Genomic prediction ability for feed efficiency traits using different models and pseudo-phenotypes under several validation strategies in Nelore cattle.

There is a growing interest to improve feed efficiency (FE) traits in cattle. The genomic selection was proposed to improve these traits since they are difficult and expensive to measure. Up to date, there are scarce studies about the implementation of genomic selection for FE traits in indicine cattle under different scenarios of pseudo-phenotypes, models, and validation strategies on a commercial large scale. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the feasibility of genomic selection implementation for FE traits in Nelore cattle applying different models and pseudo-phenotypes under validation strategies. Phenotypic and genotypic information from 4 329 and 3 467 animals were used, respectively, which were tested for residual feed intake, DM intake, feed efficiency, feed conversion ratio, residual BW gain, and residual intake and BW gain. Six prediction methods were used: single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction, Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes Cπ, Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (BLASSO), and Bayes R. Phenotypes adjusted for fixed effects (Y*), estimated breeding value (EBV), and EBV deregressed (DEBV) were used as pseudo-phenotypes. The validation approaches used were: (1) random: the data was randomly divided into ten subsets and the validation was done in each subset at a time; (2) age: the partition into training and testing sets was based on year of birth and testing animals were born after 2016; and (3) EBV accuracy: the data was split into two groups, being animals with accuracy above 0.45 the training set; and below 0.45 the validation set. In the analyses that used the Y* as pseudo-phenotype, prediction ability (PA) was obtained by dividing the correlation between pseudo-phenotype and genomic EBV (GEBV) by the square root of the heritability of the trait. When EBV and DEBV were used as the pseudo-phenotype, the simple correlation of this quantity with the GEBV was considered as PA. The prediction methods show similar results for PA and bias. The random cross-validation presented higher PA (0.17) than EBV accuracy (0.14) and age (0.13). The PA was higher for Y* than for EBV and DEBV (30.0 and 34.3%, respectively). Random validation presented the highest PA, being indicated for use in populations composed mainly of young animals and traits with few generations of data recording. For high heritability traits, the validation can be done by age, enabling the prediction of the next-generation genetic merit. These results would support breeders to identify genomic approaches that are more viable for genomic prediction for FE-related traits.

Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle.

Several methods have been used for genome-enabled prediction (or genomic selection) of complex traits, for example, multiple regression models describing a target trait with a linear function of a set of genetic markers. Genomic selection studies have been focused mostly on single-trait analyses. However, most profitability traits are genetically correlated, and an increase in prediction accuracy of genomic breeding values for genetically correlated traits is expected when using multiple-trait models. Thus, this study was carried out to assess the accuracy of genomic prediction for carcass and meat quality traits in Nelore cattle, using single- and multiple-trait approaches. The study considered 15 780, 15 784, 15 742 and 526 records of rib eye area (REA, cm2), back fat thickness (BF, mm), rump fat (RF, mm) and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF, kg), respectively, in Nelore cattle, from the Nelore Brazil Breeding Program. Animals were genotyped with a low-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel and subsequently imputed to arrays with 54 and 777 k SNPs. Four Bayesian specifications of genomic regression models, namely, Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes Cπ and Bayesian Ridge Regression; blending methods, BLUP; and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) methods were compared in terms of prediction accuracy using a fivefold cross-validation. Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.20 to 0.35 and from 0.21 to 0.46 for RF and WBSF on single- and multiple-trait analyses, respectively. Prediction accuracies for REA, BF, RF and WBSF were all similar using the different specifications of regression models. In addition, this study has shown the impact of genomic information upon genetic evaluations in beef cattle using the multiple-trait model, which was also advantageous compared to the single-trait model because it accounted for the selection process using multiple traits at the same time. The advantage of multi-trait analyses is attributed to the consideration of correlations and genetic influences between the traits, in addition to the non-random association of alleles.