Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(Suppl 1): 200-206, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385398

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It remains unclear whether posttransplant outcomes differ according to the pretransplant dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis). Our aim was to assess posttransplant outcomes in patients with different predialysis modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two thousand two hundred fifty-eight kidney recipients following up in Hamed Alessa Organ transplant center in Kuwait were included and divided into two groups according to pre-transplant dialysis modality: Group 1: those who received hemodialysis (HD) and group 2: those with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Demographics, pretransplant and posttransplant comorbidities, and patient and graft outcomes were studied. RESULTS: There were 1956 patients on hemodialysis, and 302 patients were on peritoneal dialysis. Most were male patients (1456 vs 802 female patients), with comparable mean age (P = .34). Chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy represented the most common original kidney disease before transplant (27.6% and 21.4%, respectively), with higher prevalence of glomerulonephritis in group 1 and diabetic nephropathy in group 2 (P = .001). The 2 groups were comparable with regard to immunosuppression (induction and maintenance) (P > .05). Posttransplant diabetes and hypertension were significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (P = .004 and P = 003, respectively). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the graft outcome (P = .86). However, patient survival was significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (81.2% vs 64.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with peritoneal dialysis, pretransplant hemodialysis is associated with better posttransplant patient survival despite no difference in the graft outcome. Diabetes-related complications could be attributed to such outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Nefropatías Diabéticas , Glomerulonefritis , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Nefropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Glomerulonefritis/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefritis/terapia , Glomerulonefritis/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(Suppl 1): 323-331, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385419

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Posttransplant anemia might be associated with cardiovascular morbidity and increased mortality. To our knowledge, the debate on anemia correction has neither been revisited nor decided definitively. We aimed to assess the effects of full correction of posttransplant anemia on the cardiovascular system and quality of life among renal transplant recipients with stable graft function who were using erythropoietin-stimulating agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 247 kidney recipients with stable graft function to be assessed for anemia. Eligible patients were randomized to achieve targeted hemoglobin of 11 to 12 g/dL (group 1, n = 183) or of 13 to 15 g/dL (group 2, n = 64) with the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents. Patients underwent monthly clinical and laboratory evaluations of kidney graft function. Quality of life and echocardiography were assessed at study start and at 12 months. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable regarding pretransplant characteristics. In group 2, we observed comparable posttransplant complications (P > .05) but better graft function at 6 months and better cardiac indexes at 1 year of the study (P < .05). At 12 months, quality of life had improved after full correction of posttransplant anemia in the renal transplant recipients who received erythropoietinstimulating agents. CONCLUSIONS: Full correction of posttransplant anemia in renal transplant recipients was associated with improved quality of life and cardiac indexes without an effect on cardiovascular comorbidity.


Asunto(s)
Anemia , Eritropoyetina , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Anemia/diagnóstico , Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia/etiología , Eritropoyetina/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes
3.
Iran J Kidney Dis ; 1(1): 47-53, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36739490

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients are scarce despite the distinct risk factors such as the use of immunosuppressive agents, sympathetic denervation, glomerular hyperfiltration, and high prevalence of the cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CIN in KT recipients who received low-osmolality iodine-based contrast material (CM) for radiological assessment. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, 79 of the 3180 KT recipients followed at Hamed Al-Essa organ transplant center received low-osmolality iodine-based contrast for radiological assessment for various indications. Preventive measures including holding metformin, intravenous hydration, sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine were given before contrast administration. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 25% from the baseline within 72 hours. RESULTS: The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: those who developed CIN (n = 7) and those with no increase in serum creatinine level (n = 72). The mean age of the patients was 52.1 ± 12.3 years; 44 of them were males, and the cause of end-stage kidney disease was mostly diabetic nephropathy. The pre-transplant demographics were comparable between the two groups. Fortyseven cases received contrast for coronary angiography, and 32 received it for a CT scan. The graft function deteriorated in group 1, but no significant difference was found between the two groups at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: CIN is not uncommon in KT recipients receiving CM, especially with ischemic heart disease. Risk stratification, optimizing hemodynamics, and avoiding potential nephrotoxins are essential before performing CM-enhanced studies in KT recipients.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7165.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Trasplante de Riñón , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Creatinina , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos
4.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 20(Suppl 1): 136-139, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35384824

