[Duodenal perforation due to an endoscopic biliary prosthesis]. / Perforación duodenal por prótesis biliar endoscópica.

Endoscopic biliary drainage through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely accepted therapeutic option in malignant biliary obstructions. However, the procedure is not free of complications. Perforation is one possible complication although it is much less frequent (less than 1%) than pancreatitis (5.4%) or hemorrhage (2%). We present 2 cases of duodenal perforation after placement of a biliary prosthesis through ERCP. Both patients had extensive hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Onset of symptoms of perforation occurred a few hours after placement of the prosthesis and the diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography and laparotomy. We believe that the mechanism through which perforation occurred was proximal adhesion of the prosthesis to the tumor. This increased the intensity of distal trauma produced by the intraduodenal segment, preventing adaptation of the prosthesis to intestinal peristalsis. A good preventive measure would consist of correctly adjusting the length of the prosthesis in relation to the proximal end of the biliary stenosis.

Perforación duodenal por prótesis biliar endoscópica / Duodenal perforation due to an endoscopic biliary prosthesis

El drenaje biliar endoscópico mediante la colangiopancreatografíaretrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) es una alternativaterapéutica aceptada para las obstrucciones biliares malignas,que no está exenta de complicaciones. La perforación esuna de éstas, aunque mucho menos frecuente (menos de 1%)que la pancreatitis (5,4%) o la hemorragia (2%). Presentamos2 casos de perforación duodenal tras la colocación deuna prótesis biliar por CPRE. En ambos casos, se tratabade un colangiocarcinoma hiliar extenso, la clínica relacionadacon la perforación fue de inicio temprano, horas despuésde la colocación de la prótesis, y la tomografía computarizadajunto a la laparotomía confirmaron el diagnóstico de lacomplicación. Creemos que el mecanismo por el cual se produjola perforación fue por fijación proximal de la prótesispor el tumor. Ésta aumentaba la intensidad del trauma distalproducido por el segmento intraduodenal e impedía laadaptación de la prótesis al peristaltismo intestinal. Unabuena medida de prevención sería un adecuado ajuste de lalongitud de la prótesis respecto al extremo proximal de la estenosisbiliar

Endoscopic biliary drainage through endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely accepted therapeuticoption in malignant biliary obstructions. However,the procedure is not free of complications. Perforation is onepossible complication although it is much less frequent (lessthan 1%) than pancreatitis (5.4%) or hemorrhage (2%). Wepresent 2 cases of duodenal perforation after placement of abiliary prosthesis through ERCP. Both patients had extensive hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Onset of symptoms of perforationoccurred a few hours after placement of the prosthesisand the diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomographyand laparotomy. We believe that the mechanism throughwhich perforation occurred was proximal adhesion of theprosthesis to the tumor. This increased the intensity of distaltrauma produced by the intraduodenal segment, preventingadaptation of the prosthesis to intestinal peristalsis. A goodpreventive measure would consist of correctly adjusting thelength of the prosthesis in relation to the proximal end ofthe biliary stenosis

Biliopancreatic tumors: patient survival and quality of life after palliative treatment.

OBJECTIVES: to analyse survival and quality of life of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice after palliative treatment, comparing endoscopic stent insertion and palliative surgical (palliative resection and bypass surgical). PATIENTS AND METHOD: eighty and seven patients were included in a trial. They were distributed to endoscopic stent (50) and palliative surgical (37). It analysed survival, quality of life and comfort index of jaundiced patients. The good quality of life was defined by absence of jaundice, pruritus and cholangitis after the initial treatment. RESULTS: the median survival of the patients treated to endoscopic stent was 9,6 months whereas the patients to surgical treatment survived a median of 17 months. The time free of disease was 4 months in stented patients and 10,5 months in surgical patients. There was no significant difference in comfort index between the two groups (stented 34%, surgical 42,5%) Neither was there significant difference in survival and quality of life between palliative resection and bypass surgery. CONCLUSIONS: despite the survival and time free of disease being better in surgical patients, there was no significant difference in overall quality of life between the two groups. The survival and quality of life are the same after palliative resection as after bypass surgery, for this should not be performed routinely or to justify resection as a debulking procedure.

