From Esthetic Medicine to Optimizing Reconstructive Outcome: A Feasibility Trial on Secondary Refinement of Fasciocutaneous Anterolateral Thigh Flaps with Cryolipolysis.

BACKGROUND: Free adipocutaneous anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps have evolved as workhorse flaps to reconstruct complex, multicompound defects. While coverage is safely achieved, flaps may remain bulky. As a standard of care, flaps are refined with liposuction, partial excision, or combination of both. Cryolipolysis is widely used for fat reduction in esthetic medicine. This pilot comparative study analyses whether cryolipolysis may serve as a safe alternative method to effectively reduce volume in fasciocutaneous flaps. Moreover, patients' satisfaction with the procedure is evaluated. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective, interventional comparative cohort study, 10 patients with free subfascial ALT flaps for distal extremity reconstruction underwent cryolipolysis (60 minutes, -9°C). Circumference of the extremities and subcutaneous fat thickness were determined before (T1) and 12 weeks (T2) after cryolipolysis. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with a questionnaire of Likert's scale questions. Duration of hospital stay, intervention time, costs, and possible complications were analyzed and compared with surgical flap contouring (n = 12). RESULTS: All patients undergoing cryolipolysis were male, with a median age of 52 years without arterial disease-like state or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). At T2, a significant reduction of circumference of 1.8 ± 0.9 cm (p < 0.001) and subcutaneous fat layer of 7.7 ± 3.0 mm (p < 0.0001) was recorded. Overall, 90% of the patients were satisfied with the result. Cryolipolysis was well tolerated. One patient developed a second-degree frostbite which healed without further intervention. Cryolipolysis proofed to be as safe as surgical flap contouring. Hospital stay was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) and personal resources were spared when flap contouring was performed with cryolipolysis. CONCLUSION: This is a novel application of evolving body-contouring cryolipolysis from esthetic medicine into optimizing outcomes in reconstructive surgery. Cryolipolysis has been shown to be relatively safe and effective to reduce ALT's volume with high patients' satisfaction. This successful pilot study encourages further investigation with a prospective randomized control trial.

A single-center retrospective comparison of Duplex ultrasonography versus audible Doppler regarding anterolateral thigh perforator flap harvest and operative times.

INTRODUCTION: We reported on the superiority of preoperative Duplex mapping ("Duplex") over audible Dopplers ("Doppler") in anterolateral thigh perforator (ALT) free flaps for upper extremity reconstruction. To corroborate our findings on a larger cohort, we conducted this present study focusing on surgical efficiency and patient safety. METHODS: 150 consecutive ALT free flaps were divided into 65 cases of preoperative Duplex versus 85 Doppler controls. We first compared patient demographics, operative details, and defect and flap characteristics. We then assessed group differences in the number and course of perforators pursued intraoperatively, flap harvest and operative times, and donor-site complications. Additionally, the impact of the training level of the primary microsurgeon was evaluated. RESULTS: Cases and controls were comparable regarding age (p = .48), sex (p = .81), ASA class (p = .48), and BMI (p = .90). Duplex was associated with an increased likelihood of raising flaps on one single dominant perforator of purely septal course and significant reductions of flap harvest (68 ± 10 min, p < .0001) and operative times (74 ± 16 min, p < .0001), regardless of the experience of the primary microsurgeon. There were strong negative linear correlations between preoperative Duplex and both the flap harvest and operative times (p < .0001). Additionally, while there was no effect on the emergency take-back rate (OR = 1.3, p = .60), revisions were significantly less likely among duplexed patients (OR = 0.15, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative Duplex is associated with a significant reduction in ALT free flap harvest and overall operative times, as well as donor-site revisions as opposed to Doppler planning, regardless of the training level of the primary microsurgeon.

A Retrospective Comparative Functional and Aesthetic Outcome Study of Muscle versus Cutaneous Free Flaps for Distal Upper Extremity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Function and cosmesis are crucial in upper extremity reconstruction. Yet, there persists a lack of outcome evaluations, particularly regarding differences between free flap types. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective analysis, outcomes were compared between patients with cutaneous or muscle free flaps for distal upper extremity reconstruction between 2008 and 2018. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand -Score, Michigan-Hand (MHQ), and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaires were assessed, motor function was quantified, and self-reported measures of cosmesis were compared, including the Vancouver Scar-Scale (VSS), MHQ aesthetics-subscale (MAS), and Moscona's cosmetic validation-score (CVS). RESULTS: One-hundred forty-one cases were identified, with a shift toward cutaneous flaps over the study period. Muscle flaps were used for larger defects (251 vs. 142 cm2, p = 0.008). Losses, thromboses, and donor-site complications were equally distributed. Partial necroses were more frequent in muscle flaps (11 vs. 1%, p = 0.015). Seventy patients with 53 cutaneous versus 17 muscle flaps were reexamined. There was no difference in the timing of flap coverage (after 16 vs. 15 days, p = 0.79), number of preceding (2 vs. 1.7, p = 0.95), or subsequent operations (19/53 vs. 5/17, p = 0.77). Patients with cutaneous flaps showed higher grip strength (25 vs. 17 kg, p = 0.046) and reported better hand function (MHQ: 58 vs. 47, p = 0.044) and general health (SF-36: 70 vs. 61, p = 0.040), as well as more favorable appearance (MAS: 71 vs. 57, p = 0.044, CVS: 77 vs. 72, p = 0.048), and scar burden (VSS: 0 vs. 3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cutaneous flaps yielded better motor function, self-perceived cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life in our cohort of distal upper extremity reconstructions.

