Outcomes of endoscopic resection for high-grade dysplasia and esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) is an important advance in the management of esophageal tumors. It has been used successfully for superficial esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) arising out of Barrett epithelium. METHODS: From a single institution within the Department of Surgery, patients who underwent ER for esophageal tumors between December 2001 and January 2012 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic variables were collected and reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 81 patients who underwent ER for esophageal lesions. Median patient age was 69 years, and the median follow-up was 3.25 years. In patients with HGD, at the time of last endoscopy, the complete eradication rate of HGD was 84 % and cancer-specific survival was 100 %. During surveillance, one patient developed an invasive carcinoma that required endoscopic therapy. Patients with T1a and negative deep margins on ER had a recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival of 100 %. There were seven patients with T1b and negative margins on ER. Three patients underwent esophagectomy; final pathology revealed no residual malignancy or lymph node metastasis. Two patients had definitive chemoradiation, and two patients were observed. To date, there has been no cancer recurrence. In all patients who underwent ER, there was one episode of bleeding that required endoscopic treatment and admission for observation. CONCLUSIONS: ER can be performed safely and can adequately stage and often treat patients with HGD and superficial cancers. Patients with HGD and T1a disease with negative margins are cured with ER alone. Observation and surveillance may be an option for select patients with low-risk, early submucosal disease (T1b) and negative margins.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal/gastroesophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is increasingly treated with trimodality therapy. We present our experience using carboplatin/paclitaxel and radiotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients with distal esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma (≥T2 or N+) treated from July 2010 to October 2011 were identified. Treatment included neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy (CRT) to 50.4 Gy using an IMRT technique and then Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy (ILE). PET/CT was performed prior to and after CRT. Patient/treatment characteristics and tumor response were analyzed. RESULTS: Over this timeframe, 16 patients completed trimodality therapy. All were male, median age of 60 years (45-72 years). All tumors were grade 2-3 with mean tumor length of 4.4 cm (1-9 cm). A median of 6 cycles (5-9 cycles) neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel were administered. Average time from diagnosis to CRT completion was 76 days (44-141 days) and 60 days (35-92 days) from CRT end to surgery. Neoadjuvant CRT was well tolerated with mean weight loss of 3.9 kg. All pts had R0 resections. No anastomotic leaks or perioperative mortality occurred. Mean hospital stay was 13 days (8-28 days). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was seen in 38% of patients, microscopic residual disease (isolated tumor cells or <2 mm) in 31%, and macroscopic residual disease remained in 31%. Mean SUV reduction was 41% (0-100%). Of 11 patients with ≥35% SUV decrease, 45% had pCR and 27% had microscopic residual disease. Three patients had signet ring features. Of these, 2 had no SUV reduction and all had gross residual disease, including the only patient with positive nodal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality therapy utilizing concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and radiotherapy to 50.4 Gy followed by surgery was well tolerated and resulted in significant pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease. Further investigation of predictive factors for response is needed to best tailor therapy in the management of esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using HPPH for the treatment of precancerous lesions associated with Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with porfimer sodium, FDA approved to treat premalignant lesions in Barrett's esophagus, causes photosensitivity for 6-8 weeks. HPPH (2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a) shows minimal photosensitization of short duration and promising efficacy in preclinical studies. Here we explore toxicity and optimal drug and light dose with endoscopic HPPH-PDT. We also want to know the efficacy of one time treatment with HPPH-PDT. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two nonrandomized dose escalation studies were performed (18 patients each) with biopsy-proven high grade dysplasia or early intramucosal adenocarcinoma of esophagus. HPPH doses ranged from 3 to 6 mg/m2 . At 24 or 48 hours after HPPH administration the lesions received one endoscopic exposure to 150, 175, or 200 J/cm of 665 nm light. RESULTS: Most patients experienced mild to moderate chest pain requiring symptomatic treatment only. Six patients experienced grade 3 and 4 adverse events (16.6%). Three esophageal strictures were treated with dilatation. No clear pattern of dose dependence of toxicities emerged. In the drug dose ranging study (light dose of 150 J/cm at 48 hours), 3 and 4 mg/m2 of HPPH emerged as most effective. In the light dose ranging study (3 or 4 mg/m2 HPPH, light at 24 hours), complete response rates (disappearance of high grade dysplasia and early carcinoma) of 72% were achieved at 1 year, with all patients treated with 3 mg/m2 HPPH plus 175 J/cm and 4 mg/m2 HPPH plus 150 J/cm showing complete responses at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: HPPH-PDT for precancerous lesions in Barrett's esophagus appears to be safe and showing promising efficacy. Further clinical studies are required to establish the use of HPPH-PDT.