Failure of endoscopic therapy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to duodenal ulcers.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment in patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGIH) due to duodenal ulcer with high risk of persistent or recurrent bleeding and to determine the associated failure factors of this procedure. PATIENTS AND METHOD: three hundred and thirty-six patients with UGIH due to duodenal ulcer requiring endoscopic treatment were analyzed between January 1992 and December 2001. The patients were classified according to the endoscopic findings: a) patients with limited bleeding; and b) patients with persistent and/or recurrent bleeding due to therapeutic failure. The clinical guidelines followed in patients with endoscopic treatment failure were previously established in the internal protocol. The variables that obtained statistical significance in the univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression model to identify those with an independent predictive value for failure of the endoscopic treatment. RESULTS: mean age of the patients was 60 +/- 17 years, 271 (81%) were male. Bleeding with severe hemodynamic affectation was detected in 82 patients (24%). The most common location of the duodenal ulcer was on the anterosuperior part of the duodenal bulb (227 patients, 68%). In 43 patients (13%) the ulcer was larger than 2 cm. The bleeding stigmata were classified as: Forrest I in 125 (38%) and Forrest II in 211 (62%). It was initially reached in 297 patients (88%). Twenty-two patients required emergency surgery (6,5%) and the global mortality rate was 3%. Severe hemodynamic affectation at admission (OR 11.8, p>0.001), ulcers exceeding 2 cm (OR 6.95, p = 0.019) and the presence of active bleeding during endoscopy (Forrest I) (OR 3.55, p = 0.08) were the variables included in the multivariate analysis independently associated to endoscopic therapy failure. CONCLUSION: endoscopic therapy is an efficient treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to duodenal ulcer. By means of a clinical variable, the hemodynamic status and two endoscopies, bleeding stigmata and the size of the ulcer, a group of patients with high risk of endoscopic treatment failure can be selected.

Fracaso de la terapéutica endoscópica en enfermos con hemorragia digestiva por úlcera duodenal / No disponible

Objetivos: analizar la eficacia de la terapéutica endoscópica en enfermos con alto riesgo de persistencia y/o recidiva del sangrado específicamente en hemorragia digestiva alta (HDA) por úlcera duodenal y determinar los factores asociados al fracaso de esta técnica. Pacientes y método: se analizaron 336 enfermos con HDA por úlcera duodenal que requirieron terapéutica endoscópica, entre enero 1992 y diciembre 2001. Se clasificaron los enfermos en función de la respuesta al tratamiento endoscópico: a) pacientes con hemorragia limitada; y b) pacientes con persistencia y/o recidiva del sangrado por fracaso terapéutico. La pauta de actuación en los enfermos con fallo del tratamiento endoscópico se hizo en función de un protocolo previamente establecido. Las variables que alcanzaron significación estadística en el análisis univariante se incluyeron en un modelo de regresión logística para identificar aquellas con un valor predictivo independiente para el fracaso de la terapéutica endoscópica. Resultados: la edad media fue de 60 ± 17 años, 271 (81%) eran hombres. La hemorragia se presentó con afectación hemodinámica grave en 82 pacientes (24%). La localización más frecuente de la úlcera duodenal fue en cara anterosuperior de bulbo duodenal en 227 pacientes (68%). En 43 enfermos (13%) la úlcera era mayor de 2 cm. Los estigmas de sangrado encontrados en la endoscopia fueron: Forrest I, en 125 (38%) y Forrest II, 211 (62%). La hemostasia inicial se logró en 297 pacientes (88%). Requirieron cirugía urgente 22 enfermos (6,5%) y la mortalidad global de nuestra serie fue del 3%. En el análisis multivariante, las variables que se asociaron independientemente al fracaso de la terapéutica endoscópica fueron la afectación hemodinámica grave al ingreso (OR 11,8, p<0,001), el tamaño de la úlcera mayor a 2 cm (OR 6,95, p= 0,019) y la presencia de sangrado activo en la endoscopia (Forrest I) (OR 3,55, p=0,08). Conclusión: la terapéutica endoscópica es eficaz en la hemorragia digestiva alta por úlcera duodenal. Mediante una variable clínica, el estado hemodinámico y dos endoscópicas, los estigmas de sangrado y el tamaño de la úlcera, podemos seleccionar un grupo de enfermos con mayor riesgo de fracaso del tratamiento endoscópico (AU)

