Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
J Burn Care Res ; 2024 Apr 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609181

RESUMEN

Burn injury predisposes patients to significant psychological morbidity, including anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress. Adding to the burden of injury, patients often require transfer to specialized burn centers located far from home. We hypothesized that greater distances between a patient's home address and the treating burn center would increase the rate of postinjury anxiety and depression. From January 2021 to June 2023, patients who were admitted to our American Burn Association verified center and seen for posthospitalization follow-up were identified. Demographics, burn characteristics, and follow-up anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2) screening scores were reviewed. Comparisons between patients with positive and negative screens were performed using univariate analysis followed by logistic regression. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between distance to the burn center and incremental screening scores. Of the 272 patients identified, 35.6% and 27.9% screened positive for anxiety and depression, respectively. The distance to burn center was not greater among patients with positive screens. Likewise, no statistically significant linear relationship was found between distance to the burn center and incremental screening scores. Morphine milligram equivalents on the last day of hospitalization (P = .04) and a prior psychiatric history (P < .001) all predicted postinjury anxiety. Total body surface area burned (P = .02) and a prior psychiatric history (P = .02) predicted postinjury depression. The distance between a patient's home and the treating burn center does not alter anxiety and depression rates following burn injury, further supporting the transfer of patients to specialized centers.

2.
J Am Coll Surg ; 2024 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441159

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the increase in firearm injury observed across the country, significant gaps remain relevant to our understanding of how firearm exposure translates to injury. Using acoustic gunshot detection and a collaborative hospital and law enforcement firearm injury database, we sought to identify the relationship between firearm discharge and injury over time. STUDY DESIGN: From 2018-2021, instances of firearm discharge captured via acoustic detection in six-square miles of Louisville, KY was merged with data from the collaborative firearm injury database. Key outcomes included the total number of rounds fired, injury and fatality rates per round, and the percentage of rounds discharged from automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines. RESULTS: Over the study period, 54,397 rounds of ammunition were discharged resulting in 914 injuries, 435 hospital admissions, 2,442 hospital days, 155 emergent operations, and 180 fatalities. For each round of ammunition fired, the risk of injury and fatality was 1.7% and 0.3% respectively. The total number of rounds fired per month nearly tripled (614 vs. 1,623, p < 0.001) leading to increased injury (15 vs. 37, p < 0.001) and fatality (3 vs. 7, p < 0.001). The percentage of rounds fired from automatic weapons (0 vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and high-capacity magazines (7.6 vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001) increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: The increased burden of firearm injury is related to an overall increase in firearm exposure as measured by the total number of rounds discharged. High-capacity magazines and automatic weaponry are being used with increasing frequency in urban American.

3.
Surgery ; 175(3): 913-918, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37953144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury is classified by urine output into non-oliguric and oliguric variants. Non-oliguric acute kidney injury has lower morbidity and mortality and accounts for up to 64% of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients. However, the incidence of non-oliguric acute kidney injury in the trauma population and whether the 2 variants of acute kidney injury share the same risk factors is unknown. We hypothesized that oliguria would be present in the majority of acute kidney injury in severely injured trauma patients and that unique risk factors would predispose patients to the development of oliguria. METHODS: Patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit and diagnosed with an acute kidney injury between 2016 to 2021 were identified. Cases were categorized based on urine output into oliguric (<400 mL per day) and non-oliguric (>400 mL per day) disease. Risk factors, management, and outcomes were compared. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with oliguria. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients met inclusion criteria. Non-oliguric acute kidney injury accounted for 74% of all cases and was associated with greater survival (78% vs 35.6%, P < .001). Using logistic regression, female sex, vasopressor use, and a greater net fluid balance at 48 hours were all predictive of oliguria (while controlling for age, race, shock index, massive transfusion, operative intervention, cardiac arrest, and nephrotoxic medication exposure). CONCLUSION: Non-oliguria accounts for the majority of post-traumatic acute kidney injury and is associated with improved survival. Specific risk factors for the development of oliguric acute kidney injury include female sex, vasopressor use, and a higher net fluid balance at 48 hours.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Oliguria , Humanos , Femenino , Oliguria/etiología , Oliguria/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Factores de Riesgo , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 96(2): 232-239, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37872666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic in the United States continues to lead to a substantial number of preventable deaths and disability. The development of opioid dependence has been strongly linked to previous opioid exposure. Trauma patients are at particular risk since opioids are frequently required to control pain after injury. The purpose to this study was to examine the prevalence of opioid use before and after injury and to identify risk factors for persistent long-term opioid use after trauma. METHODS: Records for all patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center over a 1-year period were analyzed. Demographics, injury characteristics, and hospital course were recorded. A multistate Prescription Drug Monitoring Program database was queried to obtain records of all controlled substances prescribed from 6 months before the date of injury to 12 months after hospital discharge. Patients still receiving narcotics at 1 year were defined as persistent long-term users and were compared against those who were not. RESULTS: A total of 2,992 patients were analyzed. Of all patients, 20.4% had filled a narcotic prescription within the 6 months before injury, 53.5% received opioids at hospital discharge, and 12.5% had persistent long-term use after trauma with the majority demonstrating preinjury use. Univariate risk factors for long-term use included female sex, longer length of stay, higher Injury Severity Score, anxiety, depression, orthopedic surgeries, spine injuries, multiple surgical locations, discharge to acute inpatient rehab, and preinjury opioid use. On multivariate analysis, the only significant predictors of persistent long-term prescription opioid use were preinjury use and a much smaller effect associated with use at discharge. CONCLUSION: During a sustained opioid epidemic, concerns and caution are warranted in the use of prescription narcotics for trauma patients. However, persistent long-term opioid use among opioid-naive patients is rare and difficult to predict after trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Narcóticos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina
5.
Inj Prev ; 30(1): 39-45, 2024 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857476

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unintentional firearm injury (UFI) remains a significant problem in the USA with respect to preventable injury and death. The antecedent, behaviour and consequence (ABC) taxonomy has been used by law enforcement agencies to evaluate unintentional firearm discharge. Using an adapted ABC taxonomy, we sought to categorise civilian UFI in our community to identify modifiable behaviours. METHODS: Using a collaborative firearm injury database (containing both a university-based level 1 trauma registry and a metropolitan law enforcement database), all UFIs from August 2008 through December 2021 were identified. Perceived threat (antecedent), behaviour and injured party (consequence) were identified for each incident. RESULTS: During the study period, 937 incidents of UFI were identified with 64.2% of incidents occurring during routine firearm tasks. 30.4% of UFI occurred during neglectful firearm behaviour such as inappropriate storage. Most injuries occurred under situations of low perceived threat. UFI involving children was most often due to inappropriate storage of weapons, while cleaning a firearm was the most common behaviour in adults. Overall, 16.5% of UFI involved injury to persons other than the one handling the weapon and approximately 1.3% of UFI resulted in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of UFI occurred during routine and expected firearm tasks such as firearm cleaning. Prevention programmes should not overlook these modifiable behaviours in an effort to reduce UFIs, complications and deaths.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Accidentales , Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control , Aplicación de la Ley , Alta del Paciente
6.
Respir Care ; 2023 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751930

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unplanned extubations (UEs) in injured patients are potentially fatal, but etiology and patient characteristics are not well described. We have been prospectively characterizing the etiology of UEs after we identified a high rate of UEs and implemented an educational program to address it. This period of monitoring included the years of the COVID-19 pandemic that produced high rates of workforce turnover in many hospitals, dramatically affecting nursing and respiratory therapy services. We hypothesized that frequency of UEs would depend on the etiology and that the workforce changes produced by the COVID-19 pandemic would increase UEs. METHODS: This study was a prospective tracking and retrospective review of trauma registry and performance improvement data from 2012-2021. RESULTS: UE subjects were younger, were more frequently male, were diagnosed more frequently with pneumonia (38% vs 27%), and had longer hospital (19 d vs 15 d) and ICU length of stay (LOS) (12 d vs 10 d) (all P < .05). Most UEs were due to patient factors (self-extubation) that decreased after education, while UEs from other etiologies (mechanical, provider) were stable. Subjects with UEs from mechanical or provider etiologies had longer ICU LOS, higher mortality, and were less likely to be discharged home. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with more total patient admissions and more days of ventilator use, but the rate of UEs was not changed. CONCLUSIONS: UEs were decreased by education with ongoing tracking, and UEs from patient factors were associated with better outcome than other etiologies. Workforce changes produced by the COVID-19 pandemic did not change the rate of UEs.

7.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 92(1): 82-87, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34284466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current data on the epidemiology of firearm injury in the United States are incomplete. Common sources include hospital, law enforcement, consumer, and public health databases, but each database has limitations that exclude injury subgroups. By integrating hospital (inpatient and outpatient) and law enforcement databases, we hypothesized that a more accurate depiction of the totality of firearm injury in our region could be achieved. METHODS: We constructed a collaborative firearm injury database consisting of all patients admitted as inpatients to the regional level 1 trauma hospital (inpatient registry), patients treated and released from the emergency department (ED), and subjects encountering local law enforcement as a result of firearm injury in Jefferson County, Kentucky. Injuries recorded from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, were analyzed. Outcomes, demographics, and injury detection rates from individual databases were compared with those of the combined collaborative database and compared using χ2 testing across databases. RESULTS: The inpatient registry (n = 1,441) and ED database (n = 1,109) were combined, resulting in 2,550 incidents in the hospital database. The law enforcement database consisted of 2,665 patient incidents, with 2,008 incidents in common with the hospital database and 657 unique incidents. The merged collaborative database consisted of 3,207 incidents. In comparison with the collaborative database, the inpatient, total hospital (inpatient and ED), and law enforcement databases failed to include 55%, 20%, and 17% of all injuries, respectively. The hospital captured nearly 94% of survivors but less than 40% of nonsurvivors. Law enforcement captured 93% of nonsurvivors but missed 20% of survivors. Mortality (11-26%) and injury incidence were markedly different across the databases. DISCUSSION: The utilization of trauma registry or law enforcement databases alone do not accurately reflect the epidemiology of firearm injury and may misrepresent areas in need of greater injury prevention efforts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistemas de Información en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Aplicación de la Ley/métodos , Salud Pública , Sistema de Registros , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adulto , Exactitud de los Datos , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/métodos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Salud Pública/métodos , Salud Pública/normas , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/normas , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/diagnóstico , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control
8.
Surgery ; 169(3): 567-572, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012562

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend toward regionalization of emergency general surgery, which burdens patients. The absence of a standardized, emergency general surgery transfer algorithm creates the potential for unnecessary transfers. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical reasoning prompting emergency general surgery transfers and to initiate a discussion for optimal emergency general surgery use. METHODS: Consecutive emergency general surgery transfers (December 2018 to May 2019) to 2 tertiary centers were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board-approved protocol. Clinical reasoning prompting transfer was obtained prospectively from the accepting/consulting surgeon. Patient outcomes were used to create an algorithm for emergency general surgery transfer. RESULTS: Two hundred emergency general surgery transfers (49% admissions, 51% consults) occurred with a median age of 59 (18 to 100) and body mass index of 30 (15 to 75). Insurance status was 25% private, 45% Medicare, 21% Medicaid, and 9% uninsured. Weekend transfers (Friday to Sunday) occurred in 45%, and 57% occurred overnight (6:00 pm to 6:00 am). Surgeon-to-surgeon communication occurred with 22% of admissions. Pretransfer notification occurred with 10% of consults. Common transfer reasons included no surgical coverage (20%), surgeon discomfort (24%), or hospital limitations (36%). A minority (36%) underwent surgery within 24 hours; 54% did not require surgery during the admission. Median length of stay was 6 (1 to 44) days. CONCLUSION: Conditions prompting emergency general surgery transfers are heterogeneous in this rural state review. There remains an unmet need to standardize emergency general surgery transfer criteria, incorporating patient and hospital factors and surgeon availability. Well-defined requirements for communication with the accepting surgeon may prevent unnecessary transfers and maximize resource allocation.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Indiana/epidemiología , Kentucky/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Nivel de Atención , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto Joven
9.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(2): 371-376, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32345906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recidivism is a key outcome measure for injury prevention programs. Firearm injury recidivism rates are difficult to determine because of poor longitudinal follow-up and incomplete, disparate databases. Reported recidivism rates from trauma registries are 2% to 3%. We created a collaborative database merging law enforcement, emergency department, and inpatient trauma registry data to more accurately determine rates of recidivism in patients presenting to our trauma center following firearm injury. METHODS: A collaborative database for Jefferson County, Kentucky, was constructed to include violent firearm injuries encountered by the trauma center or law enforcement from 2008 to 2019. Iterative deterministic data linkage was used to create the database and eliminate redundancies. From patients with at least one hospital encounter, raw recidivism rates were calculated by dividing the number of patients injured at least twice by the total number of patients. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors for recidivism. The cumulative incidence of recidivism over time was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier survival model. RESULTS: There were 2, 363 assault-type firearm injuries with at least 1 hospital encounter, approximately 9% of which did not survive their initial encounter. The collaborative database demonstrated raw recidivism rates for assault-type firearm injuries of 9.5% compared with 2.5% from the trauma registry alone. Risk factors were young age, male sex, and African American race. The predicted incidence of recidivism was 3.6%, 5.6%, 11.4%, and 15.8% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both hospital and law enforcement data are critical for determining reinjury rates in patients treated at trauma centers. Recidivism rates following violent firearm injury are four times higher using a collaborative database compared with the inpatient trauma registry alone. Predicted incidence of recidivism at 10 years was at least 16% for all patients, with high-risk subgroups experiencing rates as high as 26%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Sistema de Registros , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Kentucky/epidemiología , Aplicación de la Ley , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/etnología , Adulto Joven
10.
Am Surg ; 85(11): 1205-1208, 2019 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775959

RESUMEN

Our department has a database of thoracic gunshot wounds (GSWs), which has cataloged these injury patterns over the past five decades. Prevailing wisdom on the management of these injuries suggested operative treatment beyond tube thoracostomy is not commonly required. It was our clinical impression that the operative treatment required beyond chest tube placement has greatly increased over the past several decades, whereas the operative management of cardiac GSWs seemed to be increasingly infrequent events. To test these observations, we analyzed the treatment of GSWs to the chest and heart in four distinct time periods, categorized as "historical" (1973-1975 and 1988-1990) and "modern" (2005-2007 and 2015-2017). There was a significant increase in emergent thoracotomy, delayed thoracic operations, overall operative interventions, and pulmonary resections from the historical period to the modern era. There was a decline in cardiac injuries treated, whereas the number of injuries remained constant. Mortality was unchanged between the early and later periods. Operative treatment beyond tube thoracostomy was much more prevalent for noncardiac thoracic GSWs in the past two decades than in the prior decades, whereas the number of cardiac wounds treated decreased by half.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Urgencias Médicas , Lesiones Cardíacas/epidemiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/mortalidad , Lesiones Cardíacas/cirugía , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiología , Pulmón/cirugía , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiología , Traumatismos Torácicos/mortalidad , Toracostomía/métodos , Toracotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Toracotomía/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad
11.
Am Surg ; 85(6): 572-578, 2019 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267896

RESUMEN

Despite low mortality rates, self-inflicted stab wounds (SISWs) can result in significant morbidity and often reflect underlying substance abuse and mental health disorders. This study aimed to characterize demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes seen in self-inflicted stabbings and compare these metrics to those seen in assault stabbings. A Level I trauma center registry was queried for patients with stab injuries between January 2010 and December 2015. Classification was based on whether injuries were SISWs or the result of assault stab wounds (ASWs). Demographic, injury, and outcome measures were recorded. Differences between genders, ethnicities, individuals with and without psychiatric comorbidities, and SISW and ASW patients were assessed. Within the SIWS cohort, no differences were found when comparing age, gender, or race, including need for operative intervention. However, patients with psychiatric histories were less likely to have a positive toxicology test on arrival than those without psychiatric histories (22% vs. 0%, P = 0.04). When compared with 460 ASW patients, SISW were older (41 vs. 35, P < 0.001), more likely to be white (92% vs. 64%, P < 0.001), more likely to have a psychiatric history (15% vs. 4%, P < 0.001), require operative intervention (65% vs. 50%, P = 0.008), and be discharged to a psychiatric facility (47% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.001). SISW patients have higher rates of psychiatric illness and an increased likelihood to require operative intervention as compared with ASW patients. This population demonstrates an acute need for both inpatient and outpatient psychiatric care with early involvement of multidisciplinary teams for treatment and discharge planning.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Sistema de Registros , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas Punzantes/epidemiología , Heridas Punzantes/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Kentucky , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas Punzantes/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
13.
Am J Surg ; 218(3): 480-483, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30827532

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is associated with significant morbidity. The risk factors for AKI in elderly trauma patients have not been defined. METHODS: Injured patients 75 years old or older from 2014 to 2016 were evaluated. AKI was identified by RIFLE criteria. Patients with and without AKI were compared with chi square, ANOVA, and logistic regression. RESULTS: 836 patients were 75 years old or older. Patients with AKI were more commonly male, hypotensive on admission with a greater Injury Severity Score but age, diabetes, hypertension and baseline creatinine were similar. Patients with AKI had a higher mortality that did not increase with RIFLE stage. Male sex, ISS, hypotension on admission and presence of an extremity injury were independently associated with AKI by logistic regression. CONCLUSION: AKI in elderly trauma patients is associated with magnitude of injury and shock but not pre-existing medical comorbidities and it significantly increased the risk of death.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Am Surg ; 84(9): 1450-1454, 2018 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30268174

RESUMEN

Gunshot wounds (GSW) are becoming increasingly prevalent in urban settings. GSW to the trunk mandate full trauma activation and immediate surgeon response because of the high likelihood of operative intervention. Extremity GSW proximal to the knee/elbow also require full trauma activation based on American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma standards. However, whether isolated extremity GSW require frequent operative intervention is unclear. We evaluated GSW at our Level I trauma center from January 2012 to December 2016. Demographic data and injury patterns were abstracted from the trauma registry and charts. The number of GSW increased yearly but the age, gender, Injury Severity Score and injury pattern did not change (P = ns, not shown). There were 504 GSW that included an extremity and 194 (38%) involved multiple body regions. There were 310 GSW (62%) isolated to an extremity and 176 were proximal to the elbow/knee. If proximal GSW had an Emergency Department systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, 53 per cent underwent vascular repair, 12 per cent had soft tissue repair, and 29 per cent required no operation. If proximal GSW had an Emergency Department blood pressure >90 mm Hg, 57 per cent underwent orthopedic repair, 22 per cent required no surgery, and only 13 per cent required vascular repair (P < 0.01). In the absence of other criteria for full trauma activation such as shock, the need for the immediate presence of a general surgeon to perform emergency surgery for a GSW isolated to the extremity is low.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Brazo/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Pierna/cirugía , Traumatismo Múltiple/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Traumatismos del Brazo/complicaciones , Traumatismos del Brazo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Hipotensión/diagnóstico , Hipotensión/etiología , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Traumatismos de la Pierna/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Pierna/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven
15.
Am Surg ; 84(6): 1049-1053, 2018 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29981647

RESUMEN

To date, no studies have examined the relationship between geographic and socioeconomic factors and the frequency of pedestrians sustaining traumatic injuries from a motor vehicle. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of location on the frequency of pedestrian injury by motor vehicle. The University of Louisville Trauma Registry was queried for patients who had been struck by a motor vehicle from 2010 to 2015. Demographic and injury information as well as outcome measures were evaluated to identify those impacting risk of pedestrian versus motor vehicle accidents. Number of incidents was correlated with lower median household income. There was also a moderate correlation between the number of incidents and population density. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a significant association between increased median household income and distance from downtown Louisville and decreased risk of death following pedestrian versus motor vehicle accident. Incidence of pedestrian injury by motor vehicles is influenced by regional socioeconomic status. Efforts to decrease the frequency of these events should include further investigation into the mechanisms underpinning this relationship.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Peatones , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Mapeo Geográfico , Humanos , Incidencia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Kentucky , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Densidad de Población , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos
16.
Am Surg ; 83(5): 507-511, 2017 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28541863

RESUMEN

Animal-related injuries are common in rural areas. Agricultural workers can suffer severe injuries involving farm machinery or falls. The spectrum of injuries related to rural activities is poorly defined and characterizing these injuries will improve injury prevention efforts. Records for injured patients admitted between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a mechanism of injury involving a large animal or with the injury site listed as "farm" were included. Patients with agricultural injuries (n = 85) were older with more multisystem injuries than patients injured by animals (n = 132) but the Injury Severity Score was equivalent. There was no difference in intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, or mortality. There was no difference in frequency of solid organ injury, pelvic fractures, rib fractures, or hemo- or pneumothorax between groups. Animal injuries had more frequent traumatic brain injuries (22.4% vs 10.5%, P = 0.03), whereas agricultural injuries had more vertebral fractures (20.5% vs 9.2%). Of toxicology screens performed, 25 per cent (22/88) were positive. No significant differences were found between occupational versus recreational animal injuries. Agricultural and animal-related injuries have different characteristics but Injury Severity Score and mortality were similar. Severe injuries from both mechanisms are common in rural communities and injury prevention activities are needed in both settings.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Agricultura , Ganado , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 18(4): 18, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26951231

RESUMEN

Vitamin D deficiency has recently been recognized as a widespread global disorder. Generally considered a direct extension of malnutrition, even subclinical hypovitaminosis D is now recognized in adequately nourished populations. Compared to the general population, the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D is greater in the critically ill population. In fact, several studies have shown poorer outcomes in critically ill patients discovered to be vitamin D deficient or insufficient. Controversy persists regarding vitamin D measurements, quantity of supplementation, and appropriate target level in various populations. Vitamin D has a vital role in calcium homeostasis and extra-skeletal health, such as immune function. Therefore, vitamin D supplementation may have a role for improving outcomes in critically ill patients. In this review, we will first discuss the metabolism and function of vitamin D under normal physiologic conditions. We will then explore the prevalence and prognostic value of vitamin D deficiency in critical illness. Finally, we will examine recent trials focusing on appropriate dosing, route of administration, and outcomes associated with vitamin D supplementation in the ICU.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Vitamina D/sangre , Vitamina D/fisiología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología
18.
J Am Coll Surg ; 222(4): 603-11, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26847589

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Full trauma team activation in evaluating injured patients is based on triage criteria and associated with significant costs and resources that should be focused on patients who truly need them. Overtriage leads to inefficient care, particularly when resources are finite, and it diverts care from other vital areas. Although shock and gunshot wounds to the abdomen are accepted indicators for full trauma activation, intubation as the sole criterion is controversial. We evaluated our experience to assess if intubation alone merited the highest level of trauma activation. STUDY DESIGN: All trauma patients from 2012 to 2013 were assessed for level of activation, injury characteristics, presence of intubation, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 5,881 patients, 646 (11%) were level 1 (full) and 2,823 (48%) were level 2 (partial) activations. Level 1 patients were younger (40 ± 17 vs 45 ± 20 years), had more penetrating injuries (42% vs 9%), and had higher mortality (26% vs 8%)(p < 0.001). Intubated level 2 patients (n = 513), compared with intubated level 1 patients (n = 320), had higher systolic blood pressure (133 ± 44 vs 90 ± 58 mmHg), lower Injury Severity Score (21 ± 13 vs 25 ± 16), more falls (25% vs 3%), fewer penetrating injuries (11% vs 23%), and lower mortality (31% vs 48%)(p < 0.01). Fewer intubated level patients went directly to the operating room from the emergency department (ED)(16% vs 33%), and most who did had a craniotomy (63% vs 13%). Only 3% of intubated level 2 patients underwent laparotomy compared with 20% of intubated level 1 patients (p < 0.001). The ED lengths of stay before obtaining a head CT (47 ± 26 vs 48 ± 31 minutes) and craniotomy (109 ± 61 vs 102 ± 46 minutes) were similar. Deaths in intubated level 2 patients were primarily from fatal brain injuries. CONCLUSIONS: When appropriately triaged, selected intubated trauma patients do not require full trauma activation to receive timely, efficient care.


Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Triaje , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad
19.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 78(2): 386-90, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25757126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tube thoracostomy is a common procedure used in the management of thoracic trauma. Traditional teaching suggests that chest tubes should be directed in specific locations to improve function. Common examples include anterior and superior placement for pneumothorax, inferior and posterior placement for hemothorax, and avoidance of the pulmonary fissure. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of specific chest tube position on subsequent chest tube function. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing tube thoracostomy for trauma from January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2012, was performed. Only patients undergoing computed tomography scans following chest tube insertion were included so that positioning could be accurately determined. Rib space insertion level and positioning of the tube relative to the lung parenchyma were recorded. The duration of chest tube drainage and the need for secondary interventions were determined and compared for tubes in different rib spaces and locations. For purposes of comparison, tubes placed above the sixth rib space were considered "high," and those at or below it were considered "low." RESULTS: A total of 291 patients met criteria for inclusion. Forty-eight patients (16.5%) required secondary intervention. Neither high chest tube placement nor chest tube location relative to lung parenchyma was associated with an increased need for secondary interventions. On multivariate analysis, only chest Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores, mechanism, and volume of hemothorax were found to be significant risk factors for the need for secondary interventions. CONCLUSION: Chest tube location does not influence the need for secondary interventions as long as the tube resides in the pleural space. The severity of chest injury is the most important factor influencing outcome in patients undergoing tube thoracostomy for trauma. Tube thoracostomy technique should focus on safe insertion within the pleural space and not on achieving a specific tube location. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Tubos Torácicos , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos , Adulto , Tubos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Toracostomía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...