Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Transplant ; 24(1): e13617, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31880042

RESUMEN

Aims Unexpected decompensation of PHTRs may surprise, when the patient is at home. If the PHTR lives a distance from transplant center, the task of identifying risk factors of allograft rejection/dysfunction falls primarily on the PCP in the PCC, whether or not they are knowledgeable toward pediatric heart-transplantation. Methods We reviewed the medical reports of three heart-transplanted children in our periphery clinic between the years 2005 and 2019. Results The unexpected death of one patient, hours after he left our health facility, was the impetus for writing this article. Another heart transplant child attended our periphery clinic for 774 visits. Majority of visits were casual, others were scheduled, and the rest were for administrative affairs. We referred the PHTR to the transplantation center in 9% of all visits. In remaining 91% visits, we handled problems locally. Conclusions One of the important lessons we have learned through handling the PHTR at the PCC is that, during daily workflows and dealing with the occasional visits of a heart transplant child, related critical clinical information to allograft rejection or its dysfunction can easily evade from awareness of the attending physician. Through this study, we demonstrated that a program of summoning the PHTR to "initiated monthly visits" at the PCC enables the PCP to be maximally aware of critical clinical information, in addition to limiting futile referrals of 91% of the visits to specialized centers, without adversely affecting the prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Corazón , Atención Primaria de Salud , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Cuidados Posteriores/organización & administración , Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/terapia , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 42(10): 4799-802, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15472344

RESUMEN

A new cefoxitin-agar medium (CAM)-based assay was compared to the previously published modified three-dimensional (M3D) assay for the detection of AmpC production in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clinical isolates of cefoxitin-resistant E. coli (n = 5) and K. pneumoniae (n = 7) and multiple control strains with and without AmpC enzymes were tested by both methods. The CAM method with 4 microg of cefoxitin/ml was equivalent to the M3D method for detecting AmpC production in E. coli and K. pneumoniae. This new method is easier to perform and interpret and allows for testing of multiple isolates on a single plate.


Asunto(s)
Agar , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Cefoxitina/farmacología , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Medios de Cultivo , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resistencia betalactámica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA