RESUMEN
Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea, often known as OSA, is a sleep-related breathing disease that, if not treated, can lead to serious disabilities or even death. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the therapy technique that is suggested for treating severe and moderate OSA. An auto/manual CPAP titration study can be used to determine the appropriate pressure that must be maintained to treat this condition. The motive of this research is to appraise the effectiveness among OSA patients for the auto-PAP titrations. Methodology: A cross-sectional clinical prospective study was conducted at the tertiary care center. Subjects who underwent auto-PAP titration and had a diagnosis of moderate and sever OSA were included. They were evaluated for the efficacy of auto-PAP titration and other demographic features and their association with the titration efficacy. The values were compared for statistical significance. Results: The findings of the study showed that fifty percent of the cohort showed optimal titration, forty percent showed good titration, ten percent showed suitable titration, and none fell into the unacceptable group. Conclusion: According to the findings, using auto-PAP was associated with positive results in those with moderate and severe OSA. There is evidence to suggest that unattended auto-PAP titration is a very successful technique that might be regarded as a substitute for attended CPAP titrations. This would result in a reduction in the amount of labor required and the price.
RESUMEN
Introduction: In today's healthcare environment, peripheral venous cannulations are frequently performed procedures. Bloodstream infections could occur as a result of the intrusive operation. Peripheral venous cannulas should be inserted and managed according to specific rules. This study compared these standards to the peripheral venous cannulation procedure and results at a teaching hospital institution. Materials and Methods: This study investigated the procedure and results of peripheral venous cannulation in a teaching center using a prospectively completed audit loop study. The "Royal College of Nursing's criteria for infusion therapy" is one such set of recommendations. After the first phase of the observations, the audit was conducted. Later, after 4 months based on the recommendations, the personnel received training on a variety of cannulation-related topics and the second set of observations for the cannulations was performed. Both observations were made and compared for significance that was considered at. 05 using the ANOVA. Results: During the first phase of the research, 212 cannulations were made, and 314 were made for the second phase to be audited. In the reaudit compared with the initial audit, there was a statistically substantial surge in documentation, cannula cleansing, glove use, suitable site selection, and hand cleanliness, according to comparative exploration. Moreover, there was a statistically substantial decline in recannulations. Conclusion: Even though peripheral intravenous cannulation is a straightforward process, if done incorrectly, it might have serious side effects. Such techniques' auditing reveals performance flaws. Reaudit results reveal a noticeable increase in performance and outcome following proper personnel retraining.
RESUMEN
Introduction: The material that is currently available on the psychological issues that doctors deal with is restricted to a few national surveys and certain particular hospital surveys. The motive of the current study was to define the mental health status of medical as well as surgical professionals working in the public and private sectors of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Methodology: A self-reported questionnaire survey was used in an observational cross-sectional study to appraise the mental health state of both private and public medical practitioners. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) by William C. Menninger was applied. Results: The majority of study participants experienced psychological anguish, showing a substantial difference in the total level of psychological distress. When the Wellinger's Distress and the Kesslers Distress tools were compared, it was found that there was a substantial difference for all the variables taken into account in the current study, including gender, experience, marital status, children, and occupation, designation, and sector of work. Conclusion: Stress and burnout were more prevalent among medical specialists with lower yearly income, young ages, and fewer years of practice. Clinicians and policymakers must be proactive in creating programes that help healthcare professionals cope with stress and burnout.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Sevoflurane and desflurane virtually equally dissolve in blood gases, yet current research suggests that desflurane helps in a quick return of airway reflex than sevoflurane however the return of cognitive activity fluctuates greatly. In order to compare the lengths of time required to recover after sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia, the current research was conducted. Materials and Methods: Current study was randomized that included 100 subjects who were posted for cholecystectomy (elective). Only adult and non-obese subjects were included in the study. The intended anesthetic agents sevoflurane and desflurane were utilized in the study and all the protocols were followed for the surgery. After the end of the surgery, tests for regaining cognitive function and airway reflexes were carried out, and different time intervals were recorded. The values were recorded and compared for the variances while considering the P < 0.05 as significant. Results: The mean T1 was 8.19 ± 3.28 min for sevoflurane and was 5.82 ± 4.02 min. There was no significant variance between the two agents for the T1, 2 (P = 0.013 and 0.110 respectively). After the inhalation anesthetics ceased at T1, desflurane patients responded to verbal commands more quickly than sevoflurane patients (5.824.02 vs. 8.193.28 min). The SOMCT and swallowing test were similarly completed more quickly by desflurane-treated patients than by sevoflurane-treated patients (T3VST4) (13.693.37 vs. 10.024.86 min, P = 0.008 and (14.094.30 vs. 9.824.50 min, P 0.001, respectively). For the T3, 4-time intervals, there was a significant difference between the sevoflurane and desflurane groups. Conclusion: Desflurane causes patients to recover more quickly from laparoscopic cholecystectomy under controlled circumstances than sevoflurane does.