Genetic description of VanD phenotype vanA genotype in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from a Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) is an important agent of hospital-acquired infection. VanA phenotype is characterized by resistance to high levels of vancomycin and teicoplanin and is encoded by the vanA gene, whereas VanD phenotype is characterized by resistance to vancomycin and susceptibility or intermediate resistance to teicoplanin; however, some isolates carry a VanD phenotype with a vanA genotype, but there are many gaps in the knowledge about the genetic mechanisms behind this pattern. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the genetic structure, clonality, and mobile genetic elements of VRE isolates that display a VanD-vanA phenotype. RESULTS: All vanA VRE-fm isolates displayed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for vancomycin > 32µg/mL and intermediate or susceptible MIC range for teicoplanin (8-16µg/mL). The isolates were not clonal, and whole-genome sequencing analysis showed that they belonged to five different STs (ST478, ST412, ST792, ST896, and ST1393). The absence of some van complex genes were observed in three isolates: Ef5 lacked vanY and vanZ, Ef2 lacked vanY, and Ef9 lacked orf1 and orf2; moreover, another three isolates had inverted positions of orf1, orf2, vanR, and vanS genes. IS1542 was observed in all isolates, whereas IS1216 in only five. Moreover, presence of other hypothetical protein-encoding genes located downstream the vanZ gene were observed in six isolates. CONCLUSION: VRE isolates can display some phenotypes associated to vanA genotype, including VanA and VanB, as well as VanD; however, further studies are needed to understand the exact role of genetic variability, rearrangement of the transposon Tn1546, and presence of insertion elements in isolates with this profile.

Predictive factors, outcomes, and molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile diarrhea in Brazilian hospitals.

Little is known about the role of lineage of strains of Clostridioides difficile (CD) on the clinical presentation of CD infection (CDI) in Latin America, especially regarding the treatment response. We conducted a multicenter, prospective study to investigate the predictive factors and treatment outcomes of CDI in hospitalized patients and to performed phenotypical and molecular characterization of CD strains. A total of 361 diarrheic patients at 5 hospitals from different regions of the country were enrolled. All stool samples were tested for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), toxins A and B, and toxin genes using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Specimens were cultured and susceptibility profile and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were performed. CDI positivity was 15% (56/377). Predictive factors for CDI were prior use of meropenem (OR 4.09, 95% CI 2.097-7.095; p<0.001), mucus in stools (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.406-7.722; p=0.006) and neutrophil left-shift with >20% of bands (OR 3.77; 95% IC 1.280-11.120; p=0.016). Overall mortality was 19%, with no deaths attributed to CDI. Oral metronidazole was used in 74% of cases, with 85% of cure and 14% of recurrence. A total of 35 CD isolates were recovered, all of them susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. The WGS revealed 17 different STs, six of which were novel. ST42 was the most common ST and hypervirulent strains were not found. Severe CDI were caused by ST42, ST5, ST8, ST48, ST33 and a novel ST667. The ermB gene was more frequently found in isolates of ST42 (p=0.004).

Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND: The use of combined antibiotic therapy has become an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The time-kill (TK) assay is considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of in vitro synergy, but it is a time-consuming and expensive method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two methods for testing in vitro antimicrobial combinations: the disk diffusion method through disk approximation (DA) and the agar gradient diffusion method via the MIC:MIC ratio. The TK assay was included as the gold standard. MDR Gram-negative clinical isolates (n = 62; 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 20 Acinetobacter baumannii, and 14 Serratia marcescens) were submitted to TK, DA, and MIC:MIC ratio synergy methods. RESULTS: Overall, the agreement between the DA and TK assays ranged from 20 to 93%. The isolates of A. baumannii showed variable results of synergism according to TK, and the calculated agreement was statistically significant in this species against fosfomycin with meropenem including colistin-resistant isolates. The MIC:MIC ratiometric agreed from 35 to 71% with TK assays. The kappa test showed good agreement for the combination of colistin with amikacin (K = 0.58; P = 0.04) among the colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The DA and MIC:MIC ratiometric methods are easier to perform and might be a more viable tool for clinical microbiology laboratories.