Patterns of practice regarding surgical site infection prevention in head & neck surgery: An international survey.

INTRODUCTION: Head & neck surgery encompasses a variety of surgical approaches for benign and malignant conditions. Due to the complexity in treating patients with head and neck pathology, it is necessary to adhere to basic surgical principles to decrease complications. Among them, surgical site infection can be prevented using a surgery quality protocol including the correct use of antibiotics and optimization of nutritional status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent through the YO-IFOS and SEORL-CCC international mailing list. RESULTS: A total of 435 surgeons completed the survey. Of the respondents, 97.7% confirm that they scrub their hands before surgery, 40.9% respondents recommend nutritional support according to sign and symptoms, 60.9% use of antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery and just 9.2% use clindamycin in combination. CONCLUSION: This survey has broadened the scope regarding H&N surgical safety around the globe. Identifying innovative ways in which surgical care may be improved is mandatory.

Patterns of practice regarding surgical site infection prevention in head & neck surgery: An international survey

IntroductionHead & neck surgery encompasses a variety of surgical approaches for benign and malignant conditions. Due to the complexity in treating patients with head and neck pathology, it is necessary to adhere to basic surgical principles to decrease complications. Among them, surgical site infection can be prevented using a surgery quality protocol including the correct use of antibiotics and optimization of nutritional status.Materials and methodsA survey was sent through the YO-IFOS and SEORL-CCC international mailing list.ResultsA total of 435 surgeons completed the survey. Of the respondents, 97.7% confirm that they scrub their hands before surgery, 40.9% respondents recommend nutritional support according to sign and symptoms, 60.9% use of antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery and just 9.2% use clindamycin in combination.ConclusionThis survey has broadened the scope regarding H&N surgical safety around the globe. Identifying innovative ways in which surgical care may be improved is mandatory. (AU)

IntroducciónLa cirugía de cabeza y cuello abarca una variedad de técnicas quirúrgicas dirigidas al tratamiento de un grupo de enfermedades benignas y malignas. Debido a la complejidad en el tratamiento de este tipo de pacientes el uso de protocolos quirúrgicos va a permitir disminuir las diversas complicaciones, entre ellas la infección del sitio quirúrgico, que será posible prevenirla mediante la adopción de protocolos de control quirúrgico que incluya, por ejemplo, el uso correcto de antibióticos y la optimización del estado nutricional.Materiales y métodosPara este estudio se envió una encuesta a través de la lista de correo electrónico del grupo internacional YO-IFOS y de la SEORL-CCC.ResultadosUn total de 435 cirujanos completaron la encuesta. El 97,7% de los encuestados confirmó practicar el lavado de manos antes de la cirugía, el 40,9% refirió recomendar el apoyo nutricional en el periodo perioperatorio según los signos y síntomas del paciente, el 60,9% refirió utilizar profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía limpia y solo el 9,2% utilizar clindamicina en combinación.ConclusiónEsta encuesta intenta analizar el alcance de los protocolos de seguridad quirúrgica a nivel mundial, con la intención de identificar formas innovadoras de mejorar los resultados quirúrgicos en cirugía de cabeza y cuello. (AU)

A Retrospective Clinical Audit of Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Multiple Disabilities in Comparison with Normal Implantees: A South Indian Experience.

AIMS: Cochlear implantation (CI) is established as a standard remedy for children with congenital bilateral profound hearing loss to attain hearing perception and thereby develop speech and language. A subgroup includes children with multiple disabilities in whom the implant helps to improve their quality of life and also of their families via enhanced communication skills. Cochlear implants today form an integral part of their multi-handicap rehabilitation process. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out on children with and without multiple handicaps who have received cochlear implantation at the cochlear implant clinic of MERF, Chennai, India over the past decade. Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scores, Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores, and also Meaningful Auditory-Integration Scale (MAIS) and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) scores were compared at set time frequencies of 6 months and 12 months post-implantation between the two groups of implanted children. RESULTS: All the four CAP, SIR, MAIS and MUSS scores showed improvement over time with auditory and speech therapy in both groups of children as reflected by the improvement in their quality of life. The normative group of implantees showed better improvement compared to the group of children with multiple disabilities. CONCLUSION: Intensive habilitation is essential especially for children with multiple disabilities who have received cochlear implantation in which their special needs are addressed individually and optimised for the best outcome. The study shows that restoration of the special sense of hearing helps as a remedy to alleviate their other multi-handicaps to a notable extent.

A clinical profile of revision cochlear implant surgery: MERF experience.

Objective: To study the prevalence of revision cochlear implant study in a tertiary care referral center. To assess the various indications and surgical outcomes of revision cochlear implant surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of revision cochlear implant surgery done from June 1997 to December 2019. All the surgeries that were done in children of 12 years and below were included. The revision surgeries were either with or without explantation and reimplantation. The causes included were device failures, electrode extrusion/malposition, magnet migration, persistent foreign body reaction, facial twitching, wound infection, and cholesteatoma. Results: A total of 1636 pediatric cochlear implantation surgery were performed during the study period of 22 years. There were 94 (5.7%) revision surgeries done for various indications during this period. Out of them, 67 patients (71.3%) had device failure thus being the commonest indication for revision surgery, followed by infection in 12.8% of the total patients. Among the total revision, 81 (86.2%) patients had explantation and reimplantation of the new device. Conclusion: Indications of revision cochlear implant surgery are manifold that can be either device-related or patient-related. Revision surgery needs a highly skilled and experienced team of surgeons, audiologists, and habilitationists for achieving optimal results.

International registry of otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: It has become clear that healthcare workers are at high risk, and otolaryngology has been theorized to be among the highest risk specialties for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of this study was to detail the international impact of COVID-19 among otolaryngologists, and to identify instructional cases. METHODS: Country representatives of the Young Otolaryngologists-International Federation of Otolaryngologic Societies (YO-IFOS) surveyed otolaryngologists through various channels. Nationwide surveys were distributed in 19 countries. The gray literature and social media channels were searched to identify reported deaths of otolaryngologists from COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 361 otolaryngologists were identified to have had COVID-19, and data for 325 surgeons was available for analysis. The age range was 25 to 84 years, with one-half under the age of 44 years. There were 24 deaths in the study period, with 83% over age 55 years. Source of infection was likely clinical activity in 175 (54%) cases. Prolonged exposure to a colleague was the source for 37 (11%) surgeons. Six instructional cases were identified where infections occurred during the performance of aerosol-generating operations (tracheostomy, mastoidectomy, epistaxis control, dacryocystorhinostomy, and translabyrinthine resection). In 3 of these cases, multiple operating room attendees were infected, and in 2, the surgeon succumbed to complications of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The etiology of reported cases within the otolaryngology community appear to stem equally from clinical activity and community spread. Multiple procedures performed by otolaryngologists are aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) and great care should be taken to protect the surgical team before, during, and after these operations.