NCCN Guidelines® Insights: B-Cell Lymphomas, Version 6.2023.

Novel targeted therapies (small molecule inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and CD19-directed therapies) have changed the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors continue to evolve in the management of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), in both the relapsed/refractory and the frontline setting. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapies are now effective and approved treatment options for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and MCL. Bispecific T-cell engagers represent a novel immunotherapeutic approach for relapsed FL and DLBCL after multiple lines of therapies, including prior CAR T-cell therapy. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight the significant updates to the NCCN Guidelines for B-Cell Lymphomas for the treatment of FL, DLBCL, and MCL.

Exposure of progressive immune dysfunction by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have reduced seroconversion rates and lower binding antibody (Ab) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers than healthy individuals following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination. Here, we dissected vaccine-mediated humoral and cellular responses to understand the mechanisms underlying CLL-induced immune dysfunction. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a prospective observational study in SARS-CoV-2 infection-naïve CLL patients (n = 95) and healthy controls (n = 30) who were vaccinated between December 2020 and June 2021. Sixty-one CLL patients and 27 healthy controls received 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine, while 34 CLL patients and 3 healthy controls received 2 doses of the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. The median time to analysis was 38 days (IQR, 27 to 83) for CLL patients and 36 days (IQR, 28 to 57) for healthy controls. Testing plasma samples for SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike and receptor-binding domain Abs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we found that all healthy controls seroconverted to both antigens, while CLL patients had lower response rates (68% and 54%) as well as lower median titers (23-fold and 30-fold; both p < 0.001). Similarly, NAb responses against the then prevalent D614G and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants were detected in 97% and 93% of controls, respectively, but in only 42% and 38% of CLL patients, who also exhibited >23-fold and >17-fold lower median NAb titers (both p < 0.001). Interestingly, 26% of CLL patients failed to develop NAbs but had high-titer binding Abs that preferentially reacted with the S2 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Since these patients were also seropositive for endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs), these responses likely reflect cross-reactive HCoV Abs rather than vaccine-induced de novo responses. CLL disease status, advanced Rai stage (III-IV), elevated serum beta-2 microglobulin levels (ß2m >2.4 mg/L), prior therapy, anti-CD20 immunotherapy (<12 months), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) prophylaxis were all predictive of an inability to mount SARS-CoV-2 NAbs (all p ≤ 0.03). T cell response rates determined for a subset of participants were 2.8-fold lower for CLL patients compared to healthy controls (0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.27, p < 0.001), with reduced intracellular IFNγ staining (p = 0.03) and effector polyfunctionality (p < 0.001) observed in CD4+ but not in CD8+ T cells. Surprisingly, in treatment-naïve CLL patients, BNT162b2 vaccination was identified as an independent negative risk factor for NAb generation (5.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 27, p = 0.006). CLL patients who received mRNA-1273 had 12-fold higher (p < 0.001) NAb titers and 1.7-fold higher (6.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 32, p = 0.02) response rates than BNT162b2 vaccinees despite similar disease characteristics. The absence of detectable NAbs in CLL patients was associated with reduced naïve CD4+ T cells (p = 0.03) and increased CD8+ effector memory T cells (p = 0.006). Limitations of the study were that not all participants were subjected to the same immune analyses and that pre-vaccination samples were not available. CONCLUSIONS: CLL pathogenesis is characterized by a progressive loss of adaptive immune functions, including in most treatment-naïve patients, with preexisting memory being preserved longer than the capacity to mount responses to new antigens. In addition, higher NAb titers and response rates identify mRNA-1273 as a superior vaccine for CLL patients.