RESUMEN

Severe anemia requiring multiple blood transfusions in the posttransplant period can trigger rejection. The evaluation of anemia among transplant recipients is a challenging task. Awareness should be continued for tacrolimus to manage pure red cell aplasia, but further evidence is needed to prove whether tacrolimus is a real cause of posttransplant anemia. Our case patient, a 66-year-old male patient with end-stage renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy, underwent a preemptive living donor renal transplant in September 2018. He had received a coronary artery bypass graft with transcatheter aortic valve implantation 3 years before renal transplant. Initially, he was maintained on prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus after basiliximab induction. One month later, he presented with low cardiac output symptoms. His complete blood count showed normocytic normochromic anemia with reticulocytopenia (his hemoglobin level dropped from 112 to 69 g/L), which necessitated regular blood transfusions. His iron profile, serum folate, and vitamin B12 were within normal limits, and he had negative hemolytic and autoimmune screening tests. A bone marrow biopsy revealed acquired pure red cell aplasia, which was most likely drug induced as viral profiles were negative for parvovirus B19, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus. The patient was managed by discontinuing mycophenolate mofetil, and the steroid dose was increased up to 20 mg/day but without improvement. With tacrolimus then considered, 3 weeks after presentation, we replaced tacrolimus with cyclosporine. Complete blood count follow-up showed improvement without any need for further blood transfusions. After 1 month of cyclosporine maintenance, mycophenolate mofetil was resumed with a steady increase of hemoglobin up to 150 g/L and serum creatinine of 122 µmol/L. Pure red cell aplasia is a rare disorder among renal transplant recipients, which could be induced by maintenance tacrolimus therapy.


Asunto(s)
Anemia , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Trasplante de Riñón , Aplasia Pura de Células Rojas , Anciano , Anemia/etiología , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Rechazo de Injerto , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Aplasia Pura de Células Rojas/diagnóstico , Aplasia Pura de Células Rojas/tratamiento farmacológico , Aplasia Pura de Células Rojas/etiología , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Clin Transplant ; 35(6): e14297, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33768630

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic with high morbidity and mortality and with a reported high risk of severe disease in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). AIM: We aimed to report the largest number of COVID-19-positive cases in KTR in a single center and to discuss their demographics, management, and evolution. METHODS: We enrolled all the two thousand KTR followed up in our center in Kuwait and collected the data of all COVID-19-positive KTR (104) from the start of the outbreak till the end of July 2020 and have reported the clinical features, management details, and both patient and graft outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the one hundred and four cases reported, most of them were males aged 49.3 ± 14.7 years. Eighty-two of them needed hospitalization, of which thirty-one were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Main comorbidities among these patients were hypertension in 64.4%, diabetes in 51%, and ischemic heart disease in 20.2%. Management strategies included anticoagulation in 56.7%, withdrawal of antimetabolites in 54.8%, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal in 33.7%, the addition of antibiotics in 57.7%, Tocilizumab in 8.7%, and antivirals in 16.3%. During a follow-up of 30 days, the reported number of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 28.7%, respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy 46.2%, and overall mortality rate was 10.6% with hospital mortality of 13.4% including an ICU mortality rate of 35.5%. CONCLUSION: Better outcome of COVID-19-positive KTR in our cohort during this unremitting stage could be due to the younger age of patients and early optimized management of anticoagulation, modification of immunosuppression, and prompt treatment of secondary bacterial infections. Mild cases can successfully be managed at home without any change in immunosuppression.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes
6.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 17(Suppl 1): 83-91, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777529

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of BK-induced nephritis in renal transplant recipients is estimated to be 1% to 10%; the rate of graft loss within 1 year is 30% to 65%. We conducted this study to evaluate screening of BK virus in blood and/or urine among renal transplant recipients and to assess the effects of different therapeutic modalities in renal transplant recipients with BK nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients were screened at the time of transplant and then at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Fiftynine patients were diagnosed with BK virus viremia. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment: group 1 (n = 29) received an active treatment and group 2 (n = 30) received minimized immunosuppression. RESULTS: Most patients required graft biopsies to confirm diagnosis (86.2% in group 1 vs 50% in group 2; P = .03). Both groups were comparable regarding demographic data. Initial posttransplant graft function was significantly better in group 1 (P = .017); ultimately, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding graft survival (P= .51). Fifty percent of patients had biopsy-proven acute T-cell-mediated rejection before BK virus-associated nephropathy diagnosis (significantly higher in group 1). Serum creatinine levels were significantly better in group 2 at 3, 4, and 5 years after BK nephropathy (P = .001, .017, and .003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of BK nephropathy in our renal transplant recipients was 5.9% with a rate of graft loss ranging from 43% to 51%. Regular screening, less intensive immunosuppressive therapy, and early intervention by reduction of immunosuppressive medications are advisable to obtain early diagnosis and to have better outcomes of BK virus-associated nephropathy with antiviral agents.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Virus BK/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Infecciones Oportunistas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/tratamiento farmacológico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Virus BK/inmunología , Virus BK/patogenicidad , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Kuwait/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/inmunología , Infecciones Oportunistas/mortalidad , Infecciones Oportunistas/virología , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/virología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/inmunología , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/mortalidad , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/virología
7.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 17(Suppl 1): 99-104, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777531