Comparison of pedicled versus free flaps for reconstruction of extensive deep sternal wound defects following cardiac surgery: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Myocutaneous pedicled flaps are the method of choice for sternal reconstruction after deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) following cardiac surgery. We set out to investigate whether free flaps provide a superior alternative for particularly extended sternal defects. METHODS: Between October 2008 and February 2020, 86 patients with DSWI underwent sternal reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps at our institution. Patients were retrospectively grouped into pedicled (A; n = 42) and free flaps (B, n = 44). The objective was to compare operative details, outcome variables, surgical as well as medical complication rates between both groups, retrospectively. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the effect of increasing defect size on flap necrosis. RESULTS: Rates of partial flap necrosis (>5% of the skin island) were significant higher in pedicled flaps (n = 14), when compared to free flaps (n = 4) (OR: 5.0; 33 vs. 9%; p = .008). Increasing defect size was a significant risk factor for the incidence of partial flap necrosis of pedicled flaps (p = .012), resulting in a significant higher rate of additional surgeries (p = .036). Binary regression model revealed that the relative likelihood of pedicled flap necrosis increased by 2.7% with every extra square-centimeter of defect size. CONCLUSION: To avoid an increased risk of partial flap necrosis, free flaps expand the limits of extensive sternal defect reconstruction with encouragingly low complication rates and proved to be a superior alternative to pedicled flaps in selected patients.

A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning.

INTRODUCTION: The anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap's vascular variability can lead to complications. Thus, the accuracy of numerous planning modalities has been studied. The clinical relevance of competing mapping methods, however, remains unknown. Therefore, we compared the impact of color-coded Duplex ultrasonography and handheld audible Dopplers on surgical efficacy and flap safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four ALT flaps were included in this comparative retrospective monocentric study. Twelve patients received Duplex scans and 32 flaps were designed using Dopplers only. Patient, defect, and flap characteristics of both groups were analyzed. The effect of either planning method on the primary outcome variables - flap harvest and operative times (HT, OT), course of perforator dissection, incidence of flap loss, emergent re-explorations, and donor-site revisions - was then assessed. RESULTS: Patient, defect, and flap characteristics were comparable between both groups, including flap size (Doppler: 134 ± 73 cm2 , Duplex: 131 ± 65 cm2 , p = .90). There was no flap loss. Emergent re-explorations (Doppler: 4/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .70) and donor-site revisions (Doppler: 2/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .81) were equally distributed. Duplex rendered septal perforator dissection 10 times more likely (Chi-Square = 8.9, p = .003, OR = 9.7), reaching 50% (n = 6/12), as opposed to only 9% in the Doppler cohort (n = 3/32). This allowed for highly significant HT and OT reductions of 89 minutes, respectively (p < .01): from 255 and 383 min (Doppler) to 166 and 294 min (Duplex). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative Duplex significantly reduces harvest and operative times of ALT flaps.

Continuous Video-Rate Laser Speckle Imaging for Intra- and Postoperative Cutaneous Perfusion Imaging of Free Flaps.

BACKGROUND: Success of free tissue transfer depends on standardized intraoperative flap design, microsurgical technique, and postoperative monitoring. We sought to investigate whether laser speckle imaging (LSI) is suitable for optimization of intraoperative flap design and postoperative monitoring of free flaps with skin paddles. METHODS: Skin perfusion was assessed with LSI in 27 free flaps after dissection at the donor site, after anastomosis at the recipient site, after inset and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 5, and 10. Skin perfusion of the whole flap (ROI [region of interest]-1) and the area over the pedicle (ROI-2) were compared between patients with and without postoperative complications (POC+ and POC - , respectively). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff for perfusion during LSI-guided microsurgery. RESULTS: In flaps without or only minor POC, intraoperatively measured perfusion over ROI-2 was significantly higher compared with ROI-1, whereas no significant differences were found for flaps with major POC. Perfusion of ROI-1 and 2 intraoperatively and on POD 1 was significantly lower in the POC+ compared with the POC- group (p < 0.05). ROC analysis yielded a threshold of 107 perfusion units (PU) at ROI-2 with an area under the curve (AUC) of > 0.8 for identification of flaps with major POC. CONCLUSION: LSI is an easy to use, noninvasive technique for identification of malperfused areas in free flaps, thus allowing for intraoperative decision-making on flap dimensions and postoperative monitoring. LSI therefore is a valuable tool for perfusion assessment with a high potential to become an established part of microsurgical practice.