Mucosal Microbiota from Colorectal Cancer, Adenoma and Normal Epithelium Reveals the Imprint of Fusobacterium nucleatum in Cancerogenesis.

An increasing amount of evidence suggests the emerging role of the gut microbiota in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to elucidate the architecture of microbial communities within normal and neoplastic colonic mucosa. METHODS: Microbiota were analyzed by NGS and by an ensemble of metagenomics analysis tools in a total of 69 tissues from 9 patients with synchronous colorectal neoplasia and adenomas (27 specimens: 9 from normal tissues, 9 adenomas, and 9 tumours), 16 patients with only colonic adenomas (32 specimens: 16 from normal tissues and 16 adenomas), and from healthy subjects (10 specimens of normal mucosa). RESULTS: Weak differences were observed in alpha and beta metrics among the synchronous tissues from CRC and controls. Through pairwise differential abundance analyses of sample groups, an increasing trend of Rikenellaceae, Pseudomonas and Fusobacterium, and decreasing trends of Staphylococcus, Actinobacillus and Gemmiger were observed in CRC, while Staphylococcus and Bifidobacterium were decreased in patients with only adenomas. At RT-qPCR analysis, Fusobacterium nucleatum was significantly enriched in all the tissues of subjects with synchronous colorectal neoplasia. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide a comprehensive view of the human mucosa-associated gut microbiota, emphasizing global microbial diversity mostly in synchronous lesions and proving the constant presence of Fusobacterium nucleatum, with its ability to drive carcinogenesis.

Germline Alterations in Patients With IBD-associated Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are at risk of developing a colorectal cancer (CRC). No information is available on the contribution of patients' genetic background to CRC occurrence. This study investigates germline alterations in patients with IBD-associated CRC. METHODS: We profiled a panel of 39 genes potentially involved in cancer predisposition and searched for germline variants in IBD patients with CRC or high-grade dysplasia. RESULTS: After clinical exclusion of genetic cancer syndromes, 25 IBD patients (4 CD and 21 UC) with CRC or high-grade dysplasia were studied. After excluding variants with low likelihood of pathogenicity (classes 1 or 2 according the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC]), the panel identified pathogenic variants, likely pathogenic, or variants with unknown significance in 18 patients (72%). Six patients (24%) carried pathogenic or likely variants (IARC class 5 or 4). Of the identified variants, 4 encompassed the APC region, 3 the MLH1 gene, and the remaining ones the MSH2, MSH3, monoallelic MUTYH, EPCAM, BRCA1, CHEK2, POLD1, POLE, CDKN2A, and PDGFRA genes. Four patients carried at least 2 variants in different genes. Duration of IBD was significantly shorter in carriers of 4 or 5 IARC variants (7 years; range 0-21; P = .002) and in those with variants with unknown significance (12 years; range 0-22; P = .005) compared with patients without or with only benign variations (23.5 years; range 15-34). CONCLUSIONS: In silico analysis and sequence-based testing of germline DNA from IBD patients with CRC or high-grade dysplasia detected 24% of variants positioned in pathogenic classes. In patients with type 3, 4, and 5 variants, the onset of high-grade dysplasia or CRC was significantly earlier than in patients with benign or unidentified variants. The screening for these genes could identify IBD patients requiring a more intensive endoscopic surveillance for earlier detection of dysplastic changes.

Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak and the serum prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biologic drugs.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving biologic therapies are at risk for viral infections. This study investigated the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the serum prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with biologic drugs. METHODS: Information on demography, co-morbidities, clinical data regarding IBD, symptoms suggestive of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, close contacts with SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, hospitalization, and therapies administered for COVID-19 was collected for all patients who were being treated with biologic drugs. All patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients (27 children) with a mean age of 42.2 ±â€¯16.7 years (range 9 - 88) and a mean duration of disease of 13.4 ±â€¯10 years (range 0.2 - 49) were enrolled. One hundred four patients (40.2%) had ulcerative colitis, and 155 (59.8%) had Crohn's disease. About the therapy: 62 patients were receiving infliximab, 89 adalimumab, 20 golimumab, 57 vedolizumab, 27 ustekinumab, 1 thalidomide, and 3 an experimental compound. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2. Thirty-two patients (12.3%) reported respiratory symptoms, and 2 of them were hospitalized (0.77%). Two patients resulted positive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 (0.77%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBD, treatment with biologic drug does not represent a risk factor for the SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Safety and efficacy of switching from infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 to infliximab biosimilar SB2 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, switching from infliximab originator to biosimilars is effective and safe. Few data on single switch have been published, and data on multiple switches of different infliximab are unavailable. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who switched from CT-P13 to SB2, and of those with multiple switches among different infliximab compounds was conducted. Clinical activity, C reactive protein (CRP), adverse events (AE) and loss of response (LOR) were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (26 males, 14 Crohn's disease and 22 ulcerative colitis) were enrolled and followed up for >6 months. All patients switched from CT-P13 to SB2; 12 of them (33.3%) had already switched from reference Infliximab to CT-P13, and for the remaining patients CT-P13 was the first infliximab. The clinical remission rate six months before and three months after SB2-switch was the same (58.3%) and the rate of mild activity varied from 27.8 to 33.3% (P = 0.68); the percentage of patients with normal CRP values passed from 94.4 to 91.7% (P = 1). Two patients (5.5%) had AE and 11 (30.5%) a LOR. At univariate analysis, patients with a single switch had a non-significant risk of LOR during SB2 [odds ratio (OR) = 7.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-71, P = 0.06]. SB2-LOR was associated with previous AE under CT-P13 (OR = 9.1, 95% CI 0.82-100, P = 0.07). None of such factors was significant at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Switching from CT-P13 to SB2 seems to be safe and effective either in patients with a single than in those with multiple switches.