No disponible

[Factors associated with failure of endoscopic therapy in gastric ulcer bleeding]. / Factores asociados al fracaso de la terapéutica endoscópica en la hemorragia digestiva por úlcera gástrica.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic therapy is an effective technique in the control of bleeding due to peptic ulcer. However, bleeding persists or recurs in as many as 10-30% of patients. Gastric and duodenal ulcers present different clinical and endoscopic features and consequently the efficacy of endoscopic therapy and the factors associated with its failure should be studied separately. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the efficacy of endoscopic therapy in patients at high risk of persistent or recurrent bleeding due to gastric ulcer and to identify the factors associated with the failure of this technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study based on a clinical intervention protocol. Two hundred eight patients admitted for bleeding secondary to gastric ulcer with active bleeding or stigmas of recent bleeding who received endoscopic therapy between January 1992 and December 2001 were analyzed. Clinical, laboratory and endoscopic variables on admission, as well as the medical treatment and endoscopic procedure applied, were registered. Endoscopy was performed within 12 hours of admission. Patients were classified according to their response to endoscopic therapy: a) patients with limited bleeding, and b) patients with persistent or recurrent bleeding due to therapeutic failure. Intervention in patients with therapeutic failure was performed according to a previously established protocol. Variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model to identify those with an independent predictive value for failure of endoscopic therapy. RESULTS: Definitive hemostasis was achieved after initial therapy in 181 patients (87%). The efficacy of a second procedure increased the percentage of hemostasis to 91% of the patients. In the logistic regression model, the only variables that were independently associated with initial therapeutic failure were: hemodynamic status on admission (p = 0.016; OR = 3.99), the need for transfusion of blood products prior to endoscopy (p = 0.025; OR = 3.48), upper localization of the gastric ulcer (p = 0.050; OR = 3.08) and unsatisfactory endoscopic therapy (p = 0.009; OR = 17.39). CONCLUSION: These variables could contribute to the early identification of a subgroup of patients, which would enable us to increase medical-surgical surveillance and offer them other therapeutic alternatives.

[Endoscopic dilatation of caustic esophageal strictures]. / Tratamiento mediante dilatación endoscópica de las estenosis esofágicas cáusticas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of endoscopic dilatation in caustic esophageal strictures and to analyze the factors associated with a favorable response. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed a retrospective study of 33 patients who underwent dilatation with Savary bougie between 1989 and 2001. Response to initial dilatation and outcome during follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 50 years (8-83) and 58% were women. Intake was accidental in 29 (88%). In all patients, the caustic substance ingested was alkali. Dilatation was started in the acute phase in 12 patients (36%) and 13 presented inflammatory phenomena adjacent to the stenosis. During initial dilatation, 2 1.6 sessions (2-18) were performed and a favorable response was obtained in 18 patients (54%). At the end of follow-up, 68% of the patients presented satisfactory health status. The comparative study revealed that statistically significant variables for a favorable response to treatment were: accidental alkali intake, instauration of treatment in the chronic phase, absence of inflammatory phenomena, and a small number of initial dilatation sessions. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, more than half the patients with esophageal stenosis due to intake of corrosive alkalis showed a favorable initial response. In these patients with acute-phase stenosis who required a greater number of initial dilatation sessions, endoscopic therapy was less effective.

