A Real-World Comparison of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) and regorafenib are FDA-approved in the United States for treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). FDA approvals of these agents were based on modest improvements in overall survival (OS) compared with best supportive care + placebo in the RECOURSE and CORRECT trials, respectively. This study compared real-world clinical outcomes with the use of these agents. METHODS: A nationwide deidentified electronic health record-derived database was reviewed for patients diagnosed with mCRC between 2015 and 2020. Patients who received at least 2 lines of standard systemic therapy followed by treatment with either TAS-102 or regorafenib were included for analysis. Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-weighted proportional hazards models were used to compare survival outcomes between groups. RESULTS: The records of 22,078 patients with mCRC were reviewed. Of these, 1,937 patients received at least 2 lines of standard therapy followed by regorafenib and/or TAS-102. Median OS for the TAS-102 alone or prior regorafenib group (n=1,016) was 6.66 months (95% CI, 6.16-7.18 months) compared with 6.30 months (95% CI, 5.80-6.79 months) for regorafenib alone or prior to TAS-102 (n=921; P=.36). A propensity score-weighted analysis controlling for potential confounders did not demonstrate a significant difference in survival between groups (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.09; P=.82). A subgroup analysis did not identify any significant differences in outcomes regarding age, performance status, tumor sidedness, microsatellite instability status, or RAS/RAF status. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of real-world data found that OS was similar for patients with mCRC who were treated with TAS-102 compared with regorafenib. Median OS with both agents in a real-world setting was similar to that shown in the clinical trials that led to their approvals. A prospective trial comparing TAS-102 and regorafenib would unlikely change current management of patients with refractory mCRC.

Durable response to first-line PARP inhibition in BRCA-mutated metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: case report.

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an increasingly prevalent malignancy worldwide, with poor outcomes even when diagnosed at an early stage. While recent trials have shown benefit from the addition of immunotherapy to standard-of-care chemotherapy, the improvement in overall survival is modest. Multiple novel therapies for advanced CCA targeting actionable genetic alterations have been approved in recent years; BRCA1/2 mutations are identified in up to 5% of CCA patients and may be an additional target for novel treatment approaches. While BRCA mutations have been shown in clinical trials to predict response to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in several solid tumors including breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreas, no similar large-scale trials have been published in CCA to date. We report here a durable response to PARP inhibitor monotherapy in BRCA-mutated extrahepatic CCA; to our knowledge, this is the second report of first-line PARP inhibitor monotherapy and the first reported use of the second-generation PARP inhibitor talazoparib in this setting. Case Description: We report the case of a 79-year-old man with metastatic extrahepatic CCA harboring a somatic BRCA1 mutation who declined chemotherapy and was instead treated in the first-line metastatic setting with the PARP inhibitor talazoparib; he experienced a complete radiographic response six months into treatment and has remained on talazoparib for over three years without evidence of disease recurrence. Conclusions: This case adds to a growing list of retrospective studies supporting the clinical activity of PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutated extrahepatic CCA. However, prospective data are clearly needed prior to adoption of this strategy in clinical practice. Fortunately, multiple trials investigating novel combination therapies utilizing PARP inhibitors in CCA are underway.

Treatment outcomes in recurrent versus de novo metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real world study.

BACKGROUND: A majority of patients undergoing curative intent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will unfortunately develop recurrent disease. Treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic disease remain suboptimal. In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent PDAC who received systemic therapy and compared outcomes to patients with de novo metastatic PDAC undergoing systemic therapy. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC between 2014 and 2019 were included using a real-world database. Patients were characterized as either de novo or recurrent based on the date of metastatic diagnosis and history of surgical resection. Overall survival (OS) was summarized within groups via Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and compared using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We included 5170 patients with metastatic PDAC, of which 1101 (21.3%) were classified as having recurrent disease. Median OS for the recurrent group was significantly greater at 10.8 m (95% CI 9.9-11.7) than in the de novo group at 7.3 m (95% CI 7.0-7.7, p < 0.001). We did not observe a significant difference in OS based on when patients recurred after surgery: 10.0 m (95% CI 8.7-11) within six months of surgery versus 11.6 m (95% CI 10-12, p = 0.256) greater than six months from surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the inclusion of patients with recurrent PDAC in clinical trials for advanced disease, including those who develop recurrent disease within six months of surgery. Due to observed differences in survival, randomization should be stratified by disease presentation (recurrent vs de novo).

