RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic malformations are vascular developmental anomalies varying from local superficial masses to diffuse infiltrating lesions, resulting in disfigurement. Patients' outcomes range from spontaneous regression to severe sequelae notwithstanding appropriate treatment. The current classification guides, in part, clinicians through the decision-making process, prognosis prediction and choice of therapeutic strategies. Even though the understanding of molecular basis of the disease has been recently improved, a standardized management algorithm has not been reached yet. RESULTS: Here, we report our experience on five children with different lymphatic anomalies of the head and neck region treated by applying a multidisciplinary approach reaching a consensus among specialists on problem-solving and setting priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Although restitutio ad integrum was rarely achieved and the burden of care is challenging for patients, caregivers and healthcare providers, this study demonstrates how the referral to expert centres can significantly improve outcomes by alleviating parental stress and ameliorating patients' quality of life. A flow-chart is proposed to guide the multidisciplinary care of children with LMs and to encourage multidisciplinary collaborative initiatives to implement dedicated patients' pathways.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Linfáticas , Humanos , Anomalías Linfáticas/terapia , Anomalías Linfáticas/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Niño , Cuello/patología , Cabeza , Preescolar , Lactante , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Over the years, congenital lung malformations (CLM) management remains a controversial topic in pediatric thoracic surgery. The Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery performed a national survey to study the current management variability among centers, trying to define national guidelines and a standardized approach of children with congenital lung malformations. METHODS: Following a National Society approval, an electronic survey including 35 items on post-natal management was designed, focusing on surgical, anesthesiology, radiology and pneumology aspects. The survey was conducted contacting all pediatric surgical units performing thoracic surgery. RESULTS: 39 pediatric surgery units (97.5%) participated in the study. 13 centers (33.3%) were classified as high-volume (Group A), while 26 centers (66.7%) were low volume (Group B). Variances in diagnostic imaging protocols were observed, with Group A performing fewer CT scans compared to Group B (p = 0.012). Surgical indications favored operative approaches for asymptomatic CLM and pulmonary sequestrations in both groups, while a wait-and-see approach was common for congenital lobar emphysema. Surgical timing for asymptomatic CLM differed significantly, with most high-volume centers operating on patients younger than 12 months (p = 0.02). Thoracoscopy was the preferred approach for asymptomatic CLM in most of centers, while postoperative long-term follow-up was not performed in most of the centers. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic approach seems uniform in asymptomatic CLM patients and variable in symptomatic children. Lack of uniformity in surgical timing and preoperative imaging assessment has been identified as key areas to establish a common national pattern of care for CLM.