Development and Internal Validation of the Postoperative Analgesic Intake Needs Score: A Predictive Model for Post-Operative Narcotic Requirement after Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a clinical tool to pre-operatively risk-stratify patients undergoing spine surgery based on their likelihood to have high postoperative analgesic requirements. METHODS: A total of 1199 consecutive patients undergoing elective spine surgery over a 2-year period at a single center were included. Patients not requiring inpatient admission, those who received epidural analgesia, those who had two surgeries at separate sites under one anesthesia event, and those with a length of stay greater than 10 days were excluded. The remaining 860 patients were divided into a derivation and validation cohort. Pre-operative factors were collected by review of the electronic medical record. Total postoperative inpatient opioid intake requirements were converted into morphine milligram equivalents to standardize postoperative analgesic requirements. RESULTS: The postoperative analgesic intake needs (PAIN) score was developed after the following predictor variables were identified: age, race, history of depression/anxiety, smoking status, active pre-operative benzodiazepine use and pre-operative opioid use, and surgical type. Patients were risk-stratified based on their score with the high-risk group being more likely to have high opioid consumption postoperatively compared to the moderate and low-risk groups in both the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: The PAIN Score is a pre-operative clinical tool for patients undergoing spine surgery to risk stratify them based on their likelihood for high analgesic requirements. The information can be used to individualize a multi-modal analgesic regimen rather than utilizing a "one-size fits all" approach.

Percutaneous screw fixation versus open fusion for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: A retrospective case series of 185 Patients with a single-level spinal column injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Single-Center Review of Data at a Level 1 Trauma Center. OBJECTIVE: Compare deformity correction and surgical outcomes of percutaneous instrumentation and open fusion in traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: In our retrospective study, all patients undergoing elective spine surgery for TL fractures at a Level 1 trauma center between 2000 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients who underwent percutaneous fixation were given the option of hardware removal after the fracture had healed. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were included in the study, with 109 treated with an open fusion, and 76 with percutaneous fixation. Twenty-five patients in the latter group had the instrumentation removed after the fracture had healed. None of them required reoperation. In the open fusion group 54.1% of patients required a decompressive laminectomy. Percutaneous fixation patients had a shorter operative time (98.3 min vs 214 min, p < 0.0001), shorter length of stay (9.8 days vs 13.5 days, p = 0.04), and less blood loss (68.4 cc vs 691 cc, p < 0.001). They also had a better correction of their traumatic kyphosis after surgery (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous fixation is a valuable option for the treatment of TL fractures in cases without evidence of neural compression. It is still unclear whether hardware removal helps prevent adjacent segment degeneration. Percutaneous fixation could allow for better reduction of the fracture with improvement of postoperative alignment.

Extraneural metastatic anaplastic ependymoma: a systematic review and a report of metastases to bilateral parotid glands.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic ependymoma with extraneural metastases is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Metastatic spread to the parotid gland is a rare clinical entity that requires multidisciplinary intervention. Herein, we present a systematic review of anaplastic ependymoma with extraneural metastases and report on a case with metastases to both parotid glands. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from their inception to February 2019. Inclusion criteria included reports of anaplastic ependymoma with extraneural metastasis. Studies were excluded if the tumor grade was not reported. A case illustration is provided. RESULTS: The search yielded 15 cases of anaplastic ependymoma with extraneural metastases, including the present case. Mean age at diagnosis was 15 years. The initial tumor location was predominantly supratentorial (93.3%). All cases demonstrated leptomeningeal seeding before extraneural metastasis. Mean survival from initial diagnosis was 4.5 years. Metastasis to the parotid gland occurred in 2 cases, including the present case. We present a 17-year-old female patient who underwent gross total resection of a supratentorial, paraventricular anaplastic ependymoma followed by adjuvant external beam radiation therapy. The patient developed recurrent leptomeningeal seeding, treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery over a 5-year period. She returned with a parotid mass and cervical lymphadenopathy and underwent parotidectomy and modified radical neck dissection. She continued to experience recurrences, including the left parotid gland, and was ultimately placed in hospice care. CONCLUSIONS: Anaplastic ependymoma with extraneural metastasis is rare. A combination of repeated surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy can be used to manage recurrent and metastatic disease, but outcomes remain poor.

Tumoral Mimics of Subdural Hematomas: Case Report and Review of Diagnostic and Management Strategies in Primary B-Cell Lymphoma of the Subdural Space.

