Transcriptional CCND1 expression as a predictor of poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab in HER2-positive/ER-positive breast cancer.

Several trials have confirmed that the pathological complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are significantly lower in HER2-positive/ER-positive patients than in HER2-positive/ER-negative patients. To understand this phenomenon, we investigated the association between NAC resistance and CCND1, which is frequently overexpressed in ER-positive tumors. Pretreatment formalin-fixed tumor tissues were collected from 75 HER2-positive patients receiving NAC comprised anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab. Seventeen gene transcripts along with PIK3CA mutations were detected using MassARRAY (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). The gene expression levels were dichotomized according to the median values. The immunohistochemical expression of ER, PTEN, BCL-2, and cyclin D1 was scored. The relationship between the variables was assessed using the Spearman correlation. A logistic regression analysis was performed to detect predictors of pCR, which was defined as no invasive tumor in the breast or axilla. Forty-seven percent of the cases were ER-positive and 52 % (40/63 % in ER-positive/ER-negative) achieved a pCR. Among the ER-positive patients, the CCND1 gene expression level was 2.1 times higher than that in ER-negative patients and was significantly correlated with the expression of cyclin D1 protein. In a univariate analysis, a pCR was associated with high mRNA levels of ESR1, PGR, LMTK3, HER2, IGF1R, INPP4B, PDL-1, BCL-2, and CCND1 (P ≤ 0.05). In contrast, none of these genes were significantly correlated with a pCR among the ER-negative tumors and only EGFR was significantly correlated with a pCR. PIK3CA mutations or PTEN loss were not associated with a pCR in either group. After excluding ESR1 (r = 0.58), PGR (r = 0.64), and IGF1R (r = 0.59), the expressions of which were correlated with CCND1, a multivariate analysis revealed that CCND1 [P = 0.043; OR, 0.16] and HER2 [P = 0.012; OR, 11.2] retained its predictive value for pCR among ER-positive patients, but not among ER-negative patients. A High Level of CCND1 gene expression is a poor predictor of a pCR and provides a rationale for evaluating CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-positive/ER-positive breast cancer patients.

A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of aprepitant in nondrinking women younger than 70 years receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of aprepitant plus granisetron and an increased dose of dexamethasone in selected patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). METHODS: Nondrinking women <70 years undergoing MEC were randomly assigned to aprepitant (day 1, 125 mg; days 2 and 3, 80 mg) or placebo. Dexamethasone on days 1-3 was 12, 4, and 4 mg with aprepitant and 20, 8, and 8 mg with placebo. The primary end point was complete response (CR; no emesis or rescue therapy) during 120 h of the first cycle. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of overall CR. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients enrolled, 91 were assessable. Most received carboplatin-based chemotherapy. In the aprepitant (n=45) and placebo (n=46) groups, the overall, acute (day 1), and delayed (days 2-5) CR rates were 62% and 52%, 98% and 96%, and 62% and 52%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, the overall CR rate was 10% higher in the aprepitant group. Both regimens were well tolerated. On multivariate analysis, advanced ovarian cancer (OR, 0.26 (0.10-0.72)) was independently associated with a lower CR. CONCLUSION: Even with an increased dose of dexamethasone, aprepitant seemed more effective than placebo in these selected patients undergoing MEC; however, delayed phase management remains a significant problem.

Quality of life and disease-related symptoms in previously treated Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized phase III study (V-15-32) of gefitinib versus docetaxel.

BACKGROUND: This report describes quality of life (QoL) findings of a randomized study comparing gefitinib with docetaxel in patients with advanced/metastatic pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, phase III study randomized 490 Japanese patients to gefitinib (250 mg/day) or docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)/3 weeks), with survival as the primary outcome. Preplanned QoL analyses included Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L), Trial Outcome Index (TOI) and Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) improvement rates, and mean change from baseline. RESULTS: Gefitinib showed statistically significant benefits over docetaxel in QoL improvement rates (FACT-L 23% versus 14%, P = 0.023; TOI 21% versus 9%, P = 0.002) and mean change from baseline score [mean treatment difference: FACT-L 3.72 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-6.89, P = 0.022; TOI 4.31 points, 95% CI 2.13-6.49, P < 0.001], although differences did not meet the clinically relevant six-point change. There were no significant differences between treatments in LCS improvement rates (23% versus 20%, P = 0.562) or mean change from baseline score (0.63 points, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.34, P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib improved aspects of QoL over docetaxel, with superior objective response rate and a more favorable tolerability profile and no statistically significant difference in overall survival (although noninferiority was not statistically proven).

