Pregnancy in CADASIL.

OBJECTIVES: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an inherited cerebral small vessel disease caused by NOTCH3 gene mutations. CADASIL women are frequently considered at high risk of systemic vascular events during pregnancy and often prescribed with antithrombotic drugs. This decision is not evidence-based considering the lack of data about pregnancy outcome in CADASIL. We describe our experience on pregnancy in CADASIL patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed records of 50 CADASIL females followed in our center, and we collected prospective information in six patients for a total of 93 pregnancies. RESULTS: No woman had the disease onset or suffered from cerebral vascular ischemic events during pregnancy. Sixteen miscarriages (17.2%) were recorded. There were 72 vaginal births, and five cesarean sections. Considering the six patients followed prospectively (for a total of eight pregnancies), data on fetal growth and newborns weight were in line with those from the general population. Considering gestational complications, we recorded mild proteinuria without hypertension in one patient and hyperinsulinemia and pre-eclampsia in another affected by a known nephropathy. Antithrombotic drugs were used in three patients, in one for an unrelated coexisting prothrombotic condition. CONCLUSIONS: CADASIL does not seem to be associated with an unfavorable outcome of pregnancy either for women and fetuses. Patients and treating physicians should be reassured that pregnancy can be safely initiated in CADASIL, as there is no evidence to support a specific preventive antithrombotic treatment during pregnancy in CADASIL. Larger studies are needed to definitively confirm these conclusions.

Mild cognitive impairment etiologic subtyping using pragmatic and conventional criteria: preliminary experience in the Florence VAS-COG clinic.

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an abnormal condition defined by the presence of cognitive decline not severe enough to fit dementia criteria. According to Winblad et al.'s criteria, the clinical distinction of MCI subtypes (amnestic/non-amnestic, single/multiple domain) is based on the cognitive profiling (conventional diagnosis) and infers possible different MCI etiologies. MCI prodromic of vascular dementia (Vasc-MCI) is thought to be characterized by a multiple domain profile. In our outpatient clinic (the "Florence VAS-COG clinic"), the diagnosis of MCI and of its different subtypes (vascular, degenerative, mixed) is based on a comprehensive evaluation of clinical and neuroimaging features (pragmatic diagnosis). AIMS: To compare the pragmatic and conventional diagnoses in terms of etiologic subtyping of MCI. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the agreement between the two diagnoses in 30 MCI patients. Agreement was considered present when degenerative MCI was of the amnestic type (single or multiple domain) and Vasc-MCI was of the multiple domain type (amnestic or non-amnestic MCI). RESULTS: In 15/30 (50 %) patients, the diagnoses were in disagreement: 5/9 (56 %) patients diagnosed with a degenerative MCI type presented a non-amnestic cognitive profile (4 single domain and 1 multiple domain); 10/21 (48 %) Vasc-MCI were classified as non-amnestic single domain. CONCLUSIONS: The application of MCI etiologic subtyping using pragmatic or conventional diagnoses leads to different results. In our setting, not all the Vasc-MCI patients have a multiple domain profile. Our preliminary study suggests that the cognitive profile of Vasc-MCI is more heterogeneous than previously suggested.

Clinical, familial, and neuroimaging features of CADASIL-like patients.

OBJECTIVES: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an inherited small vessel disease caused by NOTCH3 mutations. There are no clinical and neuroimaging findings pathognomonic of the disease. The aim of this paper was to provide a description of a group of NOTCH3-negative patients with a phenotype closely resembling that of CADASIL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed NOTCH3 analysis (exons 2-23) in 117 probands because of a clinician's suspicion of CADASIL. The CADASIL scale, a recently developed tool that allows to better select patients for NOTCH3 analysis, was retrospectively applied to NOTCH3-negative patients; the patient subgroup that scored higher than the screening cutoff for CADASIL was defined as CADASIL-like. RESULTS: Thirty-four CADASIL-like patients (mean age at onset 57.8 years [52.1-63.4], 50% males) were identified. Compared with 25 patients with CADASIL for clinical, familial, and neuroimaging features, only the following variables were significantly (α level <0.05) different in frequency between patients with CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients: a positive family history for stroke at age ≤ 60 years, more frequent in patients with CADASIL, and hypertension, more frequent in CADASIL-like patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience highlights the growing number of patients presenting with a high suspicion of a cerebral small vessel disease with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and a phenotype closely similar to that of CADASIL but without NOTCH3 mutations. This group remains to be characterized from the genetic point of view. The role of other genes or NOTCH3 alterations on exons other than 2-23 or introns has to be further assessed.

Influence of vascular risk factors and neuropsychological profile on functional performances in CADASIL: results from the MIcrovascular LEukoencephalopathy Study (MILES).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an inherited cerebral small vessel disease that may lead to disability and whose phenotype modulators are still unknown. METHODS: In the MIcrovascular LEukoencephalopathy Study (MILES), we assessed the influence of vascular risk factors and the effect of different cognitive domains (memory, psychomotor speed and executive functions) performances on functional abilities in CADASIL in comparison with age-related leukoencephalopathy (ARL). RESULTS: We evaluated 51 CADASIL patients (mean age 50.3 ± 13.8 years, 47.1% males) and 68 ARL patients (70.6 ± 7.4 years, 58.8% males). Considering vascular risk factors, after adjustment for age, CADASIL patients had higher mean BMI values than ARL patients. Stroke history frequency was similar in the two groups. After adjustment for age, more CADASIL patients were disabled (impaired on ≥ 2 items of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale) in comparison with ARL patients, and CADASIL patients had worse functional performances evaluated with the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scale. In CADASIL patients, hypertension was related to both DAD score and disability. The cognitive profile of CADASIL and ARL patients was similar, but on a stepwise linear regression analysis functional performances were mainly associated with the memory index (ß = -0.418, P < 0.003) in CADASIL patients and the executive function index (ß = -0.321, P = 0.028) in ARL. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that hypertension may contribute to functional impairment in CADASIL and that memory impairment has a large influence on functional decline in contrast with that observed in a sample of subjects with ARL.

Comparison of clinical, familial, and MRI features of CADASIL and NOTCH3-negative patients.

OBJECTIVE: To report the characteristics of patients suspected to have cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) but in whom no NOTCH3 gene pathogenic mutation was found. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2008, we performed NOTCH3 gene analysis (exons 2-23) in 81 probands because CADASIL was clinically suspected. A retrospective analysis and comparison of clinical, familial, and neuroimaging features of patients with and without pathogenic mutations was performed. RESULTS: CADASIL was diagnosed in 16/81 (20%) probands by finding a mutation leading to a cysteine substitution within the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats of the NOTCH3 receptor. In the remaining 65 patients, no pathogenic mutation was found. Some features were significantly (Fisher exact test p < 0.05) more frequent in CADASIL than in NOTCH3-negative patients: history of migraine (73 vs 39%), stroke before the age of 60 among relatives (71 vs 32%), severe leukoencephalopathy (94 vs 62%), white matter changes extended to the anterior temporal lobes (93 vs 45%), external capsule involvement (100 vs 50%), and presence of lacunar infarcts (100 vs 65%). The frequency of vascular risk factors was balanced between the 2 groups. No feature was peculiar to either group. CONCLUSIONS: Although certain clinical and neuroimaging features are more frequent in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) than in NOTCH3-negative patients, none is pathognomonic. Clinicians should be aware that when diagnosing CADASIL, a number of patients with a cerebral disease phenotypically similar to CADASIL emerge. The genetic profile of these diseases and the full phenotypic difference with CADASIL remain to be further defined.