Systematic review, meta-analysis and single-centre experience of the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green-fluorescence in detecting pancreatic tumours.

BACKGROUND: During pancreatic resections assessing tumour boundaries and identifying the ideal resection margins can be challenging due to the associated pancreatic gland inflammation and texture. This is particularly true in the context of minimally invasive surgery, where there is a very limited or absent tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging can assist surgeons by simply providing valuable real-time intraoperative information at low cost with minimal side effects. This meta-analysis summarises the available evidence on the use of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with ICG for the intraoperative visualization of pancreatic tumours (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021247203). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web Of Science electronic databases were searched to identify manuscripts where ICG was intravenously administered prior to or during pancreatic surgery and reporting the prevalence of pancreatic lesions visualised through fluorescence imaging. RESULTS: Six studies with 7 series' reporting data on 64 pancreatic lesions were included in the analysis. MINOR scores ranged from 6 to 10, with a median of 8. The most frequent indications were pancreatic adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumours. In most cases (67.2%) ICG was administered during surgery. ICG fluorescence identified 48/64 lesions (75%) with 81.3% accuracy, 0.788 (95%CI 0.361-0.961) sensitivity, 1 (95%CI 0.072-1) specificity and positive predictive value of 0.982 (95%CI 0.532-1). In line with the literature, ICG fluorescence identified 5/6 (83.3%) of pancreatic lesions during robotic pancreatic resections performed at our Institution. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis is the first summarising the results of ICG immunofluorescence in detecting pancreatic tumours during surgery, showing good accuracy. Additional research is needed to define optimal ICG administration strategies and fluorescence intensity cut-offs.

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with biodegradable ductal stenting (Archimedes BPS®).

BACKGROUND: Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF) development remains a challenge after pancreaticoduodenectomy, occurring in 3-45% of cases [1]. The placement of a trans-anastomotic Wirsung stent is usually done in high-risk patients to decrease incidence and severity of POPF. METHODS: Herein, we present a fully robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with a biodegradable ductal stent interposition in a 47 y.o. female with a main duct IPMN of the pancreatic head and a fistula risk score of 6 (Moderate-risk). VIDEO: After gastrocolic ligament division and hepatic flexure and duodenum mobilization, the loco-regional lymphadenectomy was performed. Following gastric transection with endo-GIA, the bile duct and gastroduodenal artery have been divided, and the cholecystectomy performed. The neck of the pancreas has been transected, the jejunum divided with endo-GIA and mobilized from the Treitz ligament, and the uncinate process dissected from the mesenteric vessels. A Blumgart anastomosis has been performed between the soft-texture pancreatic stump and the jejunal loop with the interposition of a 6 Fr/60 mm long, medium degrading stent (20 days) in the 2 mm duct (Archimedes BPS®, AMG Int., Winsen-Germany). The hepatico-jejunostomy and gastro-jejunostomy have been performed distally on the same loop. Three abdominal drains have been positioned. RESULTS: Surgery lasted 480 min, with 175 mls blood loss. The patient postoperatively developed a biochemical leak and was discharged home by day 12. She was readmitted a month later for an amylase-negative intra-abdominal abscess that was successfully treated with percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSION: Biodegradable pancreatic stent positioning could be an effective strategy in reducing POPF occurrence in high-risk patients.

Is posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation a safe and effective alternative approach to TLSO rigid bracing for single-level pyogenic spondylodiscitis? Results of a retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Currently, treatment for patients diagnosed with noncomplicated (ie, known infectious agent, no neurologic compromise, and preserved spinal stability) pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization. Since January 2010, we started offering our patients percutaneous posterior screw-rod instrumentation as an alternative approach to rigid bracing. Supposed benefits of posterior percutaneous instrumentation over rigid bracing are earlier free mobilization, increased comfort, and faster recovery. PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation for single-level PS and compare clinical and quality-of-life outcomes with standard thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) rigid bracing. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective observational cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twenty-seven patients consecutively diagnosed with single-level noncomplicated lower thoracic or lumbar PS from January 2010 to December 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Healing rate, healing time, and changes in segmental kyphosis Cobb angle were compared in the two treatment groups. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and complete blood count at regular time points until complete healing were also obtained. Self-report measures included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-Form 12 (SF-12), and EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires. METHODS: At enrollment, patients were offered to choose between 24/7 TLSO rigid bracing for 3 to 4 months and bridging posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation followed by soft bracing for 4 weeks after surgery. All patients underwent antibiotic therapy accordingly to isolated infectious agents. Patients were seen in the clinic at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months, and ESR, CRP, complete blood count, VAS, SF-12, and EQ-5D questionnaires were obtained. Segmental kyphosis was measured at diagnosis and at 9 months follow-up. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess group and time differences across time points. RESULTS: Fifteen patients chose conservative treatment, whereas 12 patients chose surgical treatment. Complete infection healing was achieved in all patients with no significant differences in healing time (p<.366). C-reactive protein and ESR levels decreased in both groups accordingly with positive response to therapy with no significant differences. Surgically treated patients had significantly lower VAS scores at 1 month (2.76±0.80 vs. 5.20±1.21, p<.001) and 3 months (2.31±0.54 vs. 2.85±0.54, p<.016) post-diagnosis over TLSO patients. Moreover, surgery patients also showed steeper and statistically significant improvements in SF-12 scores over TLSO patients at 1, 3, and 6 months post-diagnosis (p<.012); no significant differences were detected at the other time points. EuroQol five-dimension index was significantly higher in surgery patients at 1 month (0.764±0.043 vs. 0.458±0.197, p<.001) and 3 months (0.890±0.116 vs. 0.688±0.142, p<.001); no significant changes were observed in segmental pre- and posttreatment kyphosis between the two groups. No instrumentation-related complications were observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity, and neurologic compromise in patients affected by noncomplicated lower thoracic (T9-T12) or lumbar PS. Posterior instrumentation did not offer any advantage in healing time over TLSO rigid bracing because infection clearance is strongly dependent on proper antibiotic therapy. Nevertheless, surgical stabilization was associated with faster recovery, lower pain scores, and improved quality of life compared with TLSO conservative treatment at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.