Phase III trial of docetaxel plus gemcitabine versus docetaxel in second-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG0104).

BACKGROUND: This trial evaluated whether a combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine provides better survival than docetaxel alone in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included pathologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, failure of one platinum-based regimen, performance status of zero or one, 20-75 years old, and adequate organ function. Patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (day 1) or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8), both administered every 21 days until disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients participated in each arm. This trial was terminated early due to an unexpected high incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and three treatment-related deaths due to ILD in the combination arm. Docetaxel plus gemcitabine compared with docetaxel-alone patients experienced similar grade and incidence of toxicity, except for ILD. No baseline factor was identified for predicting ILD. Median survival times were 10.3 and 10.1 months (one-sided P = 0.36) for docetaxel plus gemcitabine and docetaxel arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel alone is still the standard second-line treatment for NSCLC. The incidence of ILD is higher for docetaxel combined with gemcitabine than for docetaxel alone in patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Multicentre prospective phase II trial of gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0403).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gefitinib and the feasibility of screening for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations among select patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, chemotherapy-naive patients or patients with recurrences after up to two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Direct sequencing using DNA from tumour specimens was performed by a central laboratory to detect EGFR mutations. Patients harbouring EGFR mutations received gefitinib. The primary study objective was response; the secondary objectives were toxicity, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival (1Y-S) and the disease control rate (DCR). Between March 2005 and January 2006, 118 patients were recruited from 15 institutions and were screened for EGFR mutations, which were detected in 32 patients--28 of whom were enrolled in the present study. The overall response rate was 75%, the DCR was 96% and the median PFS was 11.5 months. The median OS has not yet been reached, and the 1Y-S was 79%. Thus, gefitinib chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations was highly effective. This trial documents the feasibility of performing a multicentre phase II study using a central typing laboratory, demonstrating the benefit to patients of selecting gefitinib treatment based on their EGFR mutation status.

Predictive factors associated with prolonged survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib.

This study aimed to identify predictive factors associated with prognostic benefits of gefitinib. A total of 221 Japanese patients who received gefitinib (250 mg day(-1)) were examined retrospectively and potential predictive factors analysed. Overall response rate (ORR) was 24.4% and median survival time (MST) was 8.0 months. In a log-rank test, survival was significantly better in females, patients with adenocarcinoma, never-smokers, favourable performance status (PS) and patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The lower the smoking exposure (Brinkman Index (BI)=cigarettes per day x years smoked), the better the MST (BI 0: 14.5 months, BI <500: 9.5 months, BI 500 to <1000: 6.9 months, BI > or =1000: 4.0 months). Positive-EGFR mutation status and PS 0-1 were independent predictors of favourable prognosis by multivariate analysis. Prognosis was significantly different according to EGFR mutation status (with the same smoking status), but not according to smoking status (with the same EGFR mutation status). EGFR mutation status is the most important independent predictor of survival benefit with gefitinib treatment. Although differences in prognosis were observed according to relative smoking status and smoking exposure, the results suggested that smoking is not a direct predictor of prognosis, yet is a surrogate marker of EGFR mutation status.

Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Four-Arm Cooperative Study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of three platinum-based combination regimens against cisplatin plus irinotecan (IP) in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a non-inferiority design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 602 patients were randomly assigned to one of four regimens: cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks (IP) carboplatin AUC 6.0 min x mg/mL (area under the concentration-time curve) on day 1 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks (TC); cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks (GP); and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks (NP). RESULTS: The response rate, median survival time, and 1-year survival rate were 31.0%, 13.9 months, 59.2%, respectively, in IP; 32.4%, 12.3 months, 51.0% in TC; 30.1%, 14.0 months, 59.6% in GP; and 33.1%, 11.4 months, 48.3% in NP. No statistically significant differences were found in response rate or overall survival, but the non-inferiority of none of the experimental regimens could be confirmed. All the four regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The four regimens have similar efficacy and different toxicity profiles, and they can be used to treat advanced NSCLC patients.

A phase I study of pemetrexed (LY231514) supplemented with folate and vitamin B12 in Japanese patients with solid tumours.