Real-World Outcomes of Patients With BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated in the United States.

BACKGROUND: BRAF mutations portend a poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Whether these patients may benefit from more aggressive frontline chemotherapy with a triplet regimen such as FOLFOXIRI remains unclear. We used real-world data from a cohort of patients in the United States to assess the BRAF testing rate, determine the prevalence of FOLFOXIRI use, and compare survival outcomes in mCRC, stratified by BRAF mutation status and first-line therapy. METHODS: A nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database was reviewed for patients diagnosed with mCRC between 2013 and 2018. Those with documented BRAF mutation testing who received standard first-line therapy were included. Kaplan-Meier estimates with corresponding log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling compared survival outcomes stratified by BRAF status and first-line therapy. RESULTS: Of 4,457 included patients, 3,991 (89.5%) had BRAF wild-type (BRAFwt) and 466 (10.5%) had BRAF-mutated (BRAFmt) mCRC. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.4 months in the BRAFmt group versus 28.1 months in the BRAFwt group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.41-0.56; P<.001). Only 3% of patients with BRAF mutations received first-line FOLFOXIRI ± bevacizumab, with a median OS of 13.8 months compared with 15.5 months in those treated with doublet chemotherapy ± bevacizumab (P=.38). In patients with BRAF mutations, propensity-weighted analysis did not detect a significant improvement in OS with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.58-1.39; P=.63) or FOLFOX/CAPEOX + bevacizumab (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.52-1.26; P=.35) versus doublet chemotherapy alone. In 2018, only 56% of patients diagnosed with mCRC had documented BRAF testing at any time. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world data analysis confirms the negative prognostic impact of BRAF mutations in mCRC and suggests that FOLFOXIRI has not been widely adopted in the United States. The proportion of patients with documented BRAF testing in this real-world population was low at 56%. We were unable to show any significant difference in OS of patients with BRAFmt mCRC based on the first-line therapy received.

Treatment Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Left-Sided RAS/RAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Post hoc analysis of the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial suggests that anti-EGFR therapy may be superior to bevacizumab when added to first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have left-sided primary tumors. We evaluated trends in use of anti-EGFR agents in patients with left-sided RAS/RAF wild-type (WT) mCRC and compared clinical outcomes among the most commonly used treatment strategies. METHODS: A nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database was reviewed for patients with left-sided RAS/RAF WT mCRC. Treatment trends over time were assessed by fitting a linear model to the percentage of patients receiving anti-EGFR therapy. A propensity score weighted Cox model was used to compare overall survival (OS) stratified by first-line targeted therapy received. RESULTS: A total of 1,607 patients with left-sided RAS/RAF WT mCRC received standard first-line chemotherapy. Of these, 965 (60%) received bevacizumab and 186 (12%) received an anti-EGFR agent. The percentage of patients receiving an anti-EGFR increased from 9% in 2013 to 16% in 2018. Median OS for patients treated with chemotherapy alone was 27.3 months (95% CI, 24.8-32.3), 27.5 months with bevacizumab (95% CI, 25.8-28.9; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; P=.33), and 42.9 months with an anti-EGFR agent (95% CI, 36.0 to not reached; HR, 0.52; P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that chemotherapy with bevacizumab remained the most widely used first-line treatment strategy for patients with left-sided RAS/RAF WT mCRC in the United States in 2018. Despite this preference, treatment with an anti-EGFR agent was associated with improved OS.

