Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Oncol ; 29(5): 1273-1279, 2018 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29438466

RESUMEN

Background: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) are traditionally caused by smoking and excessive alcohol consumption. However, in the last decades high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections play an increasingly important role in tumorigenesis. HPV-driven OPSCCs are known to have a more favorable prognosis, which has led to important and marked changes in the recently released TNM-8. In this 8th edition, OPSCCs are divided based on p16 immunostaining, with p16 overexpression as surrogate marker for the presence of HPV. The aims of this study are to evaluate TNM-8 on a Dutch consecutive cohort of patients with p16-positive OPSCC and to determine the relevance of additional HPV DNA testing. Patients and methods: All OPSCC patients without distant metastases at diagnosis and treated with curative intent at VU University Medical Center (2000-2015) and Erasmus Medical Center (2000-2006) were included (N = 1204). HPV status was determined by p16 immunostaining followed by HPV DNA PCR on the p16-immunopositive cases. We compared TNM-7 and TNM-8 using the Harrell's C index. Results: In total, 388 of 1204 (32.2%) patients were p16-immunopositive. In these patients, TNM-8 had a markedly better predictive prognostic power than TNM-7 (Harrell's C index 0.63 versus 0.53). Of the 388 p16-positive OPSCCs, 48 tumors (12.4%) were HPV DNA-negative. This subgroup had distinct demographic, clinical and morphologic characteristics and showed a significantly worse five-year overall survival compared with the HPV DNA-positive tumors (P < 0.001). Conclusions: TNM-8 has a better predictive prognostic power than TNM-7 in patients with p16-positive OPSCC. However, within p16-positive OPSCCs, there is an HPV DNA-negative subgroup with distinct features and a worse overall survival, indicating the importance to perform additional HPV DNA testing when predicting prognosis and particularly for selecting patients for de-intensified treatment regimens.


Asunto(s)
ADN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Inhibidor p16 de la Quinasa Dependiente de Ciclina/metabolismo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virología , Papillomaviridae/genética , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/virología , Análisis de Supervivencia
2.
Psychooncology ; 26(12): 2040-2047, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28264148

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To optimize personalized medicine for patients with hematological malignancies (HM), we find that knowledge on patient preferences with regard to information provision and shared decision-making (SDM) is of the utmost importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the SDM preference and the satisfaction with and need for information among newly diagnosed HM patients and their informal caregivers, in relation to sociodemographic and clinical factors, cognitive coping style, and health related quality of life. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients and their caregivers were asked to complete the Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire, the Information Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory. Medical records were consulted to retrieve sociodemographic and clinical factors and comorbidity by means of the ACE-27. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 138 patients and 95 caregivers. Shared decision-making was preferred by the majority of patients (75%) and caregivers (88%), especially patients treated with curative intent (OR = 2.7, P = .041), and patients (OR = 1.2, P < .001) and caregivers (OR = 1.2, P = .001) with a higher monitoring cognitive coping style (MCCS). Among patients, total need for information was related to MCCS (P = .012), and need for specific information was related to MCCS and several clinical factors. Importantly, dissatisfaction with the information they received was reported by a third of the patients and caregivers, especially patients who wanted SDM (χ2  = 7.3, P = .007), and patients with a higher MCCS (OR = 0.94, P = .038). CONCLUSION: The majority of HM patients want to be involved in SDM, but the received information is not sufficient. Patient-tailored information is urgently needed, to improve SDM.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Comunicación , Toma de Decisiones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Participación del Paciente , Satisfacción Personal , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/psicología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Derivación y Consulta , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...