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of pemetrexed with folate and vitamin B12 supplementation (FA/VB(12)) in Japanese patients with solid tumours and to investigate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed. Eligible patients had incurable solid tumours by standard treatments, a performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function. Pemetrexed from 300 to 1,200 mg m(-2) was administered as a 10-min infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle with FA/VB(12). Totally, 31 patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation at 700 mg m(-2), and infection and skin rash at 1,200 mg m(-2). The MTD/RD were determined to be 1,200/1,000 mg m(-2), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (grade (G) 3:29, G4:3%), leucopenia (G3:13, G4:3%), lympopenia (G3:13%) and ALT elevation (G3:13%). Pemetrexed pharmacokinetics in Japanese were not overtly different from those in western patients. Partial response was achieved for 5/23 evaluable patients (four with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and one with thymoma). The MTD/RD of pemetrexed were determined to be 1,200/1,000 mg m(-2), respectively, that is, a higher RD than without FA/VB(12) (500 mg m(-2)). Pemetrexed with FA/VB(12) showed a tolerable toxicity profile and potent antitumour activity against NSCLC in this study.

Phase I-II study of amrubicin and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Amrubicin, a totally synthetic 9-amino-anthracycline, demonstrated excellent single-agent activity for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). The aims of this trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTD) of combination therapy with amrubicin and cisplatin, and to assess the efficacy and safety at their recommended doses (RD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria were patients having histologically or cytologically proven measurable ED-SCLC, no previous systemic therapy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function. Amrubicin was administered on days 1-3 and cisplatin on day 1, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Four patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (amrubicin 40 mg/m(2)/day and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2)) and three patients at level 2 (amrubicin 45 mg/m(2)/day and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2)). Consequently, the MTD and RD were determined to be at level 2 and level 1, respectively. The response rate at the RD was 87.8% (36/41). The median survival time (MST) was 13.6 months and the 1-year survival rate was 56.1%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and leukopenia occurred in 95.1% and 65.9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of amrubicin and cisplatin has demonstrated an impressive response rate and MST in patients with previously untreated ED-SCLC.

Phase I-II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus nedaplatin (254-S) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11) and platinum compounds is effective for treating cervical cancer. Nedaplatin (254-S) is a new cisplatin analogue that achieves a high response rate (53%) in patients with primary cervical cancer. We performed a phase I-II study of combination chemotherapy with CPT-11 plus 254-S for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. The inclusion criteria were stage IV disease or recurrence. CPT-11 and 254-S were administered intravenously on day 1, while rhG-CSF (50 microg) was given on days 3-12. This regimen was repeated after 4 weeks. Dose escalation was carried out in tandem (CPT-11/254-S: 50/70, 50/80, and 60/80 mg m(-2)). A total of 27 patients (stage IV=seven, recurrence=20) were enrolled. The phase I study enrolled eight patients. At dose levels 1 and 2, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. At dose level 3, the first two patients developed DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 and 254-S was 60 and 80 mg m(-2), respectively, and the recommended doses were 50 and 80 mg m(-2). Grade 3/4 haematologic toxicity occurred in 67% in phase II study, but there were no grade 3 non-haematologic toxicities except for nausea or lethargy. In all 27 patients, there were two complete responses (7%) and 14 Partial responses (52%), for an overall response rate of 59% (95% confidence interval: 39-78%). Among the 12 responders with recurrent disease, the median time to progression and median survival were 161 days (range: 61-711 days) and 415 days (range: 74-801 days). This new regimen is promising for cervical cancer.

Randomised phase II study of docetaxel/cisplatin vs docetaxel/irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Study (WJTOG9803).

Docetaxel plus cisplatin and docetaxel plus irinotecan are active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A randomised phase II study compared their efficacy and toxicity in 108 patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC, who were randomised to receive docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) on day 1 (DC; n=51), or docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) on day 8 and irinotecan 60 mg m(-2) on day 1 and 8 (DI; n=57) every 3 weeks. Response rates were 37% for DC and 32% for DI patients. Median survival times and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 50 weeks (95% confidence interval: 34-78 weeks), 47 and 25% for DC, and 46 weeks (95% confidence interval: 37-54 weeks), 40 and 18% for DI, respectively. The progression-free survival time was 20 weeks (95% confidence interval: 14-25 weeks) with DC and 18 (95% confidence interval: 12-22 weeks) with DI. Significantly more DI than DC patients had grade 4 leucopenia and neutropenia (P<0.01); more DC patients had grade >/=2 thrombocytopenia (P<0.01). Nausea and vomiting was more pronounced with DC (P<0.01); diarrhoea was more common with DI (P=0.01). Three treatment-related deaths occurred in DC patients. In conclusion, although the DI and DC regimens had different toxicity profiles, there was no significant difference in survival.