Updates on adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies for surgically resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the US. Outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer are poor as curative approaches are only available to the minority of patients who have localized tumors for which surgery may be an option. The past decade has established fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) as the new standard of care following resection for fit patients with resectable pancreatic tumors. However, most patients will relapse and a large number of patients treated with upfront resection are unable to receive or complete adjuvant chemotherapy. There is therefore considerable interest in neoadjuvant treatment strategies for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer as a way to provide early systemic treatment of micrometastatic disease, facilitate lymph node downstaging, and increase the likelihood of negative resection margins (R0). This review will focus on key aspects of completed trials evaluating adjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer and will provide an overview of emerging evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant treatment strategies for both resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Emerging Treatment Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the main causes of cancer death in well-developed countries. Therapeutic advances in PDAC to date have been modest. Recent progress to understand the molecular landscape of the disease has opened new treatment opportunities for a small subset of patients, frequently those with KRAS wild-type disease. Novel treatment strategies in PDAC include, among others, the use of nanotechnology and metabolic reprogramming. In addition, new strategies are being investigated, which are designed to overcome the resistance to checkpoint inhibitors, targeting DNA repair pathways including mismatch repair, increasing antigen presentation through the use of vaccines, targeting various signaling pathways, and reprogramming the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the landscape of PDAC treatment strategies and some of these new agents.

Survival Outcomes Based on Sequence of Therapy Using FOLFIRINOX and Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal sequence of therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is unknown. Combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (nab-p/gem) are standard first-line (1L) therapies. They have never been prospectively compared. We retrospectively compared overall survival (OS) of patients treated with 1L nab-p/gem and second-line (2L) FOLFIRINOX with those treated with the reverse sequence. METHODS: Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with 1L FOLFIRINOX and 2L nab-p/gem or vice versa were identified using an electronic health record-derived real-world database. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, we compared OS from initiation of 1L therapy. A Cox model, stratified by deciles of propensity score, estimated the effect of treatment sequence on OS. RESULTS: The study included 3027 patients. The median OS for 1L FOLFIRINOX versus nab-p/gem was 8.6 versus 6.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.84). The median OS for 1L FOLFIRINOX and 2L nab-p/gem versus 1L nab-p/gem and 2L FOLFIRINOX was 11.9 versus 11.5 months (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of real-world data, 1L FOLFIRINOX was associated with increased OS in propensity analysis. For patients who received both FOLFIRINOX and nab-p/gem, median OS was similar regardless of sequence.

Clinical Activity of Selitrectinib in a Patient With Mammary Analogue Secretory Carcinoma of the Parotid Gland With Secondary Resistance to Entrectinib.

NTRK gene fusions are found in <1% of all cancers but are uniformly present in mammary analog secretory carcinomas (MASC) of the salivary glands. Two selective histology-agnostic tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors are currently approved for malignancies with these oncogenic fusions. Resistance to TRK inhibition has been recognized, and the mediating mechanisms are presently being studied. This report describes a patient diagnosed with an MASC of the parotid gland who after undergoing multiple lines of treatment was found to have an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and initiated TRK-targeted therapy using entrectinib. Upon disease progression, we performed tumor genetic sequencing that showed a secondary resistance mutation. The patient subsequently responded to selitrectinib, a next-generation TRK inhibitor.

From state-of-the-art treatments to novel therapies for advanced-stage pancreatic cancer.

Improvements in the outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have lagged behind advances made in the treatment of many other malignancies over the past few decades. For most patients with PDAC, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment. For patients with resectable disease, modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) is the standard-of-care adjuvant therapy, although data from several randomized trials have shown improved outcomes with neoadjuvant treatment strategies. For patients with advanced-stage or metastatic disease, comprehensive genomic profiling has revealed several potentially actionable alterations in small subsets of patients and the feasibility of implementing such strategies is beginning to be confirmed. Novel therapies targeting certain aberrations, most notably BRCA1/2 mutations, mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies or NTRK1-3 fusions, have shown considerable activity in clinical trials, and larotrectinib, entrectinib and pembrolizumab have received FDA approval for the treatment of patients with tumours harbouring NTRK fusions and MMR deficiencies, respectively, regardless of primary tumour histology. In this Review, we describe the available data on the activity of these and other agents in patients with PDAC. Our discussion is structured according to the acronym 'PRIME' to organize the various treatment strategies currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials: Pathway inhibition, alteration of DNA Repair pathways, Immunotherapy, cancer Metabolism and targeting the Extracellular tumour microenvironment.

