Comparison of Late Toxicity After Whole-pelvis Versus Prostate-only VMAT for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate whether whole-pelvis (WP) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is associated with increased late toxicity compared with prostate-only (PO) VMAT in patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants comprised 384 consecutive patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions from July 2011 to August 2016. Of these, 183 patients received PO-VMAT and 201 patients received initial WP-VMAT to 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were prospectively scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 months (range=16-88 months) in the PO-VMAT group and 52 months (range=10-85 months) in the WP-VMAT group. Frequencies of Grade 3 late GI and GU toxicities were ≤3% across both groups. No patients experienced Grade 4+ toxicity. Cumulative incidences of Grade 2+ late GI and GU toxicities were similar between PO- and WP-VMAT groups (p=0.508 and p=0.838, respectively). Five-year cumulative incidences of Grade 2+ late GI and GU toxicities were 12.2% and 6.6% for the PO-VMAT group and 12.3% and 8.9% for the WP-VMAT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: WP-VMAT did not increase late GI and GU toxicities. This suggests that concerns about increasing toxicity profile are insufficient reason for omitting WPRT for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Long-term outcomes of an esophagus-preserving chemoradiotherapy strategy for patients with endoscopically unresectable stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the long-term outcomes of a multimodal approach for maximum esophagus preservation in operable patients with endoscopically unresectable stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with stage I thoracic ESCC treated with our protocol between 1992 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Our protocol consisted of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by either additional definitive chemoradiotherapy for good responders (CRT group) or surgery for moderate or poor responders (CRT-S group) after an interim appraisal. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were analysed. The median age of the patients was 67 years. The median follow-up period was 124.8 months. After the interim assessment, 49 and 2 cases were assigned to the CRT and CRT-S groups, respectively. In the intent-to-treat analyses, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence for death from esophageal cancer, and that for loss of esophageal function were 78.9%, 53.5%, 10.5%, and 20.4% at 5 years, and 55.2%, 27.8%, 18.2%, and 22.9% at 10 years, respectively. Grade 3 late toxicities occurred with the following incidences: esophageal stenosis in 1 case, esophageal ulcer in 1 case, and pericardial effusion in 2 cases. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival and esophagus preservation outcomes were favorable, with acceptable toxicities. Our results suggest that CCRT is an alternative treatment for majority of operable patients with endoscopically unresectable stage I thoracic ESCC in combination with salvage therapy.

Inter-planner variation in treatment-plan quality of plans created with a knowledge-based treatment planning system.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the inter-planner variation of plan quality in knowledge-based plans created by nine planners. METHODS: Five hypofractionated prostate-only (HPO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans and five whole-pelvis (WP) VMAT plans were created by each planner using a knowledge-based planning (KBP) system. Nine planners were divided into three groups of three planners each: Senior, Junior, and Beginner. Single optimization with only priority modification for all objectives was performed to stay within the dose constraints. The coefficients of variation (CVs) for dosimetric parameters were evaluated, and a plan quality metric (PQM) was used to evaluate comprehensive plan quality. RESULTS: Lower CVs (<0.05) were observed at dosimetric parameters in the planning target volume for both HPO and WP plans, while the CVs in the rectum and bladder for WP plans (<0.91) were greater than those for HPO plans (<0.17). The PQM values of HPO plans for Cases1-5 (average ±â€¯standard deviation) were 41.2 ±â€¯7.1, 40.9 ±â€¯5.6, and 39.9 ±â€¯4.6 in the Senior, Junior, and Beginner groups, respectively. For the WP plans, the PQM values were 51.9 ±â€¯6.3, 47.5 ±â€¯4.3, and 40.0 ±â€¯6.6, respectively. The number of clinically acceptable HPO and WP plans were 13/15 and 11/15 in the Senior group, 13/15 and 10/15 plans in the Junior group, and 8/15 and 2/15 plans in the Beginner group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Inter-planner variation in the plan quality with RapidPlan remains, especially for the complicated VMAT plans, due to planners' heuristics.

