Macroporous copolymer matrix. IV. Expanded bed adsorption application.

Macroporous crosslinked hydroxyethyl methacrylate-ethylene dimethacrylate copolymeric beads (HEG beads) were synthesized by suspension polymerization in the presence of a pore generating agent. These beads were coupled to alpha-cyclodextrin through a urethane spacer. These modified copolymer beads (affinity-HEG beads) so prepared were evaluated for their suitability in expanded bed chromatography. The optimum thickness of the distributor plate for stable expanded bed for use in expanded bed adsorption (EBA) was established. The affinity-HEG beads are comparable in density to Streamline diethyl amino ethane (DEAE) and exhibit better mechanical stability at higher superficial velocity under fluidization. The affinity-BEG beads were used as affinity chromatography matrices for the purification of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase. Feeding of 5-fold diluted fermented broth to the column containing affinity-HEG beads of settled bed height 7.5 cm (I.D. 26 mm and length 42 cm) at double bed expansion resulted in a sharp breakthrough curve of alpha-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase). The adsorbed enzyme was eluted from the bed in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 10 mM CaCl2 at 25 degrees C in packed bed configuration.

Transport of viral proteins to the apical membranes and interaction of matrix protein with glycoproteins in the assembly of influenza viruses.

Influenza virus assembly and morphogenesis require transport of viral components to the assembly site at the apical plasma membrane of polarized epithelial cells and interaction among the viral components. In this report we have discussed the apical determinants present in the transmembrane domain (TMD) of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), and the interaction of M1 with influenza virus HA and NA. Earlier studies have shown that the NA and HA TMDs possess determinant(s) for apical sorting and raft-association (Kundu et al., 1996. J. Virol 70, 6508-6515; Lin et al., 1998. J. Cell Biol. 142, 51-57). Analysis of chimeric constructs between NA and TR (human transferring receptor) TMDs and the mutations in the NA and HA TMD sequences showed that the COOH terminus of the NA TMD and NH(2) terminus of the HA TMD encompassing the exoplasmic leaflet of the lipid bilayers were significantly involved in lipid raft-association and that apical determinants were not discrete sequences but rather dispersed within the TMD of HA and NA. These analyses also showed that although both signals for apical sorting and raft-association resided in the NA TMD, they were not identical and varied independently. Interactions of M1 protein with HA or NA, the influenza virus envelope glycoproteins, were investigated by TX-100 detergent treatment of membrane fractions and floatation in sucrose gradients. Results from these analyses showed that the interaction of M1 with mature HA and NA, which associated with the detergent-resistant lipid rafts caused an increased detergent-resistance of the membrane-bound M1 and that M1 interacted with HA and NA both in influenza virus-infected cells as well as in recombinant vaccinia virus-infected cells coexpressing M1 with HA and/or NA. Furthermore, both the cytoplasmic tail and the TMD of HA caused an increased detergent-resistance of the membrane-bound M1 supporting their interaction with M1. Immunofluorescence analysis by confocal microscopy also showed colocalization supporting the interaction of M1 with HA and NA at the cell surface and during exocytic transport both in influenza virus-infected cells as well as in coexpressing cells.

High-density lipoprotein loses its anti-inflammatory properties during acute influenza a infection.

BACKGROUND: Viruses have been identified as one of a variety of potential agents that are implicated in atherogenesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: C57BL/6J mice were killed before or 2, 3, 5, 7, or 9 days after intranasal infection with 10(5) plaque-forming units (pfu) of Influenza A strain WSN/33. Peak infectivity in lungs was reached by 72 hours, and it returned to baseline by 9 days. No viremia was observed at any time. The activities of paraoxonase and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase in HDL decreased after infection and reached their lowest levels 7 days after inoculation. The ability of HDL from infected mice to inhibit LDL oxidation and LDL-induced monocyte chemotactic activity in human artery wall cell cocultures decreased with time after inoculation. Moreover, as the infection progressed, LDL more readily induced monocyte chemotaxis. Peak interleukin-6 and serum amyloid A plasma levels were observed at 2 and 7 days after inoculation. HDL apoA-I levels did not change. ApoJ and ceruloplasmin levels in HDL peaked 3 days after infection. Ceruloplasmin remained elevated throughout the time course, whereas apoJ levels decreased toward baseline after the third day. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that alterations in the relative levels of paraoxonase, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, ceruloplasmin, and apoJ in HDL occur during acute influenza infection, causing HDL to lose its anti-inflammatory properties.