Association of Technetium(99m) MAG-3 renal scintigraphy with change in creatinine clearance following chemoradiation to the abdomen in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Information on differential renal function following abdominal chemoradiation is limited. This study evaluated the association between renal function as measured by biochemical endpoints and scintigraphy and dose volume parameters in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received abdominal chemoradiation between 2002 and 2009 were identified for this study. Technetium(99m) MAG-3 scintigraphy and laboratory data were obtained prior to and after chemoradiation in 6 month intervals. Factors assessed included age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, and dose volume parameters. Renal function was assessed by biochemical endpoints and renal scintigraphy. RESULTS: Significant reductions in relative renal function of the primarily irradiated kidney and creatinine clearance were seen. Split renal function decreased from 49.75% pre-radiation to 47.74% and 41.28% at 6-12 months and >12 months post-radiation (P=0.0184). Creatinine clearance declined from 90.67ml/min pre-radiation to 82.23ml/min and 74.54ml/min at 6-12 months and >12 months post-radiation (P<0.0001). Univariate analysis of patients who had at least one post-radiation renogram showed the percent volumes of the primarily irradiated kidney receiving ≥ 25 Gy (V(25)) and 40 Gy (V(40)) were significantly associated with ≥5% decrease in relative renal function (P=0.0387 and P=0.0438 respectively). CONCLUSION: Decline in split renal function using Technetium(99m) MAG-3 scintigraphy correlates with decrease in creatinine clearance and radiation dose-volume parameters following abdominal chemoradiation. Change in split perfusion can be detected as early as 6 months post-radiation. Scintigraphy may provide early determination and quantification of subclinical renal injury prior to clinical evidence of nephropathy.

Capecitabine, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy: a phase IB neoadjuvant study for esophageal cancer with gene expression analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximal tolerated dose of capecitabine with oxaliplatin + radiotherapy in a phase I study of localized esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) administered on days 1, 15, and 29. Capecitabine administered twice daily 5 days weekly; dose levels (DL) were 1, 1000; 2, 1250; and 3, 1500 mg/m(2) with 50.4 Gy radiation. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at DL 3. Carboxylesterase expression in day 2 tumor specimens and induction correlated with response (p

Squamous overgrowth is not a safety concern for photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium combined with acid suppression (PHOPDT) is used to treat patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). A 5-year phase 3 trial was conducted to determine the extent of squamous overgrowth of BE with HGD after PHOPDT. METHODS: Squamous overgrowth was compared in patients with BE with HGD randomly assigned (2:1) to receive PHOPDT (n=138) or 20 mg omeprazole twice daily (n=70). Patients underwent 4-quadrant jumbo esophageal biopsies every 2 cm throughout the pretreatment length of BE until 4 consecutive quarterly follow-up results were negative for HGD and then biannually up to 5 years or treatment failure. Endoscopies were reviewed by blinded gastroenterology pathologists. RESULTS: Histologic assessment of 33,658 biopsies showed no significant difference (P> .05) in squamous overgrowth between groups when compared per patient (30% vs 33%) or per biopsy (0.5% vs 1.3%), or when the average number of biopsies with squamous overgrowth were compared per patient (0.48 vs 0.66). The highest grade of neoplasia per endoscopy was not found exclusively beneath squamous mucosa in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in squamous overgrowth between patients given PHOPDT plus omeprazole compared with only omeprazole. Squamous overgrowth did not obscure the most advanced neoplasia in any patient. Treatment of HGD with PHOPDT in patients with BE does not present a long-term risk of failure to detect subsquamous dysplasia or carcinoma.

Malignant gastroparesis: pathogenesis and management of an underrecognized disorder.

Gastroparesis is a disorder of the stomach caused by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Symptoms of gastroparesis include nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating, and abdominal discomfort. Gastroparesis has been described as a complication of several malignancies, including gastric, pancreatic, gallbladder, esophageal, and lung cancers, as well as leiomyosarcoma. The prevalence of malignant gastroparesis (MG) is unknown, and this entity is widely underrecognized and undertreated. Diabetes mellitus is the most common identifiable cause of benign gastroparesis, ie, gastroparesis occurring in the absence of an underlying malignant pathology. In the setting of malignancy, gastroparesis may result from the cancer itself or may be a complication of its treatment with such modalities as surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy. Coexisting conditions, including diabetes, hypothyroidism, and neurologic diseases, may further exacerbate MG. The pathogenesis of MG is not clearly understood at present. However, mechanisms suggested in the literature include postvagotomy syndrome, malignant infiltration of the autonomic nervous system, and paraneoplastic dysmotility with autoantibody-mediated destruction of the enteric nervous system (the interstitial cells of Cajal, also called the intrinsic pacemaker of the gastrointestinal tract, or the myenteric plexus). Appropriate treatment of MG may help to avoid serious consequences, such as cancer cachexia, intolerance of oral anticancer agents, dehydration, and hospitalization. In this article, we will describe our institutional experience with MG and will provide a concise review of the literature. Guidelines for management will be suggested.