BACKGROUND: Subdural lymphomas are a rare subtype of primary central nervous system lymphomas that can radiographically mimic epidural blood and pose a diagnostic challenge. They can complicate treatment if not preemptively identified. METHODS: We present a case report of a subdural lymphoma that mimicked a compressive subdural hematoma, and we review the PubMed database for similar cases. RESULTS: A 77-year-old woman presented with a transient left facial droop and what appeared to be a subdural hematoma on computed tomography scan. The patient underwent surgery, during which grossly abnormal solid epicortical adherent tissue was noted instead of the expected appearance of a subdural hematoma. An intraoperative biopsy was suggestive of lymphoma, and the surgery was converted to a craniectomy. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. The patient underwent radiotherapy with no complications or recurrence. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated complete resolution of the mass at 3 months after treatment, at which time the patient underwent a synthetic cranioplasty. Seven case reports of primary dural lymphomas mimicking subdural blood were found, with variable pathologic subclassifications. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, a primary dural lymphoma can be mistaken for a subdural hematoma on computed tomography scan. The most common subtype is low-grade extranodal marginal zone lymphomas. It is important to keep these diseases in the differential diagnosis, especially when there is incongruence between imaging and the clinical picture, as earlier detection correlates to a stronger therapeutic response.

Oculomotor Schwannomas: A Systematic Review and Report of Two Pediatric Cases Treated with Fractionated Cyberknife Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric oculomotor nerve schwannomas are rare and challenging lesions due to the high morbidity associated with surgical intervention and their proximity to critical structures limiting the opportunity for stereotactic radiosurgery. We aim to report and review the novel use of fractionated Cyberknife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA) stereotactic radiotherapy in pediatric patients with oculomotor schwannomas. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two patients, ages 8 and 10 years, with tumor volumes of 0.1 cm3 and 0.2 cm3, respectively, were treated with fractionated Cyberknife radiotherapy at our institution. A total dose of 45-50 Gy was administered over 25 fractions (1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) to the 82%-84% isodose line. Serial magnetic resonance imaging was obtained for long-term follow-up (56-58 months). RESULTS: We found 14 articles published between 1982 and 2018 that reported a total of 18 pediatric patients with intracranial oculomotor schwannomas. No previously described cases of pediatric intracranial oculomotor schwannomas were treated with radiation therapy. In both of our patients, radiographic tumor control was achieved at a mean follow-up of 57 months, with 1 patient displaying a decrease in tumor volume. Neither patient exhibited any worsening of their presenting symptoms, nor did either patient develop any new neurocognitive deficits following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated Cyberknife radiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for intracranial oculomotor nerve schwannomas with excellent tumor control rates, similar to surgical and radiosurgical techniques, while sparing critical surrounding structures.

Clinical outcomes of normal pressure hydrocephalus in 116 patients: objective versus subjective assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Objective assessment tests are commonly used to predict the response to ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Whether subjective reports of improvement after a lumbar drain (LD) trial can predict response to VP shunting remains controversial. The goal in this study was to compare clinical characteristics, complication rates, and shunt outcomes of objective and subjective LD responders who underwent VP shunt placement. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with NPH who underwent VP shunt placement after clinical improvement with the LD trial. Patients who responded after the LD trial were subclassified into objective LD responders and subjective LD responders. Clinical characteristics, complication rates, and shunt outcomes between the 2 groups were compared with chi-square test of independence and t-test. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients received a VP shunt; 75 were objective LD responders and 41 were subjective LD responders. There was no statistically significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 groups, except for a shorter length of stay after LD trial seen with subjective responders. The complication rates after LD trial and VP shunting were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference in shunt response between objective and subjective LD responders. The mean duration of follow-up was 1.73 years. CONCLUSIONS: Reports of subjective improvement after LD trial in patients with NPH can be a reliable predictor of shunt response. The currently used objective assessment scales may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in symptomatology after LD trial.

Lumbar drain trial outcomes of normal pressure hydrocephalus: a single-center experience of 254 patients.

OBJECTIVE: A short-term lumbar drain (LD) trial is commonly used to assess the response of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients to CSF diversion. However, it remains unknown whether the predictors of passing an LD trial match the predictors of improvement after ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The aim of this study was to examine outcomes, complication rates, and associations between predictors and outcomes after an LD trial in patients with NPH. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 254 patients with probable NPH who underwent an LD trial between March 2008 and September 2017. Multivariate regression models were constructed to examine predictors of passing the LD trial. Complications associated with the LD trial procedure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 77 years and 56.7% were male. The mean durations of gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence were 29 months, 32 months, and 28 months, respectively. Of the 254 patients, 30% and 16% reported objective and subjective improvement after the LD trial, respectively. Complications included a sheared LD catheter, meningitis, lumbar epidural abscess, CSF leak at insertion site, transient lower extremity numbness, slurred speech, refractory headaches, and hyponatremia. Multivariate analyses using MAX-R revealed that a prior history of stroke predicted worse outcomes, while disproportionate subarachnoid spaces (uneven enlargement of supratentorial spaces) predicted better outcomes after the LD trial (r2 = 0.12, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The LD trial is generally safe and well tolerated. The best predictors of passing the LD trial include a negative history of stroke and having disproportionate subarachnoid spaces.