Bowel and urinary quality of life after whole-pelvic versus prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare bowel and urinary health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between prostate-only (PO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and whole-pelvis (WP) VMAT in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 234 patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions were enrolled. Of these, 108 patients received PO-VMAT and 126 patients received initial WP-VMAT to 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. HRQOL was prospectively assessed before radiation therapy (baseline), and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). RESULTS: Baseline HRQOL scores did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No significant between-group differences in HRQOL change from baseline were observed for all bowel and urinary EPIC domains. The proportion of patients showing a clinically relevant decrease in bowel and urinary HRQOL scores from baseline was similar between the groups throughout the follow-up period. An analysis of individual HRQOL items showed that patients undergoing WP-VMAT were more likely to report moderate/big problems with bloody stools (P = .039) and overall bowel problems (P = .008) than those undergoing PO-VMAT at 12 months. There was no significant between-group difference in any individual items at 24 months, however. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel and urinary HRQOL is largely similar for patients receiving PO-VMAT and WP-VMAT during 24 months of follow-up, with the only differences seen in responses to specific bowel HRQOL items at 12 months.

Optimal bladder volume at treatment planning for prostate cancer patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate optimal bladder volumes at treatment planning (TP) in prostate cancer patients who undergo volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To determine the minimum value, 122 patients were classified into 6 groups according to the bladder volume at TP: <100 mL (group 1), 100-149 mL (group 2), 150-199 mL (group 3), 200-249 mL (group 4), 250-299 mL (group 5), and ≥300 mL (group 6). Bladder volumes receiving more than 70 Gy (V70Gy) and V50Gy were calculated in each subgroup and compared with the bladder dose-volume constraints specified in our institution. To determine the maximum value, 64 patients who underwent uniform nursing interventions were classified into the same 6 groups. Bladder volumes on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were measured once weekly during treatment, for a total of 8 measurements. Relative bladder volumes (bladder volume on CBCT image [mL]/bladder volume at TP [mL] × 100%) were evaluated in each of the 6 subgroups. RESULTS: The upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals of the mean V70Gy and V50Gy values in group 1 exceeded the dose constraints at our institution. The mean relative bladder volumes were 104%, 91%, 77%, 81%, 63%, and 59% in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The institutional criterion of 70% for the mean relative bladder volume was achieved in groups 1-4, but it could not be achieved in groups 5-6. Therefore, the patients in groups 2-4 met both institutional dose constraints for the bladder at TP and the institutional criterion for the mean relative bladder volume during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal bladder volumes at TP were between 100 and 250 mL in this setting. Nursing intervention needs to be implemented before treatment planning to ensure that patients achieve the optimal bladder volume range.

Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity after whole-pelvic vs prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image guidance for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity rates between whole-pelvic (WP) and prostate-only (PO) volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 224 consecutive patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions were enrolled. Of these, 119 patients received initial WP VMAT at 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique, and 105 patients received PO VMAT. Image-guided radiotherapy was practised with daily cone beam CT. RESULTS: The mean rectal dose, the rectal volume receiving ≥30 Gy (V30Gy), rectal V50Gy, the mean bladder dose, bladder V30Gy and bladder V50Gy were significantly increased in the WP group (p < 0.05 each); however, the rectal V70Gy did not differ between groups (p = 0.101), and the bladder V70Gy was significantly lower in the WP group (p = 0.029). The WP group experienced a significantly increased frequency of acute grade 2 diarrhoea relative to the PO group (5.9% vs 0%; p = 0.015). No differences were seen between the WP and PO groups in terms of acute grade 2 proctitis (10.1% vs 6.7%; p = 0.360) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity (12.6% vs 10.5%; p = 0.620). CONCLUSION: Despite larger rectum and bladder volumes at low- and medium-dose levels, WP VMAT resulted in no significant increase in acute proctitis or GU toxicity when compared with PO VMAT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates that whole-pelvic radiotherapy has comparable acute toxicity to those observed with prostate-only radiotherapy when VMAT with daily image guidance is used.

A treatment-planning comparison of three beam arrangement strategies for stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located lung tumors using volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

The purpose of this study was to determine appropriate beam arrangement for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of patients with centrally located lung tumors. Fifteen consecutive patients with centrally located lung tumors treated at our institution were enrolled. For each patient, three VMAT plans were generated using two coplanar partial arcs (CP VMAT), two non-coplanar partial arcs (NCP VMAT), and one coplanar full arc (Full VMAT). All plans were designed to deliver 70 Gy in 10 fractions. Target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were compared across techniques. PTV coverage was almost identical for all approaches. The whole lung V10Gy was significantly lower with CP VMAT plans than with NCP VMAT plans, whereas no significant differences in the mean lung dose, V5Gy, V20Gy or V40Gy were observed. Full VMAT increased mean contralateral lung V5Gy by 12.57% and 9.15% when compared with NCP VMAT and CP VMAT, respectively. Although NCP VMAT plans best achieved the dose-volume constraints for mediastinal OARs, the absolute differences in dose were small when compared with CP VMAT. These results suggest that partial-arc VMAT may be preferable to minimize unnecessary exposure to the contralateral lung, and use of NCP VMAT should be considered when the dose-volume constraints are not achieved by CP VMAT.

Whole-pelvic volumetric-modulated arc therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: treatment planning and acute toxicity.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate dosimetric quality and acute toxicity of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and daily image guidance in high-risk prostate cancer patients. A total of 100 consecutive high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with definitive VMAT with prophylactic whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) were enrolled. All patients were treated with a double-arc VMAT plan delivering 52 Gy to the prostate planning target volume (PTV), while simultaneously delivering 46.8 Gy to the pelvic nodal PTV in 26 fractions, followed by a single-arc VMAT plan delivering 26 Gy to the prostate PTV in 13 fractions. Image-guided RT was performed with daily cone-beam computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters for the PTV and the organs at risk (OARs), total number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment time were evaluated. Acute toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. All dosimetric parameters met the present plan acceptance criteria. Mean MU and treatment time were 471 and 146 s for double-arc VMAT, respectively, and were 520 and 76 s for single-arc VMAT, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was reported. Acute Grade 2 proctitis, diarrhea, and genitourinary toxicity occurred in 12 patients (12%), 6 patients (6%) and 13 patients (13%), respectively. The present study demonstrated that VMAT for WPRT in prostate cancer results in favorable PTV coverage and OAR sparing with short treatment time and an acceptable rate of acute toxicity. These findings support the use of VMAT for delivering WPRT to high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy targeted to the abdominal lymph node area in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

We investigated whether intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during curative surgery for esophageal carcinoma is useful or not. The cases of 117 patients diagnosed with thoracoabdominal esophageal carcinoma who underwent curative surgery between 1986 and 2007 were reviewed: 72 patients received IORT (IORT group) and 45 did not (non-IORT group). Upper abdominal lymphadenectomy was performed in 115 patients (98.5%). Seventy patients (59.8%) received chemotherapy and 80 patients (68.4%) received external radiotherapy. IORT encompassed the upper abdominal lymph node area. A single-fraction dose of 20-30 Gy was delivered using high-energy electrons. Median follow-up duration for patients was 7.4 years. The 5-year overall survival rate did not significantly differ between the IORT and non-IORT groups. However, the 5-year abdominal control rate was significantly higher in the IORT group (89.2%) than in the non-IORT group (72.9%; P = 0.022). We next focused on a patient subgroup with a primary lesion in the lower thoracic or abdominal esophagus or measuring >6 cm in length since this subgroup is probably at high risk of upper abdominal lymph node metastasis. Of the 117 patients, 75 belonged to this subgroup, and among them 45 received IORT. Both univariate and multivariate analysis revealed the survival rate was significantly higher in patients who received IORT than in those who did not (P = 0.033 univariate; 0.026 multivariate). There were no obvious perioperative complications solely attributed to IORT. IORT for esophageal carcinoma will likely be effective for patients with a primary lesion in the lower thoracic or abdominal esophagus, or with a long lesion.

Successful chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer in an elderly patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

A standard treatment has not yet been established for elderly small-cell lung cancer patients, especially when they have end-stage renal disease. We report the first case of successful chemoradiotherapy in an elderly small-cell lung cancer patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. A 77-year-old Japanese man on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was diagnosed as having limited disease small-cell lung cancer. He received four monthly cycles of chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin at 240 mg/m(2) on day 1 and etoposide at 40 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 3. He underwent additional hemodialysis on days 1 and 3, while continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis continued as usual on the other days. Following chemotherapy, he underwent hyperfractionated radiotherapy to a total dose of 45 Grey, resulting in complete remission of the disease. A pharmacokinetic study showed an area under the concentration-time curve of carboplatin of 3.41 to 4.88 mg.min/mL, increasing gradually over the first three cycles, while etoposide did not show this gradual increase. The increased area under the concentration-time curve of carboplatin may have reflected a worsened renal function during chemotherapy. Despite dose reductions and favorable areas under the concentration-ime curve of carboplatin, the patient suffered grade 3-4 hematological toxicities, necessitating transfusions and a further dose reduction. The patient died of recurrent small-cell lung cancer 19 months after diagnosis.