Role of ATP in influenza virus budding.

Influenza viruses bud from the plasma membrane of virus-infected cells. Although budding is a critical step in virus replication, little is known about the requirements of the budding process. In this report, we have investigated the role of ATP in influenza virus budding by treating influenza virus infected Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells with a number of metabolic inhibitors. When WSN virus-infected MDCK cells were exposed to antimycin A, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone, or oligomycin for a short time (15 min or 1 h) late in the infectious cycle, the rate of virus budding decreased. This inhibitory effect was reversible upon removal of the inhibitors. The role of ATP hydrolysis was analyzed by treating lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)-permeabilized live filter-grown virus-infected MDCK cells with nonpermeable ATP analogues from the basal side and assaying virus budding from the apical side. In LPC-permeabilized cells, membrane-impermeable ATP analogues such as adenosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) or 5'-adenylylimidodiphosphate caused reduction of virus budding which could be partially restored by adding excess ATP. These data demonstrated that ATP hydrolysis and not just ATP binding was required for virus budding. However, inhibitors of ion channel (ATPases) and protein ubiquitinylation, which also required the ATP as energy source, did not affect influenza virus budding, suggesting that neither ion channel nor protein ubiquitinylation activity was involved in influenza virus budding. On the other hand, treatment with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which decreases membrane viscosity, reduced the rate of virus budding, demonstrating that the physical state of membrane viscosity and membrane fluidity had an important effect on virus budding. Data presented in the report indicate that influenza virus budding is an active ATP-dependent process and suggest that reduced virus budding by ATP depletion and DMSO treatment may be partly due to decreased membrane viscosity.

Macroporous copolymer matrix: 1. Effectiveness of different diisocyanate spacer arms to bind cyclodextrins.

Cross-linked macroporous beaded polymer matrices, with pendant hydroxyl groups, were synthesized by the copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate using suspension polymerization methodology. Novel affinity chromatography matrices were synthesized using various diisocyanates as bifunctional reagents to couple the macroporous polymeric supports, of controlled particle size distribution, with alpha and beta-cyclodextrins. The optimal conditions to couple the hydroxyl groups of cyclodextrin (ligand) and the polymeric supports through urethane linkages were established iteratively using various diisocyanates. Efficacy of ligand binding on the matrix and nonspecific interactions of the synthesized affinity matrices were evaluated to establish the best support and spacer arm. 2,4-Tolylene diisocyanate was established as the best spacer arm on the basis of high ligand binding and low nonspecific interactions. The characteristics of the synthesized affinity matrices toward the adsorption of alpha and beta-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) were investigated. The binding of beta-CGTase was the highest on affinity matrices with the polymeric methylene diisocyanate spacer. The optimal conditions to regenerate the matrices were also established.

Assembly of Sendai virus: M protein interacts with F and HN proteins and with the cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane domain of F protein.

Sendai virus matrix protein (M protein) is critically important for virus assembly and budding and is presumed to interact with viral glycoproteins on the outer side and viral nucleocapsid on the inner side. However, since M protein alone binds to lipid membranes, it has been difficult to demonstrate the specific interaction of M protein with HN or F protein, the Sendai viral glycoproteins. Using Triton X-100 (TX-100) detergent treatment of membrane fractions and flotation in sucrose gradients, we report that the membrane-bound M protein expressed alone or coexpressed with heterologous glycoprotein (influenza virus HA) was totally TX-100 soluble but the membrane-bound M protein coexpressed with HN or F protein either individually or together was predominantly detergent-resistant and floated to the top of the density gradient. Furthermore, both the cytoplasmic tail and the transmembrane domain of F protein facilitated binding of M protein to detergent-resistant membranes. Analysis of the membrane association of M protein in the early and late phases of the Sendai virus infectious cycle revealed that the interaction of M protein with mature glycoproteins that associated with the detergent-resistant lipid rafts was responsible for the detergent resistance of the membrane-bound M protein. Immunofluorescence analysis by confocal microscopy also demonstrated that in Sendai virus-infected cells, a fraction of M protein colocalized with F and HN proteins and that some M protein also became associated with the F and HN proteins while they were in transit to the plasma membrane via the exocytic pathway. These studies indicate that F and HN interact with M protein in the absence of any other viral proteins and that F associates with M protein via its cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane domain.

