Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Case Rep ; 12(2): e8554, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38405359

RESUMEN

Key Clinical Message: This unique case report of primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) shows bilateral ptosis and significant periorbital edema, compromising vision. To avoid misleading diagnosis, antibody tests must be evaluated and interpreted in the context of clinical findings. Abstract: Primary Sjögren's syndrome is an idiopathic, autoimmune disorder involving the lacrimal and salivary glands characterized by both localized and systemic manifestations including xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is also an autoimmune disorder characterized by the development of auto-antibodies against nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that causes decreased muscle response to stimulation. It usually presents with ptosis and generalized body weakness. Ophthalmological involvement is common in both disorders but ptosis is very rarely seen in pSS. We report the case of a 27-year-old woman presenting to our clinic with the complaint of ptosis and eyelid swelling. She also had a positive anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody test and her initial presentation mimicked Myasthenia Gravis. Her autoimmune workup revealed a positive titer of Anti Ro SSA antibodies. Myasthenia Gravis was ruled out on electrodiagnostic studies which showed no decremental response, and pSS was confirmed on lip biopsy. Our case highlights that it is important to interpret the antibody test results in the context of clinical findings as we can have spurious results in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune conditions can have varying presenting complaints hence, clinical judgment should always overrule diagnostic investigations and should thus guide patient management.

2.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 85(4): 884-891, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37113877

RESUMEN

The authors conducted a systematic review on the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 on electrophysiology (EP) practice and procedure volume in various settings. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase were examined with combinations of medical subject headings terms for identification of the relevant studies. After excluding duplicates, irrelevant, and ineligible studies, 23 studies were included for full qualitative analysis. The overall study-level volume reduction of EP procedures ranged from 8 to 96.7%. All studies reported an overall reduction in EP physiology procedures being carried out except one in Poland, which reported an overall increase in the total EP procedures carried out in 2020. This study still reported a decrease in EP procedure volume during the first lockdown phase. Procedural volume reduction was seen most commonly for cardiovascular implantable electronic device placement (20/23 studies, 86.9%), electrophysiology studies (11/23 studies, 47.8%), and ablations (9/23, 39.1% studies). The most common reason stated for the observed decline in EP procedures was the cancellation and postponement of nonurgent elective cases in the hospitals (15/23 studies, 65.2%). There has been an overall reduction in EP procedure volume across different centers. The impact of the decline in EP procedures will be seen only after the services resume to prepandemic levels, but an increase in-patient volume and procedure waiting time is expected. This review will provide insights into improving healthcare service delivery in times of unprecedented public health emergencies.

3.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 20(12): 929-932, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36421070

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As Percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy (PMBV) remains the keystone in treating mitral stenosis, we conducted this review to elucidate the cumulative frequency and predictors of complications following PMBV and their occurrence in various patient populations. AREAS COVERED: We searched digital databases for relevant studies covering complications of PMBV and retrieved articles using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) keywords. EXPERT OPINION: A total of 37 articles (8 RCTs, 7 nonrandomized clinical trials, 22 observational studies) were selected for qualitative analysis. A total of 11,803 patients undergoing PMBV among 37 studies were included, with a mean success rate of 84.54%. The most common complication was mitral regurgitation (8.2%) followed by an atrial septal defect (2.4%). Other relevant complications like stroke, pericardial tamponade, rupture of mitral leaflets, and conduction abnormalities were present in <1% of the patients.


Asunto(s)
Valvuloplastia con Balón , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Valvuloplastia con Balón/efectos adversos , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos
4.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 81: 104397, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36147088

RESUMEN

Introduction: The surgical safety checklist consists of three components: sign-in, performed before the induction of anesthesia; time-out, performed before skin incision; and sign-out, performed immediately after skin closure or before the patient leaves the operating theatre. This study aims to assess compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) and explore the barriers facing in properly implementing the surgical safety checklist in operation theatres of a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: The observational clinical audit was conducted in Surgical Unit I, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Compliance with the surgical safety checklist was observed before and after the educational intervention. After completion of the clinical audit operating theatre staff was asked about the barriers to compliance with the surgical safety checklist using an interview sheet. Mean, and standard deviation was calculated for quantitative variables, whereas frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables using SPSS version 25.0. Results: Compliance with all the steps of the surgical safety checklist was improved after an educational intervention, with the highest improvement in compliance (66.7%) observed with the Sign-out step "Count of sponges and needles & instruments complete?" Moreover, filling of the patient board and documentation of procedure in the patient file were also improved. Lack of awareness and training to follow the surgical safety checklist was the commonest barrier to compliance with the surgical safety checklist. Conclusion: Implementing the surgical safety checklist will not only upgrade the patient safety measures but also integrate teamwork skills and improve the local departmental culture.

5.
Vacunas ; 23: S77-S87, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35873308

RESUMEN

The objective of this systematic review is to give a comprehensive interpretation of menstrual cycle changes after the COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, it is imperative to assess reports of menstrual changes following vaccination to dispel concerns that COVID-19 vaccines hinder the likelihood of pregnancy in the long run. A literature review was conducted using digital databases to systematically identify the studies reporting any menstrual abnormalities after the COVID-19 vaccine. Detailed patient-level study characteristics including the type of study, sample size, administered vaccines, and menstrual abnormalities were abstracted. A total of 78 138 vaccinated females were included in this review from 14 studies. Of these, 39 759 (52.05%) had some form of a menstrual problem after vaccination. Due to the lack of published research articles, preprints were also included in this review. Menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, and polymenorrhea were the most commonly observed problems and the overall study-level rate of menstrual abnormality ranged from 0.83% to 90.9%. Age, history of pregnancy, systemic side-effects of COVID-19, smoking, and second dose of COVID-19 vaccine were predictors of menstrual problems after vaccination.


Alteraciones menstruales tras la vacunación contra la COVID-19: revisión sistemática Resumen El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática es aportar una interpretación amplia sobre los cambios de los ciclos menstruales tras la vacunación contra la COVID-19. Además, es imperativo evaluar los informes sobre los cambios menstruales tras la vacunación, para disipar preocupaciones en cuanto a que las vacunas contra la COVID-19 dificultan la probabilidad de embarazo a largo plazo. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura utilizando bases de datos digitales para identificar sistemáticamente los estudios que reportan cualquier alteración menstrual tras la vacuna contra la COVID-19. Se resumieron las características detalladas del estudio al nivel del paciente, incluyendo tipo de estudio, tamaño de la muestra, vacunas administradas, y alteraciones menstruales. Se incluyó en la revisión a un total de 78 138 mujeres vacunadas, procedentes de 14 estudios. De ellas, 39 759 (52,05%) tuvieron algún tipo de problema menstrual tras la vacunación. Debido a la falta de artículos de investigación publicados, también se incluyeron preimpresos en esta revisión. Menorragia, metrorragia, y polimenorrea fueron los problemas más comúnmente observados, oscilando la tasa global de alteraciones menstruales a nivel de estudios entre el 0,83 y el 90,9%. La edad, los antecedentes de embarazos, los efectos secundarios sistémicos de la COVID-19, el tabaquismo y la segunda dosis de la vacuna contra la COVID-19 fueron factores predictivos de problemas menstruales tras la vacunación.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...