RESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is more prevalent in south-central Asian countries, particularly the Afghan population. Screening for CRC in the Afghan population has always been challenging, primarily due to the tribal and social cultures, lack of facilities, and lack of education. The United States (US) will soon face a significantly massive influx of Afghan refugees. It becomes imperative to initiate and implement effective measures regarding CRC screening in these refugee populations. The current review article aims to identify the most likely challenges faced for CRC screening in this Afghan refugee population in the US and address the possible measures to overcome these challenges.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Primary peritoneal mesothelioma (PPM) is a rare and aggressive tumor arising from the visceral and parietal peritoneum. The diagnosis and treatment of PPM are often delayed because of non-specific clinical presentation, and the prognosis is worse. The current study investigated the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors affecting patient prognosis and survival in PPM. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data of 1998 patients with PPM were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975-2016). The chi-square test, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The majority of PPM patients were male (56.2%, p < 0.005) and Caucasian (90.4%, p < 0.005, with a mean age of diagnosis was 69 ± 13 years. The grading, histological, and tumor size information were classified as "Unknown" in most of the cases, but when available, poorly differentiated tumors (8.7%), malignant mesothelioma, not otherwise specified (63.4%) and tumors > 4 cm in size (8%), respectively, were most common, p < 0.005. Chemotherapy was administered to 50.6% of patients, followed by resection (29.2%) and radiation (1.5%), p < 0.001. The cohort of PPM had a five-year overall survival of 20.3% (±1.1), compared to 43.5% (±5.9), 25.9% (± 8.4), and 18.7% (±1.6) for those with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy alone, respectively. Poor differentiation (OR = 4.2, CI = 3.3-4.9), tumor size > 4 cm (OR = 3.9, CI = 3.2-4.5), Caucasian race (OR = 2.9, CI = 2.6-4.4), and distant SEER stage (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.1-3.2) were all linked with increased mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An extremely rare and aggressive peritoneal tumor, PPM may be difficult to identify at the time of diagnosis. Radiation therapy likely to have a limited function in the treatment of this condition, with surgery and chemotherapy being the primary choices. All PPM patients should be enrolled in a nationwide registry to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and identify factors affecting survival.
RESUMEN
The prognosis of cutaneous melanoma (CM) is based on the histological characteristics of the primary tumor, such as Breslow depth, ulceration, and mitotic rate. The lymph node ratio (LNR) is the ratio of the involved lymph nodes (LNs) divided by the total number of LNs removed during regional LN dissection. LNR is a prognostic factor for many solid tumors; however, controversies exist regarding CM. This study sought to analyze the role of LNR as a prognostic factor in CM. An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials from January 1966 to July 2015. The keywords included in the search were CM and inclusion of the ratio of positive to the total number of LNs as a prognostic factor. The outcomes analyzed included the number of patients with positive LNs, type of survival analysis, and results from the multivariate analysis. A total of 11 studies involving 12,011 patients with positive LNs were evaluated. No previous randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews were identified in the Cochrane database on the prognostic value of LNR in CM. The primary electronic database search resulted in 333 full-text articles. The LN location examined was the cervical, axillary, and inguinal regions in all studies except for one that examined only the inguinal region. All studies except three studied the prognostic value of the LNR as a categorical variable rather than a continuous variable. LNR was categorized as A (≤0.1), B (0.11-0.25), and C (>0.25). All studies identified LNR as an independent predictor of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or disease-specific survival (DSS). The hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI) associated with either DFS or OS were available only in a few studies. Moreover, pooled HR for OS was 2.08 (95% CI: 1.48 2.92), for DFS was 1.364 (95% CI: 0.92-2.02), and for DSS was 1.643 (95% CI: 0.89-3.0). The LNR provides superior prognostic stratification among patients with CM. Additional adequately powered prospective studies are needed to further define the role of LNR and be included in the staging system of CM and direct adjuvant therapy.
RESUMEN
Introduction Klatskin tumors (KTs) occur at the confluence of the right and left extrahepatic ducts and are classified based on their anatomical and histological codes in the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O). The second edition of the ICD-O (ICD-O-2) allocated a distinctive histological code to KT, which also included intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC). This unclear coding may result in ambiguous reporting of the demographic and clinical features of KT. The current study aimed to investigate the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors affecting the prognosis and survival of KT in the light of the updated third edition of ICD-O, Ninth Revision (ICD-O-3). Methods Data of 1,144 patients with KT from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database (2001-2012) were extracted. Patients with KT were analyzed for age, sex, race, stage, treatment, and long-term survival. The data were analyzed using chi-square tests, t-tests, and univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare long-term survival between KT and subgroups of all biliary CCs. Results Of all biliary CCs, KT comprised 9.35%, with a mean age of diagnosis of 73±13 years, and was more common in men (54.8%) and Caucasian patients (69.5%). Histologically, moderately differentiated tumors were the most common (38.9%) followed by poorly differentiated (35.7%), well-differentiated (23.3%), and undifferentiated tumors (2.2%) (p<0.001). Most tumors in the KT group were 2-4 cm in size (41.5%), while fewer were >4 cm (29.7%) and <2 cm (28.8%) (p<0.001). ICD-O-3 defined most KTs in extrahepatic location (53.5%), while the remainder were in other biliary locations (46.5%) (p<0.001). Most KT patients received no treatment (73%), and for those who were treated, the most frequent modality was radiation (52.7%), followed by surgery (28.1%), and both surgery and radiation (19.2%) (p<0.001). Mean survival time for KT patients treated with surgery was inferior to all CCs of the biliary tree (1.72±2.61 vs. 1.87±2.18 years) (p=0.047). Multivariate analysis identified regional metastasis (OR=2.8; 95% CI=2.6-3.0), distant metastasis (OR=2.1; 95% CI=1.9-2.4), lymph node positivity (OR=1.6; 95% CI=1.4-1.8), Caucasian race (OR=2.0; 95% CI=1.8-2.2), and male sex (OR=1.2; 95% CI=1.1-1.3) were independently associated with increased mortality for KT (p<0.001). Conclusion The ICD-O-3 has permitted a greater understanding of KT. KT is a rare and lethal biliary malignancy that presents most often in Caucasian men in their seventh decade of life with moderately differentiated histology. Surgical resection does not provide any survival advantage compared to similarly treated biliary CCs. In addition, the combination of surgery and radiation appeared to provide no added survival benefits compared to other treatment modalities for KT.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Uterine cancer (UC) is one of the leading gynecologic neoplastic disorders in the United States (US), of which over 80% are endometrioid adenocarcinomas (EA). In contrast to EA, carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus is a sporadic and highly malignant tumor, phylogenetically containing both epithelial and mesenchymal histologic elements. This study sought to analyze demographic, pathological retrospectively, and survival characteristics of a large cohort of CS patients compared to EA patients to identify prognostic factors and treatment approaches that may improve the current clinical management of CS patients. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from 88,530 patients diagnosed with uterine malignancy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for 38 years (1973-2010). Extracted variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis, while Kaplan-Meier functions were used to compare survival between groups. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS©), version 20.2 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: A total of 3,706 cases of CS comprised 38.2% of uterine sarcomas (n=9,702), and 4.1% of uterine cancers overall (n=88,530). EA made up 88.6% (n=78,481) of all uterine cancers. CS patients presented later in life (68.3±11.5 years) than EA (61.9±12.5 years). 65.2% of CS and 77.8% of EA occurred in Caucasians. The incidence (per million) of EA was higher in Caucasians compared to African-Americans (AA) (41% vs. 26.8%), while the incidence of CS was higher among AA than Caucasians (4% vs. 1.9%, p<0.001). 33.4% of CS was poorly differentiated at presentation, compared to 13.1% of EA. 27.8% of CS patients presented with a distant disease compared to only 4.7% of EA patients. 29.9% of AA patients with CS presented with metastatic disease, compared to 28.2% of Caucasian patients (p<0.001). Mean survival for CS patients (6.6±0.2 years) was significantly lower than that of EA patients (17.7±0.7 years, p<0.001), and AA CS patients had significantly lower survival than Caucasians CS patients (4.5±0.4 years vs. 7.1±0.3 years, p<0.001). CS patients treated with combined surgery and radiotherapy had the highest survival (9.4±0.5 years, p<0.001), while EA patients treated with surgery alone had the highest survival (20.4±1.2 years, p<0.001). Survival among AA CS patients treated with combination therapy was significantly inferior compared to Caucasians (6.5±0.6 years vs. 9.8±0.5 years, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified CS histology (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, CI=1.7-2.1), AA race (OR 1.3, CI=1.2-1.4), age over 40 (OR 3.4, CI=2.9-4.1), undifferentiated grade (OR 3.0, CI=2.6-3.4), and distant metastases (OR 6.2, CI=5.8-6.8) as independently associated with increased mortality (p<0.005). The use of radiotherapy in CS patients was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.1, CI=0.02-0.6, p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Uterine CS is a highly malignant tumor with a significantly worse prognosis than EA. AA has a considerably higher CS incidence compared to EA. Moreover, AA CS had higher tumor grades, higher rates of metastatic disease, and experienced significantly lower overall survival compared to Caucasians despite receiving similar therapy. Primary radiotherapy or combination radiotherapy confers a survival advantage to AA uterine CS patients.