RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The process of carving an auricular framework is technically challenging and unique to the patient. As such, there is a need for a robust and reliable training model for practicing and planning ear reconstruction. The aim of this study is to assess the best models and methods available to practice the carving of an auricular framework. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Terms such as "ear", "reconstruction" and "teaching" were searched. RESULTS: A total of 354 articles were identified, and 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Vegetables, animal tissue, synthetic materials, as well as more advanced methods such as 3D-printed moulds, were analysed. The similarity of these materials to human costal cartilage was investigated to determine the best or most suitable ones for the purpose. The methods used in the studies were also analysed. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, it was not possible to conduct a quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION: This review identifies that for the junior surgeons at the skill acquisition phase of their training in auricular framework carving repetition using firstly a cheap synthetic material would be most useful, followed by animal cartilage or 3D printing using silicone. These materials bear the most resemblance to human costal cartilage, and by repeating the carvings, proficiency will improve. Those surgeons with an established ear reconstruction practise, wishing to undertake immediate pre-operatively simulation could benefit from cross-sectional imaging and 3D printing of a patient's non-affected ear to ensure a good match.