Treatment results of radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervical esophagus.

The methods and results of treatment for cancer of the cervical esophagus differ from those for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Our objective was to retrospectively review the outcome for cervical esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Twenty-seven patients with carcinoma of the cervical esophagus treated with definitive radiotherapy from 1988 to 2002 were enrolled in the study. Clinical stage (UICC 1997) was stage I in five, II in six, III in 12 and IV in four. Concurrent head and neck malignancy was found in six patients (22%). The mean radiation dose was 66 Gy. Concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) was performed in 23 patients. The actuarial overall survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 55.6%, 37.9% and 37.9%, respectively, with a median survival of 13.9 months. In the patients with stage I, the 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 75% and 75%, respectively. With univariate analysis, only two of the possible prognostic factors were found to actually influence survival: performance status (p < 0.01) and tumor length (p < 0.01). The survival of patients with cervical esophageal cancer remains poor. It is thought that organ preservation is possible by definitive chemoradiation for early cancer.

Change in dose distribution of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy during treatment for lung tumor.

PURPOSE: We investigated the changes in dose distribution of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) during lung tumor treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had undergone planning for radical radiotherapy were selected for study. Computed tomography (CT) examination was performed at two time intervals during the course of conformal radiotherapy: t0 Gy at the time of planning and t40 Gy at 40 Gy of treatment. We transferred all the planned beam data at t0 Gy to each t40 Gy CT image. The isodose distribution was recalculated at time t40 Gy for the same beam characteristics. Variations in volumes and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared for lung, gross target volume (GTV), and planning target volumes (PTV) between t0 Gy and t40 Gy. A paired t-test was performed to compare the DVH between t0 Gy and t40 Gy. RESULTS: The mean minimum doses for t40 y GTV, and PTV were lower than t0 y. However, there was no significant difference between t0 Gy and t40 Gy (p=0.493, 0.378, respectively). There was a patient whose minimum doses of GTV and PTV were decreased and who had notable improvement of lobar atelectasis after 40 Gy of radiotherapy. Comparison of the percent volume of received dose exceeding 20 Gy (V20) and the mean dose for the total lung revealed that t40 Gy was larger than to Gy (p=0.013, 0.012). CONCLUSION: Incorporation of the time factor into 3D treatment planning is mandatory for frequent reiteration of treatment planning during treatment periods. Clearly, more work in this area should be considered.

Treatment results of chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage I (T1N0M0) esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: In 1991, we started a clinical prospective trial for operable esophageal carcinoma, foreseeing organ preservation, to assess the treatment results after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for clinical Stage I (T1N0M0) esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2003, 63 patients were enrolled in this study. Tumor depth was mucosal cancer (T1a) in 23 and submucosal cancer (T1b) in 40. CRT consisted of 55-66 Gy/50-60 fractions (median, 59.4 Gy); from 1 to 3 cycles (median, 2) of concurrent chemotherapy (Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil), followed by high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy 10-12 Gy/2-3 fractions. RESULTS: The 5-year overall and cause-specific and disease-free survival rates were 66.4%, 76.3%, and 63.7%, respectively. The 5-year cause-specific survival rates for T1a and T1b cancer patients were 85.2% and 70.0%, respectively (p = 0.06). The 5-year disease-free survival rates for T1a and T1b were 84.4% and 50.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Esophageal fistula as a late toxicity occurred in 2 patients (G4: 1; G5: 1), and esophageal stricture requiring a liquid diet occurred in 2 patients. Pericardial effusion was observed in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: We confirmed that patients with T1N0M0 esophageal carcinoma had their esophagus preserved in 89.2% of cases after definitive CRT, and the survival rates were equivalent to those of previous reports of surgery.

