Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 27(13): e589-e595, 2019 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31232793

RESUMEN

While health care evolves from volume to value, there is increasing interest by payors to use patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to determine value and more specifically, quality from the patient's perspective. This article reviews the current state of PROs and discusses future directions. Specifically, this article will review the current history and background of PROs; it will highlight the perspective of the National Quality Forum and review the efforts of the musculoskeletal community related to PROs. Goals, positive aspects, limitations, and barriers related to PROs will be discussed. Additionally, development considerations and strategies will be highlighted. Finally, development recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery position statement "principles for musculoskeletal based PRO performance measurement development" will be introduced.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Humanos
2.
Instr Course Lect ; 65: 555-66, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27049220

RESUMEN

Although the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative began generating data in January 2013, it may be years before the data can determine if the BPCI Initiative enhances value without decreasing quality. Private insurers have implemented other bundled payment arrangements for the delivery of total joint arthroplasty in a variety of practice settings. It is important for surgeons to review the early results of the BPCI Initiative and other bundled payment arrangements to understand the challenges and benefits of healthcare delivery systems with respect to total joint arthroplasty. In addition, surgeons should understand methods of cost control and quality improvement to determine the effect of the BPCI Initiative on the value-quality equation with respect to total joint arthroplasty.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Control de Costos/métodos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/métodos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Medicare/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Estados Unidos
3.
J Arthroplasty ; 28(8 Suppl): 157-65, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24034511

RESUMEN

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act contains a number of provision for improving the delivery of healthcare in the United States, among the most impactful of which may be the call for modifications in the packaging of and payment for care that is bundled into episodes. The move away from fee for service payment models to payment for coordinated care delivered as comprehensive episodes is heralded as having great potential to enhance quality and reduce cost, thereby increasing the value of the care delivered. This effort builds on the prior experience around delivering care for arthroplasty under the Acute Care Episode Project and offers extensions and opportunities to modify the experience moving forward. Total hip and knee arthroplasties are viewed as ideal treatments to test the effectiveness of this payment model. Providers must learn the nuances of these modified care delivery concepts and evaluate whether their environment is conducive to success in this arena. This fundamental shift in payment for care offers both considerable risk and tremendous opportunity for physicians. Acquiring an understanding of the recent experience and the determinants of future success will best position orthopaedic surgeons to thrive in this new environment. Although this will remain a dynamic exercise for some time, early experience may enhance the chances for long term success, and physicians can rightfully lead the care delivery redesign process.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./tendencias , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendencias , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendencias , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Ortopedia/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Healthc Financ Manage ; 62(12): 88-94, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19069328

RESUMEN

To establish an effective, and lasting, collaboration with physicians, a hospital must: Create a positive vision of the future. Structure the collaboration to reflect market imperatives. Work only with the best partners and make it clear from the start what the expectations are for those partners. Establish accounting and governance practices that promote the venture's near-term profitability and the long-term goals.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Convenios Médico-Hospital/economía , Convenios Médico-Hospital/organización & administración , Médicos/economía , Administración Financiera de Hospitales , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA