Determination of the Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of Fusion Assessment in First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis Using CT Scan: An Observational Study.

Background: First tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis is a common procedure performed by podiatrists and orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate on how useful CT scans are in assessing fusion status in the post-operative patient. The purpose of our study was to determine the reliability among both orthopedic surgeons and radiologists in reviewing both postoperative radiographs and CT in order to determine if fusion had occurred in patients undergoing 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine if CT offered improved inter- and intra-rater reliability when compared to plain radiographs. Methods: Patients who underwent 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed and those who underwent CT post-operatively for persistent pain were identified. Orthopedic surgeons and radiologists then analyzed the radiographs and CT of these patients for union with a threshold for union being set at 50% of the joint being fused. Imaging was then re-evaluated by the same provider 6 months later. Results: 24 patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability for assessment of 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis were better with CT compared to radiographs; however, this association was not deemed reliable. Both imaging modalities were not able to assess union status confidently and reliably across reviewers, although CT scan had better intra-rater reliability. Conclusions: While CT is frequently used to assess fusion in patients who have underwent 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis, it was not found to be better than radiographs. Practitioners should reconsider the use CT as the gold standard when assessing fusion in this population.

Perceptions of social media utilization among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The growing social media presence in healthcare has provided physicians with new ways to engage with patients. However, foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons have been found to underuse social media platforms despite their known benefits for patients and surgeons. Thus, this study sought to investigate the reasons for this phenomenon and to identify potential barriers to social media utilization in clinical practice. METHODS: A 19-question survey was distributed to active attending physicians identified through the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society membership database. The survey included demographic, practice characteristics, and social media use questions assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of positive attitudes toward social media. RESULTS: Fifty-eight surgeons were included. Most respondents were male (n = 43, 74.1%), in private practice (n = 31, 53.5%), and described their practice to be greater than 51% elective procedures (n = 46, 79.4%). The average years in practice was 14.8 years (standard deviation, SD: 10.0 years). A total of 32.8% (n = 19) of surgeons reported using social media as part of their clinical practice. Facebook (n = 19, 32.8%), a professional website or blog (n = 18, 31.0%), and LinkedIn (n = 15, 25.9%) were the most used platforms-primarily for practice marketing or brand development (n = 19, 32.8%). A total of 58.6% (n = 34) of surgeons reported they did not use social media. The primary reasons were the time commitment (n = 31, 53.5%), concerns about obscuring professional boundaries (n = 22, 37.9%), and concerns regarding confidentiality (n = 11, 19.0%). Many surgeons reported that social media positively influences foot and ankle surgery (n = 23, 39.7%), although no individual predictors for these views could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons tended to view social media use positively, but the time investment and concerns over professionalism and confidentiality pose challenges to its use. Given the influence of a surgeon's social media identity on patient satisfaction and practice building, efforts should be made to streamline social media use for foot and ankle surgeons to establish their online presence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Which pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are high risk for conversion to open reduction?

Supracondylar humerus fractures are common pediatric injuries encountered by orthopedic surgeons. Displaced fractures are treated operatively with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction of injuries that cannot be adequately closed reduced. The purpose of this study is to identify preoperative injury characteristics associated with open reduction. Retrospective chart review was performed on all AO type 13A (Gartland type) supracondylar humerus fractures in patients 2-13 years old treated surgically at a single level 1 trauma center over 6 years. Preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters were obtained for all patients. Primary outcomes were closed reduction or conversion to open reduction of fractures prior to k-wire fixation. Initial bivariate analysis was done using Chi-square tests. Final multivariate analysis with Bonferonni correction was performed using a backward, stepwise regression model including potential predictor variables identified in the bivariate analysis. A total of 211 patients received surgical treatment and 18 of those patients (8.5%) failed closed reduction and underwent open reduction. Final multivariate analysis demonstrated that only flexion type [relative risk (RR), 10.2] and coronal displacement more than 7 mm (RR, 4.49) were significant preoperative factors for conversion to open reduction. Patients with significant coronal displacement and flexion-type injuries are markers of challenging reduction and are at high risk for conversion to open reduction.

