Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Am J Manag Care ; 14(4): 226-9, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18402515

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and characterize biopharmaceutical agents and new indications in late-stage development in the United States as of May 2006. STUDY DESIGN: Review of drug development databases and other secondary sources. METHODS: Biopharmaceutical was defined as "any biology-based therapeutic that structurally mimics compounds found within the body." Unique biopharmaceuticals, including new molecular entities or new indications in phase 2 or higher development, were identified and characterized through reviews of the literature, 5 drug development databases, a clinical trial database, and telephone inquiries with manufacturers. RESULTS: As of May 2006, there were 111 unique biopharmaceuticals in late-stage development for 190 indications. Of 111 unique agents in the pipeline, 87 are new molecular entities, and 24 are already approved for other indications. Overall, 38 disease categories were targeted, and at least 33 physician specialties are likely to be affected. The greatest proportion of agents (43 biopharmaceuticals and 83 indications) target cancer. More than 70% of agents in the pipeline will require administration by a healthcare provider. More than 50% of the indications in the pipeline will require long-term (chronic) treatment (defined as >1 year and excludes cancer). CONCLUSIONS: The steady growth of the US biopharmaceutical pipeline and consequent anticipated near-term approvals will increasingly affect third-party portfolio decision making. Cost of therapy, identifying the right drug for the right patient, and outcomes-based value should drive that decision process.


Asunto(s)
Biofarmacia/tendencias , Biofarmacia/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Aprobación de Drogas , Drogas en Investigación , Humanos , Estados Unidos
3.
Am J Manag Care ; 10(11 Suppl): S370-6, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15603246

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review recent US cost estimates of revascularization and discuss their implications for third-party payers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A literature review was performed using MEDLINE. The review was limited to English-language articles published between January 2000 and September 2003. The most recently published articles that included US-derived clinical outcomes and costs of revascularization were selected for review. Cost estimates were abstracted and updated to 2003. RESULTS: Coronary revascularization procedures, including percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), are commonly performed in the United States. These procedures are costly. Costs for PCI in single-vessel disease are lower than costs for PCI in multivessel disease. Although initial estimated costs are lower for multivessel PCI (with or without stenting) than CABG, longer-term costs and lifetime costs are similar. Drug-eluting stents have the potential to alter treatment and economics dramatically, although it is too early to draw definitive conclusions about their costs. It is imperative that cost comparisons be placed in the appropriate context. CONCLUSION: Revascularization procedures are costly, and short-term cost differences in procedures may not exist when considered long term. Importantly, recent cost data may be conservative given the rapid innovation in revascularization procedures and technology and the lag in publication of cost data reflecting these advances.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/economía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Enfermedad Coronaria/economía , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Stents/economía , Stents/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Manag Care ; 9(6 Suppl): S124-35, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14577717

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe biopharmaceuticals in late-stage development in the United States and to understand their implications for third-party payers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: "Biopharmaceutical" and biopharmaceuticals in late-stage US development (had completed Phase 2 or higher) were identified through reviews of literature, 4 drug-development databases, a clinical trial database, and informal telephone conversations with representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration, faculty at academic institutions, and manufacturers. RESULTS: "Biopharmaceutical" was defined as "any biology-based therapeutic that structurally mimics compounds found within the body." This includes recombinant proteins, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, peptides, antisense oligonucleotides, therapeutic genes, and certain therapeutic vaccines. As of April 2003, there were 102 unique biopharmaceuticals in late-stage development for 156 indications in 36 disease categories, affecting at least 22 distinct physician specialties. Cancer agents are most common, with 30 agents (29%) targeting 62 indications (40%). Nearly 90% of the biopharmaceuticals require administration via injection or infusion, nearly 70% will require administration by a healthcare provider, and more than 60% will be administered in ambulatory care settings. All 22 physician specialties are affected by healthcare provider-administered biopharmaceuticals. Excluding cancer-related biopharmaceuticals, 60% of biopharmaceuticals and 54% of indications require chronic administration. Up to 81 biopharmaceuticals for 123 indications may be approved within the next 4 years (including secondary approvals). CONCLUSIONS: The broad range of the late-stage US biopharmaceutical pipeline has significant implications for third-party payers due to their likely premium price, once approved, as well as novel logistical considerations. Payers must prepare for a wide range of clinical, administrative, delivery, and economic issues.


Asunto(s)
Biofarmacia , Drogas en Investigación , Biofarmacia/clasificación , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA