Revisiting the Conundrum: A Case Report on Trauma Whipple's Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Despite its rarity, pancreatic trauma is a serious condition because of its retroperitoneal location, association with other organ injuries, and complex bilio-vascular anatomy. Even less common are isolated pancreatic injuries. In grade four injuries, there is a debate over resectional vs. non-resectional management and appropriate treatment is particularly difficult. Here we discuss a patient with grade four pancreatic injury with pancreatic ascites presenting four days after the incident and traumatic pancreatitis. She underwent pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and recovered well with acceptable morbidity.

First Ever Robotic Stage One ALPPS Procedure in India: for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Twenty five percent of total liver volume (TLV) is considered as the ideal functional liver remnant (FLR) in major liver resections. In patients with macro-vesicular steatosis, early cirrhosis, and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), hepatocellular injury is common. In such instances, up to 40% of FLR may be required. So in cases of marginal FLR, pre-operative portal vein (PV) embolization or two-stage hepatectomy with PV occlusion is used. Both of which take up to 14 weeks between stages and 30% of patients fail to reach the second resection either due to inadequate FLR growth or disease progression. Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) procedure has become the gold standard for those cases. A 57-year-old male presented with rectosigmoid growth + multiple right liver and segment 4B metastases. Post-NACT MRI showed interval progression of lesions. Preoperative CT (computed tomography) volumetric scan showed a FLR/TLV (future liver remnant/total liver volume) of 22%. Since patient received 10 cycles of NACT, ALPPS procedure was planned ahead of direct liver resection. Robotic ALPPS stage 1 sparing left lateral segment and 4A + anterior resection was done. We transected the parenchyma between the FLR and the diseased part of the liver with concomitant right portal vein ligation done robotically. CT abdomen done on POD7 showed hypertrophied left lateral segment. Second stage was performed on the eighth post-operative day with FLR/TLV increasing to 37%. Robotic ALPPS procedure for stage one is a safe and feasible technique in experienced centers with advanced robotic skills.

Institutional Experience in the Management of Hilar Liver Obstruction- A Series of 13 Cases.

Neoplastic hilar obstruction to the liver outflow presents a unique challenge to the surgeon, wherein, the balance between a curative and possibly larger resection has to be achieved against a more conservative local resection. These are often technically demanding and have thus, far produced equivocal outcomes on both ends. The present case series is on 13 patients who presented with hilar obstruction. They all underwent resections with possible curative intent. The focus of our review is on the technical nuances and the strategies we used, intra- and peri-operatively to make resections possible in these patients, who at first look were deemed inoperable. Among the 13, 10 had hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) while the others had a more benign diagnosis e.g., Hydatid disease. We did not encounter any peri-operative mortality in our series. Two of our patients had to be re-explored for intra-abdominal complications. Among the 13, we encountered two deaths. The rest of the patients are still on follow-up as of April 2016. Hilar CCA continue to be rare and challenging tumours for the Hepato Pancreato Biliary (HPB) surgeon to manage. Outlooks are currently changing as we try to resect bigger and more complicated hilar liver tumours with better results.