Influenza virus assembly: effect of influenza virus glycoproteins on the membrane association of M1 protein.

Influenza virus matrix protein (M1), a critical protein required for virus assembly and budding, is presumed to interact with viral glycoproteins on the outer side and viral ribonucleoprotein on the inner side. However, because of the inherent membrane-binding ability of M1 protein, it has been difficult to demonstrate the specific interaction of M1 protein with hemagglutinin (HA) or neuraminidase (NA), the influenza virus envelope glycoproteins. Using Triton X-100 (TX-100) detergent treatment of membrane fractions and floatation in sucrose gradients, we observed that the membrane-bound M1 protein expressed alone or coexpressed with heterologous Sendai virus F was totally TX-100 soluble but the membrane-bound M1 protein expressed in the presence of HA and NA was predominantly detergent resistant and floated to the top of the density gradient. Furthermore, both the cytoplasmic tail and the transmembrane domain of HA facilitated binding of M1 to detergent-resistant membranes. Analysis of the membrane association of M1 in the early and late phases of the influenza virus infectious cycle revealed that the interaction of M1 with mature glycoproteins which associated with the detergent-resistant lipid rafts was responsible for the detergent resistance of membrane-bound M1. Immunofluorescence analysis by confocal microscopy also demonstrated that, in influenza virus-infected cells, a fraction of M1 protein colocalized with HA and associated with the HA in transit to the plasma membrane via the exocytic pathway. Similar results for colocalization were obtained when M1 and HA were coexpressed and HA transport was blocked by monensin treatment. These studies indicate that both HA and NA interact with influenza virus M1 and that HA associates with M1 via its cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane domain.

Analysis of the transmembrane domain of influenza virus neuraminidase, a type II transmembrane glycoprotein, for apical sorting and raft association.

Influenza virus neuraminidase (NA), a type II transmembrane protein, is directly transported to the apical plasma membrane in polarized MDCK cells. Previously, it was shown that the transmembrane domain (TMD) of NA provides a determinant(s) for apical sorting and raft association (A. Kundu, R. T. Avalos, C. M. Sanderson, and D. P. Nayak, J. Virol. 70:6508-6515, 1996). In this report, we have analyzed the sequences in the NA TMD involved in apical transport and raft association by making chimeric TMDs from NA and human transferring receptor (TR) TMDs and by mutating the NA TMD sequences. Our results show that the COOH-terminal half of the NA TMD (amino acids [aa] 19 to 35) was significantly involved in raft association, as determined by Triton X-100 (TX-100) resistance. However, in addition, the highly conserved residues at the extreme NH(2) terminus of the NA TMD were also critical for TX-100 resistance. On the other hand, 19 residues (aa 9 to 27) at the NH(2) terminus of the NA TMD were sufficient for apical sorting. Amino acid residues 14 to 18 and 27 to 31 had the least effect on apical transport, whereas mutations in the amino acid residues 11 to 13, 23 to 26, and 32 to 35 resulted in altered polarity for the mutant proteins. These results indicated that multiple regions in the NA TMD were involved in apical transport. Furthermore, these results support the idea that the signals for apical sorting and raft association, although residing in the NA TMD, are not identical and vary independently and that the NA TMD also possesses an apical determinant(s) which can interact with apical sorting machineries outside the lipid raft.

Influenza virus nucleoprotein interacts with influenza virus polymerase proteins.

