Cochlear Implant Outcomes in the Chinese-Speaking Adult Population: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of speech perception outcomes in the Chinese-speaking adult cochlear implant (CI) population. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, EMbase, and Scopus. METHODS: A comprehensive English literature search was performed with MeSH search terms, keywords, and phrases. Literature written in a language other than English was not included. Full-text articles were screened by two blinded reviewers and adjudicated by a third. Relevant outcomes and demographic data were extracted. Qualitative summaries were performed of the demographics and assessment tools. Speech perception outcomes were assessed with quantitative measures. RESULTS: Forty-four studies (n = 467) notable for marked heterogeneity in speech perception assessment utilized and reporting of relevant patient demographics were included. Mean duration of deafness among studies reporting this metric was 10.27 years (range, 0.08-49; SD, 7.70; n = 250), with 80% of subjects reporting >5 years' duration of deafness and only 19 subjects (7.6%) with <1 year of deafness preimplantation. A summary of the most commonly used assessments is provided. CONCLUSION: Within the English-language literature, there is marked heterogeneity and lack of standardization regarding speech perception outcomes, tests utilized, and reported patient demographics in the Chinese-speaking adult CI population. Most Chinese-speaking CI users for whom data were available had prolonged duration of deafness before implantation. This study may serve as an initial reference for providers counseling Chinese-language CI candidates and who may be interested in adopting these tests, while highlighting the need for continued efforts to measure speech perception outcomes after CI for tonal language speakers.

Corticosteroids for patients with vestibular neuritis: An evidence synthesis for guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: A short course of corticosteroids is among the management strategies considered by specialists for the treatment of vestibular neuritis (VN). We conducted an umbrella review (systematic review of systematic reviews) to summarize the evidence of corticosteroids use for the treatment of VN. METHODS: We included systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated the effects of corticosteroids compared to placebo or usual care in adult patients with acute VN. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate. The quality of reviews was assessed with the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was used to rate certainty of evidence. No meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: From 149 titles, five systematic reviews were selected for quality assessment, and two reviews were of higher methodological quality and were included. These two reviews included 12 individual studies and 660 patients with VN. In a meta-analysis of two RCTs including a total of 50 patients, the use of corticosteroids (compared to placebo) was associated with higher complete caloric recovery (risk ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32 to 6.00, low certainty). It is very uncertain whether this translates into clinical improvement as shown by the imprecise effect estimates for outcomes such as patient-reported vertigo or patient-reported dizziness disability. There was a wide CI for the outcome of dizziness handicap score (one study, 30 patients, 20.9 points in corticosteroids group vs. 15.8 points in placebo, mean difference +5.1, 95% CI -8.09 to +18.29, very low certainty). Higher rates of minor adverse effects for those receiving corticosteroids were reported, but the certainty in this evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence to support the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of VN in the emergency department.