Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Air Med J ; 41(3): 292-297, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35595337

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Emergency medical personnel are exposed to multiple stressors, including those of psychological etiologies. The aim of this study was to report the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms in Norwegian medical helicopter personnel and to determine to what degree they report personal growth or deprecation due to exposure to work-related events. METHODS: This was a web-based, cross-sectional survey performed among rescue paramedics and physicians staffing helicopter emergency medical services and search and rescue helicopters between May 5, 2021, and July 5, 2021. Questions included demographic data, the traumatic events exposure index, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (Depression), the posttraumatic change scale, and the posttraumatic symptom scale. RESULTS: Of the 245 eligible participants, 10 declined to take part and 74 failed to answer, producing a response rate of 66% (72 rescue paramedics and 89 physicians). Of the study population, 3.9 % reported manifest posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, and 1.9% described moderate to severe depression and anxiety. The majority (76%) described posttraumatic emotional growth because of their work experience. CONCLUSION: Despite exposure to several traumatic stressors, participants reported a lower prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms, depression, and anxiety compared with a Norwegian adult population.


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias Aéreas , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , Aeronaves , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología
2.
BMC Emerg Med ; 22(1): 57, 2022 04 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35366802

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, reports emerged on decreasing emergency department (ED) visits in many countries. Patients experiencing chest pain was no exception. The aim of the current study was to describe how the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequential lockdown impacted the chest pain population in a Norwegian ED. METHODS: All patients presenting to the ED with chest pain during the study period were included. Data were collected retrospectively from the time period January 6th to August 30th, 2020, and compared to the corresponding period in 2019, assessing variations in the number of ED visits, severity, gender, and age. RESULTS: Fewer patients with chest pain were seen in the ED following the national lockdown in Norway, compared to the corresponding 2019 period (week 13: 38% fewer; weeks 11-27: 16% fewer). By week 28, the rate normalized compared to 2019 levels. There was a relative increase in lower acuity patients among these patients, while fewer moderate acuity patients were seen. During the initial period following lockdown, the median age was lower compared to the corresponding 2019 period (58 years (IQR 25) vs 62 years (IQR 24), respectively). Admissions due to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remained proportionally stable. CONCLUSIONS: Succeeding the Covid-19 outbreak and the subsequent national lockdown in Norway, fewer chest pain patients presented to the ED. Paradoxically, the patients seemed to be less severely ill and were on average younger compared to 2019 data. However, the proportion of patients admitted with ACS was stable during this period. This could imply that some patients may have failed to seek medical advice despite experiencing a myocardial infarction.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Dolor en el Pecho/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 142(4)2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés, Noruego | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239280

RESUMEN

We propose new recommendations for the emergency treatment of low-voltage electric injuries (<1 000 volts). A large proportion of these patients can be treated as outpatients.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Electricidad , Traumatismos por Electricidad/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Electricidad/prevención & control , Humanos
4.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 141(1)2022 01 11.
Artículo en Inglés, Noruego | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35026093

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients exposed to electricity are often referred to the Emergency Department, but guidelines differ as to how they should be managed. In this article, we describe patients with low-voltage electric shock in the Emergency Department at St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective data from patients referred to the Emergency Department following low-voltage electric shock (< 1,000 V) in the period 1.1.2012-31.12.2017 (N = 210) were included. RESULTS: The median age was 26 years and 186/210 (89 %) were men. Out of the 210 patients, 165 (79 %) had symptoms following electric shock. Localised pain and chest discomfort occurred in 84/165 (51 %) and 57/165 (35 %) of patients respectively. ECG findings were normal in 168/209 (80 %), and no patients had arrhythmias requiring treatment or elevated troponin T or creatine kinase. No patients had serious complications or died. INTERPRETATION: Low-voltage electric shock did not cause serious arrhythmias or elevated levels of troponin T or creatine kinase. It should be possible to manage asymptomatic patients with normal findings on clinical examination and ECG in a prehospital setting without reducing patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Electricidad/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Troponina T , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Dolor en el Pecho , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 30(1): 3, 2022 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35016708

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been shown to be elevated among first responders (Emergency Medical Services, fire service, police force) compared to the general population. Examining the prevalence of mental health issues in a work force with an elevated occupational risk is fundamental towards ensuring their wellbeing and implementing safeguard measures. The goal of this study is therefore to report the prevalence of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic development, and PTSD in Norwegian ambulance personnel. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional, anonymous, web-based survey (Questback®), performed among operative personnel employed in the Emergency Medical Services in the Regional Health Trust of Central Norway between 18. February and 9. April 2021. The study was sent to 1052 eligible participants. Questions reported demographic data, a traumatic events exposure index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Depression), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale, Posttraumatic symptom scale (PTSD) and Posttraumatic change scale. RESULTS: The response rate in this study was 45.5% (n = 479/1052). The mean age of respondents was 37.1 years (std. 11.1) and 52.8% (n = 253) were male. Of the respondents, 80.6% (n = 386) were married or had a partner, and 91.6% (n = 439) reported having access to a peer support programme, with 34.9% (n = 167) reporting that they had utilized peer support. In this study, 5% (n = 24) showed a prevalence of manifest posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, while 8.6% (n = 41) reported moderate to severe depression and 2.9% (n = 14) presented moderate to severe symptoms of general anxiety. Of the respondents, 77.2% (n = 370) reported personal growth because of their work experiences. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that Norwegian ambulance personnel report a prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms and depression, which is slightly higher for men, and lower for the female proportion in this study, when compared to an adult Norwegian population. The vast majority of respondents reported personal growth because of their work experience, and both the degree of peer support and having a partner seem to influence levels of posttraumatic stress and -development.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , Ambulancias , Ansiedad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Prevalencia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología
6.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 140(8)2020 05 26.
Artículo en Inglés, Noruego | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32463204

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Emergency Department in Trondheim has prepared for a large influx of patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We conducted a study comparing patients in the Emergency Department in the first weeks of the pandemic in Norway (weeks 11 and 12) with the average number of patient visits. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Data from patients at the Emergency Department of St Olav's Hospital in the period 6 January 2020-22 March 2020 were retrieved from the Emergency Department's database. Logistical patient data concerning patient numbers, chief complaints, length of stay in the Emergency Department, acuity level, isolation status, and treatment level were analysed. RESULTS: In week 12, 331 patients were referred to the Emergency Department, a reduction of 39 % compared with the average of 541 patients in weeks 2-10. There was a general reduction in all patient groups, but particularly those discharged from the Emergency Department. In week 12 there were 56 more patients isolated with suspected/potentially infectious disease (187 %) compared with the average for weeks 2-10, and these patients spent almost two hours longer in the Emergency Department than other patients. INTERPRETATION: There was a reduction in patient visits to the Emergency Department in the first weeks of the pandemic. The percentage of patients isolated for infection control increased, and the time spent in the Emergency Department for these patients was greater than for other patients. The reduction in the inflow of patients is expected to be temporary, and the Emergency Department at St Olav's Hospital expects a large influx of patients with suspected COVID-19 disease.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Defensa Civil , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 53(1): 28-34, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30760035

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Chest pain is one of the most frequent chief complaints in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). No study has evaluated this patient population in Norway. The aim of the present study was to describe the diagnoses and logistics of chest pain patients admitted to the ED at a Norwegian university hospital. DESIGN: Data were collected from all patients referred to the ED at St. Olav's Hospital-Trondheim University Hospital in 2015. Patients presenting at the ED with a chief complaint of chest pain based on the Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System were included in this study. RESULTS: In the study period, 22,403 patients were admitted to the ED. Chest pain was the second most common chief complaint (11%), only exceeded by acute abdominal pain (18%). Among the chest pain patients, 12% had acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 37% were diagnosed with non-specific chest pain. Gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and pulmonary conditions were less common, affecting 6%, 4%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. In total, 90% of the ED chest pain patients were handled by the Clinic of Cardiology. CONCLUSIONS: Chest pain was the second most common chief complaint among patients admitted to the ED, and most patients were handled by the Clinic of Cardiology. More than one-third of the patients received a cardiac diagnosis, but the largest group of patients was discharged with a diagnosis of non-specific chest pain. Other conditions managed by non-cardiac medical specialties were less common.


Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/diagnóstico , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angina de Pecho/epidemiología , Angina de Pecho/terapia , Dolor en el Pecho/epidemiología , Dolor en el Pecho/terapia , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente , Pronóstico , Triaje
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...