Comparison of cytomorphology and histomorphology in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Gold standard for the establishment of the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are cytomorphological features of hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates. There is increasing evidence that bone marrow histomorphology not only aids in the diagnosis of MDS but can provide additional prognostic information, particularly through assessment of fibrosis and cellularity. However, there is only sparse data on direct comparison between histological and cytomorphological findings within the same MDS patient cohort. Therefore, we performed such an analysis under exceptionally well-standardized conditions. We reexamined biopsy material of 128 patients from the Düsseldorf MDS registry who underwent bone marrow trephine biopsy (in addition to bone marrow aspiration) at the time of diagnosis, addressing the following items: a. Analysis of concordance of diagnoses made by histology and cytomorphology b. Analysis of additional information by histology with regard to the diagnosis and prognosis. The respective biomaterials were available at our institution and had been processed according to unchanged protocols between 1992 and 2010. Fresh histopathological sections were obtained from the tissue blocks, stained under identical conditions and re-assessed by a designated expert pathologist (C.B.) without knowledge of the previous histopathological report or the respective cytomorphological diagnosis. The latter, likewise, was uniformly made by the same expert cytomorphologist (U.G.). Histopathology of bone marrow trephine biopsies reliably captured the diagnosis of MDS. Assignment to the diagnostic WHO subgroup was not entirely concordant with cytomorphology, mainly due to incongruences between the proportion of CD34-positive cells on histopathology and the cytomorphological blast count. Histopathology provided additional diagnostic and prognostic information with high diagnostic and prognostic significance, such as fibrosis. Likewise, histopathology allowed more reliable estimation of bone marrow cellularity.

Smart Conditioning with Venetoclax-Enhanced Sequential FLAMSA + RIC in Patients with High-Risk Myeloid Malignancies.

Up to 50% of patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies die of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Current sequential conditioning regimens like the FLAMSA protocol combine intensive induction therapy with TBI or alkylators. Venetoclax has synergistic effects to chemotherapy. In a retrospective survey among German transplant centers, we identified 61 patients with myeloid malignancies that had received FLAMSA-based sequential conditioning with venetoclax between 2018 and 2022 as an individualized treatment approach. Sixty patients (98%) had active disease at transplant and 74% had genetic high-risk features. Patients received allografts from matched unrelated, matched related, or mismatched donors. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in two patients but no significant non-hematologic toxicity related to venetoclax was observed. On day +30, 55 patients (90%) were in complete remission. Acute GvHD II°-IV° occurred in 17 (28%) and moderate/severe chronic GvHD in 7 patients (12%). Event-free survival and overall survival were 64% and 80% at 1 year as well as 57% and 75% at 2 years, respectively. The off-label combination of sequential FLAMSA-RIC with venetoclax appears to be safe and highly effective. To further validate these insights and enhance the idea of smart conditioning, a controlled prospective clinical trial was initiated in July 2023.

Infectious Complications in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Report from the Düsseldorf MDS Registry.

Despite notable advancements in infection prevention and treatment, individuals with hematologic malignancies still face the persistent threat of frequent and life-threatening complications. Those undergoing chemotherapy or other disease-modifying therapies are particularly vulnerable to developing infectious complications, increasing the risk of mortality. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) predominantly affect the elderly, with the incidence rising with age and peaking at around 70 years. Patients with MDS commonly present with unexplained low blood-cell counts, primarily anemia, and often experience varying degrees of neutropenia as the disease progresses. In our subsequent retrospective study involving 1593 patients from the Düsseldorf MDS Registry, we aimed at outlining the incidence of infections in MDS patients and identifying factors contributing to heightened susceptibility to infectious complications in this population.

Validation of a novel algorithm with a high specificity in ruling out MDS.