Influenza virus nucleoprotein (NP) is a critical factor in the viral infectious cycle in switching influenza virus RNA synthesis from transcription mode to replication mode. In this study, we investigated the interaction of NP with the viral polymerase protein complex. Using coimmunoprecipitation with monospecific or monoclonal antibodies, we observed that NP interacted with the RNP-free polymerase protein complex in influenza virus-infected cells. In addition, coexpression of the components of the polymerase protein complex (PB1, PB2, or PA) with NP either together or pairwise revealed that NP interacts with PB1 and PB2 but not PA. Interaction of NP with PB1 and PB2 was confirmed by both coimmunoprecipitation and histidine tagging of the NP-PB1 and NP-PB2 complexes. Further, it was observed that NP-PB2 interaction was rather labile and sensitive to dissociation in 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and that the stability of NP-PB2 interaction was regulated by the sequences present at the COOH terminus of NP. Analysis of NP deletion mutants revealed that at least three regions of NP interacted independently with PB2. A detailed analysis of the COOH terminus of NP by mutation of serine-to-alanine (SA) residues either individually or together demonstrated that SA mutations in this region did not affect the binding of NP to PB2. However, some SA mutations at the COOH terminus drastically affected the functional activity of NP in an in vivo transcription-replication assay, whereas others exhibited a temperature-sensitive phenotype and still others had no effect on the transcription and replication of the viral RNA. These results suggest that a direct interaction of NP with polymerase proteins may be involved in regulating the switch of viral RNA synthesis from transcription to replication.

Association of influenza virus NP and M1 proteins with cellular cytoskeletal elements in influenza virus-infected cells.

We have investigated the association of the influenza virus matrix (M1) and nucleoprotein (NP) with the host cell cytoskeletal elements in influenza virus-infected MDCK and MDBK cells. At 6.5 h postinfection, the newly synthesized M1 was Triton X-100 (TX-100) extractable but became resistant to TX-100 extraction during the chase with a t1/2 of 20 min. NP, on the other hand, acquired TX-100 resistance immediately after synthesis. Significant fractions of both M1 and NP remained resistant to differential detergent (Triton X-114, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate [CHAPS], octylglucoside) extraction, suggesting that M1 and NP were interacting with the cytoskeletal elements. However, the high-molecular-weight form of the viral transmembrane protein hemagglutinin (HA), which had undergone complex glycosylation, also became resistant to TX-100 extraction but was sensitive to octylglucoside detergent extraction, indicating that HA, unlike M1 or NP, was interacting with TX-100-insoluble lipids and not with cytoskeletal elements. Morphological analysis with cytoskeletal disrupting agents demonstrated that M1 and NP were associated with microfilaments in virus-infected cells. However, M1, expressed alone in MDCK or HeLa cells from cloned cDNA or coexpressed with NP, did not become resistant to TX-100 extraction even after a long chase. NP, on the other hand, became TX-100 insoluble as in the virus-infected cells. M1 also did not acquire TX-100 insolubility in ts 56 (a temperature-sensitive mutant with a defect in NP protein)-infected cells at the nonpermissive temperature. Furthermore, early in the infectious cycle in WSN-infected cells, M1 acquired TX-100 resistance very slowly after a long chase and did not acquire TX-100 resistance at all when chased in the presence of cycloheximide. On the other hand, late in the infectious cycle, M1 acquired TX-100 resistance when chased in either the presence or absence of cycloheximide. Taken together, these results demonstrate that M1 and NP interact with host microfilaments in virus-infected cells and that M1 requires other viral proteins or subviral components (possibly viral ribonucleoprotein) for interaction with host cytoskeletal components. The implication of these results for viral morphogenesis is discussed.

Receptor interference mediated by the envelope glycoproteins of various HIV-1 and HIV-2 isolates.

The envelope glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) plays a major role in the down-regulation of its receptor, CD4. This down-regulation, at least in part, is caused by the formation of gp160-CD4 intracellular complexes which fail to transport out of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In this report, we have evaluated the ability of envelope glycoproteins from various isolates to block CD4 transport within the endoplasmic reticulum. Using a recombinant vaccinia virus expression system in HeLa cells, we expressed different HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope glycoproteins with CD4. Pulse-chase labeling followed by immunoprecipitation demonstrated that envelope glycoproteins from primary and lab-adapted isolates were capable of forming intracellular complexes with CD4, resulting in the partial inhibition of CD4 transport to the Golgi. Although the efficiency of CD4 modulation was variable, these differences did not correlate with the type of isolate from which the HIV-1 glycoprotein was derived. However, we did find that the HIV-2 ST envelope glycoprotein (gp150) was not as efficient at blocking CD4 as the glycoprotein (gp140) derived from HIV-2 ROD. The decreased ability of ST gp150 to block CD4 within the ER was associated with an increased efficiency of ST gp150 transport and cleavage. Thus, differences in the ability of HIV envelope glycoproteins to block CD4 transport do exist, and these differences may be determined by envelope glycoprotein transport kinetics.

Influenza virus polymerase basic protein 1 interacts with influenza virus polymerase basic protein 2 at multiple sites.

Three polymerase proteins of influenza type A virus interact with each other to form the active polymerase complex. Polymerase basic protein 1 (PB1) can interact with PB2 in the presence or absence of polymerase acidic protein. In this study, we investigated the domains of PB1 involved in complex formation with PB2 in vivo, using coexpression and coimmunoprecipitation of the PB1-PB2 complex with monospecific antibodies. Results show that PB1 possesses at least two regions which can interact independently and form stable complexes with PB2. Both of these regions are located at the NH2 terminus of PB1; the COOH-terminal half of PB1 is not involved in interacting with PB2. Deletion analysis further demonstrated that the interacting regions of PB1 encompass amino acids (aa) 48 to 145 and aa 251 to 321. Linker insertions throughout the PB1 sequences did not affect complex formation with PB2. Deletion and linker-insertion mutants of PB1 were tested for polymerase activity in vivo. For this analysis, we developed a simplified assay for viral polymerase activity that uses a reporter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene containing the 5' and 3' ends of influenza viral promoter and nontranslating regions (minus sense) of the NS gene joined to a hepatitis delta virus ribozyme at its 3' end. This assay demonstrated that all deletion mutants of PB1 exhibited either background or greatly reduced polymerase activity irrespective of the ability to interact with PB2 and that all linker-insertion mutants except one at the extreme COOH end (L-746) of PB1 were also negative for viral polymerase activity. These results show that compared with complex formation of PB1 with PB2, the polymerase activity of PB1 was extremely sensitive to structural perturbation.

Transmembrane domain of influenza virus neuraminidase, a type II protein, possesses an apical sorting signal in polarized MDCK cells.

The influenza virus neuraminidase (NA), a type II transmembrane protein, is directly transported to the apical plasma membrane in polarized MDCK cells. By using deletion mutants and chimeric constructs of influenza virus NA with the human transferrin receptor, a type II basolateral transmembrane protein, we investigated the location of the apical sorting signal of influenza virus NA. When these mutant and chimeric proteins were expressed in stably transfected polarized MDCK cells, the transmembrane domain of NA, and not the cytoplasmic tail, provided a determinant for apical targeting in polarized MDCK cells and this transmembrane signal was sufficient for sorting and transport of the ectodomain of a reporter protein (transferrin receptor) directly to the apical plasma membrane of polarized MDCK cells. In addition, by using differential detergent extraction, we demonstrated that influenza virus NA and the chimeras which were transported to the apical plasma membrane also became insoluble in Triton X-100 but soluble in octylglucoside after extraction from MDCK cells during exocytic transport. These data indicate that the transmembrane domain of NA provides the determinant(s) both for apical transport and for association with Triton X-100-insoluble lipids.

Mutational analysis of HIV-1 gp160-mediated receptor interference: intracellular complex formation.