A phase 1 first-in-human study of GS-0189, an anti-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) is the receptor for cluster of differentiation (CD)47, a potent "don't eat me" signal for macrophages. Disruption of CD47-SIRPα signaling in the presence of prophagocytic signals can lead to enhanced phagocytosis of tumor cells, resulting in a direct antitumor effect; agents targeting this pathway have shown efficacy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and other tumor types. GS-0189 is a novel anti-SIRPα humanized monoclonal antibody. Here we report: (1) clinical safety, preliminary activity, and pharmacokinetics of GS-0189 as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab from a phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL (NCT04502706, SRP001); (2) in vitro characterization of GS-0189 binding to SIRPα; and (3) in vitro phagocytic activity. Clinically, GS-0189 was well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL with evidence of clinical activity in combination with rituximab. Receptor occupancy (RO) of GS-0189 was highly variable in NHL patients; binding affinity studies showed significantly higher affinity for SIRPα variant 1 than variant 2, consistent with RO in patient and healthy donor samples. In vitro phagocytosis induced by GS-0189 was also SIRPα variant-dependent. Although clinical development of GS-0189 was discontinued, the CD47-SIRPα signaling pathway remains a promising therapeutic target and should continue to be explored.

Real-World Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes for Patients With Stage III or IV Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With Frontline ABVD: A Retrospective Database Review in the United States.

In newly diagnosed stage III/IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) improved overall survival (OS) versus ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). As clinical trial and real-world populations may differ, real-world treatment characteristics and OS (rwOS) were assessed for patients with stage III/IV cHL treated with frontline ABVD. This retrospective, observational analysis of deidentified electronic health record data (1/1/2011-8/31/2020) evaluated baseline disease and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and rwOS in patients with stage III/IV cHL treated with frontline ABVD. Data for 167 patients were analyzed. A median of 6 ABVD cycles were received. Baseline/interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans were obtained for 60.5%/89.8% of patients. Of patients diagnosed in 2016 or later (n = 73), 89% received an interim PET scan; 15/46 patients with no documented Deauville score, 6/15 with a score of 1 to 3, and 3/4 with a score of 4 to 5 de-escalated to AVD. Following frontline ABVD, 55.1% of patients received subsequent systemic therapy and 31.7% stem cell transplantation (SCT). At a median follow-up of 31.8 months, 82.0% of patients were alive (median rwOS, 101.2 months). Patients with stage III/IV cHL treated with frontline ABVD in the real world versus in clinical trials receive more subsequent therapy, including SCTs. Interim PET scans and Deauville scores were not universally obtained after treatment cycle 2, yet treatment de-escalation was observed. Patients with stage III/IV cHL may benefit from frontline A+AVD versus ABVD, as it improves OS and reduces the burden of subsequent therapy, including SCTs.

Patterns of Utilization and Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 Rearrangements.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Diffuse Large Bcell Lymphoma (DLBCL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 gene rearrangements [double-hit lymphoma/triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL)] have poor prognosis in the relapsed/refractory setting. METHODS: We utilized a real-world deidentified database of DLBCL patients and report patterns of therapy utilization in relapsed/refractory DLBCL. We used log-rank test to compare real-world overall survival (rwOS) among DHL and non-DHL subgroups for CAR Tcell therapy or ASCT respectively, stratified for prior lines of therapy. RESULTS: Of all 7,877 patients with DLBCL, 367 patients had DHL while 6113 had non-DHL. Second line chemotherapy was administered to 147 DHL patients and 1517 non-DHL. 1393 were excluded, including 934 with unknown DHL/THL status. Approximately 47% received salvage intent chemotherapy in the DHL subgroup, of which 19% patients eventually received ASCT, while 34% received salvage intent chemotherapy in the non-DHL/THL group with 32% receiving ASCT. DHL/THL status negatively influenced median rwOS for patients who underwent ASCT in the second-line while it was associated with numerically inferior but without statistically significant rwOS among patients that underwent CAR Tcell therapy on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: rwOS of relapsed DHL/THL is inferior to non-DHL/THL. Fewer patients with DHL/THL were able to proceed with ASCT after salvage chemotherapy compared to non-DHL/THL. ASCT as second-line therapy for relapsed DHL/THL had worse rwOS than for non-DHL/THL, consistent with the natural history of DHL/THL. This difference was not seen for CAR Tcell therapy, which combined with promising results from clinical trials, suggests a greater role for CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory DHL.

Evaluating real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of mantle cell lymphoma.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered incurable with the available chemoimmunotherapy approaches, and therefore, newer effective targeted therapies such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are increasingly used in MCL as chronic suppressive therapy, especially in the elderly. We aimed to describe the treatment patterns in MCL at different lines of therapy with a focus on BTK inhibitor use and compare outcomes with known prognostic factors using a nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. We analyzed patient-level data from the period of 2011 to 2021. In this study of 4336 patients with MCL, we found that bendamustine plus rituximab chemotherapy was the most commonly used frontline regimen (42%). Maintenance rituximab or consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was administered to 31% of all patients. Also, for patients who received ASCT as consolidation therapy, only 34% subsequently received rituximab maintenance. BTK inhibitors were the most preferred agents in second or later lines of therapy (n = 933, 57%), followed by bortezomib, lenalidomide, and venetoclax, respectively. Among patients treated with BTK inhibitors, the median real-world overall survival (rwOS) was 35 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-50), 24 months (95% CI, 22-30), and 18 months (95% CI, 14-21) for first line, second line, and third or later line of therapy, respectively. Patients with a deletion 17p/TP53 mutation and blastoid variant MCL had poor outcomes; however, BTK inhibitors appeared to mitigate the negative influence of del17p/TP53-mutated MCL with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% CI, 0.88-1.55) on multivariable analysis.

Timing of high-dose methotrexate CNS prophylaxis in DLBCL: a multicenter international analysis of 1384 patients.

Prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is often used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, despite limited evidence demonstrating efficacy or the optimal delivery method. We conducted a retrospective, international analysis of 1384 patients receiving HD-MTX CNS prophylaxis either intercalated (i-HD-MTX) (n = 749) or at the end (n = 635) of R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapy (EOT). There were 78 CNS relapses (3-year rate 5.7%), with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT: 5.7% vs 5.8%, P = .98; 3-year difference: 0.04% (-2.0% to 3.1%). Conclusions were unchanged on adjusting for baseline prognostic factors or on 6-month landmark analysis (n = 1253). In patients with a high CNS international prognostic index (n = 600), the 3-year CNS relapse rate was 9.1%, with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT. On multivariable analysis, increasing age and renal/adrenal involvement were the only independent risk factors for CNS relapse. Concurrent intrathecal prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in CNS relapse. R-CHOP delays of ≥7 days were significantly increased with i-HD-MTX vs EOT, with 308 of 1573 (19.6%) i-HD-MTX treatments resulting in a delay to subsequent R-CHOP (median 8 days). Increased risk of delay occurred in older patients when delivery was later than day 10 in the R-CHOP cycle. In summary, we found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk vs i-HD-MTX. Findings in high-risk subgroups were unchanged. Rates of CNS relapse in this HD-MTX-treated cohort were similar to comparable cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. If HD-MTX is still considered for certain high-risk patients, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion.

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination exposes progressive adaptive immune dysfunction in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients have lower seroconversion rates and antibody titers following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but the reasons for this diminished response are poorly understood. Here, we studied humoral and cellular responses in 95 CLL patients and 30 healthy controls after two BNT162b2 or mRNA-2173 mRNA immunizations. We found that 42% of CLL vaccinees developed SARS-CoV-2-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), while 32% had no response. Interestingly, 26% were seropositive, but had no detectable NAbs, suggesting the maintenance of pre-existing endemic human coronavirus-specific antibodies that cross-react with the S2 domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. These individuals had more advanced disease. In treatment-naïve CLL patients, mRNA-2173 induced 12-fold higher NAb titers and 1.7-fold higher response rates than BNT162b2. These data reveal a graded loss of immune function, with pre-existing memory being preserved longer than the capacity to respond to new antigens, and identify mRNA-2173 as a superior vaccine for CLL patients.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: B-Cell Lymphomas, Version 5.2021.

In the last decade, a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas has resulted in the development of novel targeted therapies, such as small molecule inhibitors of select kinases in the B-cell receptor pathway, antibody-drug conjugates, and small molecules that target a variety of proteins (eg, CD-19, EZH2, and XPO-1-mediated nuclear export). Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, first approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, has also emerged as a novel treatment option for R/R follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight the new targeted therapy options included in the NCCN Guidelines for B-Cell Lymphomas for the treatment of R/R disease.

CAR T-cell therapy in mature lymphoid malignancies: clinical opportunities and challenges.

The advent of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of various hematologic malignancies. Ever since its first approval for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in 2017, CAR T-cell therapy has been found to be efficacious in various other lymphoid malignancies, with recent approvals in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Although CAR T-cell therapeutics offer a novel immunotherapeutic approach to treat otherwise refractory malignancies, the plethora of studies/products and complexities in manufacturing and administration have led to several challenges for clinicians and the healthcare system as a whole. Some of the areas of unmet need include manufacturing delays, short persistence of CAR T-cells in circulation, lack of predictive biomarkers for efficacy and toxicity, and high cost of therapy. In this review, we evaluate the existing data on the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapies in mature lymphoid malignancies [lymphomas, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and multiple myeloma]. We also provide an in-depth review of the challenges posed by CAR T-cell therapeutics and potential strategies to overcome them. With newer CAR T-cell products and incorporation of measures to mitigate toxicities pertaining to cytokine release and neurological syndromes, there is a potential to overcome several of these challenges in the near future. Finally, as CAR T-cell therapy gains regulatory approval for more indications, there is a need to tackle the financial toxicity posed by this modality to sustain patient access.

Copanlisib in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

B-cell receptor signaling is important in the pathogenesis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The PI3K pathway is activated by B-cell receptor signaling. Recently, several PI3K inhibitors have been in development for the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Copanlisib is a PI3Kα and PI3Kδ inhibitor that has been approved for its use as third-line therapy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. The two other PI3k inhibitors approved by the US FDA in this setting are idelalisib and duvelisib. In this review, we compare the efficacy and adverse event profile of these different PI3K inhibitors and discuss the advantages and challenges of using copanlisib along with a guide on managing routinely encountered adverse events in the clinics.

Targeting Biology in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Chemotherapy nonspecifically affects all cells undergoing DNA replication and has severe side effects. Understanding of the biology of non-Hodgkin lymphomas has led to development of drugs that target specific lymphoma cell functions and tumor microenvironment. Targeted agents used in combination with chemotherapy pave the way to a chemotherapy-free world. These drugs target multiple oncogenic pathways and modulate the immune system, with better outcomes. Such combinations should be administered only in clinical trials. Incorporating studies of the biology and genetics of these tumors into therapeutic studies may lead to a chemotherapy-free world with improved outcomes and reduced toxicities.

Determining the sequence of novel therapies in the treatment of relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) accounts for about 10% of all lymphomas in the U.S.A. Exceptional progress has been made in the treatment of HL with complete response (CR) rates up to 94% in limited stage and 88% in advanced stage disease with regimens such as adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in the frontline setting. Nevertheless, up to 10% of patients with limited stage disease and 20-30% of those with advanced stage HL relapse. In the last decade, newer agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and checkpoint inhibitors have been approved by the FDA for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory HL. As these newer agents are increasingly incorporated in both the frontline and relapsed settings, their optimal sequence becomes challenging for clinicians. Areas covered: This review will discuss the evidence behind the approval of BV and checkpoint inhibitors in HL and the appropriate sequence for using them in relapsed HL. Expert commentary: The appropriate sequence of BV and/or checkpoint inhibitors in the relapsed setting depends on the regimen used in the frontline setting.

Primary effusion lymphoma: current perspectives.

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare and aggressive disease, affecting a unique population of patients who are often elderly or immunocompromised. PEL is associated with human herpesvirus type-8 infection and most commonly presents as malignant effusions of the body cavities. Patients diagnosed with PEL often have a compromised immune system from secondary conditions such as HIV. Chemotherapy has traditionally been the cornerstone of treatment for patients with a good performance status and no significant comorbidities. However, an optimal regimen does not exist. Most patients with PEL experience a relapse after frontline therapy within 6-8 months and subsequently require further treatment. In recent years, our understanding of the molecular drivers and environmental factors affecting the pathogenesis of PEL has expanded. This review will discuss the pathogenesis of PEL and various management approaches available in the frontline and relapsed setting as well as targeted agents that have shown promise in this disease.

Surrogate Endpoints and Risk Adaptive Strategies in Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma.

Follicular lymphoma is the second most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with an estimated 3.18 cases per 100,000 people. Despite the prolongation of survival with chemoimmunotherapy, variability in response to initial treatment and outcome still exists. Whereas prolonging overall survival is important, it is generally an unreasonable primary endpoint in the front-line setting. The long follow-up needed and the influence of subsequent therapies creates a potential bias. Thus, clinical trials require approximately 5 to 8 years from activation to completion and analysis of outcomes. This duration results in enormous cost and a delay in developing newer therapies. Thus, there is a need to identify markers or surrogate endpoints that can be used in clinical trials to expedite the development of new treatments. This review will discuss various clinical, radiologic, and laboratory measures used to assess outcomes and overall survival in patients with untreated follicular lymphoma, and gauge their utility in clinical trials as surrogate endpoints.

The association of histologic grade with acute graft-versus-host disease response and outcomes.

Consensus criteria are routinely used to clinically grade acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A histologic grading system for acute GVHD is available, but there are limited data on its correlation with clinical grade and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes. Among 503 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT from 2005 to 2013, we identified 300 biopsy episodes of the skin and gastrointestinal (GI) tract in 231 patients. Histologic grade was correlated with clinical grade of GVHD, day 28 treatment response, and outcome. Both skin (R = 0.32) and GI (R = 0.61) histologic grade correlated with clinical grade (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, histologic grade (HR 0.87, P = 0.011) and clinical grade (HR 0.86, P = 0.008) were significantly associated with day 28-treatment response. A histologic grade lower than its associated clinical grade predicted for better response (HR 1.26, P = 0.027), while a histologic grade higher than associated clinical grade had no correlation with response (P = 0.89). Both clinical and histologic GVHD grade were significant predictors of non-relapse mortality (HR 1.47, P = 0.04 and HR 1.67, P = 0.002, respectively) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.57, P = 0.001 and HR 1.29, P = 0.046, respectively). Histologic GVHD grade thus is correlated with clinical grading and treatment response, and may play a role in further predicting severity and treatment response of acute GVHD.

Neuropathy and efficacy of once weekly subcutaneous bortezomib in multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Randomized studies have shown that bortezomib (BTZ) can be given weekly via intravenous (IV) route or twice weekly via subcutaneous (SC) route with lower neuropathy risk and no loss of anti-myeloma efficacy compared to original standard IV twice weekly schedule. Weekly SC should therefore yield the best therapeutic index and is widely used but has not been compared to established administration schedules in the context of a clinical trial. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic medical record review was done for disease control and neuropathy symptoms of 344 consecutive patients who received their first BTZ-containing regimen for myeloma or AL amyloidosis before or after we changed to SC weekly in December 2010. Univariate and multivariable analyses were carried out that adjusted for age, underlying disease, concurrently used anticancer agents, underlying conditions predisposing to neuropathy, and number of prior regimens compared SC weekly to other schedules. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients received BTZ SC weekly, 17 SC twice weekly, 127 IV weekly and 147 IV twice weekly. Risk for neuropathy of any grade was higher with other schedules compared to SC weekly (44.3% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.001) while response rate was similar (72.1% vs. 76.6%, respectively, p = 0.15). Multivariable analyses upheld higher neuropathy risk (Odds ratio 2.45, 95% CI 1.26-4.76, p = 0.008) while the likelihood of not achieving a response (= partial response or better) was comparable (Odds ratio 1.25, 95% CI 0.58-2.71, p = 0.56) for other schedules compared to SC weekly, respectively. Lower neuropathy risk translated into longer treatment duration when BTZ was started SC weekly (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly SC BTZ has activity comparable to other schedules and causes low rates of neuropathy.