Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 29(8): 604-609, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167618

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In many countries, the restrictions related to the first period of lockdown during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to widespread changes in health service usage in general and in emergency departments in particular. However, no comprehensive evaluation of changes has been published to date. The objective of the present study was to determine the precise impact of the 2020 lockdown on admissions to a pediatric emergency department (PED) compared to the same periods in 2018 and 2019. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included all patients under the age of 183 months (15.25 years) admitted to our French university hospital's PED during the period from March 17 to May 11 in the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The primary outcome was the change in PED admissions in 2020 compared to 2018 and 2019. The secondary outcomes were notably changes in the primary discharge diagnoses, the discharge destination, and unwarranted visits. RESULTS: A total of 10,479 PED visits were identified, of which 10,295 were analyzed. In 2020, the number of PED visits fell by 61% and 63% vs. 2018 and 2019, respectively. Although the number of discharges to other hospital departments decreased by 52% and 49%, the proportion of these discharges increased: 18% of 1579 in 2020 vs. 13% of 4232 in 2018 and of 4484 in 2019 (p<0.01). Discharge from the PED to the intensive care unit was significantly more frequent in 2020 (p<0.05). Unwarranted visits were significantly lower in 2020 (19%) as compared to 2018 (22%) and 2019 (24%). Surgical and injury-related discharge diagnoses increased by 6% in 2020 (p<0.001), with a significant rise in trauma and foreign-body injuries (p<0.05). With regard to disease-related discharge diagnoses, we observed a significant rise in mental, behavioral, and social issues (p<0.01). Conversely, there was a significant (p<0.01) drop in diagnoses of acute infectious diseases in 2020 compared with 2018 and 2019. CONCLUSION: Lockdown was associated with a massive reduction in the number of PED visits, a significant change in primary discharge diagnoses, and a decrease in the proportion of unwarranted PED visits compared to the previous 2 years. This should encourage public health researchers to examine how to alleviate the burden of unnecessary PED visits.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales Pediátricos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
2.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(7): 504-508, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34400056

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Managing child abuse and neglect in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) is difficult because of the complexity of screening and the prolonged care process. This study's main objective was to measure the child protection activity in a PED. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted in the PED of the Lille University Hospital from 16 September∫2017 to 11 February 2019. All patients who required a social evaluation by the PED staff were included. Children admitted at first to the PED but for whom social management was exclusively performed by other units were not included. The whole population was analyzed first and then by type of abuse. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients who needed social management in the PED. The length of stay in the PED, the number of reports for investigation by child protective services, and reports to a judge were secondary assessment criteria. RESULTS: The study involved 245 patients (median age, 5 years; interquartile range [IQR], 2-13; boys, 49%), accounting for 0.6% of the PED visits. The main reasons for visiting the PED were somatic complaints (31%), sexual assault (23%), and behavioral disorders (20%). The median length of care in the PED was 5 h (IQR, 3-13). Thirty-three percent of the patients were monitored in the short-stay unit of the PED; 78% returned home. The main social measures taken were reports to child protective services (34%) and reports to a judge (24%); 51% of the patients required further actions by the PED physician after discharge. CONCLUSION: Management of child abuse in the PED is important and time-consuming. A hospital team specialized in child protection is essential for the initial care and monitoring of child victims.


Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Protección Infantil/métodos , Servicios de Protección Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/métodos , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...