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy after kidney transplant has a high risk for maternal and fetal complications; however, it can be successful if patients are properly selected. Here, we studied outcomes and complications of pregnancies in kidney transplant recipients who received calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case control study, we reviewed patients who became pregnant between 2004 and 2017. For this analysis, each pregnancy was considered an event. We divided pregnancies into 2 groups according to calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression: group 1 (49 pregnancies) received cyclosporine, and group 2 (33 pregnancies) received tacrolimus. Patients also received steroids and azathioprine. Patients had regular antenatal follow-up at the Hamed Alessa Organ Transplant Center (Kuwait) and in the maternity hospital (monthly until month 7 and then weekly until delivery). RESULTS: Of 750 female kidney transplant recipients within childbearing potential, there were 82 pregnancies (10.9%) in 49 recipients (6.5%). Seventy-eight pregnancies were planned, and 4 pregnancies occurred while women were using contraception. There was 1 triple pregnancy, 5 double, and 76 single pregnancies. Two women had preeclampsia as maternal complication, 2 had uncontrolled hypertension, and 7 developed graft dysfunction. Forty-seven women (57.3%) had caesarean section, and the remaining had vaginal deliveries. Of 89 babies, 86 were viable (1 intrauterine fetal death and 2 abortions). Eight babies were delivered prematurely with low birth weight, and 2 needed incubators. Mean serum creatinine levels were 97.9 ± 24, 109 ± 38, 100 ± 39, 120 ± 46, and 115 ± 57 µmol/L at baseline, first, second, and third trimesters, and postpartum, respectively. Twelve patients showed high panel reactive antibodies but without donor-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Posttransplant pregnancy can be successful in most renal allograft recipients, but the increased risk of fetal and maternal complications, including low birth weight, spontaneous abortus, and preeclampsia, should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Kuwait , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 17(Suppl 1): 135-141, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777539

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The number of renal transplants in elderly patients is increasing as age per se does not constitute a contraindication to transplant. We compared renal transplant outcomes in elderly recipients versus a group of middle-aged patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective casecontrolled study compared elderly transplant recipients (n = 252; > 60 y old) with a matched cohort of younger adult recipients (n = 710; between 40 and 60 years old) who underwent renal transplant at the Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Center of Kuwait between 2000 and 2014. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, complications after transplant, and graft and patient outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were 252 elderly kidney transplant recipients (mean age of 65.5 ± 4.8 y; 59.52% males) and 710 younger adult patients (mean age of 49.3 ± 5.5 years; 61.4% males). Most donors were males in their thirties. Deceased donors predominated in the younger adult group, whereas living unrelated donors predominated in the elderly group (P < .05). Diabetes represented the most common cause of endstage kidney disease. Younger patients tended to receive heavier induction therapy but comparable maint enance immunosuppression. Posttransplant diabetes was higher in younger patients; however, there were more elderly patients with micro- and macroangiopathies (P < .05). No significant differences were shown between groups with regard to patient or graft survival (P > .05). This could be attributed to a significantly higher number of patients with cardiovascular risks, less rejection episodes, and higher number of malignancies in the elderly group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Due to relatively less potent immunosuppression, elderly patients experienced lower rejection rates and better graft survival; however, patient survival was lower due to higher cardiovascular risk factors. Older patients should not be discouraged from living-donor renal transplant. Targeted research studies on protocols for the elderly are needed.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Kuwait , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 17(3): 339-343, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674240