Phase I pharmacokinetic trial of the selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839) in Japanese patients with solid malignant tumors.

BACKGROUND: This phase I dose-escalating study investigated the tolerability and toxicity of the selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839) in Japanese patients with solid tumors. Thirty-one patients were included. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients initially received a single oral dose of gefitinib followed by 10-14 days of observation. Oral gefitinib was subsequently administered on 14 consecutive days, every 28 days. Dose escalation was from 50 mg/day to a maximum of 925 mg/day or dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: Most adverse events were mild (grade 1/2); the most frequent were an acne-like rash and gastrointestinal effects. Two of six patients at 700 mg/day had DLT; no further dose escalation occurred. C(max) was reached within 3-7 h and exposure to gefitinib increased with dose. Mean terminal half-life following multiple dosing was 50.1 h (range 27.8-79.7 h). A partial response (duration 35-361 days) was observed in five of the 23 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer over a range of doses (225-700 mg/day), and seven patients with a range of tumors had disease stabilization (duration 40-127 days). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, gefitinib showed a favorable tolerability profile in Japanese patients. The safety profile, pharmacokinetic parameters and antitumor activity observed in our study are comparable to those observed in patients from the USA and Europe.

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin, irinotecan and etoposide combinations administered weekly or every 4 weeks for extensive small-cell lung cancer (JCOG9902-DI).

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and antitumor effect of cisplatin, irinotecan and etoposide combinations on two schedules, arms A and B, for previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer (E-SCLC), and to select the right arm for phase III trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized to receive either arm A (cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) day 1, weekly for 9 weeks, irinotecan 90 mg/m(2) day 1, on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, and etoposide 60 mg/m(2) days 1-3, on weeks 2, 4, 6, 8), or arm B (cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) day 1, irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and etoposide 50 mg/m(2) days 1-3, every 4 weeks for four cycles). Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was provided in both arms. RESULTS: Full cycles were delivered to 73% and 70% of patients in arms A and B, respectively. Incidences of grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, infection and diarrhea were 57, 43, 27, 7 and 7%, respectively, in arm A, and 87, 47, 10, 13 and 10%, respectively, in arm B. A treatment-related death developed in one patient in arm A. Complete and partial response rates were 7% and 77%, respectively, in arm A, and 17% and 60%, respectively, in arm B. Median survival time was 8.9 months in arm A, and 12.9 months in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Arm B showed a promising complete response rate and median survival with acceptable toxicity in patients with E-SCLC, and should be selected for the investigational arm in phase III trials.

Phase I study of combined radiation, hyperthermia and intra-arterial carboplatin for local recurrence of cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical cancer who develop pelvic recurrence after primary surgery are usually treated with radiation-based therapy. However, their prognoses are dismal. We conducted a phase I study of combined radiation, hyperthermia and intra-arterial (IA) carboplatin for local recurrence of cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with local recurrence of cervical cancer without extrapelvic recurrence were included in this study. Carboplatin was given as a 5-min IA infusion without hydration just before pelvic radiation every day. External pelvic irradiation (1.8 Gy/day for 28 days) was performed according to local standard schedules. After 20 Gy had been administered, hyperthermia was performed once a week with a radio frequency heating system for four cycles. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were entered through the four dose levels of carboplatin. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 25 mg/m(2 )and the dose-limiting toxicities were leukocytopenia, neutrocytopenia and diarrhea. Grade 3/4 leukocytopenia and diarrhea were observed in nine (60%) and three (20%) of 15 patients. Tumor responses included five complete responses and nine partial responses, and the overall response rate was 93.3% (14 of 15) (95% confidence interval 59.4% to 100%). Tumor reductions were observed only at 20 Gy in 10 cases of 14 responders (71.4%). CONCLUSION: The combination therapy of radiation, hyperthermia and IA carboplatin is safe and well-tolerated for locally recurrent cervical cancer.

