Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the early-onset colorectal cancer.

The COVID19 pandemic has affected the spectrum of cancer care worldwide. Early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is defined as diagnosis below the age of 50. Patients with EOCRC faced multiple challenges during the COVID19 pandemic and in some institutions it jeopardized cancer diagnosis and care delivery. Our study aims to identify the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with EOCRC in our Centre during the first wave of the pandemic in comparison with the same period in 2019 and 2021. Patients with EOCRC visited for the first time at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Spain from the 1st March to 31st August of 2019, 2020 and 2021 were included in the analysis. 177 patients with EOCRC were visited for the first time between 2019 and 2021, of which 90 patients met the inclusion criteria (2019: 30 patients, 2020: 29 patients, 2021: 31 patients). Neither differences in frequency nor in stage at diagnosis or at first visit during the given periods were observed. Of note, indication of systemic therapy in the adjuvant or metastatic setting was not altered. Days to treatment initiation and enrollment in clinical trials in this subpopulation was not affected due to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Effectiveness of radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with short life expectancy.

AIM: To analyze the effect of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) and poor prognosis in our center. BACKGROUND: RT is an effective treatment for MSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation on patients with MSCC and limited survival (according to Rades' scale), and treated with single-dose 8 Gy RT (February 2013-August 2014). Pain, ambulatory status and sphincter control were recorded. Pain relief was evaluated following the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party Guidelines. Ambulatory status was evaluated with Frankel's scale. Spinal fracture and instability were recorded. Health aspects were evaluated via a short survey and measuring the time spent on RT. RESULTS: 35 patients were included. 51% had unfavorable histologies; 60% bone fracture and 17% spinal instability. Median Karnofsky score was 60; 100% were on high doses of opioids. Median survival was 1.5 months. 49% had a partial pain response at 2 weeks post-radiation, and 47% at one month. Significant reductions in pain intensity were present at 2 weeks (Visual analog scale, VAS score, from 8 ± 1.5 to 5 ± 1.9). Negligible effects were observed on motor and bladder function, along with side effects. KPS score was maintained during follow-up. 80% of patients spent ≤5% of their remaining lifetime on RT. A survey comparison between clinical judgment and the results according to treatment decision consider that these patients merit treatment evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: A moderate pain response tailored to life expectancy can be obtained in patients treated with radiation. 8-Gy single-dose is an option for patients with limited survival.

Management of painful chronic pancreatitis with single-dose radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Some patients with chronic pancreatitis present recurrent flare-ups of pancreatitis and/or unrelenting pain. Current management is mostly limited to analgesics and surgery. We reasoned that anti-inflammatory radiotherapy, which has proven useful to alleviate other painful inflammatory painful disorders, might prove valuable for severely symptomatic patients with chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: We prospectively studied the efficacy of single-dose anti-inflammatory radiotherapy in 15 consecutive patients with chronic pancreatitis who fulfilled the following criteria: either two flare-ups of pancreatitis in the previous 6 months and/or continuous pain for more than 3 months. Treatment consisted of a single radiation dose of 8 Gy to the pancreas. Exocrine function (fecal elastase), endocrine function (c peptide), quality of life (EuroQol questionnaire), and clinical outcome were assessed before and after radiation. Response was defined as no further pain or flare-ups of pancreatitis. RESULTS: During follow-up (median: 39 months; range: 4-72 months), 12 patients had no further pain or flare-ups. One patient required a second radiation dose 1 year after the initial treatment, but he has remained well ever since (50 months). Two other patients did not respond to radiotherapy. After radiotherapy either exocrine or endocrine pancreatic function, or both, deteriorated in three patients. Patients who responded to treatment (13/15) gained 4-20 kg in body weight during follow-up (median 4 kg) and EuroQol improved significantly from 0.58 to 0.86 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for severe symptomatic chronic pancreatitis appears to be a useful and effective therapeutic choice that could potentially substitute for or delay surgery.

Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy with UFT and Leucovorin in patients with advanced rectal cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: The aim this study was to determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate defined as tumor regression grade 1 (TRG1) and toxicity profile of the combination of high-dose pre-operative radiotherapy and simultaneous UFT/leucovorin (LV) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS: Eligibility included biopsy proven rectal adenocarcinoma; T3-T4 N0-N2; performance status < 2 (ECOG) and adequate blood, hepatic and renal function. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy/day and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day and LV 60 mg/day, given simultaneously daily for 6 weeks. Surgery was performed within 4-6 weeks period after chemoradiotherapy. Patients who did not achieve TGR1 were to receive 4 cycles of adjuvant UFT/LV on days 1-28, every 5 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included. All but one received full dose of radiation and 62 had the total planned pre-operative UFT/LV dose. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea 7% and proctitis 3%. Complete resection was achieved in 62 patients (91%). Tumor regression grade 1 (TRG1) was seen in 11 patients (16%). Forty-eight patients received adjuvant UFT/LV. Grade 3 toxicity during adjuvant UFT/LV included diarrhea 12%, asthenia 4%, neutropenia 2%, and hand-foot syndrome 2%. The 3-year disease-free survival was 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous high-dose pre-operative localized radiation therapy concurrent with UFT/LV is feasible and has a low toxicity profile. This schedule is highly effective and merits further investigation.

Results of radiotherapy in primary cutaneous lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple therapeutic strategies have been proposed for the management of primary cutaneous lymphomas. We report the outcome data and therapeutic response of a group of patients treated with local radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty seven patients with diagnostic of cutaneous lymphoma and treated with local radiation were evaluated for clinical response. Thirteen cases corresponded to cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) and 14 to cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (CBCL). Orthovoltage radiotherapy of 100 Kv was used and total dose of radiation ranged from 15 to 30 Gy (mean 24 Gy; median 20 Gy). RESULTS: The immediate response to the treatment was satisfactory in all cases. In 24 patients (89%) complete response was obtained in the irradiated lesion and in 3 cases (11%) the response was partial. With a mean follow-up of 25.4 months (range 1-100 months) the overall response rate was 96.3%. Fourteen patients (52%) were alive without evidence of disease (6 CTCL and 8 CBCL), 5 patients (18%) retained cutaneous disease or had systemic progression (3 CTCL and 2 CBCL) and 8 patients died (30%). In 7 patients lymphoma progression was the factor leading to death (26%) and in one patient the cause was not related with the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy was demonstrated to be able to induce clinical remission of primary cutaneous lymphomas.

Results of radiotherapy in primary cutaneous lymphoma

No disponible

Introduction. Multiple therapeutic strategies havebeen proposed for the management of primary cutaneouslymphomas. We report the outcome dataand therapeutic response of a group of patientstreated with local radiotherapy.Material and methods. Twenty seven patientswith diagnostic of cutaneous lymphoma and treatedwith local radiation were evaluated for clinicalresponse. Thirteen cases corresponded to cutaneousT-cell lymphomas (CTCL) and 14 to cutaneousB-cell lymphomas (CBCL). Orthovoltage radiotherapyof 100 Kv was used and total dose ofradiation ranged from 15 to 30 Gy (mean 24 Gy;median 20 Gy).Results. The immediate response to the treatmentwas satisfactory in all cases. In 24 patients (89%)complete response was obtained in the irradiatedlesion and in 3 cases (11%) the response was partial.With a mean follow-up of 25.4 months (range1-100 months) the overall response rate was 96.3%.Fourteen patients (52%) were alive without evidenceof disease (6 CTCL and 8 CBCL), 5 patients(18%) retained cutaneous disease or had systemicprogression (3 CTCL and 2 CBCL) and 8 patientsdied (30%). In 7 patients lymphoma progressionwas the factor leading to death (26%) and in onepatient the cause was not related with the disease.Conclusions. Radiotherapy was demonstrated tobe able to induce clinical remission of primary cutaneouslymphomas

Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor and cyclooxygenase-2 in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the prognostic value of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were studied. All patients received preoperative pelvic radiotherapy. Forty-seven patients received concomitant chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed 4-8 weeks later in all patients. Immunohistochemical examination of COX-2 and VEGF was performed on the preirradiation diagnostic biopsies. An immunohistochemical score established from the extension and intensity of the markers was used for analysis. The log-rank test and proportional hazards regression analysis were used to calculate the probability that the biomarkers were associated with patient outcome. RESULTS: COX-2 expression was positive in 38 tumors (51%) while VEGF expression was positive in 43 (57%). The only clinicopathological parameter significantly associated with COX-2 or VEGF expression was performance status. None of the 2 markers were found to predict treatment response. There was no statistically significant correlation between COX-2 and VEGF. Univariate analysis identified pathological stage (pT, pN) as prognostic for disease-free survival. When VEGF expression was analyzed, disease-free survival was reduced among patients with VEGF-positive tumors (p = 0.047). This was specifically related to metastases-free survival (p = 0.016). These results were not observed for COX-2. After multivariate analysis, the pT and pN stage remained as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: VEGF-positive expression is an indicator of poor disease-free survival, specifically linked to distant metastasis. More aggressive treatment strategies are warranted in pT3-4 and pN1-2 rectal cancer patients.