Targeting Epilepsy Through the Foremen Ovale: How Many Helical Needles are Needed?

Laser ablation of the hippocampus offers medically refractory epilepsy patients an alternative to invasive surgeries. Emerging commercial solutions deliver the ablator through a burr hole in the back of the head. We recently introduced a new access path through the foremen ovale, using a helical needle, which minimizes the amount of healthy brain tissue the needle must pass through on its way to the hippocampus, and also enables the needle to follow the medial axis of the hippocampus more closely. In this paper, we investigate whether helical needles should be designed and fabricated on a patient-specific basis as we had previously proposed, or whether a small collection of pre-defined needle shapes can apply across many patients. We propose a new optimization strategy to determine this needle set using patient data, and investigate the accuracy with which these needles can reach the the medial axis of the hippocampus. We find that three basic tube shapes (mirrored as necessary for left vs. right hippocampi) are all that is required, across 20 patient datasets (obtained from 10 patient CT scans), to reduce worst-case maximum error below 2 mm.

Focused stimulation of dorsal subthalamic nucleus improves reactive inhibitory control of action impulses.

Frontal-basal ganglia circuitry dysfunction caused by Parkinson's disease impairs important executive cognitive processes, such as the ability to inhibit impulsive action tendencies. Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease improves the reactive inhibition of impulsive actions that interfere with goal-directed behavior. An unresolved question is whether this effect depends on stimulation of a particular Subthalamic Nucleus subregion. The current study aimed to 1) replicate previous findings and additionally investigate the effect of chronic versus acute Subthalamic Nucleus stimulation on inhibitory control in Parkinson's disease patients off dopaminergic medication 2) test whether stimulating Subthalamic Nucleus subregions differentially modulate proactive response control and the proficiency of reactive inhibitory control. In the first experiment, twelve Parkinson's disease patients completed three sessions of the Simon task, Off Deep brain stimulation and medication, on acute Deep Brain Stimulation and on chronic Deep Brain Stimulation. Experiment 2 consisted of 11 Parkinson's disease patients with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation (off medication) who completed two testing sessions involving of a Simon task either with stimulation of the dorsal or the ventral contact in the Subthalamic Nucleus. Our findings show that Deep Brain Stimulation improves reactive inhibitory control, regardless of medication and regardless of whether it concerns chronic or acute Subthalamic Nucleus stimulation. More importantly, selective stimulation of dorsal and ventral subregions of the Subthalamic Nucleus indicates that especially the dorsal Subthalamic Nucleus circuitries are crucial for modulating the reactive inhibitory control of motor actions.

Easy to learn, hard to suppress: The impact of learned stimulus-outcome associations on subsequent action control.

The inhibition of impulsive response tendencies that conflict with goal-directed action is a key component of executive control. An emerging literature reveals that the proficiency of inhibitory control is modulated by expected or unexpected opportunities to earn reward or avoid punishment. However, less is known about how inhibitory control is impacted by the processing of task-irrelevant stimulus information that has been associated previously with particular outcomes (reward or punishment) or response tendencies (action or inaction). We hypothesized that stimulus features associated with particular action-valence tendencies, even though task irrelevant, would modulate inhibitory control processes. Participants first learned associations between stimulus features (color), actions, and outcomes using an action-valence learning task that orthogonalizes action (action, inaction) and valence (reward, punishment). Next, these stimulus features were embedded in a Simon task as a task-irrelevant stimulus attribute. We analyzed the effects of action-valence associations on the Simon task by means of distributional analysis to reveal the temporal dynamics. Learning patterns replicated previously reported biases; inherent, Pavlovian-like mappings (action-reward, inaction-punishment avoidance) were easier to learn than mappings conflicting with these biases (action-punishment avoidance, inaction-reward). More importantly, results from two experiments demonstrated that the easier to learn, Pavlovian-like action-valence associations interfered with the proficiency of inhibiting impulsive actions in the Simon task. Processing conflicting associations led to more proficient inhibitory control of impulsive actions, similar to Simon trials without any association. Fast impulsive errors were reduced for trials associated with punishment in comparison to reward trials or trials without any valence association. These findings provide insight into the temporal dynamics of task irrelevant information associated with action and valence modulating cognitive control. We discuss putative mechanisms that might explain these interactions.

Deep brain stimulation in early Parkinson's disease: enrollment experience from a pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus is an accepted therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). In animal models, pharmacologic ablation and stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus have resulted in clinical improvement and, in some cases, improved survival of dopaminergic neurons. DBS has not been studied in the early stages of PD, but early application should be explored to evaluate safety, efficacy, and the potential to alter disease progression. METHODS: We are conducting a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial of optimal drug therapy (ODT) compared to medication plus DBS (ODT + DBS) in subjects with Hoehn & Yahr Stage II idiopathic PD who are without motor fluctuations or dementia. We report here subject screening, enrollment, baseline characteristics, and adverse events. RESULTS: 30 subjects (average age 60 ± 6.9 years, average duration of medicine 2.1 ± 1.3 years, average UPDRS-III scores 14.9 on medication and 27.0 off medication) are enrolled in the ongoing study. Twelve of 15 subjects randomized to DBS experienced perioperative adverse events, the majority of which were related to the procedure or device and resolved without sequelae. Frequently reported adverse events included wound healing problems, headache, edema, and confusion. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates that subjects with early stage PD can be successfully recruited, consented and retained in a long-term clinical trial of DBS. Our ongoing pilot investigation will provide important preliminary safety and tolerability data concerning the application of DBS in early stage PD.

Deep brain stimulation and chemical neuromodulation: current use and perspectives for the future.

During the last decade there has been a marked increase in the applications of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. In addition, the last years were marked by the first studies using the intraparenchymal administration of drugs into the brain. There have been improvements in outcome and an increase in the number of surgical candidates and conditions to be treated. This will act as a driving force to improve the technology applied to design and manufacture new devices.