Survival of patients with metastatic HER2 positive gastro-oesophageal cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy plus trastuzumab or ramucirumab after progression on front-line chemotherapy plus trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND: The role of continuing anti-HER2 therapy beyond progression on front-line therapy in patients with metastatic HER2 positive gastro-oesophageal cancer (GEC) is unclear. Continued chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (CT) has never been compared with the current standard second-line treatment, chemotherapy plus ramucirumab (CR). METHODS: The Flatiron Health electronic health record derived database, a nationwide database comprising patient-level structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction, was reviewed for patients with metastatic HER2 positive GEC who received first-line CT, followed by second-line CT or CR. Survival from second-line therapy (SST) and time to next therapy or death (TTNTD) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank analysis. RESULTS: 133 patients with metastatic HER2 positive GEC who received first-line CT were identified. 32 received second-line CR and 101 received CT. Median SST for patients treated with CT versus CR was 10.2 months (IQR 5.1-20.8) and 6.8 months (IQR 2.4-20.2), respectively (p=0.29). Median TTNTD for second-line CT versus CR was 4.9 months (IQR 2.8-9.8) and 5.1 months (IQR 2.3-7.5), respectively (p=0.65). Patients who received second-line CT were more likely to receive a multiagent chemotherapy backbone (76% vs 3%, p≤0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed no significant difference in SST for patients treated with second-line CT versus CR. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of trastuzumab in the second line, especially in patients with confirmed retention of HER2 positivity following progression.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy based on lymph node involvement for oesophageal cancer following trimodality therapy.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer (OC) survival rates have improved since the widespread adoption of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) followed by oesophagectomy (trimodality therapy). Unfortunately, the overall prognosis for patients with locally advanced disease remains poor. In this study, we sought to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients treated with trimodality therapy. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database we retrospectively identified 6785 patients with locally advanced (cT1b-T4a, N0-N+, M0) OC who were treated with trimodality therapy from 2006 to 2014. Patients were separated based on receipt of AC (n=463), as well as clinical and pathological lymph node involvement. Overall survival (OS) between groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modelling. RESULTS: Based on multivariate analysis, AC was associated with a statistically significantly reduced risk of death (HR 0.77, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that AC was associated with reduced risk of death compared with NACRT alone in the cN+/pN0 (median OS 64 vs 43 months; p=0.019) and the cN+/pN+ (median OS 27 vs 22 months; p=0.010) groups, but not in the cN0/pN0 (median OS 48 vs 49 months; p=0.253) or cN0/pN+ (median OS 31 vs 24 months; p=0.077) groups. CONCLUSION: AC following trimodality therapy may improve survival in patients with locally advanced OC. Patients who undergo lymph node downstaging may be the most likely to benefit from AC. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Placenta-based therapies for the treatment of epidermolysis bullosa.

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a severe blistering skin disease caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene. These mutations lead to decreased or absent levels of collagen VII at the dermal-epidermal junction. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in the treatment of RDEB, including the use of hematopoietic cell transplantation, but a cure has been elusive. Patients still experience life-limiting and life-threatening complications as a result of painful and debilitating wounds. The continued suffering of these patients drives the need to improve existing therapies and develop new ones. In this Review, we will discuss how recent advances in placenta-based, umbilical cord blood-based and amniotic membrane-based therapies may play a role in the both the current and future treatment of RDEB.