Randomised phase III trial of irinotecan combined with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

To determine a standard combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a phase III trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to test the hypotheses that CPT-11+cisplatin is superior to cisplatin+vindesine and that CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to cisplatin+vindesine. A total of 398 patients with previously untreated NSCLC were randomised to receive cisplatin+CPT-11 (CPT-P), cisplatin+vindesine (VDS-P) or CPT-11 alone (CPT). In the CPT-P arm, CPT-11 60 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1. In the VDS-P arm, cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1, and vindesine 3 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. In the CPT arm, CPT-11 100 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. The median survival time was 50.0 weeks for patients on CPT-P, 45.6 weeks for those on VDS-P and 46.0 weeks for those on CPT (P=0.115, CPT-P vs VDS-P; P=0.089, CPT vs VDS-P), and the hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.11) for CPT-P vs VDS-P and 0.83 (0.64-1.09) for CPT vs VDS-P. The response rate was 43.7% for patients on CPT-P, 31.7% for those on VDS-P and 20.5% for those on CPT. Major adverse reactions were grade 4 neutropenia observed in 37, 54 and 8% of the patients on CPT-P, VDS-P and CPT, respectively; and grades 3 and 4 diarrhoea observed in 12, 3 and 15% of the patients, respectively. CPT-P therapy produces comparable survival to VDS-P in patients with advanced NSCLC. CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to VDS-P in terms of survival. The CPT-11-containing regimen is one of the most efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

The CA125 regression rate to predict overall survival differ between paclitaxel-containing regimen and nonpaclitaxel regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

In this study, we compare the time to normalization of CA125 after cytoreductive surgery between a paclitaxel-containing regimen and a non-paclitaxel regimen. This study demonstrates that CA125 regression in a paclitaxel-containing regimen was slower than that in a non-paclitaxel regimen. When we determine the CA125 regression rate to predict overall survival in ovarian cancer, we should take into account the kind of chemotherapy regimen, especially the use of paclitaxel.

Dose-escalation study of weekly irinotecan and daily carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and toxicity profile of weekly irinotecan with daily carboplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-one previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients received weekly irinotecan plus carboplatin (20 mg x m(-2) daily for 5 days a week) for 4 weeks and thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The irinotecan dose was escalated from 30 mg x m(-2) in increments of 10 mg x m(-2). Four irinotecan dose levels were given and 30 patients were assessable. Their median age was 62 years (range: 52-72 years), 28 had a performance status of 0-1 and two had a performance status of 2, 12 had stage IIIA disease and 18 had IIIB disease. There were 19 squamous cell carcinomas, 10 adenocarcinomas, and one large cell carcinoma. The dose-limiting toxicities were pneumonitis, esophagitis, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was 60 mg x m(-2), with two patients developing grade 4 pulmonary toxicity and one patient died of pneumonitis (grade 5). The recommended dose of irinotecan was 50 mg x m(-2). Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were nausea and vomiting. Three patients achieved complete remission and 15 had partial remission, for an objective response rate of 60.0%. The median survival time was 14.9 months, and the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 51.6% and 34.2%, respectively. The study concluded that the major toxicity of this regimen was pneumonitis. This therapy may be active against unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer and a phase II study is warranted.

Right ventricular cardiomyopathy accompanied by protein-losing enteropathy and chylous effusion.

Severe right-side heart failure developed in a 47-year-old Japanese woman who suffered from hypoalbuminemia and a massive right side chylous pleural effusion. She had been diagnosed as having protein-losing enteropathy with right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Autopsy showed congenital anomalies of the lymph ducts and abnormal deposition of fibrous and fatty tissue in the right ventricular myocardium. The clinical and pathological findings are consistent with the nonarrythmogenic form of the arrythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.

Dose escalation study of irinotecan combined with carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

From December 1994 to July 1997, we conducted a dose escalation study of irinotecan combined with carboplatin in 17 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities. Irinotecan was administered intravenously over 90 min on days 1, 8 and 15, with carboplatin given at an area under the concentration-time curve dose of 5 mg/ml x min (calculated using Calvert's formula) on day 1. The starting dose of irinotecan was 30 mg/m2 and dose escalation was done in 10-mg/m2 increments. Treatment was repeated at 28-day intervals for at least two cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, since three out of five patients given 60 mg/m2 of irinotecan developed grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The overall response rate was 35.3%. The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were 10.5 months and 35.3%, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan with this regimen was 60 mg/m2, while 50 mg/m2 can be recommended for future use. Further studies of this combination in advanced NSCLC are warranted.