Formation of CD4-gp160 intracellular complexes represents an important mechanism leading to the induction of receptor interference. Previous studies have demonstrated that cells coexpressing gp160 and CD4 formed complexes of CD4 and gp160 which became blocked within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), preventing CD4 from reaching the cell surface. In this report we have investigated the domains and residues of CD4 and gp160 involved in intracellular interaction. Accordingly, we have introduced mutations in both CD4 and gp160 at sites previously shown to disrupt CD4-gp120 interactions at the cell surface. Using a T7-vaccinia virus transient expression system, we expressed these gp160 and CD4 mutants in HeLa cells and analyzed their effects on intracellular complex formation and CD4 surface modulation. We observed that a number of gp160 mutants which failed to interact with CD4 at the cell surface also failed to bind and trap CD4 within the ER as expected. However, mutations at a critical residue, W427, did not abrogate intracellular CD4 binding. These gp160 mutants continued to interact with intracellular CD4 and inhibit CD4 transport to the cell surface, although gp120 produced from these mutants did not bind CD4 at the cell surface as expected. A number CD4 mutants also continued to form intracellular complexes with gp160, resulting in the loss of CD4 surface expression. Again, these CD4 mutants did not bind to gp120 at the cell surface, consistent with earlier reports. These results demonstrate that intracellular interactions between gp160 and CD4 in the ER may utilize different contact sites compared to those used during CD4 and gp120 binding at the cell surface. The data provide further evidence that the environment in which CD4 and the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein interact can have a significant effect on their interaction.

Membrane anchorage of gp160 is necessary and sufficient to prevent CD4 transport to the cell surface.

The HIV envelope glycoprotein gp160 plays a major role in the posttranslational down-regulation of its receptor, CD4. In this report we have analyzed the requirements of both CD4 and gp160 involved in transport block of the gp160-CD4 complex causing the down-regulation of cell surface CD4. Using a transient expression system we observed that both soluble and membrane-bound CD4 were equally blocked by the wild-type gp160, indicating that neither the transmembrane domain nor the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 affected its interaction with gp160 or exocytic transport block of the complex. Similarly, deletions of the gp160 cytoplasmic domain or mutation in the transmembrane domain had little effect on its transport, or its ability to down-regulate CD4 surface expression. Furthermore, substitution of the gp160 transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail with that of the influenza virus hemagglutinin or with a glycophosphatidylinositol moiety did not affect its ability to bind CD4 and block its transport. However, soluble envelope glycoprotein constructs (either gp120 or soluble gp160) were unable to block CD4 transport to the cell surface despite their binding to CD4 within the ER. Taken together these results demonstrate that neither the gp160 cytoplasmic tail nor the specific sequences of the transmembrane region of gp160 nor the membrane anchoring of CD4 were involved in ER retention of the CD4-gp160 complex and that anchoring of gp160 to the ER membrane was responsible for gp160-mediated cell surface down-regulation of CD4.

Interaction of Sendai viral F, HN, and M proteins with host cytoskeletal and lipid components in Sendai virus-infected BHK cells.

We have studied the interaction of Sendai viral fusion (F), hemagglutinin/neuraminidase (H/N), and matrix (M) proteins with host cytoskeletal and lipid components in Sendai virus-infected BHK cells using two nonionic detergents Triton X-100 (TX-100) and octyl glucoside (OG). Our results show that while M protein acquired resistance to both TX-100 and OG extraction, F and HN exhibited insolubility only to TX-100 but not to OG. Furthermore, in the presence of high salt (1 M NaCl), M, but not F or HN, became TX-100 soluble. Both type I (F) and type II (HN) viral glycoproteins acquired TX-100 insolubility at a late stage during exocytic transport as they acquired endo H resistance. In addition, TX-100 insoluble F and HN exhibited a lighter density compared to TX-100 resistant M by flotation analysis. Using recombinant vaccinia viruses that express Sendai virus HN, F, or M protein individually, we observed that each viral protein (F, HN, or M) was independently capable of acquiring TX-100 insolubility in the absence of other viral components. These results would indicate that while Sendai viral F and HN became bound to TX-100 insoluble lipids, M protein bound ionically to TX-100 insoluble cytoskeletal components and not to TX-100 insoluble lipids.

Abortive replication of influenza virus A/WSN/33 in HeLa229 cells: defective viral entry and budding processes.