Ligadura de varices en pacientes pediátricos / Variceal ligation in pedidatric patients

No disponible

Criterios diagnósticos y manejo terapéutico de la colitis colágena / Diagnosic criteria and therapeutical management of collagen colitis

No disponible

[Role of early colonoscopy in severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding]. / Rendimiento de la colonoscopia precoz en la hemorragia digestiva baja aguda grave.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (SALGIB) accounts for 15% of cases of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB). The incidence increases with age and comorbidity. Identification of the origin of bleeding may be difficult. Colonoscopy has been proposed as the primary investigative tool. AIM: To assess the role of early colonoscopy as the primary method of evaluation in patients with SALGIB. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospective study based on a guideline for clinical practice approved in our institution. The study included 50 patients with SALGIB admitted to our gastrointestinal bleeding unit between January 1998 and April 2000. SALGIB was suspected when patients fulfilled two or more of the following criteria: 1) significant hemodynamic compromise, 2) decrease in hemoglobin 2 g/dl, and 3) transfusion requirement >= 2 blood units. Early colonoscopy was performed within 24 hours of onset of bleeding. An accurate endoscopic diagnosis was established if a lesion with active bleeding, visible non-hemorrhagic vessel or adherent red clot was identified. A presumptive diagnosis was made when hematochezia or fresh blood localized in a colonic segment, associated with a single, potentially hemorrhagic lesion, was observed and when the results of esophagogastroduodenoscopy were negative. Colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, barium studies, nuclear scan and angiography were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients were admitted for ALGIB. Fifty patients(22%) fulfilled the SALGIB criteria. The male/female ratio was 1:1. Definitive diagnosis was accurate in 20 patients. The most frequent cause was angiodysplasia (6 patients) and rectal ulcer (6 patients). Eighteen patients had a presumptive diagnosis; of these 14 had diverticulosis. In 12 patients, no cause was identified. Colonoscopy was performed in 45 patients, of which 32 were performed early and 13 electively. Accurate endoscopic diagnosis was more frequently established with early colonoscopy than with elective colonoscopy (15 [47%] vs 2 [15%], p < 0.05). The results of urgent nuclear scans contributed to accurate diagnosis in 5 out of the 10 patients in whom this technique was performed. Angiography was performed in 2 patients. Endoscopic therapy was attempted in 4 patients, all during early colonoscopy. Ten patients (20%) underwent surgery and 3 patients (6%) died. CONCLUSIONS: In 22% of patients with ALGIB admitted to our hospital bleeding was severe. Colonoscopy is the diagnostic tool of choice. When performed within 24 hours of hospital admission, this technique provides more accurate diagnosis than when performed electively.

[Efficacy of fecal detection of Helicobacter pylori with the HpSA technique in patients with upper digestive hemorrhage]. / Eficacia de la determinación fecal de Helicobacter pylori mediante la técnica HpSA en enfermos con hemorragia digestiva alta.

BACKGROUND: The rapid urease test is the most commonly used test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. However, some studies have suggested that results of this test are frequently false negative when blood is present. An effective new enzyme immunoassay for determining H. pylori antigens in stools has recently begun to be used. AIM: To determine the efficacy of the H. pylori stool antigen test (HpSAT) in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were prospectively studied from November 1998 to April 1999. In all patients the following tests were performed in the first 72 hours after onset of bleeding and 24 hours after hospital admission: upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, biopsy samples for the rapid urease test and histological study, blood samples for serology, stool samples for HpSAT, and the 13C urea breath test. Criteria for infection was a positive result in at least two of the four diagnostic techniques, except in the case of HpSAT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 32 patients, 23 (71.8%) were infected. The results of four HpSAT (12.5%) were negative and 28 were positive (87.5%). HpSAT showed high sensitivity (95.6%) but low specificity (33.3%). The PPV and NPV were 78.5% and 75% respectively. Of the 32 HpSAT, 25 (78.1) were performed in melenic stools: 22 were positive and 3 were negative. Seventy-five percent of negative HpSAT and 78.5% of positive HpSAT corresponded to melenic stools. CONCLUSIONS: HpSAT is a rapid, non-invasive technique that does not appear to be influenced by the presence of blood. Consequently, it can be applied in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The rapid urease test showed high sensitivity, specificity and PPV and should remain the first-line test in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. HpSAT is appropriate as a second-line technique and is useful when the rapid urease test is negative and infection is strongly suspected, when no samples for the rapid urease test have been taken and when endoscopy cannot be performed. The result obtained in the present study should be confirmed in future studies with larger samples.

[Evaluation of the efficacy of the endoscopic treatment in volvulus of the colon]. / Evaluación de la eficacia del tratamiento endoscópico en el vólvulo de colon.