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In a previous study, we evaluated 1-year outcomes of using low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in intermediate-risk kidney transplant recipients. Whether this effect persists in the long term is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the 2-year follow up of such adopted prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized 2 matched groups of kidney transplant recipients (1:1) to receive valganciclovir as 450 mg daily (group 1) or 900 mg daily (group 2) for the first 6 months after kidney transplant. The final analysis included 196 patients as intermediate-risk patients (98 in each treatment group) after exclusion of 5 high-risk patients. Serologically, all patients were at moderate risk for cytomegalovirus infection. Long-term outcomes including cytomegalovirus disease, acute rejection, new-onset diabetes after transplant, graft loss, and patient survival were assessed. RESULTS: Through year 2 of follow-up, cytomegalovirus infection was reported in only 1 patient in group 1 (at month 13) and 1 patient in group 2 (at month 19) (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were not statistically different between the groups (2 episodes in group 1 and 6 in group 2; P = .431). New-onset diabetes posttransplant was reported in 8.1% in group 1 and 13.2% in group 2 (P = .535). Graft failure was equal in both groups (1 in each group) at 2 years of follow up (not significant). Patient survival was comparable in both groups (100% in group 1 versus 97.9% in group 2; P = .661). The total number of cytomegalovirus infections at 2 years was numerically less in group 1 (P = .128). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis for 6 months was associated with sustained reduction of cytomegalovirus infection up to 2 years after kidney transplant without significant impact on the acute rejection, new-onset diabetes posttransplant, or patient and graft outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Valganciclovir/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Nephrourol Mon ; 8(3): e34770, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27570751

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is the ideal method for management of end-stage renal disease. The use of living donors for renal transplantation was critical for early development in the field and preceded the use of cadaveric donors. Most donors are related genetically to the recipients, like a parent, a child, or a sibling of the recipient, but there are an increasing percentage of cases where donors are genetically unrelated like spouses, friends, or altruistic individuals. Donor shortages constitute the major barrier for kidney transplantation, and much effort has been made to increase the supply of living donors. The impact of donor source on the outcome of renal transplantation is not adequately studied in our country. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of donor source on the outcome of live donor kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1976 to December 2013, the number of patients that underwent living renal transplantation sharing at least one HLA haplotype with their donors was 2,485. We divided these patients into two groups: (1) 2,075 kidney transplant recipients (1,554 or 74.9% male and 521 or 25.1% female) for whom the donors were living related, (2) 410 kidney transplant recipients (297 or 72.4% male and 113 or 27.6% female) for whom the donors were living unrelated. All patients received immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine and prednisolone. We compared acute rejection and complication rates, as well as long-term graft and patient survival of both groups. Demographic characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Graft survival and patient survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The percentages of patients with acute vascular rejection were significantly higher in the unrelated group, while percentages of patients with no rejection were significantly higher in the related group, but there were no significant differences regarding patient and graft survivals between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplant recipients who received their grafts either from live related donors or live unrelated donors had comparable patient and graft survival outcomes.

11.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 13 Suppl 1: 111-6, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25894138

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Kidney donors, similar to the general population, are at risk for development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The course of donors who develop type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been well studied. This work is aimed at estimating the incidence of diabetes after kidney donation, and study some risk factors and some complications of diabetes mellitus after donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material of this record based work comprised the records 2267 donors who donated 1 of their kidneys between 1976 and 2014 in the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt, and regularly followed-up at its outpatient clinic. There were 388 donors included in the study and their medical records were revised. RESULTS: Postdonation weight gain and family history of diabetes mellitus were statistically significant on both the development of diabetes mellitus, high, very high albuminuria, and/or decreased creatinine clearance. Metformin and insulin use seemed to significantly reduce the protein excretion, and creatinine clearance decline in the studied group. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant effect of the family history of diabetes mellitus on the development of high, very high albuminuria, and/or decreased creatinine clearance.


Asunto(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Albuminuria/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Nefropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Nefropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Egipto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Pruebas de Función Renal , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Aumento de Peso
12.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 13(1): 26-34, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654411

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant is a common complication in renal allograft recipients. Recently, a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been reported in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus. The association between hepatitis C and diabetes mellitus is well demonstrated in the general population, but some controversy still exists. This work aimed to study the effect of pretransplant hepatitis C virus on the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant in Egyptian living-donor renal allotransplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single center study included 913 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted at Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center between 2000 and 2010. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their hepatitis C virus serology and diabetic status. RESULTS: Pretransplant dialysis duration and number of blood transfusion units were statistically significant among both viremic and nonviremic groups. With respect to induction therapy, a highly statistical significance was observed between the 4 groups regarding presence and type of adjuvant therapy (P < .001). With respect to maintenance immunosuppression, high statistically significant results were observed regarding steroid and rapamycin between the 4 groups (P < .001) with lower significance regarding mycophenolate mofetil (P = .04) but no significance regarding azathioprine, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus therapy. Incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant was statistically higher in the viremic than nonviremic group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive correlation between incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant and positive pretransplant hepatitis C virus status.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Hepacivirus/patogenicidad , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/virología , Egipto , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Hepatitis C/sangre , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/virología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...