Gender-Affirming Mastectomy: Psychosocial and Surgical Outcomes in Transgender Adults.

BACKGROUND: Limited literature exists examining the effects of gender-affirming mastectomy on transmasculine and nonbinary patients that is prospective and uses validated survey instruments. STUDY DESIGN: The psychosocial functioning of transmasculine and nonbinary patients was compared between patients who underwent gender-affirming mastectomy and those who had not yet undergone surgery. Participants were enrolled in a single-site, combined study of surgical and psychosocial outcomes, including a cross-sectional cohort of preoperative and postoperative patients, as well as separate prospective cohort. Participants completed the BREAST-Q psychosocial and sexual well-being modules, the BODY-Q satisfaction with chest and nipples modules, the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory, the Transgender Congruence Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale before and after surgery. We also examined how patient demographic factors correlated with postoperative surgical and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 111 transmasculine and nonbinary patients 18 to 63 years of age (mean ± SD 26.5 ± 8) underwent mastectomy and were included in the study. All were included in the cross-sectional cohort, and 20 were enrolled in the prospective cohort. More than one-third (34.2%) of patients were nonbinary. After surgery, psychosocial and sexual well-being, satisfaction, body image-related quality of life, and gender congruence were increased (p < 0.001) in both cohorts, and depression (p < 0.009 cross-sectional), and anxiety (p < 0.001 cross-sectional) were decreased. The most common adverse event was hypertrophic scarring, which occurred in 41 (36.9%) participants. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of transmasculine and nonbinary adults, gender-affirming mastectomy was followed by substantial improvements in psychosocial functioning.

The challenging patient in autologous breast reconstruction: obesity, breast ptosis and beyond.

Autologous breast reconstruction has consistently demonstrated excellent patient satisfaction, ideal aesthetic results, and a low risk of complications. With the increasing incidence of breast cancer diagnoses and higher reconstruction rates, surgeons encounter a broader spectrum of patients. Obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction are more likely to experience a surgical complication. While free tissue transfer carries a higher donor site complication rate, implant-based reconstruction carries a higher loss of reconstruction in this population. Additionally, autologous reconstruction consistently demonstrates better patient-reported outcomes. Oncoplastic reconstruction is an oncologically safe alternative to free tissue transfer and implant reconstruction which reduces the risk of complications and the risk of delaying adjuvant therapy. Particularly in obese patients for whom radiation is indicated based on tumor size or nodal involvement, oncoplastic reconstruction is maximally beneficial. The Goldilocks mastectomy is yet another alternative to free tissue transfer or implant reconstruction which carries an acceptable risk profile, especially when augmentation with tissue expander or implant is delayed and performed at a second stage. In patients with breast ptosis undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy, vertical skin reduction allows an acceptable aesthetic result while minimizing the risk for mastectomy flap necrosis (MFN), especially in comparison to Wise pattern skin reduction. If a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is to be performed in the setting of breast ptosis, a nipple delay or a pre-mastectomy reduction/mastopexy is the safest and most conservative approach, but can alter the timeline for primary cancer resection and therefore is predominantly performed in patients with a genetic predisposition or those undergoing a prophylactic mastectomy. Patients with obesity, breast ptosis, advanced age, active smoking history, prior radiation therapy, or abdominal procedures can carry an increased risk of complications and present a challenge to plastic surgeons. We review the most recent literature published regarding reconstruction in these patient groups and seek to provide practical information to help inform clinical decision-making and operative execution.

The Central Mound Pedicle: A Safe and Effective Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty.

BACKGROUND: The central mound technique offers a relatively less common approach for breast reduction. This study evaluated the expected safety and efficacy outcomes using this technique in a large patient series. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing central mound breast reduction at the authors' institution between June of 1999 and November of 2018 was performed. Both bilateral macromastia and unilateral symmetrizing reduction patients were included but evaluated separately for some outcomes. Patient demographics and comorbidities, operative details, postoperative adverse events, and BREAST-Q scores were recorded. Associations between preoperative variables and outcomes were assessed with chi-square tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Kendall tau-b correlations. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients were identified for inclusion (227 bilateral and 98 unilateral; 552 breasts). The average patient age was 46 years, and the average body mass index was 27.4 kg/m. Among the bilateral macromastia patients, the average operative time was 3 hours 34 minutes, and average breast tissue removed was 533 g (right breast) and 560 g (left breast). Among all patients, average follow-up was 169 days. On a per-breast basis for all patients, the following complication rates were observed: seroma, 0.2 percent; hematoma, 1.1 percent; dehiscence, 2.9 percent; infection, 1.5 percent; hypertrophic scar, 4.6 percent; nipple necrosis, 0.4 percent; fat necrosis, 0.9 percent; and skin flap necrosis, 1.7 percent. Using the BREAST-Q Reduction/Mastopexy questions on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, restricted to the bilateral macromastia patient population, all scores improved with statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The central mound pedicle is a safe and effective approach for reduction mammaplasty for both bilateral macromastia patients and unilateral symmetrizing operations. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Postnatal Pancraniosynostosis in a Patient With Infantile Hypophosphatasia.

Hypophosphatasia is a rare metabolic bone disorder that predisposes patients to craniosynostosis. Typically, patients born with hypophosphatasia will exhibit fused cranial sutures at birth. This is the first reported case of delayed onset of pancraniosynostosis in a patient with infantile hypophosphatasia. The severity of onset and delayed presentation in this patient are of interest and should give pause to those care providers who treat and evaluate patients with hypophosphatasia.

A retrospective review of the outcomes of migraine surgery in the adolescent population.

BACKGROUND: Migraine surgery has been studied extensively in adult patients with refractory headaches. The purpose of this study was to review a single surgeon's outcomes following migraine surgery in an adolescent population. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients operated on by the senior author (B.G.) from 2000 to 2014 was performed. All patients aged 18 years or younger with at least 1 year of follow-up after surgery were included. Preoperative and postoperative migraine frequency, duration, severity, and migraine headache days and migraine index were analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients and 15 operations were analyzed. After an average follow-up of 38.2 months, the frequency of migraine headaches per 30-day period was reduced from 25 to 5 (p < 0.0001), the migraine headache index decreased from 148.1 to 12.4 (p < 0.0001), the duration of headaches (number of hours per 24 hours) declined from 0.71 to 0.25 (p = 0.002), severity of headaches diminished from 8.2 to 4.3 (p = 0.0004), and migraine days per month declined from 25 to 5 (p < 0.0001). Five patients remained free of any symptoms following surgery. One patient had no improvement in frequency of headaches, but did have improvement in severity and duration of headaches. No postoperative complications were noted in this group of patients. CONCLUSION: In the adolescent population with migraine headaches refractory to traditional medical management, migraine surgery may offer symptomatic improvement of migraine headache frequency, duration, and severity in patients with identifiable anatomical trigger sites. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.