INTRODUCTION: A previously published web-based App using Gradient-boosted models (GBMs) of eight laboratory parameters was established by Oster et al. to facilitate diagnosis or exclusion of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in patients. METHODS: To validate their algorithm, we compared 175 anemic patients with MDS diagnosis from our German MDS Registry with 1378 non-MDS anemic patients who consulted various specialties in the Düsseldorf university hospital. RESULTS: Based on hemoglobin level, leukocyte and platelet count, mean corpuscular volume, absolute neutrophil count, absolute monocyte count, glucose and creatinine, plus the patients' gender and age, we could not reproduce a high negative predictive value (NPV), but confirmed a useful specificity of 90.9% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 77.1%. 1192 of 1378 controls were correctly categorized as "probably not MDS (pnMDS)" patients. A total of 65 patients were wrongly classified as "probable MDS (pMDS)," of whom 48 had alternative explanations for their altered laboratory results. In a second analysis, we included 29 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) resulting in only one label as possible MDS, suggesting that highly proliferative bone marrow disorders are correctly excluded. CONCLUSION: The possibility of reliably excluding MDS from differential diagnosis based on peripheral blood lab work appears to be attractive for patients and physicians alike while the confirmation of MDS diagnosis still requires a bone marrow biopsy.

The Absolute Monocyte Count at Diagnosis Affects Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Independently of the IPSS-R Risk Score.

The absolute monocyte count (AMC) is associated with mortality in a variety of medical conditions. Its prognostic impact in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) is less well studied. Therefore, we investigated its potential prognostic value in a cohort from the Düsseldorf MDS registry in relationship to the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R). An AMC below the population's median (<0.2 × 109/L) was associated with several adverse disease features such as lower haemoglobin levels, lower count of neutrophils and platelets, and a higher percentage of blasts in the bone marrow. MDS patients with an AMC < 0.2 × 109/L had a significantly higher risk of progression into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a univariate, proportional hazards model the effect of the AMC as a continuous variable was modelled via p-splines. We found a U-shaped effect with the lowest hazard around 0.3 × 109/L. Accordingly, an AMC within the last quartile of the population (0.4 × 109/L) was associated with a reduced overall survival independently of IPSS-R, but not with the risk of secondary AML. Considering monocytopenia as a risk factor for AML progression in MDS may provide an additional argument for allogeneic transplantation or the use of hypomethylating agents in patients who are not clear candidates for those treatments according to current prognostic scoring systems and/or recommendations. Further studies are needed to assess the prognostic impact of the AMC in the context of prognostic scoring systems, considering the molecular risk profile, and to identify the mechanisms responsible for the higher mortality in MDS patients with a subtle monocytosis.

In-depth virological and immunological characterization of HIV-1 cure after CCR5Δ32/Δ32 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Despite scientific evidence originating from two patients published to date that CCR5Δ32/Δ32 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can cure human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the knowledge of immunological and virological correlates of cure is limited. Here we characterize a case of long-term HIV-1 remission of a 53-year-old male who was carefully monitored for more than 9 years after allogeneic CCR5Δ32/Δ32 HSCT performed for acute myeloid leukemia. Despite sporadic traces of HIV-1 DNA detected by droplet digital PCR and in situ hybridization assays in peripheral T cell subsets and tissue-derived samples, repeated ex vivo quantitative and in vivo outgrowth assays in humanized mice did not reveal replication-competent virus. Low levels of immune activation and waning HIV-1-specific humoral and cellular immune responses indicated a lack of ongoing antigen production. Four years after analytical treatment interruption, the absence of a viral rebound and the lack of immunological correlates of HIV-1 antigen persistence are strong evidence for HIV-1 cure after CCR5Δ32/Δ32 HSCT.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes: New Methods of Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Treatment

BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are malignant diseases arising from hematopoietic stem cells. Their overall incidence is 4 cases per 100 000 persons per year, and they are usually diagnosed when evaluating cytopenia. The median survival time is three years. Myelodysplastic syndromes take a variable course; one-quarter of patients go on to develop acute leukemia. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature from 2013 to 2022, including relevant guidelines, in the PubMed database. The time period was chosen to reflect developments since the publication of the latest EHA guidelines in 2013. RESULTS: The gold standard of diagnosis is cytomorphology of the blood and bone marrow, supplemented by banding cytogenetics, histomorphology, and somatic mutation analyses. The new classification proposed by the WHO incorporates the molecular and cytogenetic findings. The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M), which takes somatic mutations into account, is now available as an aid to prognostication. Quality of life evaluation with standardized instruments is helpful in many ways. Low-risk patients are treated supportively with erythrocyte transfusions and iron chelation therapy. Erythropoietin-a can be given to patients whose erythropoietin level is less than 200ng/mL, lenalidomide to those with a 5q deletion, and luspatercept to those with an SF3B1 mutation. High-risk patients should be evaluated as early as possible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent. 5-azacytidine improves outcomes in patients for whom stem cell transplantation is not suitable. CONCLUSION: Once a precise diagnosis has been established, new prognostic instruments such as the IPSS-M enable risk-adapted treatment based on the biological aspects of the patient's disease as well as his or her age and comorbidities.

Opportunities for Participation in Randomized Controlled Trials for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Trial Access Depends on Restrictive Eligibility Criteria and Patient Expectations.

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the driver of therapeutic innovations. However, it has been frequently shown that less than 5% of adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials, although 70% of patients are considered as being willing to participate. Barriers to trial participation have been extensively studied. Although there is evidence that trial participation correlates with improved survival and reduced mortality, the rate of participation has not changed substantially. We provide retrospective data from a single-center analysis of 411 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were treated at the University Hospital Duesseldorf in Germany between January 2014 and December 2016. Each patient was analyzed for the real-world possibility of participating in a clinical study, based on the inclusion and exclusion (I/E) criteria and the recruiting period of open studies. The overall rate of study participation was 19%. A total of 53% of NDMM patients were eligible for first-line studies (GMMG-HD6, LenaMain). Of these, 80% consented to enrolment (42% of all). In contrast, only 38% of the RRMM population was eligible (GMMG-Relapse, Castor, Tourmaline, Admyre). Of these, only 22% (7% of all) consented. This was confirmed by virtual analysis, showing that only 29% of all RRMM patients would have been eligible for six internationally recruiting trials leading to later drug approval. The majority of cases were rendered ineligible by only one I/E criterion. The most common criteria were study-specific (prior therapies or refractory disease to a specific drug), kidney disease, and previous malignancy, followed by internal, neurologic, and infectious disease. In summary, this single-center analysis showed that I/E criteria permit study participation for most NNDM patients, with a dramatic decrease in the RRMM population. This is aggravated by the fact that the willingness for study participation also significantly declines in RRMM. Thus, addressing patient expectations and priorities seems to be the most promising approach to increasing patient enrollment in clinical trials.

Assessing the Prognosis of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Prognostic stratification in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relies on a number of key factors. Combining such patient-related and disease-related prognostic parameters into useful assessment tools remains a challenge. The most widely used scoring systems include the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS), the revised IPSS (IPSS-R), the World Health Organization (WHO) Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), and the new molecular IPSS (IPSS-M). Similar to the IPSS-R and the IPSS-M, the chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) prognostic scoring system (CPSS) and the CPSS molecular (CPSS-mol) are powerful and reliable prognostic tools that help to assess the individual prognosis of patients with CMML. The well-established prognostic assessment of MDS and CMML may be further augmented by additional disease-related parameters, such as somatic mutations, or patient-related factors, such as comorbidities. In this article, we briefly describe useful prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes and identify some open questions that require further investigation.

Prognostic value of low-level MRD in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia detected by low- and high-throughput methods.

Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction/consolidation therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the leading cause of relapse. The GMALL 07/2003 study used MRD detection by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction of clonal immune gene rearrangements with 1 × 10-4 as discriminating cutoff: levels ≥1 × 10-4 define molecular failure and MRD-negativity with an assay sensitivity of at least 1 × 10-4 defining complete molecular response. The clinical relevance of MRD results not fitting into these categories is unclear and termed "molecular not evaluable" (MolNE) toward MRD-based treatment decisions. Within the GMALL 07/03 study, 1019 consecutive bone marrow samples after first consolidation were evaluated for MRD. Patients with complete molecular response had significantly better outcome (5-year overall survival [OS] = 85% ± 2%, n = 603; 5-year disease-free survival [DFS] = 73% ± 2%, n = 599) compared with patients with molecular failure (5-year OS = 40% ± 3%, n = 238; 5-year DFS = 29% ± 3%, n = 208), with patients with MolNE in between (5-year OS = 66% ± 4%; 5-year DFS = 52% ± 4%, n = 178). Of MolNE samples reanalyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS), patients with undetectable NGS-MRD (n = 44; 5-year OS = 88% ± 5%, 5-year DFS = 70% ± 7%) had significantly better outcome than those with positive NGS-MRD (n = 42; 5-year OS = 37% ± 8%; 5-year DFS = 33% ± 8%). MolNE MRD results not just are borderline values with questionable relevance but also form an intermediate-risk group, assignment of which can be further improved by NGS.

Influence of platelet count at diagnosis and during the course of disease on prognosis in MDS patients.

Thrombocytopenia at diagnosis and platelet drop within the first 6 months have an adverse effect on prognosis of MDS patients. We therefore were interested in the association and impact on prognosis of morphologic findings of megakaryocytes and platelets with platelet count at diagnosis, bleeding complications, and the drop of platelets during the course of disease. This retrospective analysis was based on 334 MDS patients from the Duesseldorf MDS registry that were followed up for blood counts, bleeding, transfusion dependency, and AML evolution and correlated with morphology of the megakaryocytes and platelets. Thrombocytopenia was found more frequently in higher risk MDS and was associated with hypocellularity of the megakaryocytes in the bone marrow. Signs of bleeding were present at diagnosis in 14% and occurred during the disease in 48% of all MDS patients. Death due to bleeding was ranked third behind infections and AML. A decrement of platelets during the first 6 months was associated with an inferior overall survival of 21 vs. 49 months and with a higher cumulative 2-year AML rate of 22.2% vs. 8.3% (p = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, besides bone marrow blasts and karyotype, decreasing platelets were also associated with an inferior outcome. Signs of bleeding are present in a relevant number of MDS patients and account for significant morbidity and mortality in MDS. We could demonstrate the prognostic importance of decreasing platelets during the course of disease in all MDS patients, identifying patients at higher risk for death or AML progression.

Guidelines for Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Converting Evidence into Action?

The heterogeneous group of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) needs an individualized and patient-tailored therapeutic approach. Consensus-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment provide a basis for clinical decision making. MDS guidelines are issued by expert panels. Our main objective was to examine how guidelines influence patients' adherence to expert recommendations and how they ensure healthcare quality. To approach this question, we reviewed the most common guidelines for diagnosing and treating MDS in adult patients. Furthermore, we critically looked at quality indicators for everyday practice and studied adherence in an everyday outpatient setting. Finally, we also paid close attention to patient-reported outcome measures and studied how they are used as endpoints in clinical trials. We can conclude that the combination of evidence-based diagnostic tools, standardized treatment recommendations, and patient-centered shared decision making will eventually lead to a healthcare standard that will significantly improve outcomes in adult patients with MDS.

Luspatercept as a therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts.

INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell diseases characterized by cell dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis and risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The median age of 75 years at diagnosis is associated with the presence of comorbidities, which preclude intensive therapies like allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in most MDS patients. Risk stratification using the (Revised) International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS/IPSS-R) is necessary to plan individualized treatment. AREAS COVERED: Luspatercept (ACE-536), a specific activin receptor fusion protein, promotes late-stage erythropoiesis. Two clinical trials, PACE-MDS (phase 2) and MEDALIST (phase 3), yielded positive results in terms of improved hemoglobin levels and loss of transfusion dependence, with hardly any side effects. A phase 3 trial to compare luspatercept to ESAs (COMMANDS study) is ongoing. EXPERT OPINION: Luspatercept is a promising alternative to ESAs for a subset of transfusion-dependent patients with lower risk MDS, namely those with a sideroblastic phenotype who are either not suitable for or have already failed erythropoietin-based treatment. The favorable safety profile and convenient subcutaneous administration every 3 weeks are more conducive to patients' quality of life than chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy.