Five-year efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy with Photofrin in Barrett's high-grade dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a risk factor for development of esophageal carcinoma. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Photofrin (PHO) has been used to eliminate HGD in BE. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare PHOPDT plus omeprazole with omeprazole only (OM). DESIGN: Five-year follow-up of a randomized, multicenter, multinational, pathology-blinded HGD trial. SETTING: 30 sites in 4 countries. PATIENTS: 208. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with BE and HGD were randomized (2:1) to PHOPDT (n=138) or OM (n=70) into a 2-year trial followed up for 3 more years. PHOPDT patients received 2 mg/kg PHO intravenously followed by endoscopic laser light exposure of Barrett's mucosa at a wavelength of 630 nm within 40 to 50 hours to a maximum of 3 courses at least 90 days apart. Both groups received 20 mg of OM twice daily. Pathologists at one center assessed biopsy specimens in a blinded fashion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: HGD ablation status over 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: At 5 years PHOPDT was significantly more effective than OM in eliminating HGD (77% [106/138] vs 39% [27/70], P<.0001). A secondary outcome measure preventing progression to cancer showed a significant difference (P=.027) with about half the likelihood of cancer occurring in PHOPDT (21/138 [15%]) compared with OM (20/70 [29%]), with a significantly (P=.004) longer time to progression to cancer favoring PHOPDT. LIMITATIONS: Not all patients were available for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This 5-year randomized trial of BE patients with HGD demonstrates that PHOPDT is a clinically and statistically effective therapy in producing long-term ablation of HGD and reducing the potential impact of cancer compared with OM.

The changing profile of esophageal cancer presentation and its implication for diagnosis.

CONTEXT: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is rising and has surpassed squamous cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To determine how the increasing incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma alters the classic clinical presentation and the implications of these changes for diagnosis. DESIGN AND SETTING: A five-year retrospective review (1991-1996) was made. PARTICIPANTS: All patients were identified by a computerized registry search with a diagnosis of esophageal carcinoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical presentation; duration of symptoms; and correlation with diagnosis, pathology, treatment and outcome. RESULTS: One-hundred-eight (35%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 199 (65%) had adenocarcinoma. Dysphagia and weight loss were more common among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (93% and 68%), when compared to adenocarcinoma (79% and 53%). Twenty-one percent of adenocarcinoma patients had other symptoms presentation, including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Once dysphagia was present, there was no correlation between the duration.of symptoms and survival. However, cancers detected in patients who presented with reflux symptoms without dysphagia showed an improved prognosis over patients who presented with both. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal adenocarcinoma has surpassed squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroesophageal reflux was associated with an earlier stage of presentation compared to the "classic" presentation of esophageal cancer.

Surgical management and outcome in primary adenocarcinoma of the small bowel.

BACKGROUND: Primary adenocarcinoma of the small bowel is a rare malignancy and is associated with poor survival outcome. Patient, tumor and treatment-related factors were analyzed for their association with recurrence and survival. METHODS: Between 1971 and 2005, 64 patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the small bowel were treated at our institution. Clinico-pathologic data, operative details, postoperative treatment, recurrence pattern and survival were reviewed. RESULTS: The most common clinical features at presentation included abdominal pain (n = 33; 51.6%) or bowel obstruction (n = 20; 31.3%). The most frequently involved portion of the small bowel was the duodenum (n = 41; 64%). A segmental bowel resection was performed in 30 patients and pancreaticoduodenectomy in 14 patients. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 3.6% (n = 2) and 14.5% (n = 8), respectively. Of the 55 patients who underwent operative intervention, a curative resection was performed in 30 (54.5%). The most common sites of recurrence following a curative resection were the liver and lung. Median survival for all 64 patients was 18 months with a 5-year survival of 21.1%. On multivariate analysis, absence of distant metastatic disease (5-year survival 30.4%), curative resection (5-year survival 44.8%) and pathological T stage 1-3 (5-year survival 39.2%) were identified as independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: A curative resection in the absence of both distant metastases and pathological T4 tumor provides the best survival outcome. Recurrence at distant sites is the predominant pattern of failure following a curative resection, suggesting a role for adjuvant therapy.