Does the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Accurately Predict Complications Rates After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures?

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical case series. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) surgical risk calculator in the prediction of complications after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Identifying at-risk patients may aid in the prevention of complications after spine procedures. The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator was developed to predict 30-day postoperative complications for a variety of operative procedures. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing ALIF at our institution from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and comorbidity variables were entered into the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator to generate percentage predictions for complication incidence within 30 days postoperatively. The observed incidences of these complications were also abstracted from the medical record. The predictive ability of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator was assessed in comparison to the observed incidence of complications using area under the curve (AUC) analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-three (253) patients were analyzed. The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator was a fair predictor of discharge to non-home facility (AUC 0.71) and surgical site infection (AUC 0.70). The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator was a good predictor of acute kidney injury/progressive renal insufficiency (AUC 0.81). The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator was not an adequate predictive tool for any other category, including: pneumonia, urinary tract infections, venous thromboembolism, readmission, reoperations, and aggregate complications (AUC < 0.70). CONCLUSION: The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator is an adequate predictive tool for a subset of complications after ALIF including acute kidney injury/progressive renal insufficiency, surgical site infections, and discharge to non-home facilities. However, it is a poor predictor for all other complication groups. The reliability of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator is limited, and further identification of models for risk stratification is necessary for patients undergoing ALIF.Level of Evidence: 3.

Social Media Utilization Among Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Social media represents a novel platform for patient-physician interaction. Although social media utilization patterns have been analyzed in other fields, no such study has been performed in shoulder and elbow specialists. METHODS: The membership database of the society of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons was queried. Online searches were performed to identify if each surgeon had professional profiles on popular social media platforms. A social media score was then calculated, defined as the number of active accounts. Statistical analysis was used to test for associations between demographics and social media utilization. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-six surgeons were analyzed. The average social media score was 1.61. The most highly used platform was LinkedIn (61%). The least used platform was Instagram (5% active, 11% total). Female surgeons were more likely to use Instagram than men (12.5% versus 4.9%). Academic surgeons were more likely to use ResearchGate (46.5% versus 33.3%), whereas private practice surgeons were more likely to have a website (19.9% versus 11.7%). Practitioners from the South had the lowest social media utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder and elbow surgeons underuse social media. As the influence of social media continues to grow, it will be important for surgeons to implement social media within their practices.

Improvements in Back and Leg Pain Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is poorly defined. As such, the purpose of this study was to quantify improvements in Visual Analogue Scale back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental and Physical Composite scores following MIS-TLIF. METHODS: A surgical registry of patients who underwent primary 1-level MIS-TLIF during 2014-2015 was reviewed. Comparisons of Visual Analogue Scale back and leg pain, ODI, and Short Form-12 Mental and Physical Composite scores were performed using paired t tests from preoperative to each postoperative time point. Analysis of variance was used to estimate the degree of improvement in back and leg pain over the first postoperative year. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients presenting with predominant back (pBP) or leg (pLP) pain. Multivariate linear regression was performed to compare patient-reported outcome scores by subgroup. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were identified. Visual Analogue Scale back and leg scores, and ODI improved from preoperative scores at all postoperative time points (P < .05 for each). Patients with pBP (n = 68) and patients with pLP (n = 38) reported reductions in both back and leg pain over the first postoperative year (P < .05 for each). In the pBP cohort, patients experienced significant reductions in ODI after the first 6 postoperative weeks (P < .05 for each). In the pLP cohort, patients experienced significant reductions in ODI throughout the first postoperative year (P < .05 for each). Patients with pLP and pBP experienced similar reductions in back pain, whereas patients with pLP experienced significantly greater reductions in leg pain at all postoperative time points (P < .05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests patients experience significant improvements in back and leg pain following MIS-TLIF regardless of predominant symptom. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results can assist surgeons when counseling their patients on the magnitude of symptom improvement they may experience following MIS-TLIF.

Postoperative Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Based on PROMIS Physical Function Following a Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) scores with postoperative pain, narcotics use, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a scarcity of prior literature on the ability of baseline PROMIS scores to predict clinical outcomes for patients undergoing ACDF procedures. METHODS: Patients who underwent a primary ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into low and high disability cohorts. Preoperative PROMIS PF cohorts were tested for association with demographic and perioperative characteristics using chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance. Cohorts were tested for association with inpatient pain scores and narcotics consumption, as well as postoperative improvements in PROMIS PF, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain using linear regression. RESULTS: Ninety one patients were included: 39 low disability and 52 high disability. Inpatient postoperative VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption are also compared between cohorts. Patients with greater disability reported higher VAS pain scores (P = 0.003). However, patients in both cohorts consumed comparable amounts of narcotics (P = 0.926). Patients with greater preoperative disability demonstrated lower PROMIS PF scores, greater NDI scores, and greater VAS Neck scores at the preoperative baseline. However, patients demonstrated similar improvement of VAS neck and arm pain, as well as NDI at all postoperative timepoints. Patients with low disability reported worsened physical function at the 6 weeks timepoint. CONCLUSION: Patients with worse preoperative disability as measured by PROMIS PF reported increased pain but comparable narcotics consumption in the immediate postoperative period following a single-level ACDF procedure. Furthermore, patients experienced similar long-term postoperative improvement of PROs regardless of preoperative physical function. PROMIS PF can efficiently quantify physical function before and after the ACDF procedure as self-evaluated by patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications after 1-2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) have a significant impact on clinical outcomes and health care resource use. Identifying predictive factors for complications after ACDF may allow for the modification of care protocols to mitigate complication risk. The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors for the incidence of medical and surgical complications up to 2 years postoperatively after ACDF procedures. METHODS: A prospectively maintained surgical registry of patients who underwent primary, 1-2-level ACDF was retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of medical and surgical complications up to 2 years postoperatively was determined. Patients were classified according to demographic, comorbidity, and procedural characteristics. Bivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to determine if an association existed between the incidence of medical or surgical complications and patient characteristics. A final multivariate model including all patient and procedural characteristics as controls was created using backwards, stepwise regression until only those variables with P < .05 remained. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were included. Upon bivariate analysis, age >50 years was identified as a risk factor for medical complications after ACDF procedures. Additionally, bivariate analysis identified ageless Charlson comorbidity index ≥2, operative duration >60 minutes, and 2-level procedures as risk factors for surgical complications after ACDF. Upon multivariate analysis, age >50 years was identified as an independent risk factor for medical complications (relative risk [RR] = 3.6, P = .005), while operative time >60 minutes was identified as an independent risk factor for surgical complications after ACDF (RR = 4.5, P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that older age and longer operative time were independent risk factors for medical and surgical complications, respectively, following ACDF. Patients with these risk factors should be counseled regarding their increased risk of postoperative complications and should undergo more vigilant monitoring to aid in complication avoidance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should consider the elevated risk of postoperative complications in >50 years old patients and >60 min procedures.

A Review of Vitamin D in Spinal Surgery: Deficiency Screening, Treatment, and Outcomes.

