RESUMEN
Recently, wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) research has experienced a strong impetus during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, a few technical issues related to surveillance strategies, such as standardized procedures ranging from sampling to testing protocols, need to be resolved in preparation for future infectious disease outbreaks. This review highlights the study characteristics, potential use of WBE and overview of methods, as well as methods utilized to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) including its variant in wastewater. A literature search was performed electronically in PubMed and Scopus according to PRISMA guidelines for relevant peer-reviewed articles published between January 2020 and March 2022. The search identified 588 articles, out of which 221 fulfilled the necessary criteria and are discussed in this review. Most global WBE studies were conducted in North America (n = 75, 34 %), followed by Europe (n = 68, 30.8 %), and Asia (n = 43, 19.5 %). The review also showed that most of the application of WBE observed were to correlate SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) trends in sewage with epidemiological data (n = 90, 40.7 %). The techniques that were often used globally for sample collection, concentration, preferred matrix recovery control and various sample types were also discussed. Overall, this review provided a framework for researchers specializing in WBE to apply strategic approaches to their research questions in achieving better functional insights. In addition, areas that needed more in-depth analysis, data collection, and ideas for new initiatives were identified.
RESUMEN
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may transmit through airborne route particularly when the aerosol particles remain in enclosed spaces with inadequate ventilation. There has been no standard recommended method of determining the virus in air due to limitations in pre-analytical and technical aspects. Furthermore, the presence of low virus loads in air samples could result in false negatives. Our study aims to explore the feasibility of detecting SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) in air samples using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Active and passive air sampling was conducted between December 2021 and February 2022 with the presence of COVID-19 confirmed cases in two hospitals and a quarantine center in Klang Valley, Malaysia. SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air was detected and quantified using ddPCR and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The comparability of two different digital PCR platforms (QX200 and QIAcuity) to RT-PCR were also investigated. Additionally negative staining transmission electron microscopy was performed to visualize virus ultrastructure. Detection rates of SARS-CoV-2 in air samples using ddPCR were higher compared to RT-PCR, which were 15.2% (22/145) and 3.4% (5/145), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR was 100 and 87%, respectively. After excluding 17 negative samples (50%) by both QX200 and QIAcuity, 15% samples (5/34) were found to be positive both ddPCR and dPCR. There were 23.5% (8/34) samples that were detected positive by ddPCR but negative by dPCR. In contrast, there were 11.7% (4/34) samples that were detected positive by dPCR but negative by ddPCR. The SARS-CoV-2 detection method by ddPCR is precise and has a high sensitivity for viral RNA detection. It could provide advances in determining low viral titter in air samples to reduce false negative reports, which could complement detection by RT-PCR.