Gender Biases Toward People With Difficulty in Balancing Work and Family Due to ADHD: Two Case Vignette Randomized Studies Featuring Japanese Laypersons and Psychiatrists.

Objective The gender gap in labor force participation is likely larger in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) than that in the general population. Thus, we investigated whether gender affected the perception toward persons displaying ADHD symptoms and experiencing difficulty in balancing work and family. Methods Both Japanese laypersons and psychiatrists were recruited for web-based surveys in March and October 2020 via an online survey company, Cross Marketing Inc., and the secretariat of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology, respectively. The participants were randomly assigned to read either a male or female case vignette. The vignettes were identical, except for the gender of the patient in the case. The primary and secondary outcomes were the respondents' opinions on the seriousness of the case and the degree to which the case's wish should be maintained, using sliding scales of 0-100. Results We included 560 laypersons and 585 psychiatrists. Neither cohort differed in most outcomes between the groups assigned to the male and female case vignettes. Among laypersons, the average score of seriousness was 58.8 in the female-vignette group and 58.6 in the male-vignette group (mean difference, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, -4.9 to 5.2). Among psychiatrists, the average score of seriousness was 53.9 in the female-vignette group and 53.7 in the male-vignette group (mean difference, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, -3.1 to 3.4). Similarly, between-group differences in the opinions on the degree to which the case's wish should be maintained were 1.2 in laypersons and 0.63 in psychiatrists. We found no significant interaction between the gender of the case and the respondent's gender in any of the outcomes. Conclusion Our results did not support the hypothesis that women were more likely to be pressured to prioritize family over work than men were when there was difficulty balancing work and family due to ADHD symptoms.

Development and preliminary validation of the Group Cognitive Therapy Scale.

Aim: The aim of this research was to create a scale to assess the competency of therapists who conduct group cognitive behavioral therapy (G-CBT). The scale is intended to serve as a tool to aid the training of therapists. Methods: Three stepped studies were conducted. Process 1: Through literature review and experts' consensus process, essential skills for G-CBT were articulated and categorized according to the criteria of the Cognitive Therapy Scale, a well-established rating scale for evaluating clinicians' skills in individual cognitive behavioral therapy. The list of those skills was organized into a rating scale. Process 2: Behavioral anchors were added to each skill and were classified by the levels of difficulty (beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels), based on the rating by G-CBT experts. Process 3: Inter-rater reliability and validity of the rating scale were examined in a sample of 41 videotaped G-CBT sessions of actual clinical sessions and educational role-plays. Results: The 12-item Group Cognitive Therapy Scale (G-CTS) was developed. It consists of 11 items that are adapted from the original Cognitive Therapy Scale, and a new 12th item called "Intervention using relationships with other participants," which describes therapists' skills to address group dynamics. The G-CTS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.95), satisfactory inter-rater reliability (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.65-0.88), and high predictive validity. Conclusion: A novel rating scale to evaluate therapists' competency in G-CBT was developed and successfully validated. The G-CTS behavioral checklist created in this study provides concrete guidelines that can be used by therapists to hone their skills in G-CBT.

Efficacy of Group Cognitive Behavior Therapy Targeting Time Management for Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Japan: A Randomized Control Pilot Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Time-processing disorders in adults is a priority area for intervention. Time management program, which has been demonstrated to be effective in children with ADHD, has not been examined in adults. We anticipate the need for the development of specialized programs for adults. This is because it has been reported that time processing disorders have different patterns in childhood and adulthood. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of a gCBT program focusing on time management for adults with ADHD. METHOD: Adults with ADHD were randomly assigned to gCBT (n = 24) or a treatment as usual group (n = 24). Outcome measures were masked clinically rated, self-reported, and family-reported ADHD symptoms. RESULTS: The gCBT group significantly reduced ADHD symptoms on all measures. CONCLUSION: Interventions focused on time management have been shown to be effective not only in children with ADHD but also in adult patients.