One-year clinical course following visually guided irrigation for chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the clinical course following visually guided irrigation (VGIR) for chronic closed lock (CCL) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) as well as the factors of importance for clinical outcome. Evaluation emphasis was placed on the period needed for the patients to reach the success criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-one patients with unilateral CCL comprised the study group. The cumulative success rate of VGIR and the additional surgical treatments following VGIR were studied. The 61 patients were divided into either the good outcome (g) group or poor outcome (p) group on the basis of whether they reached the success criteria within 3 months postoperatively, and clinical and arthroscopic factors were correlated with the clinical outcome of VGIR. RESULTS: The cumulative success rate of VGIR increased up to the 6-month follow-up (success rate of 72.1%) but did not change after that point in time. A repeated VGIR (success rate of 87.5%) was performed in 8 patients. Open TMJ surgery (success rate of 87.5%) was performed in 8 patients, 7 of whom had an interfering condylar osteophyte. A pronounced reduction of preoperative painless range of mandibular motion (P-ROM) and advanced osteoarthritis (OA) were more frequently found in the p-group than in the g-group. The multivariate adjusted odds ratio showed that a decreased preoperative P-ROM was significantly predictive for a poor outcome of VGIR. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of VGIR is clinically acceptable as an initial surgical treatment for TMJ CCL. A 6-month follow-up period ought to be sufficient for outcome assessment of VGIR. A pronounced reduction of preoperative P-ROM should be considered as a risk factor for delay of the postoperative improvement, and OA changes may sometimes affect the clinical outcome of VGIR.

Close radiographic landmarks for spinal cord localization in treatment of thoracic malignancy.

BACKGROUND: On simulation radiographs of oblique fields, the spinal canal is estimated to be located on the deep surface of the tangential parts of the vertebral laminae within a width of the oblique diameter of the spinal canal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the estimated location of the spinal canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beam's eye view digital simulation radiographs were produced using actual patient data from a computed tomography (CT) scanner. The spinal canal was projected onto the Beam's eye view image, and measurement of the distance between the tangential parts of the vertebral laminae and the anterior border of the spinal canal was performed. The oblique diameter on the axial CT image was compared to the measured distance. RESULTS: In all 10 patients, the tangential parts of the vertebral laminae were detectable on the Beam's eye view image. At all levels in all patients, the oblique diameter was slightly larger than or equal to the distance. With a gantry angle of 30 degrees the difference ranged from 0 to 2.5 mm (mean, 1.2 mm), from 0 to 1.0 mm (mean, 0.4 mm), and from 0 to 1.5 mm (mean, 0.4 mm) at levels T-1, T-4, and T-7, respectively. With a gantry angle of 45 degrees the difference ranged from 0 to 1.5 mm (mean, 0.8 mm), from 0 to 0.5 mm (mean, 0.3 mm), and from 0 to 1.0 mm (mean, 0.4 mm), respectively. CONCLUSION: The tangential parts of the vertebral laminae are useful landmarks, since the spinal canal location estimated using the tangential parts and measured oblique diameter of the spinal canal on the axial CT image is sufficiently accurate.

Monitoring of respiratory movement of the diaphragm for gated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In order to obtain a respiratory signal for gated radiotherapy, diaphragm movement was monitored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To obtain the diaphragm signal, an image brightness stabilizer for fluoroscopy of an X-ray simulator was used. The image brightness stabilizer output electric current in response to image brightness, which changed with diaphragm movement. The electric current was recorded as the diaphragm signal and compared with the abdominal wall signal, which was obtained by monitoring the height of the abdominal wall using a laser displacement sensor. RESULTS: A regular diaphragm signal was obtained in all of nine patients. At 70% expiration of the abdominal wall signal, the diaphragm signal ranged from 35% to 70% expiration (median, 55%). At 30% inspiration of the abdominal wall signal, the diaphragm signal ranged from 10% to 30% inspiration (median, 20%). CONCLUSION: A regular diaphragm signal could be conveniently obtained utilizing an image brightness stabilizer. The diaphragm signal tended to be delayed in comparison with the abdominal wall signal.

Backward distraction osteogenesis of condylar segment in patient with mandibular ramus deficiency--report of a case.

A backward distraction osteogenesis (BDO) of the condylar segment for treatment of mandibular ramus deficiency was developed. This report describes the clinical progress of a patient with mandibular ramus deficiency in whom satisfactory occlusion was achieved and maintained by gradual posterosuperior repositioning of the displaced condyles into the glenoid fossae during intermaxillary fixation. Findings of pre- and postoperative clinical and magnetic resonance imaging indicate that the effect of BDO on the temporomandibular joint was negligible.

