RESUMEN
Research findings in natural sciences need to be comparable and reproducible to effectively improve our understanding of ecological and behavioural patterns. In this sense, knowledge frontiers in biodiversity studies are directly tied to taxonomic research, especially in species-rich tropical regions. Here we analysed the taxonomic information available in 470 studies on Brazilian ant diversity published in the last 50 years. We aimed to quantify the proportion of studies that provide enough data to validate taxonomic identification, explore the frequency of studies that properly acknowledge their taxonomic background, and investigate the primary resources for ant identification in Brazil. We found that most studies on Brazilian ant diversity (73.6%) explicitly stated the methods used to identify their specimens. However, the proportion of papers that provide complete data for the repository institutions and vouchered specimens is vanishingly small (5.8%). Additionally, only 40.0% of the studies consistently presented taxon authorities and years of description, rarely referencing taxonomic publications correctly. In turn, the number of specialists and institutions consulted for ant identification in Brazil has increased in the last years, along with the number of studies that explicitly provide their taxonomic procedures for ant identification. Our findings highlight a shift between generations regarding the recognition of taxonomy as fundamental science, deepening our understanding of biodiversity.
RESUMEN
The central tendency in ecological studies to explain variations in the outcomes of biotic interactions is to suppose that the majority of meaningful functional diversity occurs at the species level. However, individuals are rarely identical and behavioral ecology shows that consistent individual differences alter the roles that individuals play within populations and possibly communities, but the intraspecific variation is commonly ignored in studies of species interactions. Here, throughout examples of field work studies, we discuss that the knowledge of individual aspects (including genetic variation) and natural history are basic tools and fundamental to a real and whole comprehension of species interaction networks in qualitative and quantitative terms.
A tendência central em estudos ecológicos para explicar as variações nos resultados das interações bióticas é supor que a maioria da diversidade funcional significativa ocorre em nível de espécie. No entanto, indivíduos raramente são idênticos e a ecologia comportamental mostra que as diferenças individuais alteram os papéis que cada um desempenha dentro das populações e possivelmente dentro em comunidades; e essa variação intraespecífica é comumente ignorada em estudos de interações entre espécies. Aqui, por meio de exemplos de estudos de trabalho de campo, discutimos que o conhecimento de aspectos individuais (incluindo a variação genética) e história natural são ferramentas básicas e fundamentais para uma compreensão real e mais ampla sobre redes de interação entre espécies, em termos qualitativos e quantitativos.