Concurrent oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin with concurrent radiotherapy was demonstrated to be a safe regimen for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma in a prior phase I study. We now report the efficacy data for 42 patients treated with this regimen. METHODS: Each chemotherapy cycle lasted 29 days and consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 180 mg/m2 protracted-infusion from days 1 to 29, and oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, and 29. The first cycle was administered concurrently with radiation. The radiation field included regional lymph nodes as well as the primary tumor or tumor bed to a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 1 to 2 additional cycles of chemotherapy were administered. If esophagectomy was indicated, it occurred 4 weeks after completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In the adjuvant group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy was initiated 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Median age was 61 years (range 38-78 years); 30 (71%) of the patients were male. Thirty-three patients had adenocarcinoma, and 9 had squamous cell carcinoma. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was administered preoperatively (group 1) in 24 patients, definitively (group 2) in 13 patients, and as adjuvant treatment (group 3) in 5 patients. In group 1, 16 patients were down-staged including 1 patient with minimal residual disease and 5 with a complete pathologic response; 4 patients were not down-staged, and 4 did not undergo esophagectomy (2 progressed, 1 died of unrelated causes, and 1 refused). In group 2, 1 patient had a complete clinical response, 4 others were down-staged, 2 had stable disease, and 6 progressed. Four patients in group 3 progressed. Median survival was 28 months for group 1, 12 months for group 2, and not reached at 14 months for group 3. There was one grade 4 toxicity (anaphylaxis) in group 2. Grade 3 toxicities were reported for 5 patients in group 1 and 1 patient in group 2. They consisted of hypotension (n=1), fatigue (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), neuropathy (n=1), mucositis (n=1), pneumonitis (n=1), dehydration (n=1), emesis (n=1), and weight loss (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the incorporation of oxaliplatin into a multimodal concurrent chemoradiotherapy protocol for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Palliation of malignant dysphagia in esophageal cancer: a literature-based review.

Esophageal cancer is a lethal malignancy and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is increasing in incidence. Most patients present with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic disease. The 5-year survival rate of patients with esophageal cancer is < 20%. Dysphagia is the most common presenting symptom of this disease and leads to nutritional compromise, pain, and deterioration of quality of life. Palliation is an important goal of esophageal cancer therapy. Severity is commonly measured using a dysphagia grade, and dysphagia is an integral component of quality-of-life instruments, such as FACT-E and EORTC-OES 24. Investigation of dysphagia includes radiographic studies such as barium or Gastrografin swallow, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and other staging studies for esophageal cancer. Current management options for the palliation of dysphagia include esophageal dilatation, intraluminal stents, Nd:YAG laser therapy, photodynamic therapy, argon laser, systemic chemotherapy, external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and combined chemoradiation therapy. The clinical situation, local expertise, and cost effectiveness play an important role in choosing the appropriate treatment modality. The benefits and disadvantages of these approaches along with a concise review of the literature are presented.

Risk factors associated with earlier age of onset in familial pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 5-10% of all pancreatic adenocarcinomas have a hereditary association. The objective of the current study was to characterize the clinical and pathologic features of familial pancreatic carcinoma and to determine potential differences in demographics, risk factors, and outcomes between familial and sporadic pancreatic carcinoma populations. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients diagnosed with pancreatic carcinoma who had an associated familial disposition. Demographic analyses and assessment of clinical features and treatment outcomes were performed for the familial subgroup, and the results were compared with observations made in the nonfamilial, or 'sporadic', population. RESULTS: Thirty of 826 patients (3.6%) had familial pancreatic carcinoma. Baseline demographics, resectability, and metastases were similar in both the familial cohort and the sporadic cohort. The mean age of onset was slightly lower in the familial cohort (57.6 years, compared with 61 years in the sporadic cohort). However, the familial population had a significantly greater proportion of patients who were diagnosed at age <50 years compared with the sporadic population (36.7% vs. 18.3%; P=0.017). A positive smoking history was more commonly associated with familial pancreatic carcinoma (87% vs. 66%; P=0.06). The overall median survival durations were 7 months and 6 months for the familial group and the sporadic group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with familial pancreatic carcinoma present at an earlier age compared with their counterparts who have nonfamilial disease. Smoking may play a significant role in the risk or promotion of pancreatic carcinoma in patients with an inherited predisposition.

Effect of concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy on pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer: dose-volume histogram analysis.