Since influenza A virus replication is defective in HeLa229 cells but productive in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, we have investigated the steps in the infectious cycle of A/WSN/33 virus defective in HeLa229 cells. We find that both the entry and exit processes of the infectious cycle were defective in HeLa229 cells. During entry, viral adsorption was apparently normal in HeLa229 cells but a subsequent step(s) involving one or more processes namely the fusion/uncoating and nuclear transport of viral ribonucleoprotein was inefficient and slow compared to those in MDCK cells. Fewer HeLa229 cells were infected at the same multiplicities of infection, resistance to ammonium chloride developed much more slowly and degradation of the incoming virus proteins was delayed when compared to those in MDCK cells. Subsequent to the entry process, there was no significant difference in either the synthesis of viral proteins or the transport, maturation, and membrane insertion of viral glycoproteins although the glycosylation pattern of hemagglutinin was different and the peak protein synthesis was albeit delayed in HeLa229 cells compared to that in MDCK cells. However, there was a major defect in the budding and release of viral particles. In HeLa229 cells, viral bud formation occurred but viral particles remained attached to the plasma membrane and were not released into the medium. This defect in virus release was not due to lack of neuraminidase activity but could be, at least partly, overcome by cytochalasin B treatment, suggesting a possible involvement of microfilaments in virus release. These results indicate that the abortive replication of influenza virus A/WSN/33 in HeLa229 cells appears to be due to multiple defects involving both the entry and release of viral particles and that host cell membrane and microfilaments may be important contributing factors in these processes.

Deletion mutation in the signal anchor domain activates cleavage of the influenza virus neuraminidase, a type II transmembrane protein.

Influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) is a type II integral membrane protein with a long hydrophobic domain [29 amino acids (aa)] at the N terminus that functions as an uncleaved signal for translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum and anchors the protein in the membrane. The function of the transmembrane domain in intracellular transport was investigated by deletion mutagenesis. Expression of the mutated NA in eukaryotic cells and by in vitro translation in the presence of membranes showed that the deletion of eight amino acids (aa 28 to 35) from the carboxy end of the signal anchor domain resulted in cleavage, probably by the signal peptidase and secretion of NA into the culture medium. The mutant NA (N28-35) was present inside the cell predominantly as dimers, secreted as dimers, and was enzymatically inactive. When translated in vitro in the presence of dog pancreatic microsomal membranes, the N28-35 protein underwent cleavage and did not remain anchored to membranes. Two other deletion mutants in the transmembrane domain, N7-17 and N17-23, were partially cleaved and secreted, whereas two mutants, one (N19-27) lacking nine aa in the central region and the other (N1-14) lacking the first 14aa from the N terminus remained uncleaved and exhibited a phenotype similar to the wild-type NA. We conclude that the longer transmembrane domain (29 aa) may play an important role in determining that type II signal is not cleaved during translocation; however, in addition, adjacent amino acid sequences also provide determinants important in signal cleavage.

Analysis of the signals for polarized transport of influenza virus (A/WSN/33) neuraminidase and human transferrin receptor, type II transmembrane proteins.

In polarized MDCK cells influenza virus (A/WSN/33) neuraminidase (NA) and human transferrin receptor (TR), type II glycoproteins, when expressed from cloned cDNAs, were transported and accumulated preferentially on the apical and basolateral surfaces, respectively. We have investigated the signals for polarized sorting by constructing chimeras between NA and TR and by making deletion mutants. NATR delta 90, which contains the cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane domain of NA and the ectodomain of TR, was found to be localized predominantly on the apical membrane, whereas TRNA delta 35, containing the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of TR and the ectodomain of NA, was expressed preferentially on the basolateral membrane. TR delta 57, a TR deletion mutant lacking 57 amino acids in the TR cytoplasmic tail, did not exhibit any polarized expression and was present on both apical and basolateral surfaces, whereas a deletion mutant (NA delta 28-35) lacking amino acid residues from 28 to 35 in the transmembrane domain of NA resulted in secretion of the NA ectodomain predominantly from the apical side. These results taken together indicate that the cytoplasmic tail of TR was sufficient for basolateral transport, but influenza virus NA possesses two sorting signals, one in the cytoplasmic or transmembrane domain and the other within the ectodomain, both of which are independently able to transport the protein to the apical plasma membrane.