Capsule endoscopy capture rate: has 4 frames-per-second any impact over 2 frames-per-second?

AIM: To compare the current capsule and a new prototype at 2 and 4 frames-per-second, respectively, in terms of clinical and therapeutic impact. METHODS: One hundred patients with an indication for capsule endoscopy were included in the study. All procedures were performed with the new device (SB24). After an exhaustive evaluation of the SB24 videos, they were then converted to "SB2-like" videos for their evaluation. Findings, frames per finding, and clinical and therapeutic impact derived from video visualization were analyzed. Kappa index for interobserver agreement and χ (2) and Student's t tests for qualitative/quantitative variables, respectively, were used. Values of P under 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighty-nine out of 100 cases included in the study were ultimately included in the analysis. The SB24 videos detected the anatomical landmarks (Z-line and duodenal papilla) and lesions in more patients than the "SB2-like" videos. On the other hand, the SB24 videos detected more frames per landmark/lesion than the "SB2-like" videos. However, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Both clinical and therapeutic impacts were similar between SB24 and "SB2-like" videos (K = 0.954). The time spent by readers was significantly higher for SB24 videos visualization (P < 0.05) than for "SB2-like" videos when all images captured by the capsule were considered. However, these differences become non-significant if we only take into account small bowel images (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: More frames-per-second detect more landmarks, lesions, and frames per landmark/lesion, but is time consuming and has a very low impact on clinical and therapeutic management.

[Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography in the etiological diagnosis of patients with acute idiopathic pancreatitis]. / Utilidad de la ecoendoscopia en el diagnóstico etiológico de los pacientes con pancreatitis aguda idiopática.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of endoscopic ultrasonography in the etiological diagnosis of patients initially diagnosed with acute idiopathic pancreatitis and to determine the clinical and laboratory factors related to the results of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 73 patients initially diagnosed with acute idiopathic pancreatitis and referred to our service for biliopancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography. A positive result was considered to be identification of at least one possible cause of pancreatitis, excluding patients in whom the only echoendoscopic finding was chronic pancreatitis. The clinical characteristics and clinical course of these patients were compared with the results of the technique. RESULTS: Endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosed at least one possible cause of acute pancreatitis in 32 patients (44%). The most frequent diagnoses were cholelithiasis (16%) and biliary sludge (20%). The diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography was lower in patients with prior cholecystectomy (16% vs. 49%; p=0.037) while a positive result was more likely in patients with elevated glutamyl oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) or glutamyl pyruvic transaminase (GPT) levels at diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (GOT: 68 vs. 31%; p=0.002; GPT: 63 vs. 26%; p=0.001). No differences were found in diagnostic yield according to whether endoscopic ultrasonography was performed during the first episode of pancreatitis (48%) or in recurrent episodes (37%) (p=0.40). Over a mean follow-up period of 28 months, recurrence of new episodes of pancreatitis was significantly lower in patients with an etiological diagnosis (3 vs. 22%; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a useful technique in the etiological diagnosis of acute pancreatitis of unknown origin, especially in patients with elevated transaminase levels and/or without cholecystectomy. This technique should be used in the first episode of acute idiopathic pancreatitis.

Clinical features of patients with negative results from traditional diagnostic work-up and Crohn's disease findings from capsule endoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Capsule endoscopy (CE) can detect Crohn's disease in patients with suggestive symptoms but with negative results from the traditional diagnostic work-up (ileocolonoscopy and small bowel follow-through). The objective of this study was to determine which clinical features predict the diagnosis of Crohn's disease by CE in this subgroup of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (7 men, 16 women; mean age: 40+/-15 y) with negative results from conventional imaging techniques were prospectively included in the study because of suspicion of Crohn's disease (long-standing abdominal pain and/or diarrhea and at least one of the following symptoms: anemia, weight loss, long-standing fever, perianal disease, extraintestinal manifestations typical of inflammatory bowel disease, elevated inflammatory parameters, or family history of inflammatory bowel disease). RESULTS: CE diagnosed Crohn's disease in 6 patients (26%). Crohn's disease diagnosis was more frequent in patients with a combination of anemia and elevated inflammatory parameters than in patients without this combination (57% vs. 12.5%; P=0.04). The only statistically significant association between an inflammatory parameter and Crohn's disease was an increased platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: CE is a useful tool for the diagnosis of subtle small bowel Crohn's disease. The diagnostic yield of CE in patients with suspicion of Crohn's disease but negative results from the traditional diagnostic work-up is significantly higher in patients with anemia and increased platelet count than in patients without this combination of clinical features.