Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Oxygen With Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Alone on Reintubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: High-flow nasal oxygen may prevent postextubation respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU). The combination of high-flow nasal oxygen with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be an optimal strategy of ventilation to avoid reintubation. Objective: To determine whether high-flow nasal oxygen with prophylactic NIV applied immediately after extubation could reduce the rate of reintubation, compared with high-flow nasal oxygen alone, in patients at high risk of extubation failure in the ICU. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted from April 2017 to January 2018 among 641 patients at high risk of extubation failure (ie, older than 65 years or with an underlying cardiac or respiratory disease) at 30 ICUs in France; follow-up was until April 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to high-flow nasal oxygen alone (n = 306) or high-flow nasal oxygen alternating with NIV (n = 342) immediately after extubation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reintubated at day 7; secondary outcomes included postextubation respiratory failure at day 7, reintubation rates up until ICU discharge, and ICU mortality. Results: Among 648 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 70 [10] years; 219 women [34%]), 641 patients completed the trial. The reintubation rate at day 7 was 11.8% (95% CI, 8.4%-15.2%) (40/339) with high-flow nasal oxygen and NIV and 18.2% (95% CI, 13.9%-22.6%) (55/302) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone (difference, -6.4% [95% CI, -12.0% to -0.9%]; P = .02). Among the 11 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 showed no significant difference. The proportion of patients with postextubation respiratory failure at day 7 (21% vs 29%; difference, -8.7% [95% CI, -15.2% to -1.8%]; P = .01) and reintubation rates up until ICU discharge (12% vs 20%, difference -7.4% [95% CI, -13.2% to -1.8%]; P = .009) were significantly lower with high-flow nasal oxygen and NIV than with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. ICU mortality rates were not significantly different: 6% with high-flow nasal oxygen and NIV and 9% with high-flow nasal oxygen alone (difference, -2.4% [95% CI, -6.7% to 1.7%]; P = .25). Conclusions and Relevance: In mechanically ventilated patients at high risk of extubation failure, the use of high-flow nasal oxygen with NIV immediately after extubation significantly decreased the risk of reintubation compared with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03121482.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy alone or with non-invasive ventilation during the weaning period after extubation in ICU: the prospective randomised controlled HIGH-WEAN protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Recent practice guidelines suggest applying non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to prevent postextubation respiratory failure in patients at high risk of extubation failure in intensive care unit (ICU). However, such prophylactic NIV has been only a conditional recommendation given the low certainty of evidence. Likewise, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has been shown to reduce reintubation rates as compared with standard oxygen and to be as efficient as NIV in patients at high risk. Whereas HFNC may be considered as an optimal therapy during the postextubation period, HFNC associated with NIV could be an additional means of preventing postextubation respiratory failure. We are hypothesising that treatment associating NIV with HFNC between NIV sessions may be more effective than HFNC alone and may reduce the reintubation rate in patients at high risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing HFNC alone or with NIV sessions during the postextubation period in patients at high risk of extubation failure in the ICU. Six hundred patients will be randomised with a 1:1 ratio in two groups according to the strategy of oxygenation after extubation. The primary outcome is the reintubation rate within the 7 days following planned extubation. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients who meet the criteria for moderate/severe respiratory failure, ICU length of stay and mortality up to day 90. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee and patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03121482.

Pleth variability index predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the pleth variability index, a noninvasive and continuous tool, can predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory insufficiency. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory insufficiency in whom volume expansion was planned by attending physician. Exclusion criteria included spontaneous respiratory activity, cardiac arrhythmia, known intracardiac shunt, severe hypoxemia (Pao2/Fio2 <100 mm Hg), contraindication for passive leg raising, left ventricular ejection fraction of <50%, and hemodynamic instability during the procedure. INTERVENTIONS: Fluid challenge with 500 mL of 130/0.4 hydroxyethyl-starch if respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure were ≥ 13% or with passive leg raising if variations in arterial pulse pressure were <13%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pleth variability index, variations in arterial pulse pressure, and cardiac output estimated by echocardiography were recorded before and after fluid challenge. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in cardiac output of ≥ 15%. Twenty-one patients were responders and 19 were nonresponders. Mean ± sd pleth variability index (28% ± 13% vs. 11% ± 4%) and arterial pulse pressure variation (22% ± 11% vs. 5% ± 2%) values at baseline were significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders. The pleth variability index threshold value of 17% allowed discrimination between responders and nonresponders with a sensitivity of 95% (95% confidence interval, 74% to 100%) and a specificity of 91% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 99%). The pleth variability index at baseline correlated (r = .72, p < .0001) with the percentage change in cardiac output induced by fluid challenge, suggesting that a higher pleth variability index at baseline will correlate with a higher percentage change in cardiac output after volume expansion. CONCLUSIONS: The pleth variability index can predict fluid responsiveness noninvasively in intensive care unit patients under mechanical ventilation.

Indwelling time and risk of colonization of peripheral arterial catheters in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the lack of evidence to support routine scheduled replacement of peripheral arterial catheters this practice continues to be widely used in many intensive care units (ICU). This study evaluated whether additional risks of catheter colonization are incurred with a conservative attitude in severely ill patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study over a 18-month period in a 15-bed surgical ICU of a 1,000-bed French university-affiliated hospital. CATHETERS: A total of 295 peripheral arterial catheters were inserted in 295 patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hazard rates of catheters colonization (defined as quantitative culture of a catheter tip showing at least one microorganism at a concentration of 1,000 or more colony-forming units per milliliter) according to indwelling time were determined over 5-day periods by survival analysis. The mean indwelling time was 8 +/- 6 days (median 6 days). Overall, 47 (16%) colonization episodes were diagnosed, leading to catheter colonization incidence density of 19.9 per 1,000 catheter-days. Risk factors for catheters colonization increase in proportion to the duration of catheter use. Hazard rates of catheter colonization were 1.0, 1.9, 3.5, 7.0, 6.0 and 5.7%, for the 111 arterial catheters left in place for 4 days or less, 5-9 days (87 catheters), 10-14 days (55 catheters), 15-19 days (27 catheters), 20-24 days (10 catheters) and more than 24 days (5 catheters). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic replacement of peripheral arterial catheters might be useful in preventing catheter-related colonization, especially after 2 weeks of use.

Protected telescopic catheter also allows anaerobic bacteria isolation in patients with ventilatory-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the possibility of isolating anaerobic bacteria using protected telescopic catheter (PTC) in patients with ventilatory-associated pneumonia. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective epidemiological study in a 12-bed intensive care unit. PATIENTS: 104 patients with suspected ventilatory-associated pneumonia undergoing PTC for microbiological determination including specific methods for anaerobic bacteria identification (mean age 59.3, range 17-82; SAPS II 44.6+/-17.9). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We performed 156 PTC procedures. Of the 14 cases ventilatory-associated pneumonia occurred early in 6 and in 8 late. In 52 samples at least one bacteria was isolated (33.3%). Of the 156 samples 14 yielded with anaerobic bacteria, representing 26.9% of the positive samples and 9% of all the samples. CONCLUSION: Considering the potential pathogenic role of anaerobic bacteria in patients with ventilatory-associated pneumonia, the possibility of isolating these bacteria using PTC and taking into account its easiness and limited side effects should be underlined.