Visually guided temporomandibular joint irrigation in patients with chronic closed lock: clinical outcome and its relationship to intra-articular morphologic changes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after visually guided irrigation (VGIR) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and its relationship with postoperative arthroscopic changes. STUDY DESIGN: Of the original 69 patients, thirty patients (30 TMJs) underwent VGIR of the TMJ a second time. After the first VGIR, the clinical outcome was assessed, and 18 patients were assigned to the good outcome group. The remaining 12 patients were assigned to the poor outcome group. The arthroscopic findings related to the articular surface, synovial lining, and fibrous adhesion scores were recorded. Then, the arthroscopic findings in the first and second VGIR were compared. RESULTS: The intra-articular tissue status between the first and second VGIR was unchanged in approximately 40% of all joints. No significant differences with respect to an improvement in tissue status were found when the good outcome and poor outcome groups were compared. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic closed lock of the TMJ, a clinical improvement after VGIR does not seem to be accompanied by improved intra-articular tissue status.

Inhomogeneity correction in radiotherapy for lung cancer in multicenter clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Dose distribution in patients in past multicenter clinical trials was reviewed from the perspective of clinicians to evaluate the quality of treatment and to improve the quality of future clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with stage III lung cancer, who had undergone radical radiation therapy in multicenter clinical trials were retrospectively reviewed. A two-dimensional treatment planning system using Clarkson integration was used to calculate correction factors at the primary lesions and at the mediastinal lymph nodes. RESULTS: Correction factors at the primary lesions ranged from 1.00 to 1.12 (mean, 1.06) and from 1.02 to 1.14 (mean, 1.06) in the AP/PA fields and in the oblique fields, respectively. The lowest values of correction factors at the mediastinal lymph nodes on the axial plane including the primary lesions ranged from 0.93 to 1.04 (mean, 0.98) and from 0.97 to 1.10 (mean, 1.02) in the AP/PA fields and in the oblique fields, respectively. In 14 patients whose primary tumor was located in the upper lung field, the correction factors at the subcarinal lymph nodes ranged from 0.90 to 1.01 (mean, 0.96) in the AP/PA fields. CONCLUSION: Delivered doses lower than those prescribed at the mediastinal lymph nodes should be taken into consideration to improve the quality of multicenter clinical trials.

Reirradiation for locally recurrent lung cancer previously treated with radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Local recurrence of lung cancer after previous external beam irradiation poses some problems for subsequent management. We retrospectively reviewed our series of patients with local recurrence of lung cancer to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reirradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1979 and 2000, 34 patients with local recurrence of lung cancer were retreated with external radiation. There were 29 males and 5 females ranging in age from 38 to 85 years (median: 69 years). At the time of reirradiation, the clinical stage was I or II in 2 patients, IIIa in 5 patients, IIIb in 14 patients, and IV in 13 patients. Reirradiation was performed in 18 patients with the aim of achieving a cure or prolongation of survival (radical treatment), while 16 patients were treated for improvement of their symptoms (symptomatic treatment). RESULTS: The median interval between the initial radiation therapy and reirradiation was 23 months, with a range of 5 to 87 months. The dose of initial irradiation delivered to the tumor ranged from 30 to 80 Gy (median: 60 Gy) in 1.5--2.0-Gy fractions per day. During reirradiation, it ranged from 10 to 70 Gy (median: 50 Gy) in 1.8--3.0-Gy fractions per day. The cumulative dose delivered to the tumor by treatments of both initial and second irradiation ranged from 56.5 to 150 Gy (median: 110 Gy). A response was observed in 14 out of 18 patients given radical treatment (complete response, 6; partial response, 8). Twelve of the 16 patients (75%) given symptomatic treatment also showed a symptomatic benefit. The overall survival rate after reirradiation was 43% at 1 year and 27% at 2 years, with a median survival time of 8 months. The median survival time after radical treatment was 15 months, with a range of 3 to 58 months, whereas that after symptomatic treatment was 3 months, with a range of 1 to 14 months. Six long-term survivors lived for more than 20 months. Reirradiation-induced toxicity included symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in 19 patients and symptomatic radiation esophagitis in 6 patients. These toxicities were not fatal, and radiation myelopathy was not caused by reirradiation. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, external beam reirradiation can achieve satisfactory results for local recurrence of lung cancer provided that attention is paid to the possible hazards.