Eligibility for clinical trials is unsatisfactory for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, even at a tertiary referral center.

Participation in clinical trials may allow patients with MDS to gain access to therapies not otherwise available. However, access is limited by strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, reflecting academic or regulatory questions addressed by the respective studies. We performed a simulation in order to estimate the average proportion of MDS patients eligible for participation in a clinical trial. The simulation drew upon 1809 patients in the Düsseldorf MDS Registry whose clinical data allowed eligibility screening for a wide range of clinical trials. This cohort was assumed to be alive and available for study participation. The simulation also posited that all MDS trials (n = 47) conducted in our center between 1987 and 2016 were open for recruitment. In addition, study activities in the year 2016 were analyzed to determine the proportion of patients eligible for at least one of the 9 MDS trials open at that time. On average, each clinical trial was suitable for about 18 % of patients in the simulation cohort. Conversely, 34 % of the patients were eligible for at least one of the 9 clinical studies in 2016. Inclusion/exclusion criteria of studies initiated by the pharmaceutical industry excluded more than twice the fraction of patients compared with investigator initiated trials (potential inclusion of 10 % vs. 21 %, respectively). Karyotype (average exclusion rate 58 %), comorbidities (40 %), and prior therapies (55 %) were the main reasons for exclusion. We suggest that in- and exclusion criteria should be less restrictive, in order to meet the needs of the real-life population of elderly MDS patients.

Relapse patterns and treatment strategies in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) cures a considerable number of patients with myeloid malignancies, but relapse is the most frequent cause of death. We retrospectively studied relapse rate, kinetics, treatment, and outcome after first aHSCT in 446 patients during a 13-year period. Relapse occurred in 167 patients after a median of 4.6 months (116 hematologic (HR), 38 molecular (MR), and 13 extramedullary relapses (XR)). Median survival after relapse was 8.4 months and 2-year overall survival was 25%. Regarding survival after relapse, type (MR/HR/XR) and timepoint of relapse ( 12 months), age ( 50), diagnosis (MDS/AML and sAML), and remission status at transplant (CR and untreated MDS vs. refractory disease) were relevant in univariate analyses, in multivariate analyses timepoint, and type of relapse, age, and diagnosis. One hundred fifty-six patients were treated, most frequently with hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 109) or intensive chemotherapy (n = 12). Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was administered to 99 patients. Second aHSCT was performed in three patients as first and in 21 as higher salvage treatment. A complete remission (CR) was achieved in 46 patients (30%). Among CR patients, 65% had received HMA and DLI. Median survival of patients achieving CR was 105 months and 2-year overall survival was 80%. We conclude that with HMA and DLI or second aHSCT, a substantial number of patients, who relapse after aHSCT, can re-achieve remission and long-term survival. Techniques to further improve the detection of minimal residual disease are urgently needed because early treatment of MR results in significantly better survival.

Comparison between Upfront Transplantation and different Pretransplant Cytoreductive Treatment Approaches in Patients with High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML), but in the absence of prospective trials the impact of pretransplant cytoreduction is controversially discussed. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 165 patients with MDS and excess blasts (n = 126, 76%) and sAML (n = 39, 24%) according to a pretransplant strategy. Sixty-seven patients (41%) were directly transplanted (upfront group), whereas 98 patients (59%) had received pretransplant cytoreductive treatment (induction chemotherapy [CTX], n = 64; hypomethylating agents [HMAs], n = 34) resulting in a significantly higher complete remission rate in the CTX group (59% versus HMA 18%, P < .0001). Estimated rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) for the entire group were 54% and 39%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of the upfront, CTX, and HMA groups were 61%, 50%, and 45%, respectively (P = .116), whereas RFS rates were 38%, 41%, and 38% (P = .926). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) did not differ between treatment groups. In the upfront group no difference regarding OS and RFS was seen with respect to pretransplant blast count (>10% versus <10%). In multivariate analyses type of pretransplant strategy did not have an effect on OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM, whereas cytogenetics (OS, RFS, CIR), reduced-intensity conditioning (OS, RFS, CIR), and an unrelated donor (RFS, CIR) were identified as negative predictors. When compared with the upfront group, 5-year OS was significantly lower in patients with CTX-refractory disease (34% versus 64%, P = .0346) and by clear trend in HMA nonresponders (42% versus 61%, P = .073), whereas RFS did not differ significantly. In further support of the concept, that pretransplant therapy may favor the selection of resistant clones, patients in the upfront group had a higher likelihood to respond to HMAs as salvage therapy for relapse in comparison with pretreated patients (complete remission, 58% versus 10%; P = .0005) and a higher 2-year OS rate after relapse (59% versus 19%, P = .0001). These data suggest that an upfront transplant strategy is at least not inferior to pretransplant cytoreduction and may be augmented by HMAs + donor lymphocyte infusion salvage therapy in case of relapse after allo-HSCT.

Wilms' Tumor 1 Gene Expression Using a Standardized European LeukemiaNet-Certified Assay Compared to Other Methods for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia after Allogeneic Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.

Overexpression of the Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene is informative in many patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and is measurable in peripheral blood (PB). Despite these advantages, WT1 has not broadly been established as a marker for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) due to limited patient numbers, differing sample sources, and nonstandardized in-house methods. To estimate the value of WT1 as an MRD marker, we serially quantified PB WT1 expression using a standardized European LeukemiaNet-certified assay in 59 patients with AML and MDS after allo-HSCT. We compared its performance with routine methods such as chimerism, XY-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), disease-specific cytogenetic, and molecular analyses, which were accessible in 100%, 34%, 68%, and 37%, respectively. Twenty-four patients (41%) relapsed within a median of 126 days after allo-HSCT, and 20 of them showed at least 1 elevated WT1 value above the validated cutoff. The other 35 patients (59%) remained in complete remission, and only 1 patient had a transient increase in WT1 expression. This reflects a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 97% for WT1 and appears to be favorable compared with the sensitivities and specificities observed for chimerism (33% and 91%), XY-FISH (67% and 73%), cytogenetic (33% and 77%), and molecular (78% and 85%) analyses. Further supporting its predictive impact, elevated WT1 expression prompted an earlier BM biopsy and consecutively the diagnosis of relapse in 62% of patients. The results of this real-life experience imply that PB WT1 expression is measurable by a standardized assay and predicts imminent relapse after allo-HSCT with high sensitivity and specificity in most patients with AML and MDS.

Treatment of relapsed AML and MDS after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with decitabine and DLI-a retrospective multicenter analysis on behalf of the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group.

In contrast to the evidence regarding azacitidine (Aza), there is limited knowledge about the combination of decitabine (DAC) and donor lymphocyte infusions as salvage therapy for relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) so far. We retrospectively analyzed data of 36 patients with hematological (n = 35) or molecular relapse (n = 1) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 29) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 7) collected from 6 German transplant centers. Patients were treated with a median of 2 cycles DAC (range, 1 to 11). DAC was the first salvage therapy in 16 patients (44%), whereas 20 patients (56%) had previously received 1 to 5 lines of salvage therapy including 16 of them had been treated with Aza. In 22 patients (61%), a median of 2 DLI per patient (range, 1 to 5) was administered in addition to DAC. As a result, overall response rate was 25% including 6 complete remissions (CR, 17%) and 3 partial remissions (PR, 8%). Three patients within the first-line group achieved CR, while also 3 patients receiving DAC as second-line treatment reached CR including 2 patients with previous Aza failure. Median duration of CR was 10 months (range, 2 to 33) and no patient relapsed so far. The 2-year OS rate was 11% (± 6%) without any difference between first-line and pretreated patients. Incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was 19 and 5%. Taken together, DAC exerts clinical efficacy in patients with AML or MDS relapsing after allo-SCT and is able to induce durable remissions in individual patients suggesting that DAC may be an alternative to Aza or even a second choice after Aza failure.