were transplanted first into the right iliac fossa with mean cold ischemia times of 10.62 ± 3.09 hours for the pancreatic and 14.00 ± 2.97 hours for the renal grafts. Pancreas arterial inflow was re-established by an end-to-side anastomosis of an extension Y-graft to the recipient right iliac artery. The portal vein was sutured to the iliac vein directly. The exocrine secretions of the pancreas were managed by duodenojejunostomy extraperitoneally (n = 3) or intraperitoneally (n = 1). The ureteral anastomosis was performed using the Taguchi technique. RESULTS: After SPK, endocrine pancreatic function was immediately restored in all patients. Insulin administration was stopped within the first 24 hours after surgery. Two patients displayed delayed renal graft function necessitating dialysis for 9 and 23 days, respectively. The postoperative course was prolonged with a mean hospital stay of 82 ± 1 day. At a 31.75 ± 9.03 months follow up all patients are alive with functioning grafts. CONCLUSION: Our experience with SPK, although limited, has shown encouraging results over a short follow-up period.

Prevalence and clinical impact of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplantation: ten years of experience in a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation is regarded as the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Despite significant improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive therapy, long-term graft survival has not markedly increased over the years, due in part to the occurrence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and September 2011, we performed 592 kidney transplantations (214 living and 378 cadaveric donors). All patients received induction therapy with interleukin (IL)-2 monoclonal antibodies or antithymoglobulin (ATG) combined with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or mTOR antagonists and steroids. All CMV-seronegative patients and all subjects receiving ATG induction were prescribed prophylactic therapy with ganciclovir-intravenous (IV) for 15 days 2.5 mg/kg BW bid and thereafter oral valgancyclovir once a day. CMV infection was diagnosed using a CMV-PVR of ≥ 600 copies. We analyzed the time to manifestations of CMV infection, or positive CMV-PCR, patient and graft survival, serum creatinine (Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) values before and after CMV infection, as well as type of immunosuppression therapy. RESULTS: The overall incidences of CMV infection and CMV disease were 76/592 (12.8%) and 23/592 (3.9%), respectively. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) times to positive CMV-PCR and CMV disease were 16.66 ± 23.38 months and 106 ± 61.2 (range, 28-215) days, respectively. Mortality was 1% (6/592) among our whole population, 7.9% (6/76) for CMV-infected, and 26% (6/23) in the CMV disease cohort. Cr and BUN showed no significant differences among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: CMV infection and CMV disease comprise significant clinical problems, increasing morbidity and mortality. The use of prophylactic anti-CMV treatment is of paramount importance.