Volvulus of the colon mainly affects the elderly and early surgery, with high morbidity and mortality, is often required. The efficacy of endoscopic devolvulization as an alternative is evaluated herein. From January 1993 to April 1999, 25 patients diagnosed with volvulus of the colon were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic devolvulization was not performed in one patient who showed signs of necrosis but was carried out in the remaining 24. The mean follow-up was 35.3 months. In all patients the procedure was initially effective. After the first attempt, 9 of the 24 patients (37%) relapsed, 4 out of 7 (57%) after a second attempt and 2 out of 2 (100%) after a third attempt. No morbidity or mortality was associated with the endoscopy. Six patients underwent surgery. Of these, none relapsed but two presented complications associated with the surgery. Mean hospital stay of the patients undergoing surgery was 30.8 days and that of those undergoing endoscopic devolvulization was 9.1 days. We conclude that endoscopic devolvulizatio is an effective therapeutic option when the mucosa is viable, with a high percentage of initial success, few complications inherent to the technique and with the possibility of carrying out a maximum of two attempts in cases of relapse. In the majority of patients, this technique is a valid alternative to urgent surgery, which has higher morbidity and mortality and longer mean hospital stay.

[Resident physician training in the digestive system. The point of view of the residents]. / Formación MIR en aparato digestivo. El punto de vista de los residentes.

AIM: To evaluate various aspects of current training of Spanish residents in gastroenterology. METHOD: An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to fourth-year resident physicians in Spanish hospitals with accredited gastroenterology residency programs. RESULTS: Forty residents in the fourth year (53% offered positions), four from the second year and one from the first year (20 men, 25 women) answered the survey. Mean age was 29.7 years (26-42 years). Fifty-one percent of the departments did not have ultrasonography facilities apart from those in the radiology department. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was available in all the departments but in 55% of these, residents did not receive training in this technique. Forty-one percent of residents did not know the objectives of the various training periods. Eighty-four percent evaluated the pressure of clinical work as "intense" or "very intense" with 67% reporting that it disturbed their training "seriously" or "very seriously" and 71% that it disturbed their personal lives. Supervision in ultrasonography, endoscopy and clinical work were mainly evaluated as "good" or "very good". Supervision was rated lower in outpatient departments and while on duty. Forty-two percent of residents rated the supervision of the personal tutor as "average". Seventy-six percent were "fairly" or "very interested" in the introduction of "areas of specific training". CONCLUSIONS: The quality of residents' training in general and of gastroenterology training in particular is high. There are, however, several aspects which could be improved.

[Endoscopic drainage with polyethylene endoprosthesis of malignant obstructive jaundice]. / Drenaje endoscópico mediante prótesis de polietileno de la ictericia obstructiva maligna.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and complications of endoscopic drainage of malignant obstructive jaundice with plastic endoprosthesis as well as to identify possible factors related with occlusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-hundred and forty patients with malignant obstructive jaundice were retrospectively evaluated. The site of obstruction was proximal in 35 patients (25.0%), distal in 64 (45.7) and ampullary in 41 (29.3). Amsterdam or pigtail polyethylene prostheses of variable caliber and length were used. Drainage was preoperative in 41 patients and palliative in 99. Seventy-seven patients who underwent with palliative drainage were followed up long-term. RESULTS: Drainage was satisfactory in 132 patients (94.2%). Early morbidity was 10.7% (14/140) and early mortality related with the technique was 5% (7/140). Time free of obstruction was 4.6 +/- 1.0 months and in 47/77 (60%) the prostheses were still working at the end of follow-up. The actuarial rate of obstruction at 6 months was 42%, the majority (61%) occurring in the first 3 months. The median survival was 5.9 +/- 1.3 months. Of all the factors analyzed, greater permeability was found only in the ampullary tumors (p < 0.01) and in prostheses of caliber equal or superior to 10 French (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic biliary drainage using plastic prostheses is satisfactory in the majority of patients with malignant jaundice. It has a low complication rate and provides acceptable palliation: the majority of patients do not require prostheses to be replaced and, when they becomes clogged, substitution usually solves the problem. Ampullary tumors and prostheses of higher caliber (> or = 10F) have been associated with greater permeability.