In this review, we discuss the demonstrated value of vitamin D in bone maintenance, fracture resistance, spinal health, and spine surgery outcomes. Despite this, the effect of vitamin D levels in spine surgery has not been well described. Through this review of literature, several conclusions were drawn. First, despite the fact that a high number of spine surgery patients are vitamin D deficient, screening is not commonly performed. Second, adequate vitamin D levels will not be achieved in a majority of these patients without supplementation. Last, inadequate vitamin D levels may increase the risk of pseudarthrosis. Given these findings, we suggest that many patients undergoing spinal surgery could be treated with vitamin D supplementation prior to surgery without the need for confirmatory testing for vitamin D deficiency. This is a more cost-effective method than screening all patients. However, future randomized trials and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to determine the ultimate effects of vitamin D supplementation on clinical morbidity and surgical outcomes.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Grade I Versus Grade II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is often used to treat low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). No studies have compared surgical outcomes for grade I and II IS following MIS-TLIF. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to compare outcomes between patients with grade I and II IS following MIS-TLIF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent a primary 1-level MIS-TLIF for treatment of IS between 2007 and 2015. Grade I patients underwent a unilateral tubular approach with a single interbody cage and bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Grade II patients underwent a bilateral tubular approach with bilateral interbody cage and pedicle screw placement. Baseline patient demographics and characteristics were compared using Student t test and χ2 analysis. Differences in peri- and postoperative outcomes were assessed using Poisson regression with robust error variance or linear regression adjusted for perioperative variables. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients with IS underwent MIS-TLIF; 21 (36.2%) were grade I and 37 (63.8%) were grade II. The grade I cohort was younger (42.2 versus 50.6 years, P = .029); no other differences in preoperative variables were observed. No significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative visual analogue scale scores, or complication and revision rates were demonstrated between cohorts. Arthrodesis rate was lower in the grade I cohort, though not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the grade I cohort being younger with less-severe diagnoses, the grade II cohort experienced similar outcomes. This finding may be due to the grade II cohort receiving bilateral cages, potentially providing a better fusion environment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that MIS-TLIF provides sufficient stabilization and fusion for treatment of grade II IS despite increased vertebral body displacement. In addition, MIS-TLIF with bilateral approach and interbody cage placement should be examined for treatment of high-grade IS cases.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is a common surgical procedure for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) but remains controversial for treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). Few studies have compared IS and DS outcomes after MIS TLIF. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to compare outcomes of patients with IS and DS after MIS TLIF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent a primary, 1-level MIS TLIF for grade I or II IS or DS. Grade I and II DS and grade I IS patients were treated with MIS TLIF via a unilateral tubular approach, whereas the grade II IS patients were treated via a bilateral tubular approach. Differences in patient demographics and preoperative characteristics were assessed using independent sample t tests and χ2 tests. The type of spondylolisthesis and its effect on postoperative outcomes was analyzed using Poisson regression with robust error variance (binary outcomes) or linear regression (continuous outcomes) adjusted for preoperative characteristics. Subgroup analysis comparing grade I IS versus DS and grade II IS versus DS was performed. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were included (IS: 62 [27.8%]; DS: 161 [72.2%]). IS patients were younger (P < .001), had a lower comorbidity burden (P < .001), and a greater incidence of grade II spondylolisthesis (P < .001) at L5-S1 (P < .001) than the DS cohort. Patients with IS experienced longer operative times (P < .001) and lower, but not statistically significant, arthrodesis rates compared to the DS cohort. No differences were observed in the remaining preoperative patient characteristics, perioperative or postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being younger and having a lower comorbidity burden than the DS cohort, similar outcomes were observed after MIS TLIF for IS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest MIS TLIF is an appropriate treatment option for IS patients despite the increased instability inherent with IS.

Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications After Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of perioperative and postoperative complications is necessary to avoid poor postoperative outcomes and increased costs. Previous investigations have identified risk factors for complications after various spine procedures, but no such study exists in a population solely undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors for the development of complications up to 2 years after MIS TLIF procedures. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary, single-level MIS TLIF from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of medical and surgical complications up to 2 years postoperatively was determined. Patients were categorized according to demographic, comorbidity, and procedural characteristics. Bivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to determine if an association existed between patient characteristics and complication incidence. A final multivariate model including all patient characteristics as controls was created using backwards, stepwise regression until only those variables with P < .05 remained. RESULTS: 390 patients were analyzed. Upon bivariate analysis, age >50 years (P = .025), diabetes mellitus (P = .001), and operative duration >105 minutes (P = .016) were associated with increased medical complication rates. Regarding surgical complications, age ≤50 years (P < .001), obesity (P = .012), and diabetes mellitus (P = .042) were identified as risk factors on bivariate analysis. Upon final multivariate analysis, operative time >105 minutes (P = .009) and diabetes mellitus (P = .001) were independent risk factors for medical complications. Independent risk factors for surgical complications on multivariate analysis included age ≤50 years (P < .001), diabetes mellitus (P = .002), and obesity (P = .030). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients and those who underwent longer operations were at increased risk of medical complications, while younger patients, obese patients and those also with diabetes mellitus were at increased risk of surgical complications up to 2 years after MIS TLIF. Practitioners can use this information to identify patients who require preventative care before their procedure or increased postoperative vigilance and monitoring after single-level MIS TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Diabetes Does Not Increase Complications, Length of Stay, or Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the presence of diabetes mellitus as comorbidity is associated with complications, inpatient length of stay, or direct hospital costs after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Very few studies have investigated the effect of diabetes on complications, length of stay, or costs in minimally invasive lumbar surgeries. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF were retrospectively reviewed. Diabetic and nondiabetic patients were propensity matched in a 1:1 manner for age, sex, and comorbidity burden. An association between diabetic status and preoperative demographic or perioperative variables, including inpatient length of stay, was tested for using Student t test or χ analysis. Multivariate linear regression was used to test for an association between diabetic status and direct hospital costs. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity matching, 100 patients were included in this analysis. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, or Charlson Comorbidity Index between propensity-matched patients with and without diabetes. In regards to the length of stay, no significant differences existed between diabetic and nondiabetic groups (68.7 vs. 58.3 h, P=0.218). No other significant differences existed in other perioperative variables including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or complication rate (P≥0.05 for each). Multivariate analysis indicated that diabetic status was not associated with differences in total direct hospital costs (US$20,428 vs. US$20,429, P=0.792) or cost subcategories after MIS TLIF (P≥0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: In this investigation, diabetes was not associated with postoperative complication rates, inpatient length of stay, or direct hospital costs after primary, single-level MIS TLIF. The reduced extent of operative exposure and tissue trauma in MIS TLIF may mitigate the risk of complications in diabetic patients, possibly preventing extensions in hospital stay length and associated hospital costs.

Preoperative Mental Health May Not Be Predictive of Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has associated poor preoperative mental health with inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after spinal procedures. Therefore, the objective of this study was to test for association of preoperative Short Form 12 (SF-12) mental health composite score (MCS) with improvements in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and back and leg visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores after a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). METHODS: A surgical database of patients who underwent a primary, 1 level MIS TLIF was reviewed. Preoperative SF-12 MCS was tested for association with preoperative ODI, back VAS, and leg VAS. Preoperative MCS was then tested for association with changes in ODI, back VAS, and leg VAS from preoperative to postoperative visits. These tests were conducted using multivariate regression controlling for baseline characteristics and the preoperative score of the PRO being assessed. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, higher preoperative MCS was associated with lower preoperative ODI (coefficient: -0.58, P < .001), lower preoperative back VAS (-0.05, P = .003), and lower preoperative leg VAS (-0.06, P = .003). However, there was no association between preoperative MCS and improvement in PROs at any postoperative timepoint (P > .05). The percent of patients achieving a minimum clinically important difference in PROs at 6 months did not differ between the bottom and top MCS halves (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that better preoperative mental health is associated with lower perceived preoperative disability and decreased severity of back and leg pain. In contrast to other studies, the present study was unable to demonstrate that preoperative mental health is predictive of improvement in PROs at any postoperative timepoint after MIS TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that surgeons should exercise care in assuming that patients with poorer preoperative mental health are inferior surgical candidates.

American Society of Anesthesiologists Score is Not Predictive of Complication Incidence After Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Spine Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Complications occurring after spinal procedures are associated with recurrent symptomatology, new-onset symptomatology, and increased health care costs. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score is a commonly cited risk factor for complication incidence. Few investigations have been performed analyzing the relationship between ASA score and complication rate following spinal minimally invasive surgery (MIS) decompressions or fusions. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine whether an association exists between preoperative ASA score and the incidence of postoperative complications among patients undergoing MIS posterior lumbar decompression or fusion. METHODS: A surgical registry of patients undergoing single-level MIS posterior lumbar decompressions or fusions between 2007 and 2016 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by preoperative ASA score (≤2, >2). The ASA score was tested for an association with preoperative demographic, comorbidity, and perioperative characteristics using the Student t test or χ2 analysis. Multivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to test for an association between ASA score and the incidence of complications up to 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 772 patients were analyzed. Of those, 86.7% had an ASA score ≤2, whereas 13.3% had an ASA score >2. An ASA score >2 was associated with older age (P < .001), higher comorbidity burden (P < .001), and higher rates of obesity (P < .001). An ASA score >2 was also associated with significantly longer operative time (P = .001) and longer length of hospital stay (P < .001). Upon multivariate analysis, ASA score category was not associated with the incidence of any complication (P = .248), medical complications (P = .227), or surgical complications (P = .816). CONCLUSIONS: The ASA score was not a predictive factor for complication incidence up to 6 months postoperatively. Thus, a higher ASA score should not preclude patients from being surgical candidates for MIS posterior lumbar decompressions or fusions. Further investigation is required to identify other predictive factors for complication incidence after minimally invasive spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Postoperative Outcomes Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Score After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have investigated the correlation between ASA score and PROs after MIS TLIF. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF were retrospectively reviewed and placed into 3 cohorts: ASA score ≤2 and outpatient status, ASA score ≤2 and inpatient status, and ASA score >2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain, and Short Form-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS) were administered preoperatively and at 6-week, 12-week, and 6-month time points. ASA scores were tested for association with improvements in PROs using linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients had an ASA score ≤2 and 41 patients had an ASA score >2. Higher ASA scores were associated with older age, obesity, higher comorbidity burden, and an increased length of stay. ASA subgroups demonstrated a significant difference in preoperative ODI and VAS back pain scores and improvement in VAS back pain scores at the 12-week and 6-month time points; however, there was no discernible pattern of improvement amongst cohorts. No statistically significant differences were observed with improvements in PROs. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests ASA scores are not associated with postoperative recovery in pain and disability after MIS TLIF. Our results indicate that regardless of the preoperative ASA score, patients are likely to achieve similar improvements in PROs through 6 months follow-up. Although using ASA as a risk stratification tool to predict perioperative complications, its utility in predicting improvement in PROs is still uncertain at this time.

Predictors of Citation Rate in the Spine Literature.

The number of citations a publication receives has been regarded as one measure of its importance and clinical impact. However, studies have yet to investigate which characteristics are predictors of citation rates within the spine subspecialty literature. To explore this topic, all articles published in 2010 in Spine and from 2010 to 2011 in The Spine Journal and the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine were reviewed. The Web of Science search engine was used to determine the number of times each article was cited in the 5 years following its publication. Sample characteristics were collected and were compared with a χ test for differences Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to determine if collected study characteristics were associated with achievement of citation frequency higher than the median for the entire study sample. Among the 927 articles analyzed, the 5-year citation number ranged from 0 to 125, with a median of 8 (interquartile range: 4-16). Upon multivariate analysis, the following were identified as predictors of citation number higher than the median: North American origin (P=0.014), sample size >30 (P<0.001), study topic (P<0.050), and publication in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine (P<0.001). Practitioners and research personnel can use these findings to help elucidate which factors might affect the potential impact and overall reach of their work in the spine literature.

Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: The minimum clinically importance difference (MCID) represents a threshold for improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that patients deem important. No previous study has comprehensively examined risk factors for failure to achieve MCID after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures for radiculopathic symptomatology. The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors for failure to reach MCID for Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck pain, and VAS arm pain in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level ACDF procedures. METHODS: A surgical registry of patients who underwent primary, 1- or 2-level ACDF from 2014 to 2016 was reviewed. Rates of MCID achievement for NDI, VAS neck pain, and VAS arm pain at final follow-up were calculated based on published MCID values. Patients were then categorized into demographic and procedural categories. Bivariate regression was used to test for association of demographic and procedural characteristics with failure to reach MCID for each PRO. The final multivariate model including all demographic and procedural categories as controls was created using backward stepwise regression. RESULTS: Eighty-three, 84, and 77 patients were included in the analysis for VAS neck, VAS arm, and NDI, respectively. Rates of MCID achievement for VAS neck, VAS arm, and NDI were 55.4%, 36.9%, and 76.6%, respectively. On bivariate analysis, patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 2 were less likely to achieve MCID for NDI than patients with CCI < 2 (P = .025). On multivariate analysis, CCI ≥ 2 (P = .025) was further associated with failure to reach MCID for NDI. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the majority of patients do not reach MCID for arm pain. Additionally, higher comorbidity burden as evidenced by higher CCI scores is a negative predictive factor for the achievement of MCID in neck disability following ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Does the Day of the Week Affect Length of Stay and Hospital Charges Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

BACKGROUND: To reduce the economic impact of excessive costs, risk factors for increased length of stay (LOS) must be identified. Previous literature has demonstrated that surgeries later in the week can affect the LOS and costs following joint arthroplasty. However, few investigations regarding the day of surgery have been performed in the spine literature. The present study attempts to identify the association between day of surgery on LOS and hospital charges following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. METHODS: A prospectively maintained surgical database of primary, level 1-2 ACDF patients between 2008 and 2015 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by surgery day: early week (Tuesday) or late week (Friday) ACDF. Differences in patient demographics and preoperative characteristics were compared between cohorts using chi-square analysis or Student t test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Direct hospital costs were obtained using hospital charges for each procedure and subsequent care prior to discharge. Associations between date of surgery and costs were assessed using multivariate linear regression controlled for. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients were included in the analysis. One hundred and fifty-three patients underwent early week ACDF, and 142 underwent late week ACDF. Surgery day cohorts reported similar baseline characteristics. There were no differences in operative characteristics or hospital LOS between cohorts. Additionally, no differences in total or subcategorical hospital costs were identified between surgery day cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ACDF later in the week exhibit similar LOS and hospital costs compared to those undergoing ACDF early in the week. These results suggest that outpatient procedures with short postoperative stays are likely not affected by the changes in hospital work efficiency that occur during the transition to the weekend. As such, hospitals should not restrict outpatient procedures to specific days of the week. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Assessment Using an Abridged SWAL-QOL.

BACKGROUND: Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To determine which components of the swallowing disorders quality of life (SWAL-QOL) survey are most relevant to assess dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Summary of background data: The SWAL-QOL survey is an instrument that has been applied to patients undergoing ACSS procedures as a means of objectifying swallow function. However, the SWAL-QOL is lengthy, cumbersome, and primarily used for otolaryngological procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACSS procedures were administered the SWAL-QOL prior to surgery and at 6- and 12-week postoperative visits. The preoperative and postoperative SWAL-QOL scores were compared using paired t tests. Questions with statistically and clinically significant postoperative changes were used to create an abridged survey. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed surveys at all 3 encounters and were included in the analysis. The total scaled score at 6 weeks was significantly lower than the preoperative score (P = .003) but returned to near baseline scores by 12 weeks (P = .178). Five sections had significantly lower scores at both postoperative visits compared to their respective preoperative values. Additionally, 13 individual questions had significantly lower scores at both postoperative visits, while 8 had significantly lower scores at only 1 of the postoperative visits. Of these 21 questions demonstrating statistical significance, 16 also demonstrated a clinically significant decrease (>5.0%) from preoperative scores. These 16 questions were included in the abridged survey developed for use in ACSS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that several questions in the full SWAL-QOL questionnaire demonstrated minor or no changes at postoperative visits following ACSS. As a result, we propose a modified, 16-question SWAL-QOL survey including only questions that were both statistically and clinically significant. This truncated survey may be better suited for use in cervical spine patients.