PURPOSE: The pulmonary effects of concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy were studied in patients enrolled in a phase I trial for esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulmonary function tests were performed prospectively before and after combined-modality therapy (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation therapy) in 20 patients with esophageal cancer. Cumulative and differential lung DVH analysis from 0 to 5400 cGy in 25-cGy intervals was performed for the last 15 patients. Correlation between radiation exposure in various dose ranges and percent reduction in pulmonary function tests was calculated as an exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Significant reductions in carbon monoxide diffusion capacity corrected for hemoglobin (12.3%) and total lung capacity (2.5%) were evident at a median of 15.5 days after radiation therapy. DVH analysis revealed that the single dose of maximum correlation between lung volume radiation exposure and lung function reduction was less than 1000 cGy for all pulmonary functions. The percent lung volume that received a total dose between 700 and 1000 cGy maximally correlated with the percent reductions in total lung capacity and vital capacity, and the absolute lung volume that received a total dose between 700 and 1000 cGy maximally correlated with the percent reductions in total lung capacity, vital capacity, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity. DISCUSSION: Significant declines in carbon monoxide diffusion capacity and total lung capacity are evident immediately after the administration of conformal radiation therapy, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer. Other lung functions remain statistically unchanged. The percent or absolute lung volume that received a total dose between 700 and 1000 cGy may be significantly correlated with the percent decline of carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, total lung capacity, and vital capacity. These associations will be evaluated further in a follow-up study.

Predictive factors associated with long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas are rare tumors. We identified predictive factors that are associated with long-term survival (> or=5 years). METHODS: Fifty patients with a diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas were retrospectively evaluated. The following factors were evaluated for disease-specific mortality: age, sex, primary tumor location, functional status, type of primary tumor treatment, presence or absence of liver metastases, timing of liver metastases occurrence, and type of liver metastases treatment. Aggressive treatment of the liver metastases included surgery, chemoembolization, or intrahepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (47%) had tumor located in the head of the pancreas, and 29 patients (58%) had nonfunctioning tumor. Thirty-nine patients (78%) had liver metastases. The median follow-up for the entire group was 35 months (range,.76-206 months). The median survival for the entire group was 40 months, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 84%, 69%, and 36%, respectively. Factors that had a significant favorable effect on survival included curative resection of the primary tumor, metachronous liver metastases, absence of liver metastases, and aggressive treatment of the liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive surgical resection of the primary tumor, absence of liver metastases, metachronous liver metastases, and aggressive treatment of the liver metastases were predictors of long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

Esophageal resection for carcinoma in patients older than 70 years.

BACKGROUND: A larger number of older patients are presenting as candidates for esophageal resection. An aggressive surgical approach in this population is controversial. METHODS: Four hundred thirteen patients with esophageal cancer who presented to Roswell Park Cancer Institute from 1991 to 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, perioperative details, and postoperative courses were compared for patients older and younger than 70 years. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven patients (36%) were older than 70 years. Risk factors, clinical symptoms, histology, and stage at presentation were equivalent for both age groups. A higher percentage of patients <70 years were candidates for curative resection. There were no significant differences between groups for estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusions, length of stay, overall morbidity, or mortality. Only postoperative myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation were increased in the older group. Excluding stage IV disease, there was a significant and similar improvement in median survival after resection for patients both <70 years and >70 years. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, esophageal cancer in older patients warrants surgical resection because the benefit to the patient is the same as it is for younger patients, without a significant increase in operative morbidity or mortality.

High-grade dysplasia within Barrett's esophagus: controversies regarding clinical opinions and approaches.

Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia is a well-known risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma, which has become the predominant form of esophageal cancer in the United States. This review addresses four major fundamental issues that shape our treatment decisions regarding high-grade dysplasia within Barrett's esophagus: (1) the poorly defined natural history of high-grade dysplasia in its progression to adenocarcinoma, (2) the potentially high morbidity and mortality of esophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia, (3) the difficulty in detecting cancer among dysplastic cells during endoscopy, and (4) the controversial role of endoscopic mucosal ablative therapy for high-grade dysplasia. Until there are more accurate surveillance methods, better biochemical or molecular markers in predicting cancerous progression, or more effective minimally invasive methods of treatment, esophagogastrectomy must be considered the standard means of managing patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia. Regular rigorous systematic surveillance and endoscopic mucosal ablation are alternative treatment options that are available but should be used only under strict conditions. The decision to proceed in a certain direction is quite complex and challenging and ideally requires the feedback of patients who are properly educated about the controversies surrounding this disease.