Epinephrine administered with lidocaine solution does not worsen intrathecal lidocaine neurotoxicity in rats.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine can potentially worsen the neurotoxic effects of local anesthetics when used for spinal or epidural anesthesia. The vasoconstrictive property of epinephrine reduces dural blood flow, which in turn reduces the clearance of local anesthetics from the subarachnoid space. This study examined the histological and neurofunctional effects of intrathecally administered lidocaine combined with epinephrine in rats. METHODS: Sixty-two rats were divided into 9 treatment groups: 5% or 7.5% lidocaine in 10% glucose solution with or without 0.1 or 0.5 mg/mL epinephrine, or epinephrine alone at 0.1 or 0.5 mg/mL in 10% glucose, or 10% glucose alone. Hind-limb motor function was evaluated immediately after drug injection by walking behavior. Sensory function was assessed by the response to radiant heat stimulation at just before and 1 week after the injection. Seven days after the injection, L3 spinal cord with anterior and posterior roots, the dorsal ganglion, and cauda equina were harvested and examined histologically. RESULTS: Histological lesions were limited to the posterior root just at entry into the spinal cord in rats injected with 7.5% lidocaine, with and without epinephrine. No histological abnormalities were noted in other areas or other groups. There was no significant change in sensory threshold in all groups. Significantly, prolongation of gait recovery time was noted in 5% and 7.5% lidocaine with epinephrine groups compared with 5% or 7.5% lidocaine alone. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal epinephrine prolonged the action of intrathecal lidocaine but did not worsen lidocaine-induced histological damage and functional impairment.

Intrathecally administered ropivacaine is less neurotoxic than procaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in a rat spinal model.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the neurotoxicity of intrathecal procaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in an animal model. METHODS: The study comprised two experiments. In the concentration experiment, rats (n = 78) were administered 0.12 µL·g(-1) body weight (BW) of 2% or 20% procaine, 0.5% or 5% bupivacaine, 0.5% or 5% levobupivacaine, or 0.5% or 5% ropivacaine. Based on the findings, the doses were increased by volume in the subsequent volume experiment using 0.12, 0.24, or 0.48 µL·g(-1) BW of 6% procaine, 6% levobupivacaine, or 6% ropivacaine (n = 79). Walking behaviour and sensory threshold were analyzed, and a histological examination of the spinal cord, posterior and anterior roots, and cauda equina was performed. RESULTS: The concentration experiment showed abnormalities only in the 5% bupivacaine group, and these abnormal findings were in the posterior root (PR) and posterior column (PC). The volume experiment revealed that procaine 0.24 µL·g(-1) was neurotoxic, mainly affecting the PR. At 0.48 µL·g(-1), severe injury was observed in the PR and PC in all six procaine rats and four of six levobupivacaine rats, while milder injury was limited to the PR in one of six ropivacaine rats, which differed significantly from the former two groups (P = 0.006 and P = 0.014, respectively). Electron microscopy showed axonal degeneration. CONCLUSION: All four local anesthetics seemed to cause identical neurotoxic lesions commencing in the PR and extending to the PC by axonal degeneration. Bupivacaine appeared to be the most neurotoxic of the four drugs, and the neurotoxicity at higher doses increased by volume with procaine > levobupivacaine > ropivacaine.

Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered fentanyl in a rat spinal model.

OBJECTIVE: Intrathecally administered fentanyl rarely causes drug tolerance or formation of inflammatory masses and might therefore be a suitable treatment option for chronic pain. However, the neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered fentanyl remains to be clarified. We examined the histological changes, neurodysfunction, and side effects of intrathecal fentanyl in rats. DESIGN: The rats received fentanyl at 0.12 µL/g body weight (0, 50, 1000, 2000, and 5000 µg/mL in saline) via an intrathecal catheter. Seven days after the injection, the spinal cord with both roots were removed for histological examination. The neurological function was evaluated by monitoring walking behavior and latencies to radiant heat. Side effects were also recorded. RESULTS: No histological abnormalities were observed in the spinal cord, anterior and posterior roots, cauda equina nerves, or arachnoid membrane. Formation of white neomembrane was noted around the catheter in some animals, but there was no significant difference in the incidence among the groups. The sensory threshold was significantly higher at 1 and 2 hours after injection in the 50 and 5000 µg/mL groups, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the sensory threshold among the five groups at 7 days postinjection. All of the rats walked normally within 4 hours even after injection of 5000 µg/mL fentanyl. The incidence of apnea, muscular rigidity, and bradycardia increased significantly at ≥ 1000 µg/mL dose. CONCLUSION: The side effects of intrathecally administered fentanyl were concentration-dependent, although no neuronal tissue damage, inflammation, or irreversible neurodysfunction were observed even at 5000 µg/mL.

Spinal procaine is less neurotoxic than mepivacaine, prilocaine and bupivacaine in rats.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lidocaine has been reported to be more neurotoxic than other local anesthetics. Alternatives to lidocaine with lower toxicity and shorter duration of action are desirable. Therefore, we compared the histologic and functional changes induced by intrathecal injection of prilocaine, mepivacaine, procaine, and bupivacaine in rats. METHODS: Rats (n = 184) randomly received via an intrathecal catheter 0.12 microL/g body weight of 2%, 10%, 16%, or 20% prilocaine, mepivacaine, or procaine; 0%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 4%, or 5% bupivacaine in distilled water; or distilled water or 15% glucose solution alone as a control. We evaluated neurofunction by analyzing walking behavior and sensory threshold and examined the L3 spinal cord, posterior and anterior roots, and cauda equina by light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: The recovery time to normal ambulation after intrathecal injection was significantly faster with procaine than with the other 3 drugs at all concentrations. There were no significant differences in the sensory threshold among the 4 anesthetics. Histologic damage was observed only in rats treated with greater than 16% prilocaine or mepivacaine or with greater than 4% bupivacaine. Histologic damage occurred at the posterior root and posterior white matter and was characterized by axonal degeneration. Rats treated with procaine, even at 20%, showed no histologic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: In this animal model, the neurotoxicity of intrathecal procaine was the mildest, and the recovery time to ambulation with procaine was the fastest among the 4 tested anesthetics.

Intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Histologic evidence of the comparative neurotoxicity of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and prilocaine is incomplete. We compared the intrathecal neurotoxicity in rats among these 3 drugs based on morphologic and neurofunctional findings. METHODS: Rats (n=169) randomly received 0.12 microL/g of 0%, 2%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, or 20% lidocaine, mepivacaine, or prilocaine or 25% glucose dissolved in distilled water via a chronically implanted intrathecal catheter. The effect of the agents on neurofunction was evaluated by movement of the hind limb (behavior test) and by sensory threshold (paw-stimulation test). The L1 spinal cord, the posterior and anterior roots, and the cauda equina were removed en bloc 5 days later and examined by light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: A significant decrease in sensory threshold or irreversible hind-limb limitation was observed only in rats receiving 20% lidocaine. Morphologic abnormalities characterized by axonal degeneration were observed in rats receiving > or =7.5% lidocaine, 20% mepivacaine, and 20% prilocaine, at the posterior white matter and the proximal portion of the posterior root just at the entrance into the spinal cord. The incidence of lesions was significantly higher in rats receiving lidocaine than mepivacaine and prilocaine. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than highly concentrated lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model.

Role of kinin and prostaglandin in cutaneous thermal nociception.

Involvements of kinin and prostaglandin and their interaction in noxious thermal stimuli were investigated in noninflamed and inflamed rats. The nociceptive response was evaluated from the escape latency of foot withdrawal to the thermal stimuli with a beam of light. The escape latency in kininogens-deficient Brown Norway (B/N-) Katholiek rats was significantly longer than that in the normal strain, B/N-Kitasato rats. The latency in B/N-Kitasato rat was prolonged by administration of a bradykinin (BK) B2 receptor antagonist, FR173657 (30 mg/kg, p.o.), whereas it was shortened by pretreatment with a kininase II inhibitor, captopril (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Both agents did not affect the latency in B/N-Katholiek rats. In normal Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat, administration of indomethacin did not change the escape latency against the thermal stimuli. In contrast, administration of indomethacin or a relatively cyclooxygenase-1-selective inhibitor, mofezolac (10 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced numbers of writhing reaction in mice induced by acetic acid solution. Injection of lipopolysaccharide (1 mg/kg, i.v.) resulted in shortening escape latency at 8 h after the injection in B/N-Kitasato rats. This hyperalgesia could be reversed by pretreatment of the rats with indomethacin, a cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor JTE-522 (10 mg/kg, p.o.), or FR173657, but not with mofezolac. The hyperalgesia was not seen in B/N-Katholiek rats. These results indicate that kinin has major participation in peripheral skin thermal nociception under noninflamed condition, although cyclooxygenases may have little participation. Prostaglandins produced by cyclooxygenase-2 could coordinate with BK to elicit hyperalgesia during inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide.